Title: Psychological Assessment
1Psychological Assessment
- Projective Personality Tests
2Projective Tests Essential Features
- Individuals must impose their own structure which
is meaningful - Stimulus material is unstructured
- Indirect (disguised) method
- Freedom of response
- Interpretation is broad
3Projective Tests
- Rorschach Inkblot Test
- Thematic Apperception Test
4Rorschach Inkblot Test
- Hermann Rorschach (1884-1922)
- Nicknamed Kleck or inkblot
- Talented art student who decided to study science
- Dream convinced him of relationship between
perception and unconscious - 1921 published Psychodiagnostik
- Died in 1922
5Rorschach Inkblot Test
6(No Transcript)
7Rorschach Historical
- 5 Scoring Systems
- Adopted by 5 American psychologists with very
different theoretical backgrounds - Shared common features (same blots were used,
response phase followed by inquiry) - 5 different systems of administration, scoring
and interpretation emerged - Two most popular (Beck, Klopf)
8Rorschach Validity and Reliability
- Poor psychometric reputation
- Lack of standardized rules for administration and
scoring - Poor inter-rater reliability
- Lack of adequate norms
- Unknown or weak validity
9(No Transcript)
10Rorschach Contemporary Use
- John Exner
- Established Rorschach Research Foundation in 1986
- Integrated five scoring and interpretation
systems - Established empirical support for new system
- Provide a center for training
11Contemporary Use Administration
- Association Phase
- What might this be?
- Present all the cards
- Record response verbatim
- Note location of response
- Inquiry Phase
- I want you to help me see what you saw. Im going
to read what you said, and then I want you to
show me where on the blot you saw it and what
there is there that makes it look like that so
that I can see it too. Id like to see it just
like you did, so help me now.
12Rorschach Inkblot Test
- A psychometrically sound test?
- An in-class exercise
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Contemporary Use Scoring
- Exner scoring system The Structural Summary
- Location
- Location (W, D, Dd)
- Use of white space (S)
- Determinants
- Form (good, poor, bad quality)
- Movement (active and passive)
- Color
- Texture
- Shading
16Rorschach Inkblot Test
- A psychometrically sound test?
- Particularly useful in assessing thought processes
17Thematic Apperception Test (TAT)
- Developed by Henry Murray and colleagues at
Harvard Psychological Clinic - 31 TAT cards depicting people in a variety of
ambiguous situations (one blank card) - Examinee is asked to create a story about each
picture
18TAT Administration
- Now I want you to make up a story about each of
these pictures. Tell me who the people are, what
they are doing, what they are thinking or
feeling, what led up to the scene, and how it
will turn out.
19(No Transcript)
20TAT Scoring/Interpretation
- Content analysis of themes that emerge from the
stories
21TAT Psychometric Critique
- Selection of cards is not standardized
- Lack of norms
- Clinicians rely on qualitative impressions
22Thematic Apperception Test
- Used to assess
- Locus of problems
- Nature of needs
- Quality of interpersonal relationships
23Psychological Assessment cont.
- Objective Personality Testing
24What is Personality?
- characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and
acting - emerges in informal, familiar situations in which
we feel unconstrained - principle of aggregation
- personality is the sum of the best descriptors
and predictors of our actions over time in a
number of situations
25Objective Personality Tests
- Material Covered
- 4 major approaches to test construction
- Examples of test based on first three test
construction procedures - Use of personality tests in modern clinical
practice
26Characteristics Objective Personality Tests
- Standard set of questions
- Standardization as a concept given to large 's
of people--yield norms to which an individual's
scores can be compared - Norms are defined as a set of scores from a large
group of people who have completed the measure. - Fixed response options
27Objective Personality Tests Advantages
- Individual or groups (economical)
- Administration is simple/objective
- Scoring is simple/objective
- Interpretation of results requires less
interpretative skill than projective tests - Apparent increased objectivity and reliability
28Objective Personality Tests Disadvantages
- Items limited to behavior
- Single overall score
- Transparent meaning of items
- Forced choice approach
29(No Transcript)
30Test Construction Approaches
- Logical or content validation
- Empirical Criterion Keying (MMPI)
- Factor Analysis (NEO Personality Inventory)
- Construct Validity (Combines all of the above)
31Approaches to Test Construction Content
Validation
- Defining all aspects of the construct
- Consulting experts about the constructs
- Having expert judges assess each potential item
- Perform psychometric analyses of items
32Content Validation An Example
- Goal Construct a test designed to measure
attitudes toward school - Answer true or false
- I enjoy getting up in the morning for school
- I like my teacher(s)
- I enjoy seeing my friends at school
- I enjoy the subjects I learn about at school
33Content Validation Advantages and Disadvantages
- Advantages
- Face validity with test takers
- Disadvantages
- Easy to fake good or bad
34Content Validation The Mooney Problem Checklist
- Assesses emotional functioning in the following
areas - Home and family
- Interpersonal relationships
- Courtship and marriage
- Morals an religion
- School/occupation
- Economic security
- social skills and recreation
- Health and physical development
35Approaches to Test Construction Empirical Keying
- Create test items to measure one or more traits
- Administer test items to a criterion and
control group - Select items that distinguish between these two
groups - Content of the item is not considered important
36Empirical Keying Minnesota Multiphasic Inventory
(MMPI)
- Developed in 1930s
- Starke Hathaway Ph.D. J. Charnley McKinley, MD.
- Needed test to identify diagnosis
- Developed an item pool
- Identified a group of patients and nonpatients
- Resulting scale of 550 items (true/false/cannot
say)
37MMPI Clinical Scales
38MMPI Validity Scales
- ? (Cannot say)
- Unanswered items
- L (Lie)
- Faking good
- F (Infrequency)
- Faking bad
- K (Defensiveness)
- Defensiveness in admitting to problems
39Interpreting MMPI
- Validity Scales
- Single scales
- Profile analysis
40(No Transcript)
41MMPI Shortcomings
- Unrepresentative normative sample
- Language of items was outdated (including sexist
language) - Inadequately addressed difficulties such as
suicide or drug use
42MMPI Revision
- Assembled team of MMPI experts
- Rewrote some items
- Added new items
- Administered new item pool (n704) to a
standardization sample (representative) - Retained 567 items from the item pool
43Continued problems
- failure of some items to reliably discriminate
between groups - dimensions based on pre-conceived theory about
structure of personality, - scales correlate highly and thus provide
redundant information - they are highly influenced by state at the time
of taking, and the test and re-test stability may
therefore be lower than desired (a problem for
many/most trait measures)
44MMPI-2 Content Scales
- Anxiety
- Fears
- Obsessiveness
- Depression
- Health Concerns
- Bizarre Thoughts
- Anger
- Cynicism
- Antisocial Practices
- Type A
- Low Self-Esteem
- Social Discomfort
- Family Problems
- Work Interference
- Negative Treatment Indicators
45- Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory (MCMI)
- more useful than the MMPI-2 for diagnosis
- The purpose of the MCMI is to help the clinician
make a diagnosis of personality disorder. - These disorders are pervasive and stable patterns
of maladaptive behavior that are deeply ingrained
and influence the individual's thinking, feeling,
and acting in a wide range of situations. - The MCMI is primarily used for clinical
populations it is not intended for normal
subjects.
46Approaches to Test Construction Factor Analysis
(Internal Consistency)
- Correlational technique used to determine whether
a group of items are correlated with one another
47Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R)
- Based on five factor model of personality
(Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness,
Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness) - Name derived from initials of the first three
traits - Assesses all five traits
- Emphasizes assessment of normal personality style
rather than psychopathology - Parallel forms
48- The Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive
Personality (SNAP) - a factor-analytically derived instrument designed
to assess traits important in personality
disorders - 15 scales
- 12 trait scales assess specific or primary traits
and - 3 temperament scales measure more general
affective traits. - 5 validity scales plus an overall validity index
- items to assess the personality disorder criteria
in the DSM - follows the three-factor model of personality
- Neuroticism/Negative Emotionality,
Extraversion/Positive Emotionality, and
Disinhibition vs. Constraint.
49Approaches to Test Construction Construct
Validity
- Combines aspects of content validity, empirical
criterion keying and factor analytic approaches
in developing assessment devises (Clark and
Watson, 1995)
50The Place of Personality Assessment in
Contemporary Clinical Psychology
- Or
- Why do we use these tests?
51Psychological Assessment Purpose (Textbook
Response)
- Classification (diagnosis)
- Description
- Prediction
52Classification
- Results from psychological testing assists in
making a diagnosis - Critics of psych testing- tests are not reliable
or valid diagnostic instruments - Defenders test information is used in
conjunction with other clinical data
53Description
Testing provides a time efficient means of
developing a broader understanding of the
patient.
Dependent Depressed Client
Narcissistic Depressed Client
54Prediction
- Test findings can be used to make predictions
about behavior - Whether client will benefit from psychotherapy
- What type of psychotherapy would be best
- Suicidal risk
- Risk for violence
55The Place of Personality Assessment in
Contemporary Clinical Psychology
- Or
- Why do we use these tests?
56Psychological Assessment Purpose Typical
Referral Question
- Please evaluate for organic brain damage (patient
has history of polysubstance abuse) and evaluate
for psychotic thinking
57Tests Administered
- Evidence of Organic Damage
- Weschler Memory Scale
- Trail Making Test
- Rey-Osterieth Complex Figure Test
- Benton Test of Visual Memory
- Evidence of Psychotic Thought
- MMPI
- Rorschach
- Beck Depression Inventory
58Interpretation of Results
- Normal performance on tests of memory,
concentration and attention - Personality testing suggested the primary
etiological role of emotional turmoil. - Presence of both acute distress and chronic
characterological problems. - Acute distress severe depression and a risk for
suicide - Reality testing in the normal range
- Significant ego regression when faced with
affective arousal was noted.
59Projective and Objective Personality Tests
Incremental Validity
- Degree to which assessment increases prediction
based on base rates (prevalence) or other sources
60Incremental Validity Current Findings
- Tentative support for the incremental validity of
the MMPI-2 scales in prediction of personality
disorder, aggression, and differentiation between
depressed patients and substance abuse patients - NEO-PI-R personality disorder, maternal
responsiveness to infants and violence - Rorschach thought disorder but not other scores
- TAT not adequately investigated
61Objective Tests Summary
- Material Covered
- 4 major approaches to test construction
- Examples of test based on first three test
construction procedures - Use of personality tests in modern clinical
practice