Title: Social semiotic approaches to pedagogic discourse
1Social semiotic approaches to pedagogic discourse
- Workshop
- Kristina Love
- The University of Melbourne
2Overview
- A brief history of classroom discourse analysis
- Transcription and analysis as theory
- The theory of social semiotics
- Social semiotics and the institution of
schooling the formation of social identities - Social semiotics and the enacted curriculum
visible and invisible pedagogies - Social semiotics and the enacted curriculum in
cyberspace transformation or reproduction? - Social semiotics and teacher stance APPRAISAL
3Classroom Discourse Analysis a brief history
- Broadly interactionist (ie not linguistic)
perspectives - Flanderss (1970) focus on teacher talk
- Asking questions
- Giving directions
- Accepting feelings etc
- Barnes (1971) impact of patterns of teacher talk
on student learning - Eg Teachers use of closed questions required
one-word answers - Student learning through small group discussion
- But interpretations often idiosyncratic
4Sample 1
- Teacher directed lesson section
- Write your own transcript of this section
- What does the transcript tell/not tell about the
interaction?
5Sample 2
- Later in the same lesson
- What are some of the patterns of language use
here? - How are they different to those identified in the
earlier stage? - How may the earlier discourse patterns have set
up the learning evident here?
6Linguistic approaches
- An early rank-scale model - Sinclair
Coulthard (1975) - Lesson
- Transaction
- Exchange (IRF/ IRE)
- Move
- Act
- Stubbs (1976, 1986)
7- T. Hey Dai. Just stop a minute. If hes killed a
white person what are they implying? - S. That if hed killed a black person its not so
bad. - T. Its not so important. Who are they saying is
probably more likely to be a killer? - S. A black person
- T. A black person! So if youre in the South and
youre a male and youve killed a white person
and are black, youre in trouble, big trouble.
Thank you for reading Dai. Catherine, in your
hugest voice, please.
8Workshop task
- Divide each turn into a move (Initiating,
Responding, Evaluating), including non-verbal
moves. - Identify the smaller functional units (acts)
within each move - Discuss the value of the resulting description
- What else is required of a description of the
discourse - above the level of exchange
- below the level of act?
9Above the exchange
- Ethnographic linguistics Mehan (1979) and Cazden
(1988) - Concerned with the routines or rules (mostly
tacit) of classroom social organisation - Verbal behaviours
- Physical dispositions
- Patterns of movement and interaction
- Speech act theory Gumperz Hymes (1972)
- Patterns of well defined classroom routines
- eg greetings, storytelling
- But still the need for something more?
- Veel transcript (1997)
10T. What distance do you have to measure?S. The
distance.T. Which distance?S. The distance from
the vertex.T. Which vertex?S. (pointing) That
one.T. Can you be more precise?S. The top left
vertex.T. OK. So what do we measure?S. The
distance from the top left vertex.T. Good. To
where?S. The outside of the other shape. T. Im
not sure what you mean. Where on the other
shape?S. The bottom left hand corner.T. OK. And
what do we call that shape?S. The object.T. OK.
So the lines going to S. The bottom left
vertex of the object.T. OK. Put that all
together and tell me what youre measuring, what
distance?S. The distance from the top left
vertex of the image to the bottom left vertex of
the object.
11Below the act
- Ethnomethodology Scheggloff (1972, 1982), Sacks
(1992), Jefferson (1973) - Studies human sociality at the micro-level of
individuals interacting with other, rather than
starting from a model of an external social
reality consisting of a set of fixed norms,
beliefs and values (Gardner, 2000). - The object of the enquiry is specifically talk,
viewed as jointly accomplished activity - Talk emerges moment by moment in highly locally
organised ways, with speakers and listeners
showing split second sensitivities to others
contributions
12CA analytical techniques and focus
- Turn-Taking
- Transitional relevance points
- Overlaps
- Latching
- Pauses (measured in micro-seconds)
- Minimal feedback/Back-channel responses
- Adjacency pairs
- Expansions via insertion sequences
- Preferred and dis-preferred responses
- Preliminaries
- Repairs
- particular types of adjacency pair dealing with
troubles of hearing, production or understanding
of talk
13Some titles
- Scheggloff, E. (1982) Discourse as an
interactional achievement some uses of uh hu
and other things that come between sentences - Scheggloff, E. (1980) Preliminaries to
preliminaries can I ask you a question? - Gardner, R. (2000) Resources for Delicate
Manoeuvres learning to disagree (see transcript
conventions in appendices)
14CA and pedagogy
- Olympic swim race transcript
- Note how the talk is co-constructed, moment by
moment in highly locally organised ways, with
speakers showing split second sensitivities to
others contributions - Identify these unique accomplishments in each
situation, rather than bringing beliefs about the
local and institutional contexts to the analysis - Conversation analysis and language teaching
minimal feedback tokens (see article by Rod
Gardner and transcript p33)
15CA transcription and analysis as theory
- The search for order in talk, which is achieved
as one of the most important rule-governed
activities of everyday life. - A highly empirical approach to analysis, ie
analyst uses no assumptions or pre-conceptions
(eg about institutional roles, gender, etc) - Nothing is dismissed as disorderly, accidental or
trivial - The analyst becomes highly familiar with the text
of the talk before transcribing in microscopic
detail - Context refers only to the immediate preceding
and subsequent talk, not to the wider social
context (either of situation or culture).
16Social semiotics
- Social practices, like CA, seen as enacted in
language - But so too is the construction of various
ideological positionings ie language is never
neutral, serving to both realize, and silence, a
range of values - Schools in particular work with and construct
ideological positionings for their pedagogic
subjects (Bernstein, 1996)
17The early school pedagogic subject
- What is the ideal pedagogic subject under
construction here? - What verbal routines support this classroom
social organisation? - What physical dispositions (including location
and movement) support this classroom social
organisation?
18Systemic Functional Theory
- Halliday, Hasan, Matthiessen, Martin
- Distinctive in at least 3 ways
- The metafunctional organisation of language
- Language as system
- The relationship between text and context
19The metafunctional organisation of language
20Language as a system
- At the lexical level
- eg My progeny is at home
- Entry conditions
- Sets of possible options
- Realizations
21Specify sex
Son, boy
Dont specify sex
Child, brat, darling
Lexical choice, specifying sex
22positive
Specify attitude
negative
neutral attitude
Child, son
Lexical choice, specifying attitude
23At the syntactic level
- Eg Close the door
- Entry conditions - Mood
- Sets of possible options - indicative
(declarative or interrogative), imperative. If
interrogative - wh or polar - Realizations
24Language as polysystemicRegister
- Experiential, Interpersonal and Textual choices
in one context of situation - BUILT Unit 1A - cooking
- Field Transitivity, specialised lexis
- Tenor Mood and Modality
- Mode Theme, Reference and Ellipsis
25Text, context and genre
- Spoken and written text
- Context of situation (Malinowski)
- Context of culture
- Genres as staged, goal-driven social activity
(Martin Christie, 1987)
26Curriculum genres in early primary
- Morning News Genre
- InitiationNomination(Greeting)News
GivingFinishnClosure - Teacher direction -gt Student Activity -gt Teacher
direction - Christies texts 2.1 page 38
27Curriculum Macro-genres
- Curriculum Genres and macro-genres are staged,
goal-driven activities devoted to the
accomplishment of significant educational ends
they are fundamentally involved in the
organisation of the discourses of schooling
(Christie, 2002)
28The curriculum initiation of a macrogenre in Art
- The goal-setting stage
- Compare with the language of the prior initiating
stage whose purpose is to engage students
29Curriculum development the exploration stage
- Student oral language related to their roles as
explorers - Teacher oral language for point of need
scaffolding and formulating - Focus on internal and external reference
30- 1. T. Alright, are you going to be able to
actually make it? - 2. S. No, we were stuck while we were doing the
front one. Because, we couldnt pull it up. - 3. T. Okay, right, good.
- 4. S. Look, we have this behind here and then we
go Woo !!. - 5. T. Alright, good. Okay, now, you need to
describe in words on your paper how that
actually works. - 6. S. Well, when you pull that up, thats
connected to that and it comes up. - 7. T. James, are you listening so that you can
write down what theyre saying? - 8. S. Yeah
- 9. S. Well, theyre joined together ... it was
pull the top James you dont pull the bottom,
the top. - 10. T. Have you all agreed on the way it works?
- 11. S. Yeah, when you pull this and it comes up
- 12. S. this is attached
- 13. S. and in the middle of the tower, its
joined behind, theres a bit of paper so when
you pull that it comes up and then it goes Waa
! - 14. T. Alright, just read me what youve got.
- 15. S. Um, when you pull the top, top object it
pulls the bottom object upwards because its
attached behind the thing. - 16. T. Would somebody who just walked into this
room, if they read that, would that actually help
them to would they know what youre talking
about? - 17. S. No.
- 18. S. If they pull the fox up the ladder
- 19. S. How about if you say behind the tower,
theyre joined by
31Curriculum Closure the presentation stage
- Note
- Students more confident use of technical
terminology - Students language less dependent on the context
- ie more written-like in its use of internal
reference and complete sentences (cf Veel)
32Field in the senior Art classroom
- Note the increased technicality and abstraction
used in this Year 12 Visual Communication
classroom
33Identifying abstraction
- 1. T. Solution to what?
- 2. S. To the problem being given.
- 3. T. Problem, solution. Somewhere in between
here, this sort of stuff might happen (pointing
to words on board - 'ideas', 'drawing with a
specific purpose'). It might happen here. Or it
might happen here. If we go along a continuum.
Although it's rarely like that. We're not just
talking about things are we? Anyone? I mean, you
can't just go out and buy a dozen ideas. - 4. S. It's a process.
- 5. Yep, a process (writes this on board).
Alright, it's really, really important to get
hold of that idea. We're not talking about a
thing, we're talking about a process. So if we're
going to talk about what designers do, we're not
talking so much about a product. We're talking
about a process. And that sheet that I gave you,
there's various sorts of titles, like Art
Designer, Graphic Designer, Fashion Designer,
Interior Designer, Furniture Designer.
34Register in upper secondary
- Field increased language demands
- technical language (eg continuum)
- abstraction (eg product and process)
- nominalisation (eg design problem)
- Tenor a different authoritative relationship
- Contact
- Distance
- Affect
- Mode
- Use of more written-like spoken language
- modes ancilliary to the spoken
35Methodology and SFL theory of human social
behaviour
- Genre makes explicit the relationship between
language and context - Genre provides a principled basis for making
selections of classroom text for analysis and
interpretation - Commitment to collect and analyse the whole
text, not just mine the data - Allows examination of how the whole genre unfolds
logogenetically - And allows principled comparisons between
curriculum genres, including those across year
levels
36Methodological Principles Selection of episodes
- Located in the Curriculum development stage of a
Health and Physical education curriculum
macrogenre - Focus on the nature of teacher scaffolding in a
multimodal context
37Other Curriculum Macrogenres
- Upper Secondary English
- Whole Class Text Response Discussions
- Foundational readingDeveloping
ResponseConsolidatin Response - David and Susan visible and invisible pedagogies
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40Online discussions
- Social semiotics and the enacted curriculum in
cyberspace transformation or reproduction? - Lunchtime presentation
41Social semiotics and teacher stance
- Using APPRAISAL to track the evaluative stances
in teachers planning discourse - Love Arkoudis, 2006