Title: ME 414 : Project 1
1 ME 414 Project 1
- Heating System for NASA North
Pole Project
May 5, 2006
Team Members Alan Benedict Jeffrey Jones Laura
OHair Aaron Randall
2Problem Statement
Your job as a Thermal Fluid Systems engineer is
to deliver the housing heating system in the
North Pole.
4 occupants Oxygen supply tank or
circulating fresh air from outside The
outside temperature in North Pole is -40C and the
desired temperature inside the housing is
25C. You have a space of 12 in the outside walls
and 8 in the interior walls.
3Deliverables
- Lowest blower cost measured by the least system
pressure drop - Least material cost measured by the number of
sheets used - Least labor cost per the labor rates given
- Least operating cost measured by the cost of
maintenance items and monthly natural gas,
oxygen, electricity, etc usage. - Most comfort to occupants measured by the least
flow rate variation between registers
4Supply Air System
5Return Air System
6Heat Loss Calculation Assumptions
- All heat loss occurs through exterior walls and
roof. - The structure is perfectly sealed. No transfer of
air. - There is no heat transfer between rooms.
- There is not heat transfer to or from the
basement. -
7Heat Loss Calculations
- Interior Temperature
- 25C
- Exterior Temperature
- -40C
- Thermal Conductivity of Wall
- 0.8W/mC
- Convection Coefficients
- Interior surfaces
- Walls 4.2W/m2C
- Roof 5.17W/m2C
- Exterior
- All surfaces 34W/m2C
8Heat Loss Calculations
- Used Resistance Network
- Results
-
- Roof
-
-
- Walls
- Heat Loss
-
- Room 1 7791.5W
- Room 2 10118.9W
- Room 3 6269.2W
- Room 4 7380.7W
- Room 5 8457.8W
- Total 40018.1W
9Heat Loss Calculations With Insulation Added
- Resistance Network
- Insulation Conductivity
- k0.043W/m2C
- Results
-
- Roof
-
- Walls
-
- Heat Loss
-
- Room 1 489.9W
- Room 2 634.3W
- Room 3 394.4W
- Room 4 466.7W
- Room 5 534.8W
- Total 2520.1W
- 8598.9Btu/h
10Heat Loss Rates
- Heat loss rate through walls and roof
- 2520W
- Heat loss rate through heating of outside air
- 72W
11Insulation Cost Benefit Analysis
- Cost to add insulation
- 12 inches in walls and roof
- Total of 3501.1 ft3 insulation required
- Cellulose insulation cost 0.387 per ft3
- Total cost to add insulation 1354.07
12Insulation Cost Benefit Analysis
- Heat loss rate without insulation
- 40,018.1W
- Heat loss rate with insulation
- 2,520.1W
- Heat loss rate reduction
- 37,498W or 93.7
13Insulation Cost Benefit Analysis
- 4 month cost to heat house without insulation
- 20,903.11
- 4 month cost to heat house with insulation
- 1,316.35
- 4 month savings
- 19,586.75
- Time to recover cost of insulating
- 8.4 days
14Fresh Air or Oxygen Tank?
- 4 month analysis of using bottled O2
- 5.3592 x 10-4 m3/s O2 consumption rate
- 3000L volume of O2 in tank at 1atm
- 1,050 per bottle material
- 75 per bottle labor
- COST
- 2,112,750
15Fresh Air or Oxygen Tank?
- 1.6 ft3/min addition of outside air to interior
- 5.3592 x 10-4 m3/s occupants
- 7.7794 x 10-4 m3/s burning gas
- -40C air temperature
- 0.045/ft3 cost for natural gas
- COST
- 32.28
16Furnace and Blower
- Gibson KG6RA Series Specifications
- 45000 Btu/h
- 80 Efficiency
- Cost of 543
17Furnace and Blower
- Blower Electrical Consumption and Cost
- for 4 months
- Electricity Consumption
- 1/5 hp 149.14W
- 149.14W2880hrs 429.5kWhrs
- Operational Cost
- 429.5kWhrs0.4/kWhr 171.80
18Materials
- Duct Diameter
- 7.43 inches
- 3 ducts per each 90 X 70 sheet
19Materials
- Total sheets
- 9
- 90 degree bends
- 6
- Branches
- 9
- Registers
- 9
20Material and Labor Costs
- CIRCULAR DUCTS
- Material
- 2,250.00
- Labor
- 2,400.00
- Total
- 4,650.00
- SQUARE DUCTS
- Material
- 3,250.00
- Labor
- 2,600.00
- Total
- 5,850.00
21Problems not Overcome
- Flowmaster
- Flow rates in pump do not coincide with branch
flow rate - Flow rates dont produce results as expected
22Flow Output of Pump Lower than First Branch
23Register size vs. output discrepancy
24Conclusion
- Least Pressure Drop not achievable through
Flowmaster - Least material cost calculated at 4147
- Least labor cost calculated at 2400
- Least operating cost calculated at 1488
- Flow rate variation between registers not
achievable through Flowmaster
25Questions?
26 ME 414 Project 2
- Heat Exchanger Optimization
May 5, 2006
Team Members Alan Benedict Jeffrey Jones Laura
OHair Aaron Randall
27Problem Statement
- Design a heat exchanger to meet the customer
requirements for heat transfer and maximum
dimensions, while optimizing the weight and
pressure losses in both the tube and shell sides.
28Project Definition
- Chemical Specifications
- Temperature must be reduced from 35C to 25C
- Mass flow rate is 80,000 kg/hr
- Material properties closely approximate that of
water - Cooling Water Specifications
- Treated city water at 20C
- Mass flow rate is not fixed
- Exit temperature is function of design
29Customer Requirements
- Must cool the chemical from 35 C to 25 C
- Heat exchanger length can not exceed 7m
- Heat exchanger shell diameter can not exceed 2m
- Minimize heat exchanger shell and tube weight
- Minimize heat exchanger pressure drop
30Initial Design Specifications
31Initial Results
- Desired heat transfer rate of 928,502W
- Calculated heat transfer rate of 924,068W
- Difference of 4,434W
- Desired-to-calculated ratio 0.995
32First DOE Results
33Initial Design Specifications
34Final DOE Pareto Charts
35Final DOE Optimization
Without Baffles
With Baffles
36Specifications for Optimized Heat Exchanger
- Counter flow design
- Stainless steel material for shell and tube
- Single pass shell
- Single pass tube
- Tube OD of 2.22cm (standard size)
- Tube length of 3.06m
- Tube thickness of 2.40mm
- Tube pitch of 3.18cm
- Square tube configuration with 90 layout angle
- Shell ID of 1.90m
- No baffles
37Final Results
38Conclusion
- Met requirement to cool the chemical from 35 C to
25 C - Tube length of 3.06m 3.06m
- Shell diameter of 1.9m 1.9m
- Minimized heat exchanger shell and tube weight
26,150 kg - Minimized pressure drop
- Shell side 16.72 Pa
- Tube side 22.36 Pa
39Questions?