South Asia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

South Asia

Description:

... refers to the British rule in the Indian subcontinent between 1858 and 1947 ... Indian ... Indian counterinsurgency tactics merit international ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1089
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: webCe
Category:
Tags: asia | indian | south

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: South Asia


1
South Asia
  • A Region in Conflict

2
India and Pakistan
  • The Kashmir Conflict

3
British Raj
  • The British Raj refers to the British rule in the
    Indian subcontinent between 1858 and 1947
  • Geographical extent included the regions of
    present day India, Pakistan and Bangladesh

4
Indian Independence Movement
  • Involved a wide spectrum of Indian political
    organizations, philosophies, and movements which
    had the common aim of ending the British Raj as
    well as other colonial administrations in the
    Indian Subcontinent.
  • The initial resistance to the movement can be
    traced back to the very beginnings of colonial
    expansion by the British East India Company, as
    early as the middle and late 1700s.
  • The mainstream movement from the latter part of
    the 1800s was increasingly led by the Indian
    National Congress with prominent moderatist
    leaders seeking Dominion status within the
    commonwealth. 
  • The end of WWI saw the Congress adopt the
    policies of nonviolent agitation and civil
    disobedience led by Gandhi.

5
Quit India Movement
The Quit India Movement (Bharat Chhodo Andolan or
the August Movement) was a civil disobedience
movement launched in India in August 1942 in
response to Mohandas Gandhi's call for immediate
independence.
6
The Partition of India
  • Two self governing countries, India and Pakistan,
    legally came into existence at the stroke of
    midnight on August 15, 1947.
  • The actual division between the two new dominions
    was done according to what has come to be known
    as the 3rd June Plan or Mountblatten Plan.

The Partition was a highly controversial
arrangement, and remains a cause of much tension
on the subcontinent today.
7
Kashmir Conflict
  • India claims the entire state of Jammu and
    Kashmir and presently administers approximately
    half the region including most of Jammu, Kashmir
    Valley, Ladakh and the Siachen Glacier

8
Kashmir Conflict
  • India's claim is contested by Pakistan which
    controls a third of Kashmir, mainly Azad Kashmir
    and the northern areas of Gilgit and Baltistan. 
    The Kashmiri region under Chinese control is
    known as Aksai Chin. In addition, China also
    controls the Trans-Karakoram Tract, also known as
    the Shaksam Valley, that was ceded to it by
    Pakistan in 1963.  The official stated stance of
    India is that Kashmir is an "integral part" of
    India, while the official stated stance of
    Pakistan is that Kashmir is a disputed territory
    whose final status can only be determined by the
    Kashmiri people, hoping the Kashmiri people will
    opt for Pakistan.

9
    Kashmir remains bitterly divided on the
ground two-thirds of it (known as the Indian
state of Jammu and Kashmir) compromising Jammu,
the Valley of Kashmir and the sparsely populated
Buddhist area of Ladakh are controlled by India
one-third is administered by Pakistan. This area
includes a narrow strip of land (Azad Kashmir and
the Northern Areas) compromising the Gilgit
Agency, and Baltistan and the former kingdoms of
Hunza and Nagar. Attempts to resolve the 'core
issue' through political discussion were
unsuccessful. In September 1965 war broke out
again between Islamabad and Delhi.
10
    The United Nations called for a yet another
cease-fire and peace was restored once again
following the Tashkent Declaration in 1966, by
which both nations returned to their original
positions along the demarcated line. After the
1971 war and the creation of independent
Bangladesh under the terms of the 1972 Simla
Agreement, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi of India
and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto of Pakistan agreed that
neither side would seek to alter the cease-fire
line in Kashmir, which was renamed as the Line of
Control, "unilaterally, irrespective of mutual
differences and legal interpretations".
11
    The whole Kashmir issue has caused
longstanding enmity between post-Colonial India
and newly created Muslim Pakistan. It arose as a
direct consequence of the partition and
independence of the Indian subcontinent in August
1947. The state of Jammu and Kashmir, which lies
strategically in the Northwest of the
subcontinent, bordering China and the former
Soviet Union, was a princely state ruled by
Maharaja Hari Singh. In geographical terms, the
Maharaja could have joined either of the two new
Dominions. Although urged by the Viceroy, Lord
Mountbatten, to determine the future of his state
before the transfer of power took place, Hari
Singh demurred.    The Kashmir Conflict has
taken place for almost 60 years, with the result
being 4 major wars and resulting in thousands of
casualties for both sides.
12
Kashmir ConflictIndian View
  • For the UN Resolution mandating a plebiscite to
    be valid, Pakistan should first vacate its part
    of Kashmir.
  • The Constituent Assembly of Jammu and Kashmir had
    unanimously ratified the Maharaja's instrument of
    Accession to India and had adopted a constitution
    for the state that called for a perpetual merger
    of the state with the Indian Union. India claims
    that this body was a representative one, and that
    its views were those of the Kashmiri people at
    the time.

13
Indian View Continued
  • India does not accept the Two Nation Theory that
    forms the basis of Pakistan.
  • The state of Jammu and Kashmir was made
    autonomous by the Article 370 of the Constitution
    of India, though this autonomy has since been
    reduced
  • India alleges that most of the terrorists
    operating in Kashmir are themselves from Pakistan
    Administered Kashmir and that Pakistan has been
    involved in state sponsored terrorism.

14
Indian View Continued
  • India states that despite Pakistan being named as
    an "Islamic Republic", India accuses Pakistan of
    being responsible for one of the worst genocide
    of Muslims when it allegedly killed millions of
    its own countrymen in East Pakistan in the 1971
    Bangladesh atrocities.
  • The Indian Government believes that Pakistan has
    used the Kashmir issue more as "a diversionary
    tactic" from internal and external issues.

15
Kashmir ConflictPakistani View
  • The popular Kashmiri insurgency demonstrates that
    the Kashmiri people no longer wish to remain
    within India. Pakistan suggests that this means
    that either Kashmir wants to be with Pakistan or
    independent.
  • According to the two-nation theory by which
    Pakistan was formed, Kashmir should have been
    with Pakistan, because it has a Muslim majority.
    The "K" in Pakistan stands for Kashmir.

16
Kashmir Conflict Pakistani View
  • Indian counterinsurgency tactics merit
    international monitoring of the Kashmir conflict,
    and the Indian Army has carried out human rights
    violations - including torture, rape and
    extrajudicial killings - against the Kashmiri
    people.
  • The Kashmiri people have now been forced by the
    circumstances to rise against the alleged
    repression of the Indian army and uphold their
    right of self-determination through militancy.

17
Kashmir Conflict Peace in Sight?
  • After intensive diplomatic efforts by other
    countries, India and Pakistan began to withdraw
    troops from the international border June 10,
    2002, and negotiations began again. Effective
    November 26, 2003, India and Pakistan have agreed
    to maintain a ceasefire along the undisputed
    International Border, the disputed Line of
    Control, and the Siachen glacier. This is the
    first such "total ceasefire" declared by both
    nuclear powers in nearly 15 years.

18
Kashmir Conflict Peace in Sight?
  • In February 2004, Pakistan further increased
    pressure on Pakistanis fighting in
    Indian-administered Kashmir to adhere to the
    ceasefire. The nuclear-armed neighbours also
    launched several other mutual confidence building
    measures. Restarting the bus service between the
    Indian- and Pakistani- administered Kashmir has
    helped defuse the tensions between the countries.
    Both India and Pakistan have also decided to
    cooperate on economic fronts.

19
Kashmir Conflict Peace in Sight?
  • On Dec. 5, 2006, Pakistani President Pervez
    Musharraf told an Indian TV channel that Pakistan
    would give up its claim on Kashmir if India
    accepted some of his peace proposals, including a
    phased withdrawal of troops, self-governance for
    locals, no changes in the borders of Kashmir, and
    a joint supervision mechanism involving India,
    Pakistan and Kashmir, the BBC reported. Musharraf
    also stated that he was ready to give up the
    United Nation resolutions regarding Kashmir.

20
U.S. Pakistan Relations
  • U.S. Policy interests in Pakistan encompass awide
    range of issues, including
  • Counterterrorism
  • WMD Proliferation
  • Regional Stability
  • Human Rights and Democratization
  • Economic Reforms
  • Counternarcotics Ops (i.e. halt opium
    trafficking)?

21
U.S. Pakistan Relations
  • These policies have been affected by several key
    developments in recent years.
  • Proliferation and democracy related sanctions
  • Kashmir conflict and associated nuclear issues
  • The Sept. 11 terrorist attacks on U.S.A.

22
9/11 and Pakistan
  • In the wake of the 9/11 attacks, Pakistani
    President Pervez Musharraf ---under strong US
    diplomatic pressure---offered President Bush
    Pakistan's unstinted cooperation in the fight
    against terrorism.
  • In response to Pakistan becoming the U.S.'s most
    important ally in the region, sanctions relating
    to Pakistan's 1998 nuclear tests and 1999
    military coup were waived.

23
The Relationship Begins
  • In October 2001, large amounts of U.S. Aid begin
    pouring in.
  • In June 2004, President Bush designated Pakistan
    as a major non-NATO ally of the United States
  • As a result of this relationship, revelations
    that Pakistan has been a source of onward nuclear
    proliferation to North Korea, Iran and Libya may
    complicate future Pakistan-US relations
  • Pakistan has been instrumental in pivotal
    Al-Qaeda arrests, including Khalid Mohammed.

24
Complications Arise
  • Pakistan has widely been speculated as the
    current home of Osama bin Laden
  • Infiltrations across the Kashmiri Line of Control
    by insurgents continue to this day.
  • Pakistan is known to be a base for numerous
    indigenous terrorist associations and the country
    continues to suffer from anti-Shia,
    anti-Christian and anti-Western terrorism (ex.
    Daniel Pearl) at home.

25
Pakistan-U.S. Cooperation
  • Involve commercial sales of aircraft, weapons and
    associated military radar and electronics systems
    and joint military exercises
  • Further complicated recently by the assassination
    of Benazir Bhutto.
  • Bhutto assassination has recently cooled the
    relationship between US and Pakistan
  • Newly elected Pakistan People's Party will change
    the scope of future relationships with US

26
Central Question Remains
  • How can the United States curry favor with the
    army, which it needs for counterterrorism
    purposes, while simultaneously not alienating the
    average Pakistani, who increasingly sees us as
    the Great Satan?

27
The Peace Pipeline
  • Major natural gas pipeline that would stretch
    from the fields of southern Iran to Pakistan and
    India

28
Scope of the Proposal
  • The IPI would run 1660 miles, about 690 miles in
    Iran, 440 miles in Pakistan and 530 miles in
    India.
  • Total investment of 7 billion dollars
  • Will take five years to complete
  • Has potential to be the mother of all confidence
    building measures between India and Pakistan

29
Background of Project
  • Slow to get started due to disagreements in price
    structures between Iran, India and Pakistan and
    ongoing political conflicts and pressure from the
    U.S.
  • India has in the past insisted on a seven year
    review cycle.
  • Iran wanted a shorter review cycle, citing the
    perpetual changes in the energy market.

30
Pricing the Deal
  • In January of 2007, the three parties made a
    trilateral agreement to adopt crude oil prices as
    the benchmark for determining the adjustments to
    gas prices.
  • There is debate by experts whether this agreement
    will prove to be the best for all parties.
  • Some experts think the best option is to agree on
    a structure whereby all sides agree on a specific
    oil price as the benchmark and then on a slope.

31
Proposed Price Structure
  • Necessity of periodic review is irrefutable, the
    only question remains about an appropriate review
    cycle.
  • Experts have recommended a 5 year review cycle
    it has the advantage of allowing sufficient time
    for periodic deliberations on changing gas prices
  • Avoids frictions associated with a too quick
    review cycle that would make progress suffer from
    negotiations and renogiations.

32
U.S. Political Pressure
  • American position not linked to economics.
  • Driven by Washington's policy with Iran
  • US wishes to isolate Iran, and such a deal would
    prove disastrous to their efforts
  • US has made it clear to India and Pakistan that
    such a deal might have consequences, such as
    sanctions under the Iran-Libya sanctions act.
  • US recently tried to scuttle the talks by
    offering India advanced nuke tech....but India
    denied the offer.

33
The Future?
  • Peace Pipeline could be revamped into an
    economic consortium.
  • The three countries could be linked with members
    of the Economic Cooperation Organization
  • Example Turkmenistan's gas could also be
    exported to India and Pakistan through the IPI
    pipeline.
  • By increasing the pool of regional members of
    such a consortium, the IPI glues the three
    countries into a greater web of cooperation.

34
TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- Iranian President Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad heads to Pakistan and India this week
to put the finishing touches on a controversial
deal to build a pipeline that would deliver
Iranian gas to both countries, Iran's
semi-official Fars news agency says. art.iran.gi.j
pg Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad waves
as he arrives Monday in Islamabad,
Pakistan. Ahmadinejad arrived in Islamabad on
Monday for a four-hour visit with newly elected
Prime Minister Reza Gilani and President Pervez
Musharraf, according to Pakistan's information
ministry. Later in the day, he heads to Sri Lanka
before traveling to New Delhi late Tuesday for a
short visit, according to Iran's state-run news
agency IRNA. The pipeline, if built, would be
about 2,700 kilometers (1,674 miles)
long. Pakistan and India, both key U.S. allies,
are under pressure from the United States not to
sign any kind of agreement with Iran.
35
Some observers have called the project "the
peace pipeline" because of its perceived impact
on reducing tension between India and Pakistan,
nuclear neighbors that have fought three wars,
two of them over the disputed Kashmir region.
Video Watch Ahmadinejad arrive in India The
gas pipeline project, which has been in
discussions for over a year, is aimed at
supplying Iranian natural gas to Pakistan and
India. The pipeline would run from Iran to India,
cutting through Pakistan. According to Fars,
Ahmadinejad's visit comes after Pakistani and
Indian energy ministers signed an agreement last
week, once they had resolved a major "bone of
contention" regarding the route of the gas
pipeline. "Now that all sides have calmed down,
President Ahmadinejad will discuss the 'Peace
Pipeline' at the highest levels during his visit
to the Sub-Continent," Fars said. Under the
agreement, the pipeline will run through 1,100
kilometers (682 miles) of Iran, 1,000 kilometers
(620 miles) of Pakistan and 600 kilometers (372
miles) of India, according to Fars.
36
"The pipeline will be capable of daily
transporting 150 million cubic meters of gas to
Pakistan and India -- 90 million cubic meters
will go to India and the rest will go to
Pakistan," Fars said. "The pipeline project was
initially estimated to cost 4.5 billion, but the
cost has been revised to around 7 billion." The
United States recently tried to scuttle the
pipeline by offering India advanced nuclear
technology to make up for the loss of Iranian
gas. But Fars reported that India recently
declared its readiness to participate in the
discussions on the pipeline after more than a
year. China -- Iran's largest trade partner
followed by India -- has previously said that it
would negotiate in India's place if New Delhi
withdraws from the project, according to Fars.
China borders Pakistan to the north. A top
adviser to the Iranian president spoke on the eve
of Ahmadinejad's visit about the importance of
oil and gas when it comes to putting Western
powers "in their place," according to Fars.
37
"Oil and gas are two elements of power at the
disposal of the Muslims," Gen. Yahya Safavi said
Sunday, according to Fars. "If it (the power) be
viewed properly (with wisdom) and within the
framework of the interests of Islam and Muslims,
one can then put the hegemonic powers back in
their place."
38
The Risks
  • Geopolitical risks associated with IPI may be
    high
  • But safety mechanisms exist that should decrease
    costs should any situations materialize
  • These risks include
  • State sponsored and grass roots terrorism in
    Pakistan
  • Iran is an untested and has potential to be an
    unreliable supplier
  • Proceeding with project may alienate U.S.

39
Mitigating the Risks
  • Iran has agreed to supply India if Pakistan
    meddles with it's supply
  • Iran will also discontinue exports to Pakistan if
    such a situation presents itself
  • To keep Iran acting in good faith an
    international consortium of bankers and oil
    exporters have decided to back the project
  • Despite U.S. Nuclear assistance to India it lacks
    both the political will and international support
    to do anything about it

40
India's Gain
  • Will be highly beneficial to India's economic
    future
  • The LNG provides an economically and
    environmentally sound solution to India's current
    energy problems
  • Pipeline can provide necessary fuel to fertilizer
    and industrial sectors and may also revitalize
    struggling electricity market
  • Will encourage foreign investment in India's
    infrastructure

41
Pakistan's Gain
  • Much the same as India's
  • Benefits of a stable power source in Pakistan
    will provide countless jobs for those who don't
    have them
  • Employed individuals will hopefully be steered
    away from activities that would cause them to
    lose their employment and their newfound wealth
  • Pipeline guaranteed to be profitable since high
    demand for gas not likely to subside anytime soon

42
Iran's Gain
  • Will be able to demonstrate to the World their
    ability to maintain peace and prosperity in a
    troubled region
  • LNG profits will hopefully become large enough to
    discourage Iran from causing trouble in the
    region
  • Will be a huge publicity battle won for current
    Iranian Prime Minister

43
India's Diplomatic Future
  • Doctor RK Pachauri, the father of the IPI
    Pipeline, recommends a course of quiet
    diplomacy for India's dealings with the pipeline
  • Rather than pursuing the course of high profile
    debates, backdoor sessions should be held to
    discourage high profile headlines
  • This allows India to alleviate the risk that U.S.
    Will also feel threatened by the project
  • Also will allow India to discuss it's own
    security concerns that will not be held hostage
    by the ebb and flow of current Indian/Pakistani
    relations

44
India's Diplomatic Future
  • India should be patient with it's negotiations in
    order to ensure a price for the gas that will be
    most beneficial to it's future
  • As India and Pakistan go through the gauntlet of
    negotiations surrounding the IPI they should look
    back in history and mind the lessons learned by
    Europe in the 1970's

45
A New Union
  • At the height of the Cold War in Europe most
    Europeans realized that piped gas from the Soviet
    Union would be beneficial for both parties in the
    long term
  • The Soviet Union needed a market for it's gas,
    much like Iran does today...and Europe needed to
    import the gas much like India and Pakistan do
    today
  • Europe and the Soviet Union accomplish this
    pipeline despite protests from U.S.
    administrations

46
A New Union
  • By agreeing to keep economics separate from
    politics the economic ties established between
    Europe and the Soviet Union survived the fall of
    the Soviet Union and provided a cushion for the
    transformation of Europe and Russia
  • For more than two decades this consistent supply
    of natural gas has fueled unprecedented growth in
    Europe
  • This lesson from history should hearten those
    responsible for establishing the pipeline and
    providing the long term benefits that come with
    this state of economic interdependence

47
Pipeline of Peace
  • The IPI, if it realizes it's potential, could go
    down as one of the greatest examples of peaceful
    economic cooperation in history
  • And may forever be known as the Pipeline of Peace
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com