National Center for Information Technology in Education - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 40
About This Presentation
Title:

National Center for Information Technology in Education

Description:

... their children as they build their houses, according to some plan they think ... Learner centered design: Learner friendly and ... Design Principles ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 41
Provided by: arthurizy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: National Center for Information Technology in Education


1
National Center for Information Technology in
Education
Affinity Learning An Introduction to NCITE
  • Art Zygielbaum
  • Roger Bruning
  • September 6, 2001

2
Agenda
  • Education and technology
  • An example Affinity Learning
  • Introduction to NCITE and its history
  • NCITE Organization
  • Elements of NCITE
  • Collaboration

3
Knowing how to use content and technology
People commonly educate their children as they
build their houses, according to some plan they
think beautiful, without considering whether it
is suited to the purposes for which they are
designed
-- Lady Mary Wortley Montagu, Feb. 19, 1750
4
Education is currently tied to a
turn-of-the-century factory model.
Information technology enables advancing from
that model.
5
Technology is a part of a solution
I believe that the motion picture is destined to
revolutionize our educational system and that in
a few years it will supplant largely, if not
entirely, the use of text books.-- Thomas A.
Edison, 1922
Technology is not the whole solution
Denial aint just a river in Egypt-- Mark Twain
6
Technology is a part of a solution
  • Move toward interactive, dynamic media in
    education
  • Inquiry-based learning
  • Learner centered design Learner friendly and
    tailored to the style of the learner!
  • Avoid the industrial lock-step now used to ease
    teaching and testing
  • We sense that technology can make that happen
  • It takes a team spanning research and practice to
    find out how
  • Educators
  • Technologists

7
One ExampleAffinity Learning
Lets enable some technology-based learning
8
Social Characterization
Learning Styles Learner Profiles
Knowledge Prerequisites
Content Assessment
Learning Style Assessment
Affinity Learning Environment Architecture
9
Design Principles
  • Adaptive instruction using technology to help
    students learn through real life problems, data,
    and examples of mathematical modeling
  • Actively rather than passively involve students
    in deep conceptual questions
  • Provide a resource to teachers and classrooms
  • Enhance human interaction connections to peers
    and mentors
  • Includes an ongoing assessment of student
    understanding
  • Assist a systematic learning process based upon
    a students current level of understanding.
  • Act as a non-threatening coach or assistant

10
Fuzzy Nodes
11
Knowledge Garden Framework
  • Pick a topic to teach
  • Develop the activity/assessment nodes as best you
    know
  • Predict outcomes as best you understand
  • As student uses the network of nodes, unexpected
    results can be expected
  • Develop a new node to deal with the expected
    unexpected
  • Add the node to the network
  • Repeat
  • In other words, seed the garden, then grow new
    elements as needed

12
Mathematical Modeling Acceleration
13
Network Sample
14
So do it!
  • Created web based presentation activities and
    assessments
  • Basic structure and content Steve Hammersky (HS
    teacher)
  • Educational rigor Neal Grandgenett (UNO)
  • Instructional Design Char Hazzards (UNL)
    Instructional Designers
  • Implementation NET Engineers Roger Feese
  • Track the nodes visited, how long the student
    spends at any node
  • See if learning is enhanced.or at least not hurt

Demonstration
15
What do the students think about it?
16
Students visit the nodes
17
For some time
18
For some time on the average
19
Then we get a surprise
20
Huh?
21
The Eureka Moment
22
Some people just get it.
23
(No Transcript)
24
So what have we learned?
  • We can build an expert assistant for educators
    that required simple technology
  • We can help people learn
  • We can watch people learn
  • We have a lot of things to do
  • Better assessment of learning progress
  • Can early nodes forecast performance on later
    nodes?
  • If so, can we tune the activities to fit the
    individual?
  • This technology has promise

25
So now where are we?
We have not succeeded in answering all of your
problems. The answers we have found only serve
to raise a whole set of new questions. In some
ways we feel we are as confused as ever, but we
believe we are confused on a higher level and
about more important things.
Omni Magazine, 1992
26
Does it work?Responding to a need for research
  • In a 1999 report, the National Research Council
    states "the complex world of education - unlike
    defense, health care, or industrial production -
    does not rest on a strong research base. In no
    other field is the research base so inadequate or
    so little used."
  • In 1998, the National Science Board stated
    "systematic understanding of the social and
    cognitive complexity of computer-based learning
    is limited" and constrained by a lack of
    comparability between studies.

27
National Center for Information Technology in
Education
  • Teachers College and NET Collaboration
  • Where, why, and how does educational technology
    apply to learning
  • Basic research, applied research, technology
    transfer

28
NCITE
  • A national laboratory at the University of
    Nebraska performing research, technology transfer
    and training in educational technology
  • Goals
  • Conduct systematic programs of basic and applied
    research on using technology to improve student
    learning and assessment.
  • Develop and adapt advanced technologies in
    partnership with education, technology, and
    business
  • Bridge research and application through
    demonstration, dissemination, evaluation, and
    education.

What and How
Tools
People
29
History
  • Responds to challenge from Sen. Bob Kerrey in
    1994
  • Many, many discussions/presentations by Rod
    Bates/Art Zygielbaum
  • 1996 meeting with President L. Dennis Smith
  • Large scale study, July 1999 revised December
    1999 building study August 2000
  • NET/TC MOU for collaboration in RD, production,
    distribution, and personnel development signed
    October 2000
  • TC brings research capability and educational
    expertise
  • NET brings technical and production expertise,
    national collaborations and opportunities
  • Agreement to jointly develop the NCITE concept
  • Mellon Foundation Grant 350,000
  • Federal funding earmark 2,721,000 (through
    efforts of Sen. Kerrey and President Smith)
  • NCITE became a reality on July 1, 2001
  • NCITE was officially approved by the Board of
    Regents on July 28, 2001

30
Start-up Goals
  • Put NCITE on the map
  • Take steps to ensure respected, sustainable role
    in educational technology
  • Establish educational, commercial, and government
    collaborations and contacts
  • Create initial organization, governance, and
    staffing

31
Start-up Conditions
  • Budget
  • Federal Funds
  • Department of Education 2.721 million (over 3
    years)
  • Private Funds
  • Mellon Foundation 350,000 (over 3 years)
  • Faculty line in-kind
  • Teachers College 1.5 FTE
  • Computer Science yes level being discussed
  • Leverage existing programs as part of NCITE
    start-up
  • Examples
  • Educational technology doctoral program
  • Center for Instructional Innovation
  • Temporary facilities requiring minimal renovation

32
Initial Organization
  • Governing Board
  • Co-chaired by NET Director Rod Bates and Dean Jim
    OHanlon
  • National Advisory Board
  • Chaired by University of Nebraska President L.
    Dennis Smith
  • Operating organization
  • Founding Co-directors
  • Education Roger Bruning
  • Technology Art Zygielbaum
  • Planning Team
  • 12 members from UNL colleges, other NU campuses,
    NET, NDE
  • Staffing
  • Find people who will
  • Refine NCITE vision
  • Garner funding and support
  • Provide formative evaluation
  • Extend organizational participation

33
(No Transcript)
34
Education RD Track
  • Conduct basic and applied research on
    technology-mediated learning
  • Establish a sustainable program
  • Activities
  • Seed Grants
  • Possible Projects
  • Develop rules, tools, methods for a public
    broadcast learning portal
  • Develop technology-based learning tools
  • Create assessment tools and strategies
  • Form a team of nationally recognized researchers
  • Participate in technical and educational
    standards setting organizations

35
Technology Development Track
  • Develop, test, certify and disseminate effective
    educational technology software
  • Establish sustainable program
  • Activities
  • Seed grants
  • Enhance tools developed under projects like CLASS
  • Create implementation path through Blackboard,
    WebCT, leading to integrated interactive
    environments
  • Integrate SCORM-based tools and methods
  • Create structure for public broadcasting learning
    portal in cooperation with NET, TC, and other
    partners
  • Develop software tools for school learning
    management system

36
Service Track
  • In cooperation with
  • NUs education colleges develop improved
    technology education and certification courses
  • Computer Science and Engineering and with
    education colleges, develop a specialty in
    development of educational technology
  • K-12 and higher education facilitate technology
    application expertise through active
    collaborative inquiry
  • Provide fee-based services Product and program
    review, evaluation, and assessment
  • Create a sustainable program
  • Activities
  • Help NUs education colleges develop future
    educational technology researchers, leaders and
    developers
  • Assist other educational entities in the
    development and application of educational
    technology
  • Work with CSE to create a specialization in
    educational technology software engineering
  • Evaluate and certify commercial products

37
Other Activities
  • Marketing and Program Development
  • Help NCITE become and remain sustainable
  • Aid in proposal development and submission
  • Advise on economic feasibility and
    appropriateness of projects, programs, and
    products
  • Identify and assess potential clients, markets,
    and opportunities
  • Investigate and promote potential collaborations
  • Facilitate distribution of NCITE products and
    services

38
Research Opportunities and Proclivities
  • Seed Grants
  • 75K - 100K per year set aside
  • Grants will most likely be 15 to 30K
  • Selected based on probability of outside funding
    and relevance to NCITE
  • Affinity Learning
  • Wireless Palm Pilot proposal
  • Real-time downloading exercises to student PDAs
  • Students perform exercise, results uploaded to
    teachers computer
  • Result real-time feedback on learning
  • Wide Area Classroom WAC
  • Research into the role of human teachers/coaches
    in computer-based learning
  • At the current state of technology, having humans
    in the loop is vital

39
Collaboration
  • NCITE brings together researchers and
    practitioners to appropriately and effectively
    apply technology to learning.
  • Possibilities for collaboration
  • Joint proposals and projects
  • Faculty affiliation
  • Seed grants
  • Seminars with discipline leaders
  • Research linkages and support
  • Research resources and infrastructure
  • Publication and dissemination

40
www.ncite.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com