Coalbed Methane Powder River Basin - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 64
About This Presentation
Title:

Coalbed Methane Powder River Basin

Description:

Coalbed Methane Powder River Basin – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:650
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 65
Provided by: lynge4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Coalbed Methane Powder River Basin


1
Coalbed Methane Powder River Basin
  • Goolsby, Finley, Assoc.
  • Consultants
  • to the Energy Industry
  • September 27, 2001

2
Introduction
  • What is Coalbed Methane?
  • Wyoming and Coalbed Methane
  • Where is the Powder River Basin?

3
Coalbed Methane
  • Natural gas
  • CH4
  • Simplest hydrocarbon
  • Clean burning
  • Used for residential heating
  • Used to generate electricity

4
Coalbed methane targets in Wyoming (Jones and De
Bruin, 1990).
5
Powder River Basin
Montana
Powder River Basin
Wyoming
Nebraska
6
Basin Size
  • 16.5 million acres
  • 14 million acres in Wyoming, 2.5 million acres in
    Montana
  • 6 million acres prospective development
  • Industry predicts 30,00040,000 wells in Wyoming
    and Montana

7
Geology
  • Stratigraphy
  • Coals

8
Figure 1. Coalbed methane targets in Wyoming
(Jones and De Bruin, 1990).
Geologic Time
Rocks With Coals
Cenozoic
Tertiary
Wasach Formation
Eocene
Fort Union Formation
Paleocene
Mesozoic
Cretaceous
Jurassic
Triassic
9
Generalized east-west cross section across the
Powder River Basin, Wyoming. (DeBruin, Lyman,
Jones, and Cook 2001)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Cretaceous/Paleocene contact Clinkers Mine
LBAs Cretaceous Oil Fields
S03
13
  • Thickest Coal Seam Isopach
  • Over 50of Coal in Single Seam
  • X-section
  • South Hilight to
  • Meadow Creek
  • Principle Coals
  • Anderson
  • Wyodak

S05
14
MEADOW
HARTZOG
HOUSE
SOUTH
W
E
CREEK
DRAW
CREEK
HILIGHT
5800
5800
4800
4800
3800
3800
S04
15
  • X-section
  • Lighthouse to
  • basin center
  • Principle Coals
  • Anderson
  • Wyodak

S07
16
S06
17
  • X-section
  • Rawhide LBA to
  • basin center
  • Principle Coals
  • Anderson
  • Canyon

S09
18
S08
19
  • X-section
  • Recluse to
  • basin center
  • Principle Coals
  • Schwartz
  • Anderson
  • Canyon
  • Cook
  • Wall

S11
20
S10
21
  • X-section
  • Bone Pile to
  • Dead Horse Creek
  • Principle Coals
  • Anderson
  • Wyodak
  • Canyon
  • Wall
  • Pawnee

S13
22
(No Transcript)
23
  • Shifting Deposition through
  • Late Paleocene time
  • Wyodak Limit
  • Big George

S26
24
Production
  • Steps Taken Before Drilling a Well
  • Coalbed Methane Wells
  • Reserves

25
STEPS TAKEN BEFORE DRILLING A WELL
  • Technical Studies
  • General
  • Federal Requirements
  • Other Factors

26
STEPS TAKEN BEFORE DRILLING A WELL
  • TECHNICAL STUDIES
  • Geological
  • Hydrological
  • Reservoir Eng.
  • Production Eng.
  • ETC.

27
STEPS TAKEN BEFORE DRILLING A WELL
  • GENERAL
  • Land Acquisition/title
  • Landowner/surface agreements
  • Survey location
  • Pipeline/gas gathering agreements
  • Contract with drilling company
  • Permit to drill
  • WATER DISCHARGE PERMITS

28
STEPS TAKEN BEFORE DRILLING A WELL
  • ADDITIONAL FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS
  • Federal permit to drill
  • Public comment period
  • NPDES and NEPA compliance
  • Air quality issues, raptor, archeological, botany
    surveys, etc.
  • POSSIBLE EA OR EIS

29
STEPS TAKEN BEFORE DRILLING A WELL
  • OTHER FACTORS
  • Price variations
  • Regulatory changes
  • TIME

30
Coalbed Methane Wells
31
Schematic diagram showing open-hole completion
technique for a typical coalbed methane well in
the Powder River Basin. (DeBruin, Lyman, Jones,
Cook 2001
32
Typical coalbed methane drilling rig in Hawk
Point oil field about 20 miles south of Gillette,
Wyoming. (DeBruin, Lyman, Jones, and Cook 2001)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
(No Transcript)
39
(No Transcript)
40
(No Transcript)
41
(No Transcript)
42
(No Transcript)
43
(No Transcript)
44
(No Transcript)
45
(No Transcript)
46
(No Transcript)
47
(No Transcript)
48
Reserves
  • Estimates for Powder River Basin
  • Data
  • Coal Volume
  • Gas Content
  • Volumetric Calculations
  • Conclusions

49
Data
50
COAL VOLUME AND TONNAGE
51
GAS CONTENT METHODOLOGY
  • Obtained all non-proprietary Powder River Basin
    coal gas content data from the BLM in Casper
  • Results of this data are suspect and appear to
    underestimate gas content in areas currently
    producing coal bed methane
  • Published isotherm data from adsorption studies
    appear to overestimate gas content in areas
    currently producing coal bed methane

52
Average methane adsorption isotherm based on
averaged synthesized data from coal cores. Data
are from USGS, industry sources, and WOGCC.
53
GAS CONTENT METHODOLOGY
  • Estimated gas content versus depth using current
    production to constrain gas content values
  • Verified gas content by depth estimates with
    various operators who have proprietary gas
    content data from a wide depth range
  • Gas content estimates used in our study appear to
    be reasonable but slightly conservative

54
PRB VOLUMETRICS
55
CONCLUSIONS
  • Approximately 37.5 TCFGIP from coals thicker than
    20 feet and deeper than 200 feet
  • Currently accepted recovery factors range from
    50 to 90
  • Assuming a recovery factor of 67, the Powder
    River Basin Coal Bed Methane play holds on the
    order of 25 TCF recoverable gas
  • We believe these estimates are reasonable
    although they may be somewhat conservative

56
What does TCF mean?
1,000 1,000,000 1,000,000,000 1,000,000,000,000
1 thousand cubic feet 1 million cubic feet 1
billion cubic feet 1 trillion cubic feet
MCF MMCF BCF TCF
57
Growth
  • Production
  • Forecasts
  • What this means to Wyoming
  • Factors affecting growth

58
Yearly production and number of producing wells
for coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin,
Wyoming, 1989 through 2000. (DeBruin, Lyman,
Jones, and Cook 2001)
59
Yearly production and number of producing wells
for coalbed methane in the Powder River Basin,
Wyoming, 1989 through 2000, with forecasts to
2010. (DeBruin, Lyman, Jones, and Cook 2001)
60
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN TO THE STATE?
  • Currently producing 500 million cubic feet per
    day
  • State receives
  • 12.5-16.67 royalty on state lands
  • 6.25 royalty on federal lands
  • 6.25 severance tax on ALL lands
  • Counties receive approximately 6 ad valorem tax
    on all wells within county

61
WHAT DOES THIS MEAN TO THE STATE?
Assume price of 3.00/thousand cubic feet and 500
million cubic feet per day produced State
receives approximately 150,000/day or 54
million/year Counties receive approximately
90,000/day or 33 million/year
62
FACTORS AFFECTING GROWTH
  • NEPA and permitting processes
  • Water discharge permits
  • Inter-state negotiations for water quality
  • Multiple coal completion technology
  • Infrastructure
  • Price uncertainty

63
Why now?
  • When Drake completed his first oil well in
    Pennsylvania in 1859, it was considered an
    unconventional way to produce oil (previously it
    was done by killing whales).
  • Jimmy Goolsby, 2001

64
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com