Title: Reframing Organizations
1Reframing Organizations
2Perception
3Perception is a 'Learned Experience'
- It is the awareness of the external world (or
some aspect of it), through one or more of our
senses and, the interpretation of these by our
mind.
4Comprehending Perception
- We all have a different store of knowledge.
- We all therefore interpret the world around us
differently. - Understanding relies upon the speaker and his
audience having the same perception of the
required outcome.
5Understanding
- Understanding is achieved by interpreting current
experience using past experience as a source of
reference, and establishing a context upon which
to base this new information. In other words - We are only able to understand today in terms of,
and because of, our past experiences. - Yet, we also know that 'Today' is unlike
'Yesterday'. - We inherit Yesterday's patterns and need them to
interpret what our senses are experiencing in the
present. - These patterns are simultaneously essential and
yet out of date.
6How Little We Remember
7What do you see?
8What do you see?
9How do we perceive?
- We store a model or memory of objects.
- The process of perceiving involves matching
what our senses are experiencing to one of our
models. - Perception is an active pattern-matching process.
- We recognize the world because of our historical
store of information. - We create our own unique world, our own
interpretation of reality.
10Summary
- Discovering a new perception adds to the database
of patterns which already exists in our minds. - Once existing experience has been proved
inadequate to correctly interpret an image, the
brain supplements its store of knowledge with the
new experience. - Once new experience becomes old experience, it is
often difficult to imagine the state of mind
prior to gaining this new insight.
11What is perception?
- A process by which individuals
- Organize interpret their sensory impressions,
- In order to give meaning to their environment.
- What one perceive may be substantially different
from reality.
12Factors that Influence Perception
Factors in the perceiver Attitudes Motives Inte
rests Experience Expectations
Factors in the target Novelty Motion Sounds Si
ze Background Proximity
Factors in the situation Time Work
setting Social setting
Perceptions
13Organizational Applications of Perception
- Employment Interviews
- Self-fulfilling prophecies of performance
- Performance evaluations
- Employee effort
- Employee loyalty
14Shortcuts used to Judge Others
- Selective Perception
- Halo Effect
- Contrast Effect
- Projection
- Stereotyping
15Perceiver Evaluates. . .
- Distinctiveness Does the actor behave this way
toward other people or things? - Consistency Does the actor behavior this way on
other occasions? - Consensus Do other people behave the same way
as the actor in similar situations?
16To Attribute Cause
- Distinctiveness Do I act this way toward
everyone, or only Susie? - Consistency Am I always the same way to Susie,
or just this one time? - Consensus Would everyone yell at Susie in this
situation?
17To Attribute Cause
- When Distinctiveness is low, Consistency high,
and Consensus low, we make an - INTERNAL ATTRIBUTION
- When Distinctiveness is high, Consistency low,
and Consensus high, we make an - EXTERNAL ATTRIBUTION
18Managerial Implications
- Perception
- Individuals behave based not on the way their
external environment actually is but, rather, on
what they see or believe it to be. - Evidence suggests that what individuals perceive
from their work situation will influence their
productivity more than will the situation itself. - Absenteeism, turnover, and job satisfaction are
also reactions to the individuals perceptions.
19The Johari Window
20What are the Frames?
- Structural
- Human Resource
- Political
- Symbolic
21The Structural Frame
- Emphasizes goals, specialized roles, and formal
relationships. The structures are designed to
fit an organizations environment and technology.
There is division of labor, rules, policies,
procedures and hierarchies. Problems arise when
the structure does not fit the situation. - Leadership Challenge Attune structure to task,
technology, environment.
22The Human Resource Frame
- The organization is like an extended family, with
individual needs, feelings, prejudices, skills,
and limitations. There is a capacity to learn
and a capacity to defend old attitudes and
beliefs. - Leadership Challenge Align organizational and
human needs.
23The Political Frame
- Sees organizations as arenas, contests, or
jungles. Different interests compete for scare
resources. Bargaining, negotiation, coercion,
and compromise are an enduring part of life.
Coalitions form and change. Problems arise when
power is concentrated in wrong places or so
dispersed nothing gets done. - Leadership Challenge Develop agenda and power
base.
24The Symbolic Frame
- Treats organizations as tribes, theaters, or
carnivals. Organizations are cultures, propelled
by rituals, ceremonies, stories, heroes, and
myths, not by policies and formal authority. As
theaters, actors play dramatic roles, audiences
form impressions. - Leadership Challenge Create faith, beauty, and
meaning.
25How Do We Reframe?
- First, what is framing?
- Psychological Biases
- Illusion of Control
- Framing
- Discount the future
- Domain of Gains (Risk Averse)
- Domain of Failures (Risk Seeking)
26Hayakawas Language in Thought and Action
27Take Away Message
- To understand how language works, what pitfalls
it conceals, what its possibilities are is to
understand a central aspect of the complicated
business of living the life of a human being. To
be concerned with the relation between language
and reality, between words and what they stand
for in the speakers or the hearers thoughts and
emotions is to approach the study of language as
both an intellectual and a moral discipline.
28What are we concerned with?
- Truth of statements
- Adequacy of statements
- Trustworthiness of statements
- Semantics The study of human interaction
through communication. Central assumption
cooperation is preferable to conflict.
29Language and Survival
- Most of the time we are drawing upon the
experiences of others in order to make up for
what we ourselves have missed. - Animals communicate with a few limited cries, we
have the full power of language at our command. - We differ in that we can make statements about
statements. In short, language can be about
language.
30Language and Survival
- We use language to
- Cooperate
- Pool knowledge
- However, words are tricky
- The Niagara of Words
- They can mean different things
- Yet, we are involved with these words.
31Language and Survival
- What are our unconscious assumptions about
language? - What is the relationship of language to reality?
- Words shape our beliefs, prejudices, ideals,
aspirations
32Symbols
- Signal Reaction a complete and invariable
reaction that occurs whether or not the
conditions warrant. - Symbol Reaction a delayed reaction, conditional
upon the circumstances. - We may try to avoid, but the rejection of symbols
is, in itself, symbolic.
33Symbols
- Symbols and things symbolized are independent of
each other. - Yet, we find connections.
- The symbols of piety, of civic virtue, or of
patriotism are often prized above actual piety,
civic virtue or patriotism.
34Maps and Territories
- The symbol the thing symbolized
- The map IS NOT the territory
- The word the thing
35Maps and Territories
- Verbal World the world we come to know through
words. - Extensional World the world we know through our
own experience. - This verbal world ought to stand in relation to
the extensional world as a map does to the
territory it is supposed to represent.
36Maps and Territories
- How does the territory differ from a map?
- Verbal World Reports Map
- Extensional World Experience Territory
- How good is an inaccurate map?
37Maps and Territories
- Three ways to get a false map
- They are given to us
- By making them up for ourselves by misreading
true maps - By constructing them ourselves by misreading
territories
38Reports, Inferences, Judgments
- Reports are verifiable, exclude inferences,
judgments, and loaded words - Verifiable yet we often trust without verifying
- Inferences a statement about the unknown based
on the known - Judgments expressions of the speakers approval
or disapproval of the occurrences, persons or
object he is describing
39Reports, Inferences, Judgments
- Verifiability rests upon the external observation
of facts, not upon the heaping of judgments. - Many words simultaneously report and judge
- Judgments stop thought, how?
- Snarl words and purr words report the state of
our internal worlds. - Slanting is using implied judgments
- How can we ever give an impartial report?
40Contexts
- How do words mean?
- Guided by historical record, but not bound by it,
because new situations, experiences, inventions,
feelings are always compelling us to give new
uses to old words. - Verbal Context understanding in relation to
other words - Physical and Social Context understanding in
relation to situation
41Contexts
- Extensional Meaning something that cannot be
expressed in words because it is that which the
words stands for. Its the territory!! - Intentional Meaning that which is suggested
(connoted) inside ones head.
42The One Word One Meaning Fallacy
- NO WORD EVER HAS EXACTLY THE SAME MEANING TWICE
- First, if contexts determine meaning, there are
never two exactly the same contexts - Second, everyones meanings are from their
experiences (chair) - Third, in terms of extensional meaning, it always
is changing - Contexts often indicate our meanings so clearly
that we do not even have to say what we mean in
order to be understood!
43Ignoring Contexts
- If we can get deeply into our consciousness the
principle that no word ever has the same meaning
twice, we will develop the habit of automatically
examining contexts, and this enables us to
understand better what others are saying.
44Take Away Message (Again)
- To understand how language works, what pitfalls
it conceals, what its possibilities are is to
understand a central aspect of the complicated
business of living the life of a human being. To
be concerned with the relation between language
and reality, between words and what they stand
for in the speakers or the hearers thoughts and
emotions is to approach the study of language as
both an intellectual and a moral discipline.