WINGS Forum 2006: Satellite Meeting: WINGS CI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

WINGS Forum 2006: Satellite Meeting: WINGS CI

Description:

Range from simple efforts of cooperation to more complex efforts of coordination ... of engagement from cooperation, coordination, or collaboration. Thank ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:104
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: jane86
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WINGS Forum 2006: Satellite Meeting: WINGS CI


1
WINGS Forum 2006 Satellite Meeting WINGS - CI
  • The Value of Multi-Sectoral Partnerships and the
    Role of Associations/Support Organizations
  • Bill King, Minnesota Council on Foundations 15
    November 2006
  • Bangkok, Thailand

2
About MCF
  • Founded in 1969, Minnesota Council on Foundations
    is a regional membership association of 170
    grantmakers working to improve the vitality
    health of our communities
  • Our Mission Strengthen expand philanthropy

3
Membership
  • The Councils Membership includes
  • 170 organizations
  • Community and Public Foundations
  • Corporate Foundations Giving Programs
  • Family Foundations
  • Private Independent Foundations
  • 1,400 staff and trustees

4
Minnesota History of Multi-Sectoral Partnerships
with Business
  • Geographically isolated, cold climate
  • Business Founders contributed to buildling
    education, arts, parks and other amenities
  • 17 Fortune 500 Companies and also large privately
    held companies headquarters
  • Chamber of Commerce 5 Club
  • Corporate Responsibility
  • Corporate Civic Engagement levels are high

5
Multi-Sector Partnerships
  • Range from simple efforts of cooperation to more
    complex efforts of coordination and collaboration
  • Minnesota Council on Foundations has done some
    work at all levels.
  • The Association plays various roles and often
    partnerships happen naturally outside the
    association

6
Types of partnership activity
  • Cooperation
  • Coordination
  • Collaboration

7
Cooperation
  • Informal networks work together to support
    similar activities or organizations
  • Low structure needs
  • Power generally not an issue
  • Educate each other build support among peers
  • Decisions and action happens in each
    organization, independent of the others

8
Cooperation Examples
  • Member networks, information exchange and updates
  • Early Childhood Education Network

9
Coordination
  • More formal relationships and alignment of
    missions of organizations that work together to
    achieve a common goal
  • Some structure
  • Power may be a factor
  • Action happens in each organization, but they
    work together to coordinate activities

10
Coordination Examples
  • Summer Youth Employment Guarantee Fund
  • Six foundations statewide efforts in economic
    development and early childhood
  • Twin Cities Mayors Public Safety Task Force

11
Collaboration
  • Partners come together under a joint structure.
  • Significant levels of planning and shared
    outcomes are designed into the work.
  • Everyone brings resources and expects outcomes
    for the collective work and for their individual
    organizations
  • The sum of the total is greater than the parts

12
Association Examples
  • Minnesota Futures Fund Welfare Reform Project
    mid1990s
  • Minnesota Business Gives Promotion of
    Philanthropy Project 2001-Present

13
Working in Collaboration
  • Hard work, with many agendas to balance
  • Takes resources to staff
  • Requires significant amounts of time
  • Goal setting and priority setting can be time
    consuming and difficult to gain agreement
  • If any of the players leave, requires rebuilding
    relationships

14
Regional Association Examples
  • Ongoing Funder Networks, within the association
  • Community Action or Development Initiatives
  • Pooled Funds (Adult Literacy, Schools, AIDS, etc.)

15
Associations/Support Org Roles
  • Leadership
  • Connect people of like interests
  • Convene, communicate, coordinate
  • Conduct or provide research and
    information
  • Provide neutrality among players
    safe space
  • Clearinghouse
  • Motivate
  • Report
  • Celebrate

16
Difficulties
  • Financial and Staff Resources
  • Time to work in collaboration
  • Potential Change of players or their interests
  • Gaining agreement on direction and outcomes
  • Unequal power (real or perceived) based on
    partner organizations
  • Keeping everyone moving forward on task
  • Knowing when the work is done

17
Final thoughts
  • In spite of difficulties, cross-sectoral
    partnerships seem to be growing efforts
  • Foundations and corporations are seeing their
    roles as much more than grantmakers and engage
    more at various levels of civic engagement
  • Association needs some criteria for determining
    role in partnerships
  • Consider levels of engagement from cooperation,
    coordination, or collaboration.

18
Thank You. Questions and discussion
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com