Sloths et al. teaching the "E" word: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Sloths et al. teaching the "E" word:

Description:

Collections: American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY ... Intelligent Designer. Irreducible Complexity. vs. Rational. Descent with Modification ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Shaw100
Category:
Tags: sloths | teaching | word

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Sloths et al. teaching the "E" word:


1
Sloths et al. teaching the "E" word
  • using extant and extinct xenarthran cranial
    materials to exemplify for middle school students
    change though time and how science works

Barbara J. Shaw Luis A. Ruedas Portland State
University
2
Acknowledgments
My Advisory Committee Dr. Debbie Duffield Dr.
Lisa Weasel Dr. Keith Hadley Dr. Virginia
Butler Dr. Randy Zelick (Comprehensive
Committee) Most of all Dr. Luis A. Ruedas, my
major professor, for all his invaluable support,
guidance, and encouragement Dr. Richard B.
Forbes whose memory I hold dear Tom
Lindsay and my Lab Mates
3
Acknowledgments
  • Funding
  • Collections Study Grant
  • ESIE Award 0119786
  • Collections
  • American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY
  • Dr. Jin Meng Ms. Susan Koelle Bell
  • Dr. John Wahlert Ms. S. Jean Spence
  • Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, Berkeley, CA
  • Dr. Chris Conroy Dr. Jim Patton
  • Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, FL
  • Dr. Richard Hulbert Dr. Laura Wilkins
  • Museum of Vertebrate Biology, Portland, OR
  • Dr. Luis A. Ruedas

4
K-12 Battlefield
  • Supernatural
  • Intelligent Designer
  • Irreducible Complexity
  • vs
  • Rational
  • Descent with Modification
  • Natural Selection

http//www.discovery.org/csc/
http//www.tortoisetours.com/files/Menu/gi_finches
.1.JPG
5
Support for Evolution
  • Believe????

http//www.the-funneled-web.com/NV_2005(Jan-Dec)/
NV_0504/news__views_item_april_2005-050428.htm
6
Evolution in Oregon
  • The Oregon science Content Standards, adopted in
    April 2001, clearly require the teaching of
    evolution.

7
Oregon Standards on Inquiry
  • Ask questions or develop hypothesis based on
    observations
  • Design experiment
  • Collect data
  • Interpret results

8
Methods
  • 45 crania and mandibles
  • 16 extinct xenarthrans skulls
  • 23 extant xenarthran skulls
  • 15 Dasypus novemcinctus skulls for a control
  • 6 outgroup skulls
  • 15 calipers 150 mm
  • 5 calipers 600 mm
  • Student notebooks
  • Pre and Post assessment

9
Assessment
  • Identifying Testable Questions
  • Biostratigraphy
  • General Facts and Observations
  • About xenarthrans
  • Similarities within xenarthrans
  • Differences within xenarthrans
  • Observations about a xenarthran
  • Observations about a dinosaur
  • Phylogenetic Tree

10
Pilosa Skulls
  • Family Bradypodidae
  • Bradypus tridactylus
  • Family Megalonychidae
  • Choloepus didactylus
  • Choloepus hoffmanni
  • Megalonyx leptostomus Florida Pleistocene
  • 9 unknown small ground sloths specimens
    Argentina Miocene

11
Pilosa Skulls
  • Family Mylodontidae
  • Catonyx tarijensis Bolivia Pleistocene
  • Glossotherium chapadmalensis Florida Pliocene
  • Scelidodon sp. Argentina Pleistocene
  • Family Myrmecophagidae
  • Myrmecophaga tridactyla
  • Tamandua mexicana

12
Cingulata Skulls
  • Family Glyptodontidae
  • Glyptodon calvipes Uruguay Pleistocene
  • Panochthus tuberculatus Argentina Pleistocene
  • Family Pampatheriidae
  • Holmesina septentrionalis Florida Pleistocene
  • Family Dasypodidae
  • Dasypus novemcinctus
  • Cabassous unicinctus
  • Euphractus sexcinctus
  • Priodontes maximus

13
Participants
  • Human Subjects Review approved
  • 78 students participated average 10.8 hr.
  • 35 signed permission
  • 3 students missed post-assessment
  • 32 participants total
  • Normally distributed
  • Paired Student-t test
  • Student-t test with equal variance to assess
    student variables

14
Student Demographics
15
Student Demographics
Estimated 17 students on FRM
16
Results - Significant
  • Assessment Questions
  • Testable Questions, p0.330 df31
    Mis-identified testable, p1.0000 df9
    Mis-identified nontestable, p0.0067 df9
    Mis-identified non vs test, p0.0002 df19

17
Results - Significant
  • Assessment Questions
  • Facts, p7.3x10-5 df31 Factual statements,
    p0.004 df31 Xenarthran knowledge, p0.005
    df31 Same, p0.05 df31 Different, p0.005

18
Results - Significant
  • Assessment Questions
  • Total, p0.003 df31
  • Significant gain under the following parameters
  • Over 11 hours exposure to materials p2.79x10-7
    df30
  • Over 70 Free or Reduced Meals! p0.038 df30
  • Average gain for lt50 1.65
  • Average gain for gt70 5.79!

19
Results Not Significant
  • Assessment Questions
  • Biostratigraphy, p0.325 df31
  • Observations about a dinosaur, p0.379 df31
  • Phylogenetic tree, p0.562 df31

20
Conclusions
  • Difficult for students to identify non-testable
    questions (gt? students thought that these were
    testable).
  • Are armadillos empathetic?
  • Are sloths slow because they are deep thinkers?
  • Are sloths slow because they are lazy?
  • Did anteaters lose all their teeth as a
    punishment because they wanted to eat little
    animals?

21
Conclusions
  • Students improved significantly in reciting facts
    about xenarthrans
  • Number of hours of students participation was
    significant ( gt10.5)
  • Schools with gt70 of student body in Free and
    Reduced Meal program gained significantly from
    the Pre to Post assessment

22
Conclusions
  • Students did not show significance in
    biostratigraphy or phylogenetic trees however,
    most classes asked questions related to
    biomechanics

23
Student Graph
24
Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com