Title: NSLSII Footprint
1NSLSII Footprint
- Accomodation of Extra Long Straights
- Considerations for Accommodating a possible ERL
Upgrade into NSLSII
2Outline
- Extra Long Straights
- reducing symmetry
- quasi symmetry preserving solutions
- footprint preserving solutions
- Accommodating a possible ERL Upgrade into the
NSLSII site - Requirements and constraints for an ERL
- Performance of an ERL using the NSLSII Ring to
distribute the Beams - A possible Parameter Set
- Beam Loss and Shielding
- Considerations which determine S.C. Linac
Overall Length - A possible Footprint of a NSLSII-ERL Facility
- Items to be included in present planning to ease
later upgrade of an ERL
3CD-1 Footprint
15-fold Lattice symmetry 27 Beam lines from
Insertion devices 30 Beam lines from bends 3
Utility straight sections 15 of which see hard
x-rays from 3-pole wiggler Symmetry will be
weakly broken to 3-or-5 fold Because of large
aperture dipoles in 3/5 locations
4Integrations of Extra-Long Straights
Extra-Long Straight Motivation Nano-focussed
beam and experiments with inelastically scattered
soft X-rays would profit from extra long
straight sections with an active undulator
lengths of 10m-12m
Several Possibilities to implement Reducing the
lattice super-periodicity from 15 to 3 or 5 by
introducing different achromats with extra long
straights Inserting just two long straights
optically matched to the achromat with a
transparent lattice Dfx,y n x 2 p (Bengtsson)
3-fold or 5-fold symmetry
Quasi 15-fold symmetry
5A solution based on Transparent Insertion
On-Energy Transparent Optics Dfx, Dfy n x 2p
23m Insert
- xx-1.039, xy-3.01
- Total length 23.73 m, free length 3 x 5.83 m
- bx/by 1.8/1.4 , 3.0/1.3, 1.8/1.4
Courtesy Guo Wei Ming
Requires verification for realistic conditions,
(6D-beam, imperfections, .) ? Needs time
6A Possible Strategy of Providing extra long
Straights
- Problem
- Lattice Design effort has been centered in
optimizing the achromatic super-period. - Still to do Integration of the entire ring
with damping wigglers and insertion devices - and verification of the stability and
dynamic aperture - Deadline for freezing the foot print End of May
(driven by start of CF Title I design ) - ? There is not sufficient time to work out a well
thought through concept of X-long straights,
integrate it and assure stability of the entire
ring. -
- Desirable to base long straights on solutions
which are compatible with the food print of a
15-fold symmetric lattice - Can finalize the symmetric lattice in a timely
fashion to start building design and engineering
design - Can continue to work on way to implement extra
long straights and on assurance of single
particle stability without time pressure of CD2
7Two examples of implementation of extra-long
straightsin 15-fold symmetric footprint
Shorten Straights
Shorten Arcs
T T015 ? T T013? T1
T014
Decomposition of lattice map in linear, nonlinear
and chromatic parts
T1 T120T121T130T122 T140 T1h.o T0
Require
(breaks symmetry)
T020
T0210
T0220
T040
?T0h.o
T0300
8Making a longer Long-Straights by Shortening two
Short-Straights
Lengthening long straight 2 x shortening the
short shtraight ? Maximum long 18m
9Geometry and Optics
Geometry of the
Lattice
Possible Beam Optics
10ERL Integration Considerations
(Nota bene this is no attempt to lay out an ERL)
11Requirements and Constraints
I
- Beam Losses critical, present Shielding
insufficient - Should go for significantly larger brightness
- should plan for higher energy than storage ring
- Should allow for sufficient Linac length
- Planning for ERL should minimize the additional
effort for NSLSII - Bending for returns and injection into the ring
should be minimized - Preserve an FEL option
- No planning which modifies the site appearance
in an unfavorable way - Necessary additional tunnels necessary should
stay clear from existing buildings - ERL should be planned such, that construction
and commissioning can be parallel to NSLSII
running - Stay clear from road North of the site
- Stay clear from road West of the site
12Beam Losses
13Short Parameter List
Energy 4 GeV Beam Current 200 mA Normalized
Emittance 0.5 mm Energy Spread
10 -4 Bunch Length
0.5 mm Linac gradient 10
MV/m Linac Length
723 m
14Comparison of Brightness
-
NSLS NSLS-II ERL - Energy, GeV 2.8
3 4 - Current, mA 275
500 200 - Emittance X, nm 53
0.5 0.1 - Emittance Y, nm 0.117
0.005 0.1 - Energy spread, 0.084
0.1 0.01 - BetaX, m 1.114
3.3 7 - BetaY, m 0.407
1 7 - Dispersion X, m 0.15
0 0 -
- Undulator
-
- Period, cm 1.25
1.4 14 - Length, m 0.3375
2 18 - K 1.1
2 2
15Brightness
Courtesy Timur Shaftan
16Flux Calculation
Courtesy Timur Shaftan
17Possible Site Layout Compatible with NSLSII as
planned
Linac I
Return Arc
source
Linac II
FEL Hall
Dump
Possible Footprint
Scale in m
Vertical cut through the site
7m
18Detail Footprint
FEL Exp Hall
s
Commissioning loop
D
s
Scale in m
Scale in m
Possible Injection Scheme
Lambertson septa
Horizontally separated vertical bends
19What needs to be done now
- Include a small radial vault underneath the
Eastside of the Ring - Rotate the facility footprint clockwise by 25
Degree
25degree
20Conclusions
- Due to a compressed schedule and limited
resources it might not be possible to include
extra long straights in a timely fashion in the
NSLSII footprint - ? Intend to base a later upgrade to extra
long straights on a footprint with 15-fold
lattice symmetry - need to select potential positions soon,
because we need - - to enlarge the tunnel at these locations
somewhat - - to build-in some flexibility into the
ratchet wall - In order to ease the later integration of
an ERL/FEL driven by a superconducting LINAC as
a major upgrade project, some small modifications
of the NSLSII footprint appear to be advisable - A small clockwise rotation
- A small piece of tunnel underneath the
East-side of NSLSII - shielding issue cannot be resolved, would
have to be addressed in a different way