Title: Knowledge Management COMS 380
1Knowledge ManagementCOMS 380 April 9
Mark Wolfe, PhD Candidate Senior Research
Associate Alberta SuperNet Research
Alliance University of Calgary
2What is knowledge?
Knowledge is neither data nor information, though
it is related to both, and the differences
between these terms are often a matter of degree.
We start with those more familiar terms both
because they are more familiar and because we can
understand knowledge best with reference to them.
Confusion about what data, information, and
knowledge are -- how they differ, what those
words mean -- has resulted in enormous
expenditures on technology initiatives that
rarely deliver what the firms spending the money
needed or thought they were getting. Often firms
don't understand what they need until they invest
heavily in a system that fails to provide it.
Davenport, Thomas H. and Prusak, Laurence.
(1997). Working Knowledge How Organizations
Manage What They Know . Boston Harvard Business
School Press
3What is knowledge?
- Data -- static facts raw inputs
- No inherent meaning in data
- Information -- data that is structured has
meaning - Sender/receiver aim is to reduce uncertainty
data that makes a difference (Bateson) - Knowledge -- information that is acted upon
- Knowledge arises from minds at work
4What is knowledge?
Knowledge is a fluid mix of framed experience,
values, contextual information, and expert
insight that provides a framework for evaluating
and incorporating new experiences and
information. It originates and is applied in the
minds of knowers. In organizations, it often
becomes embedded not only in documents or
repositories but also in organizational routines,
processes, practices, and norms.
5KM where does it come from?
- The computer era (1950s/60s)
- Centralized stage activity focused on the
technology itself. - Efforts within the nascent field of Information
Systems (IS) were directed to making refinements
to the base technology. - The emphasis was on large computer installations
housed in a central location and managed as a
non-distributed technology. - http//foodman123.com/s2000.htm
6KM where does it come from?
- The information era (1970s/80s)
- Distributed stage first localization of
computing as a distributed resource - Microcomputers first supercomputers
- End users beginning to exert pressure on
applications and use - Growth of IS as a strategic function of the
organization
7KM where does it come from?
- The information utility era (late 1980s)
- Diffusion stage Information is now ubiquitous,
a corporate resource that dramatically alters
not only the manner in which organizations
function, but also in the way they compete - Responsibility shifts to the line (but autonomy
slow to follow) - Organizational change is rapid downsizing
begins.
8KM where does it come from?
- The Knowledge Management era (1990s)
- Social context stage Loss of middle management
through corporate downsizing in recessionary
period of 1991-95 lobotomizes most organizations
(knowledge loss) - Employee contract re-written workers
responsible for their own careers and future - Commercialization of the internet dot-com
explosion
9KM where does it come from?
The Knowledge Management era (1990s)
10KM where does it come from?
11KM where are we now?
- The network era (2000)
- The collaboration stage advanced broadband
development enhancing distance work/training/educa
tion - Emphasis on virtual workteams heightened by
world events - Computerization under pressure through demand
and fast-approaching limits of current
miniaturization (enter quantum computing and
nanotechnology)
12COMS 380 KM how did we get here?
- Castells from industrialism to
informationalism - Exhaustion of the mass production model
- Linear processes inadequate to manage complexity
of expanded (global) markets - Horizontal integration displacing vertical
integration (multinational conglomerates) - Crisis and then reinvention of the large firm
- Toyotism flexible processes through emphasis on
people autonomy - Inter-firm networking strategic alliances craft
practices
13KM how did we get here?
- Castells from industrialism to
informationalism - These shifts are independent, and their timing
differs, but all represent - The process of disintegration of the
organizational model of vertical, rational
bureaucracies, characteristic of the large
corporation under the conditions of standardized
mass production and oligopolistic markets . . .
Toyotism is a transitional model of between
standardized, mass production and a more
efficient work organization characterized by the
introduction of craft practices, as well as by
workers and suppliers involvement, in an
assembly-line based, industrial model.
14(No Transcript)