WELCOME TO ATLANTA JANUARY 14, 1999 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 86
About This Presentation
Title:

WELCOME TO ATLANTA JANUARY 14, 1999

Description:

... the American College Of Radiology Study# 9998 Case# 0034. ... C/O American College of Radiology. 1818 Market Street. Suite 1600. Philadelphia, PA 19103 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:49
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 87
Provided by: rwe2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: WELCOME TO ATLANTA JANUARY 14, 1999


1
Welcome to the RTOG Research Associate
Orientation Loews Philadelphia Hotel Philadelphia
June 23, 2005
2
PROTOCOLS
3
Protocol Design
  • Types of Studies
  • Protocol Format
  • Protocol Development and Activation
  • Preparation for Study Participation

4
Types of Studies
  • Phase I
  • Phase II
  • Phase I/II
  • Randomized Phase II
  • Phase III
  • Lab Correlates
  • Cancer Control
  • Randomized vs. Non
  • Intergroup

5
Phase I, II, I/II, III Studies
  • I determine the maximum tolerated dose.
    Investigational
  • II response to treatment (extent of tumor
    reduction).
  • I/II early and late endpoints, dose searching
    studies.
  • III randomized prospective comparison of
    experimental regimens. Larger number of
    patients.

6
  • Laboratory correlates
  • Cancer control
  • Randomized
  • Intergroup

7
Study Classifications
  • Single Blind
  • Double Blind
  • Single Arm
  • Multiple Arm

8
Protocol Format
9
Sections of Protocol
  • Schema
  • Eligibility Check
  • 1.0 Introduction
  • 2.0 Objectives
  • 3.0 Patient Selection
  • 4.0 Pretreatment Evaluations
  • 5.0 Registration Procedures
  • 6.0 Radiation Therapy
  • 7.0 Drug Therapy

10
Sections of Protocol, Continued
  • 8.0 Surgery
  • 9.0 Other Therapy
  • 10.0 Pathology/TRP Correlates
  • 11.0 Patient Assessments
  • 12.0 Data Collection
  • 13.0 Statistical Considerations
  • References
  • Sample Consent
  • Appendices

11
Protocol Developmentand Activation
12
(No Transcript)
13
Comprehensive Review Mechanism Group Strategy
  • Concept review and feasibility survey
  • Group review
  • Internal review
  • NCI review (generating a re-review by group and
    study chair)
  • Activation
  • Revisions

14
RTOG Web Site
  • http//www.rtog.org

15
Preparation for Study Participation
16
Preparation for Case Entry
  • Review Eligibility Requirements (sect.3.0)
    -complete eligibility list
  • -questions to RA at HQ prior to registration
  • Review Required Studies Labs--did they occur
    within required time frame?
  • Review Feasibility for Success--should this
    patient be entered on study?

17
Registration Procedures
  • Mandatory Web Registration Available 24 hours a
    day/7 days a week
  • Intergroup Registration Fax Eligibilty
    Checklist to 215-574-0300
  • IMPORTANT REMINDERS
  • Complete Eligibility Checklist
  • Signed and Dated Informed Consent
  • Patients must be registered prior to the start
    of any protocol treatment

18
(No Transcript)
19
Go to RA Corner for User Authorization Form
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
Confirmation of Web Registration
  • Following a successful Web Registration you will
    receive
  • Treatment Assignment and Case Number
  • E-Mail Confirmation
  • A0
  • Patient Calendar
  • Check carefully for errors
  • Patient Label Template is available on RTOG
    website/RA Corner

24
(No Transcript)
25
Email Confirmation
From CONFIRMATION CONFIRMATION_at_rtog.org To
brenda_young Subject ACR New Case Registration
for Study No - 9998 and Case No
- 0034   Hello,   The Confirmation of New Case
Registration for the American College Of
Radiology Study 9998 Case 0034.Please Find the
attached A0 Patient Calendar HTML File.  
Thanks, ACR     Note This information E-mail
is Auto generated by the Clinical Server On Wed
Jan 14 124400 EST 2004 (Eastern Standard
Time).Replies will not be checked on this server,
so please send your Queries to HQ directly for
prompt response.  
26
? QUESTIONS ?
27
Calendars and Data Schedule
  • Purpose
  • Record / log forms
  • Form description
  • Changes to calendar
  • Calendar extension

June 2005
28
PURPOSE
  • Verification of assignment
  • case number
  • Institution name / number
  • Patient identification / number
  • Calendar base date
  • Timetable data / form submission
  • Access to real-time calendars for all cases via
    RTOG Data Log In Center on website

29
Example Hard Copy Calendar
30
Example Web Calendar
31
RECORD / LOG FORMS
  • list of forms according to due date
  • all forms are per section 12.0 of protocol
  • each form requires a response

32
ID / Description of Forms
  • Form identification via two descriptors
    form title two letter ID code

33
Changes / Due to Events
  • Additional submission required per protocol upon
    occurrence of specific events
  • Changes made due to a request to suppress a form
  • Deletion of forms due to improper administration
    of pre-treatment or QOL tools
  • Additional changes are as per the protocol
    section 12.0.

34
(No Transcript)
35
Calendar Extension
  • Headquarters revises calendar per case as needed
  • Copies of updated calendars are sent to
    institutions by request

36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Patient Status
  • Alive
  • Dead
  • Lost

39
Patient Status
  • Lost Cannot obtain patient status / information
    for
  • gt 3 years V5
  • Need to document all efforts to establish
    patients status.
  • Alive data submission is as per calendar
  • Dead data due prior to date of death becomes
    due Z1 remains due until response is received

40
? QUESTIONS ?
41
Data Submission Overview
  • Case Report Forms (CRF)
  • Forms Due Report

42
Case Report Forms
  • Protocol Specific
  • Forms Packet
  • Source Documentation
  • Investigator Obligations

Protocol Section 11.0 and 12.0
43
Coding Reminders
  • Write legibly
  • Black or blue ink
  • Signature/date required
  • Single sided forms only
  • Avoid post-its on forms
  • Avoid blanks
  • Avoid using highlighter

44
Submission Reminders
  • Affix Patient Label
  • Complete Form
  • All items have a response
  • All pages are attached
  • Quality of Life Cover Sheet
  • Signature and Date
  • Revision Box
  • Comments

45
Send All Data To
  • Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
  • (RTOG)
  • C/O American College of Radiology
  • 1818 Market Street
  • Suite 1600
  • Philadelphia, PA 19103

46
Forms Due Report
  • Institutional Report includes
  • Past due data
  • Projected data
  • Frequency
  • HQ established cut-off dates
  • Mailed 3times per year monthly for Phase I and
    Phase II studies
  • Purpose
  • Encourage Prompt Data Submission
  • Resolve Discrepancies

47
A Useful Tool
The Memorandum Detailed explanation of
Report Run Date Date the report is
printed Voids all previously dated reports Cut
Off Date Report will include only data received
by the cut off Data received after the cut
off will be reflected on the next report DO NOT
resend data submitted after the cut off The
Printout Reinstatement of the case specific
calendar issued at registration
48
? QUESTIONS ?
49
Ongoing Evaluations and Reporting
  • Disease Status
  • Adverse Events

50
Disease Status
  • Objective assessment and evaluation of tumor
    response to protocol treatment as determined by
    the Principle Investigator or Attending Physician

51
Reporting Tumor Response
Section 11.0 of the Protocol
  • Recommended assessments
  • Assessment timelines
  • Response Criteria
  • Site specific
  • RECIST

52
ADVERSE EVENTS EVALUATION AND REPORTING
  • Adverse Event
  • Common Terminology Criteria
  • Evaluation and Reporting
  • Special Reporting
  • AdEERS

53
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Definition of
Adverse Event (AE)
  • Any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom, or
    disease (including an abnormal laboratory
    finding) temporally associated with the use of a
    medical treatment or procedure regardless of
    whether it is considered related to the treatment
    or procedure (attribution of unrelated, unlikely,
    possible, probable, or definite). Each AE is a
    unique representation of a specific event used
    for medical documentation and scientific
    analysis.

54
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Definition of
Serious Adverse Event(SAE)
  • As defined in the FDA CFR 312, any adverse drug
    experience occurring at any dose that results in
    any of the following outcomes
  • Death
  • Life threatening adverse drug experience
  • In patient hospitalization ( or gt 24 hours) or
    prolongation of an existing hospitalization
  • Persistent or significant disability/incapacity
  • Congenital anomaly/birth defect

55
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Definition of
Attribution
  • The determination of whether an AE is related to
    a medical treatment or procedure
  • Clinical Investigators have the primary
    responsibility for AE
  • Identification
  • Documentation
  • Grading
  • Assignment of Attribution

56
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Definition of AE
Attribution Categories
  • Unrelated
  • AE is clearly NOT related to the intervention
  • Unlikely
  • AE is doubtfully related to the intervention
  • Possible
  • AE may be related to the intervention
  • Probable
  • AE is likely related to the intervention
  • Definite
  • AE is clearly related to the intervention

57
National Cancer Institute (NCI) Definition
ofExpected vs. Unexpected AEs
  • Expected AE
  • Determination is based on available literature
  • Package Insert, Investigators Brochure
  • Protocol Section 6.0, 7.0 and Informed Consent
  • Unexpected AE
  • Determination is based on available literature
  • NOT in Package Insert, Investigators Brochure
  • NOT in Protocol Section 6.0, 7.0 or Informed
    Consent

58
ADVERSE EVENT SEVERITY GRADING CRITERIA Protocols
activated March 1998 through Feb 2003
  • NCI Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) version 2.0
  • To evaluate AEs attributable to Systemic Agents
    and Radiation Therapy that occur between Day
    1and Day 90 of treatment
  • RTOG/EORTC Late Radiation Morbidity
  • Criteria
  • To evaluate AEs attributable to Radiation
    Therapy ONLY that occur after Day 90 of treatment

59
ADVERSE EVENTSEVERITY GRADING CRITERIAProtocols
activatedMarch 2003 through Present
  • NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse
    Events (CTCAE), version 3.0
  • To evaluate all AEs during or after completion
    of ALL modalities of treatment including Systemic
    Agents, Radiation Therapy, and Surgery
  • Adult and Pediatric trials

60
What Criteria to Use and When??Use The
Protocol As Your Guide
  • Protocol section 6.0 and 7.0
  • Specific guidelines for AE Reporting
  • Required criteria
  • Special reporting requirements
  • AE Report submission timelines

61
(No Transcript)
62
(No Transcript)
63
(No Transcript)
64
(No Transcript)
65
ADVERSE EVENTEVALUATION
  • Timelines
  • Protocol Sections 6.0, 7.0, 11.0
  • Pre-Treatment, During Treatment, Post Treatment
  • Assessments
  • Lab Values
  • Normal Tissue/Organ
  • Related to treatment modality
  • Identified In Protocol and Informed Consent

66
ADVERSE EVENTREPORTING
  • Guidelines and Requirements
  • Protocol Sections 6.0, 7.0, 11.0, and 12.0
  • Routine AE Reporting
  • Case Report Form (CRF)
  • Treatment Summary Forms, Follow-Up Forms, Adverse
    Event Forms
  • Expedited AE/SAE Reporting
  • Via Phone to RTOG HQ
  • AdEERS

67
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTREPORTING
  • Telephone RTOG within 24 hours of knowledge of
    event
  • Contact RTOG HQ Primary Disease Site RA
  • Information required at time of call
  • Study , Case, Pt. Initials, treatment
    start/stop dates, description of event, severity
    grade, and attribution
  • RTOG RA Coordinator will assist with additional
    reporting requirements
  • AdEERS 24 hour notification (if applicable)
  • MedWatch or AdEERS per FDA/NCI Guidelines

68
MedWatch
  • FDA required reporting form for SAEs R/T
    Systemic Therapy occurring during or within 30
    days of completing therapy
  • Complete report due within 10 days of initial
    phone report
  • Fax or mail to FDA (info on form)
  • and
  • Fax a copy to RTOG Regulatory Officer _at_
    215-717-0990
  • Identify with RTOG Study/Case

69
Adverse Event Expedited Reporting SystemAdEERS
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI) mandated
    electronic SAE reporting system
  • http//ctep.info.nih.gov/AdEERS/default.htm
  • IMPORTANT UPDATED GUIDELINES DATED 12-15-2004,
  • EFFECTIVE 2-1-2005
  • SAE reports are submitted directly to NCI via the
    web application
  • 24 Hour notification to AdEERS depending on Phase
    of trial, severity grade, and attribution of SAE
  • Complete Report due within 5-10 calendar days of
    24 hour notification depending on Phase of trial,
    severity grade, and attribution of SAE
  • NCI sends electronic notification to Coordinating
    Group
  • RTOG requires AdEERS for all SAE reporting
  • Computer based training program available

70
AdEERSPreparing To Submit A Report
  • Reporter I.D.
  • Name, phone, fax, and email of RA and M.D.
  • Patient I.D.
  • RTOG Case Number
  • i.e. 0099
  • Mandatory Response Fields
  • Text fields
  • Description of Treatment
  • Description of Event
  • Dates, Doses, Lab Values, Ht, Wt, BSA
  • List of Values
  • Responses selected from drop down box
  • AE Category, Severity Grade, Attribution Code

71
?QUESTIONS?
72
Quality Control/Assurance Procedures
  • Medical Oncology

73
Requirements for Participation
  • Name of responsible Medical Oncologist
  • Responsibilities of the Medical Oncologist
  • Responsibilities of the Research Associates
    /Investigator

74
Study Chair Review
  • Every chemotherapy case is reviewed.
  • Checked for
  • documentation of wt.,
  • ht., and BSA
  • drug doses
  • timing
  • lab tests
  • toxicity reporting

75
Quality Control Guidelines for Chemotherapy
  • Per Protocol
  • Variation Acceptable (minor)
  • Variation Acceptable (NOS)
  • Deviation, Unacceptable
  • Not Evaluable for Chemotherapy Review
  • Incomplete Chemotherapy

76
Quality Control/Assurance Procedures
  • Surgical Oncology

77
Surgical Study Chair Review
  • Not done on every study
  • The surgical section of the protocol will clearly
    specify the surgical technique to be followed.
  • If the surgery is reviewed in a particular
    protocol you will receive a similar QC report to
    the chemotherapy QC review.

78
?QUESTIONS?
79
Intergroup Studies
Definition
  • Two or more cooperative groups agree to
  • Enroll their eligible patients
  • Not conduct a competing study

Rationale
  • Quick recruitment
  • Decrease of protocols with same interests
  • Uncommon tumors

80
Structure
Coordinating Group (CG)
  • Administration
  • Randomization
  • Data Processing
  • Quality Assurance and Control
  • Statistical Analysis

Participating Group
  • Participates only
  • Monitors data submission from its own institutions

81
Patient Entry Procedures
Prior Process
Current Process
Complete eligibility/stratification checklist
Complete eligibility/stratification checklist
Contact Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU)
Call RTOG Headquarters
CTSU relays information to CG
RTOG relays information to CG
CG assigns treatment and intergroup case
CG assigns treatment and intergroup case
RTOG calls institution with information
CTSU relays information to Institution
Calendar and labels sent out to institution
Calendar and labels sent out to institution
82
Data Submission
  • Submit all data to RTOG unless otherwise
    specified in protocol (i.e., pathology,
    dosimetry, CTSU)
  • All data must be labeled with RTOG Study/Case
    s and CG Study/Case s
  • Labels are to be used for all data forms except
    for SWOG coordinated studies

83
Request for Study Information (Z1)
  • Queries generated from CG
  • RTOG sends the CG query to the institution
    attached to a Z1
  • Z1 reply is returned to RTOG, not CG

84
REMINDER
  • Eligibility
  • Protocol Treatment
  • Medical Issues
  • Contact Protocol Coordinator at Coordinating
    Group Data Center

85
? QUESTIONS ?
86
QUESTIONS or COMMENTS
REMINDER Please Complete RA Orientation
Evaluation and return to the Registration Desk by
6PM Friday, June 25th.
Thank You ?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com