PM%202.5%20Source%20Apportionment%20and%20Control%20Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

PM%202.5%20Source%20Apportionment%20and%20Control%20Strategy

Description:

Each receptor chemical concentration is expressed as a linear sum of products of ... the sensitivity between source and the pollutant concentration. Questions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:129
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: seoung
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: PM%202.5%20Source%20Apportionment%20and%20Control%20Strategy


1
PM 2.5 Source Apportionment and Control Strategy
  • Sun-Kyoung (Helena) Park
  • Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of
    Technology

2
Content
  • PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • Source Apportionment Receptor Modeling
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Control Strategy
  • Conclusion

3
PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • PM 2.5 Particles of size less than 2.5 mm

4
Content
  • PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • Source Apportionment Receptor Modeling
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Control Strategy
  • Conclusion

5
Source Apportionment - Receptor Modeling
Objective
Receptor models use the chemical and physical
characteristics of gases and particles measured
and source and receptor to identify the presence
and to quantify source contributions to receptor
concentration
Methods
Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) receptor model
Each receptor chemical concentration is expressed
as a linear sum of products of source profile and
source contributions
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Identify principal components which maximize the
covariance matrix of pollutant dataset
6
Content
  • PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • Source Apportionment Receptor Modeling
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Control Strategy
  • Conclusion

7
Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
A ( x1 0.23x2 0.73x3 30.80x4 19.7x5 )
B ( 15.20 x1 0.36 x2 3.15 x3 4.09 x4
5.20 x5 ) C ( 0.26 x1 0.36 x2
0.21 x3 2.40 x4 52.93 x5 ) 3.36 x1
0.97 x2 1.2 x3 1.29 x4 2.91 x5 Number of
Unknowns 3, Number of the Independent Equations
5 ? A, B and C are fitted using the least square
fitting
8
Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
PM 2.5 in Jefferson Street
9
Content
  • PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • Source Apportionment Receptor Modeling
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Control Strategy
  • Conclusion

10
Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
Identify principal components which maximize the
covariance matrix of pollutant dataset
11
Content
  • PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • Source Apportionment Receptor Modeling
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Control Strategy
  • Conclusion

12
Control Strategy
Roll-Back Method
E(c) Annual Mean ConcentrationE(c)s Annual
Mean Concentration in the Futurek
growth factorcb Background Concentration
( 3 mg/m3)
  Emission source reduction required for
meeting NAAQS
Jefferson Street Fort McPherson South Dekalb Tucker
Mean PM 2.5 21.1 mg/m3 19.1 mg/m3 16.9 mg/m3 20.2 mg/m3
Based on the mean concentration 33.7 25.4 13.7 30.2
13
Content
  • PM 2.5 in Atlanta
  • Source Apportionment Receptor Modeling
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Control Strategy
  • Conclusion

14
Conclusion
  • Major species of PM 2.5 in Atlanta ?
    Sulfate 24 ? Nitrate 5 ? Ammonium 8.5
    ? Elemental Carbon 7.8 ? Organic Carbon
    29.7
  • The major sources of PM 2.5 in Jefferson Street
    site ? Diesel Engine ? Wood Burning ? Power
    Plant
  • The emission source reductions required ? Fort
    McPherson 25.4 ? South Dekalb 13.7 ?
    Tucker 30.2 ? Jefferson Street 33.7
  • The control strategy should focus on the major
    sources of PM 2.5 and consider the sensitivity
    between source and the pollutant concentration

15
Questions Comments
16
Appendix
17
Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
18
Chemical Mass Balance (CMB)
  • Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) receptor model
  • Each receptor chemical concentration is expressed
    as a linear sum of products of source profile and
    source contributions
  • Assumption
  • Compositions of source emissions do not change.
  • All potential sources are identified and
    characterized.
  • The source profiles are linearly independent of
    each other
  • Number of source categories is less than or
    equal to the number of species

19
Principle Component Analysis (PCA)
Identify principal components which maximize the
covariance matrix of pollutant dataset
20
Site Map
  • Jefferson Street
  • Fort McPherson Army Center
  • South Dekalb
  • Tucker
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com