Reframing Organizations

About This Presentation
Title:

Reframing Organizations

Description:

... the hearer's thoughts and emotions is to approach the study of language as both ... Most of the time we are drawing upon the experiences of others in order ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: maryv51
Learn more at: https://www.siue.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reframing Organizations


1
Reframing Organizations
  • Bolman Deal

2
Perception
3
Perception is a 'Learned Experience'
  • It is the awareness of the external world (or
    some aspect of it), through one or more of our
    senses and, the interpretation of these by our
    mind.

4
Comprehending Perception
  • We all have a different store of knowledge.
  • We all therefore interpret the world around us
    differently.
  • Understanding relies upon the speaker and his
    audience having the same perception of the
    required outcome.

5
Understanding
  • Understanding is achieved by interpreting current
    experience using past experience as a source of
    reference, and establishing a context upon which
    to base this new information. In other words
  • We are only able to understand today in terms of,
    and because of, our past experiences.
  • Yet, we also know that 'Today' is unlike
    'Yesterday'.
  • We inherit Yesterday's patterns and need them to
    interpret what our senses are experiencing in the
    present.
  • These patterns are simultaneously essential and
    yet out of date.

6
How Little We Remember
7
What do you see?
8
What do you see?
9
How do we perceive?
  • We store a model or memory of objects.
  • The process of perceiving involves matching
    what our senses are experiencing to one of our
    models.
  • Perception is an active pattern-matching process.
  • We recognize the world because of our historical
    store of information.
  • We create our own unique world, our own
    interpretation of reality.

10
Summary
  • Discovering a new perception adds to the database
    of patterns which already exists in our minds.
  • Once existing experience has been proved
    inadequate to correctly interpret an image, the
    brain supplements its store of knowledge with the
    new experience.
  • Once new experience becomes old experience, it is
    often difficult to imagine the state of mind
    prior to gaining this new insight.

11
What is perception?
  • A process by which individuals
  • Organize interpret their sensory impressions,
  • In order to give meaning to their environment.
  • What one perceive may be substantially different
    from reality.

12
Factors that Influence Perception
Factors in the perceiver Attitudes Motives Inte
rests Experience Expectations
Factors in the target Novelty Motion Sounds Si
ze Background Proximity
Factors in the situation Time Work
setting Social setting
Perceptions
13
Organizational Applications of Perception
  • Employment Interviews
  • Self-fulfilling prophecies of performance
  • Performance evaluations
  • Employee effort
  • Employee loyalty

14
Shortcuts used to Judge Others
  • Selective Perception
  • Halo Effect
  • Contrast Effect
  • Projection
  • Stereotyping

15
Perceiver Evaluates. . .
  • Distinctiveness Does the actor behave this way
    toward other people or things?
  • Consistency Does the actor behavior this way on
    other occasions?
  • Consensus Do other people behave the same way
    as the actor in similar situations?

16
To Attribute Cause
  • Distinctiveness Do I act this way toward
    everyone, or only Susie?
  • Consistency Am I always the same way to Susie,
    or just this one time?
  • Consensus Would everyone yell at Susie in this
    situation?

17
To Attribute Cause
  • When Distinctiveness is low, Consistency high,
    and Consensus low, we make an
  • INTERNAL ATTRIBUTION
  • When Distinctiveness is high, Consistency low,
    and Consensus high, we make an
  • EXTERNAL ATTRIBUTION

18
Managerial Implications
  • Perception
  • Individuals behave based not on the way their
    external environment actually is but, rather, on
    what they see or believe it to be.
  • Evidence suggests that what individuals perceive
    from their work situation will influence their
    productivity more than will the situation itself.
  • Absenteeism, turnover, and job satisfaction are
    also reactions to the individuals perceptions.

19
The Johari Window
20
What are the Frames?
  • Structural
  • Human Resource
  • Political
  • Symbolic

21
The Structural Frame
  • Emphasizes goals, specialized roles, and formal
    relationships. The structures are designed to
    fit an organizations environment and technology.
    There is division of labor, rules, policies,
    procedures and hierarchies. Problems arise when
    the structure does not fit the situation.
  • Leadership Challenge Attune structure to task,
    technology, environment.

22
The Human Resource Frame
  • The organization is like an extended family, with
    individual needs, feelings, prejudices, skills,
    and limitations. There is a capacity to learn
    and a capacity to defend old attitudes and
    beliefs.
  • Leadership Challenge Align organizational and
    human needs.

23
The Political Frame
  • Sees organizations as arenas, contests, or
    jungles. Different interests compete for scare
    resources. Bargaining, negotiation, coercion,
    and compromise are an enduring part of life.
    Coalitions form and change. Problems arise when
    power is concentrated in wrong places or so
    dispersed nothing gets done.
  • Leadership Challenge Develop agenda and power
    base.

24
The Symbolic Frame
  • Treats organizations as tribes, theaters, or
    carnivals. Organizations are cultures, propelled
    by rituals, ceremonies, stories, heroes, and
    myths, not by policies and formal authority. As
    theaters, actors play dramatic roles, audiences
    form impressions.
  • Leadership Challenge Create faith, beauty, and
    meaning.

25
How Do We Reframe?
  • First, what is framing?
  • Psychological Biases
  • Illusion of Control
  • Framing
  • Discount the future
  • Domain of Gains (Risk Averse)
  • Domain of Failures (Risk Seeking)

26
Hayakawas Language in Thought and Action
27
Take Away Message
  • To understand how language works, what pitfalls
    it conceals, what its possibilities are is to
    understand a central aspect of the complicated
    business of living the life of a human being. To
    be concerned with the relation between language
    and reality, between words and what they stand
    for in the speakers or the hearers thoughts and
    emotions is to approach the study of language as
    both an intellectual and a moral discipline.

28
What are we concerned with?
  • Truth of statements
  • Adequacy of statements
  • Trustworthiness of statements
  • Semantics The study of human interaction
    through communication. Central assumption
    cooperation is preferable to conflict.

29
Language and Survival
  • Most of the time we are drawing upon the
    experiences of others in order to make up for
    what we ourselves have missed.
  • Animals communicate with a few limited cries, we
    have the full power of language at our command.
  • We differ in that we can make statements about
    statements. In short, language can be about
    language.

30
Language and Survival
  • We use language to
  • Cooperate
  • Pool knowledge
  • However, words are tricky
  • The Niagara of Words
  • They can mean different things
  • Yet, we are involved with these words.

31
Language and Survival
  • What are our unconscious assumptions about
    language?
  • What is the relationship of language to reality?
  • Words shape our beliefs, prejudices, ideals,
    aspirations

32
Symbols
  • Signal Reaction a complete and invariable
    reaction that occurs whether or not the
    conditions warrant.
  • Symbol Reaction a delayed reaction, conditional
    upon the circumstances.
  • We may try to avoid, but the rejection of symbols
    is, in itself, symbolic.

33
Symbols
  • Symbols and things symbolized are independent of
    each other.
  • Yet, we find connections.
  • The symbols of piety, of civic virtue, or of
    patriotism are often prized above actual piety,
    civic virtue or patriotism.

34
Maps and Territories
  • The symbol the thing symbolized
  • The map IS NOT the territory
  • The word the thing

35
Maps and Territories
  • Verbal World the world we come to know through
    words.
  • Extensional World the world we know through our
    own experience.
  • This verbal world ought to stand in relation to
    the extensional world as a map does to the
    territory it is supposed to represent.

36
Maps and Territories
  • How does the territory differ from a map?
  • Verbal World Reports Map
  • Extensional World Experience Territory
  • How good is an inaccurate map?

37
Maps and Territories
  • Three ways to get a false map
  • They are given to us
  • By making them up for ourselves by misreading
    true maps
  • By constructing them ourselves by misreading
    territories

38
Reports, Inferences, Judgments
  • Reports are verifiable, exclude inferences,
    judgments, and loaded words
  • Verifiable yet we often trust without verifying
  • Inferences a statement about the unknown based
    on the known
  • Judgments expressions of the speakers approval
    or disapproval of the occurrences, persons or
    object he is describing

39
Reports, Inferences, Judgments
  • Verifiability rests upon the external observation
    of facts, not upon the heaping of judgments.
  • Many words simultaneously report and judge
  • Judgments stop thought, how?
  • Snarl words and purr words report the state of
    our internal worlds.
  • Slanting is using implied judgments
  • How can we ever give an impartial report?

40
Contexts
  • How do words mean?
  • Guided by historical record, but not bound by it,
    because new situations, experiences, inventions,
    feelings are always compelling us to give new
    uses to old words.
  • Verbal Context understanding in relation to
    other words
  • Physical and Social Context understanding in
    relation to situation

41
Contexts
  • Extensional Meaning something that cannot be
    expressed in words because it is that which the
    words stands for. Its the territory!!
  • Intentional Meaning that which is suggested
    (connoted) inside ones head.

42
The One Word One Meaning Fallacy
  • NO WORD EVER HAS EXACTLY THE SAME MEANING TWICE
  • First, if contexts determine meaning, there are
    never two exactly the same contexts
  • Second, everyones meanings are from their
    experiences (chair)
  • Third, in terms of extensional meaning, it always
    is changing
  • Contexts often indicate our meanings so clearly
    that we do not even have to say what we mean in
    order to be understood!

43
Ignoring Contexts
  • If we can get deeply into our consciousness the
    principle that no word ever has the same meaning
    twice, we will develop the habit of automatically
    examining contexts, and this enables us to
    understand better what others are saying.

44
Take Away Message (Again)
  • To understand how language works, what pitfalls
    it conceals, what its possibilities are is to
    understand a central aspect of the complicated
    business of living the life of a human being. To
    be concerned with the relation between language
    and reality, between words and what they stand
    for in the speakers or the hearers thoughts and
    emotions is to approach the study of language as
    both an intellectual and a moral discipline.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)