Clinical Uses of Drug Testing - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Clinical Uses of Drug Testing

Description:

EtG can be synthesized by bacteria if alcohol is present in urine. EtS is only positive after alcohol consumption not after fermentation in urine ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:766
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 54
Provided by: Aud2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clinical Uses of Drug Testing


1
Clinical Uses of Drug Testing
  • Robert L. DuPont, M.D.
  • Certified by ASAM and ABPN and certified as an
    MRO
  • President, Institute for Behavior and Health,
    Inc.
  • First Director, National Institute on Drug Abuse
    (NIDA) 1973 to 1978
  • Second White House Drug Czar (Nixon and Ford)
  • www.ibhinc.org

2
ASAMs 2008 Review Course in Addiction Medicine
  • ACCME required disclosure of
  • relevant commercial relationships
  • Dr. DuPont discloses that Bensinger DuPont
    Associates has a contractual relationship with
    Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs LLC.

3
History of Drug Testing
  • 1960s and earlier
  • Medical Examiners and Emergency Rooms
  • 1970s
  • Drug Abuse Treatment and Criminal Justice System
  • 1980s
  • Workplace and the Military
  • 2000
  • Schools and Highways

4
Today Drug Testing is
  • Highest level of modern biotechnology
  • Workplace drug testing meets the highest standard
    for medical tests the forensic standard

5
  • What Drug Tests Detect
  • Recent Drug Use, Period.
  • What Drug Tests Do Not Detect
  • Impairment
  • Addiction
  • Abuse
  • Dependence

6
Alcohol Testing is a Misleading Precedent
  • Levels of drug detected do not correlate with
  • Impairment
  • Amount of drug used
  • Recency of drug use
  • Recent fluid consumption is big factor in urine
    levels!

7
Drug Test Results Cut Offs
  • Drug tests are not read quantitatively but as
    yes or no using specific cut-offs
  • Standard drug test cut-offs are determined by
  • The limits of the sensitivity of the testing
    technology as commonly used
  • To eliminate the risk of passive or inadvertent
    exposure
  • As a custom order laboratories may use limits of
    detection (LOD) as cut-off

8
Drugs in the Body
  • Drug users seek brain reward
  • Drugs are carried in the blood to every tissue of
    the body
  • Drugs and their metabolites are found throughout
    the body after use at concentrations that rapidly
    decline after use stops

9
Commonly Used Specimens for Drug Tests
  • Urine
  • Hair
  • Oral Fluid
  • Sweat
  • Breath (for alcohol only now)

10
The Standard 5-Drug Screen
  • Drug tests do not test for drugs in general but
    for specific drugs The SAMHSA Five
  • Marijuana
  • Cocaine
  • Amphetamine/Methamphetamine
  • Morphine/Codeine
  • PCP
  • More extensive panels are available usually
    costing more
  • Virtually all drugs can be detected by tests in
    all specimens but few labs offer a full range of
    abused drugs

11
The Standard Two-Step Drug Testing Process
  • Immunoassay Screen
  • Gas or Liquid Chromatography/Mass Spectroscopy
    Confirmation or equivalent

12
How Immunoassay Tests Work
  • Proprietary monoclonal antibodies are highly
    specific to individual drugs or their
    metabolites
  • Automated in laboratories or built into on-site
    drug detection devices
  • High sensitivity (e.g., low levels of drug
    detected) but may not be specific
  • Relatively inexpensive

13
How LC/MS or GC/MS Confirmation Works
  • Uses two separate highly specific processes, GC
    or LC and MS, to precisely identify a single
    substance
  • No cross reactivity, highly specific and highly
    sensitive
  • The marijuana example for urine LC or GC/MS
    identifies a single metabolite therefore the LC
    or GC/MS reading is about 40 of the immunoassay
    level because the immunoassay identifies several
    THC metabolites. For this reason the standard
    cut-off is 50 ng/ml on immunoassay screens and 5
    ng/ml on the LC or GC/MS)

14
The Medical Review Officers Role
  • Validating the testing process and separating
    medical from nonmedical use
  • Mostly limited to workplace and school testing
  • The MRO FUNCTIONS are important in all drug
    testing

15
Standards for Drug Testing
  • In most treatment and criminal justice settings
    confirmation and MRO are not used to reduce
    cost and speed results
  • In these settings a single positive test seldom
    leads to severe consequences

16
Confirmatory Tests
  • A confirmation test and an MRO are wise
  • Whenever a single positive test is disputed by
    the donor and when it produces severe
    consequences such as loss of job or
    incarceration
  • Whenever litigation is a threat for example,
    child custody or visitation monitoring

17
Drug Testing in the Workplace
  • Workplace drug testing mandated by the federal
    government is controlled by Federal Guidelines
  • Cover only laboratory-based urine testing for the
    standard 5-drug panel
  • Other drug testing is NOT restricted to these
    Guidelines
  • However, because workplace drug testing dominates
    the drug testing marketplace, much drug testing
    is within these limited parameters

18
Specimen Options
  • Different specimens have different strengths and
    weaknesses
  • All specimens use the same solid science and have
    the same two step options
  • Only urine and oral fluid now offer on-site
    testing options
  • No one specimen is better than the others in all
    applications

19
Urine
  • The Pluses
  • By far the most commonly used specimen
  • Most potential suppliers of the tests
  • Lowest cost
  • On-site testing widely available
  • Virtually unlimited number of drugs can be
    identified in urine
  • In disputed results the original sample can be
    retested
  • The Minuses
  • Cheating is a huge problem especially in
    scheduled drug tests and when collection is not
    observed directly
  • The bathroom problem
  • Samples difficult to handle and transport,
    require gloves in handling
  • Relatively short drug detection window (DDW)
  • Poppy seeds can give morphine/codeine positive

20
Hair
  • The Pluses
  • Cheating virtually impossible
  • Longer DDW standard is 90 days for 1 ½ inch
    sample of hair
  • Discriminates between light, moderate and heavy
    users over 90 day period
  • Poppy seed consumption does not give a positive
    result for morphine/codeine
  • No bathroom or hygiene problems
  • In case of a disputed sample, a safety net test
    is an option
  • The Minuses
  • More expensive 40 per test rather than
    10-20
  • Limited number of drugs identified on most hair
    tests
  • Fewer providers of hair tests
  • No on-site option
  • To test positive for marijuana, use must be about
    twice a week for the 90 day period covered by the
    hair sample

21
Racial Bias in Hair Testing
  • A controversy about hair testing that is refuted
    by abundant and repeated study
  • The claim is not that one race in this case
    Blacks are inherently positive on hair tests,
    but that if Blacks and Whites use the same amount
    of drug (in this argument the concern is often
    cocaine) the Blacks will have higher levels in
    the tested hair sample given the same amount of
    drug use therefore, Blacks are more likely to
    test positive on hair tests

22
Comparisons by Race in Pre-Employment Testing in
Police Applicants
23
Comparisons by Race in Pre-Employment Testing in
Police Applicants
The number of positives is too small to create
a reliable odds ratio
24
Hair Color as a Biasing Factor in Hair Analysis
Summary
  • All the large N studies and most small N studies
    do not demonstrate a statistically significant
    correlation between hair color or curvature and
    drug connection
  • Small N studies were often initially reported
    showing differences between mean concentrations,
    however mean value comparisons can be deceptive
  • Significance cannot be determined by visual
    inspection
  • Means are sensitive to extreme scores
  • Mean differences cannot be evaluated without
    consideration of deviation values
  • Codeine concentration may be uniquely related to
    melanin but effects are probably small

25
The Facts
  • In all larger studies, the same relative
    proportions of Blacks and Whites are positive on
    hair test, urine test and self-report
  • These findings could not occur if hair (or urine)
    tests were biased against Blacks

26
Oral Fluid
  • The Pluses
  • Easy to collect
  • No bathroom problem
  • Cheating difficult
  • More laboratories are now doing oral fluid
    testing
  • On-site options widely available
  • Costs comparable to urine
  • The Minuses
  • On-site oral fluid testing not sensitive to
    marijuana use
  • Less experience than with urine or hair
  • Very short DDW (12 hours or less)
  • Like urine, requires gloves for handling

27
Sweat
  • Pluses
  • Tests prospectively, not retrospectively, for one
    to three weeks
  • Cheating not a problem
  • Costs similar to urine and oral fluid tests
  • Minuses
  • Only one provider of sweat tests
  • Limited experience with these tests
  • Limited range only the Standard 5-drug panel
    currently available

28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
Clinical Examples of Advantages of Various
Specimens
  • Advantage Urine
  • When drugs other than the standard 5 are being
    used
  • When cost is a major factor
  • When on-site testing is the choice
  • Advantage Hair
  • When using a scheduled test (e.g., pre-employment
    testing)
  • In return to work after an extended absence
    (vacation, travel, illness, etc.)
  • When cheating is suspected
  • Address Poppy Seed positive urine tests where
    heroin use is suspected
  • Advantage Oral Fluid
  • As random alternative to urine when cheating is
    suspected
  • In settings where bathrooms are not available for
    collection roadside drug tests
  • Advantage Sweat
  • Monitoring early in treatment or in other setting
    where continuous monitoring for a couple of weeks
    at a time is desirable

31
Coping with Cheating The Achilles Heel of Urine
Testing
  • Observe collection
  • Test on random basis and, where possible, do not
    give donor the opportunity to consume excessive
    fluids or ingest substances which can foil the
    test
  • Test for common adulterants and measure pH,
    specific gravity and temperature
  • Use alternative samples (hair or oral fluid) when
    cheating is suspected

32
Go to the Internet and search How to Beat Drug
Tests to see how robust the market is for
cheating
33
Praise from Abbie Hoffman in Steal This Urine
Test Fighting Drug Hysteria in America, 1987
  • In the small world of drug testing, these four
    Angarola, Bensinger, DuPont and Willette are
    affectionately referred to as the Gang of Four.
    Dr. John Morgan explains, They are the ones
    responsible for a good deal of drug testings
    success, and some of the fear that goes with it.
    Remember these names. These men are among the
    most competent and knowledgeable about drug
    testing scientifically and politically. They
    are well-informed they have to be. Their
    livelihoods depend on their credibility.
    Unfortunately their expertise represents the
    greatest threat to the civil liberties we seek to
    protect. Know your enemy.

34
Bob DuPonts Advice for Drug Test Monitoring Over
Time
  • Use more than one matrix so donors do not know
    which sample will be taken when they are tested
  • Keep track of the rate of positive drug test
    results with the various matrices to get a handle
    on the biggest problem with drug testing
    clinically false negatives
  • Rotate drugs tested so donors do not know which
    drugs are being looked for

35
Interpretation of Drug Test Results One
  • Question
  • Can passive exposure cause the positive?
  • Answer
  • With current cut-off levels this is not possible
    for commonly used drug tests
  • Passive exposure to crack or marijuana smoke does
    not produce positive results in real-world
    situations

36
Interpretation of Drug Test Results Two
  • Question
  • Did my prescription or OTC medicine cause the
    positive?
  • Answer
  • If the result is LC or GC/MS confirmed, only the
    identified substance can cause the positive
    result
  • The prescription may have the substance in it,
    e.g., Adderall is D-Amphetamine Desoxyn is
    Methamphetamine
  • If only an immunoassay screening test is done,
    check with the laboratory or device manufacturer
    for whether some other specific substance is
    known to cross react with their antibody
  • This is possible but rare and when it does occur
    it can be identified

37
Interpretation of Drug Test Results Three
  • Question
  • Couldnt my positive test come from long-ago
    drug use (e.g., before treatment)?
  • Answer
  • Most urine samples are negative within a few days
    of stopping drug use, even for marijuana except
    for heavy, chronic users and most of these
    samples turn negative within a week or two after
    stopping use
  • When repeat testing continues to be positive, the
    most likely explanation is continued drug use
  • When credible disputes arise, it is possible to
    normalize the tests for creatinine and determine
    whether the THC metabolite or other drug
    concentration is or is not falling over time

38
Fail-Safe for Drug Testing
  • The Laboratory confirmation and MRO
  • The retained positive sample which can be
    retested in case of a dispute
  • For hair testing, a repeat sample is called a
    safety net test

39
Alcohol Testing
  • Alcohol is present in far higher concentrations
    than drugs of abuse making it easier to
    identify
  • Alcohol is quickly eliminated from the body
    making its detection difficult more than a few
    hours after use

40
Principles of Alcohol Testing
  • Can be done in any tissue urine, oral fluid and
    blood but breath testing is the most widely
    used form of alcohol testing
  • Blood testing may be expensive and sample
    collection is difficult
  • Alcohol levels in oral fluid and breath are in
    equilibrium with blood and therefore correlated
    with impairment
  • Urine alcohol levels reflect the blood levels
    over the time the urine in the bladder at the
    time of collection was produced by the kidneys
    typically several hours and therefore urine
    alcohol levels are not closely correlated with
    blood levels (or impairment) at the time of
    collection

41
Interpreting the Blood Alcohol Concentration (BAC)
  • The standard for under the influence of alcohol
    on the highway is 0.08 BAC
  • In the workplace, the federally mandated standard
    is 0.04 BAC for removal from duty
  • Impairment can be detected as low as 0.02 BAC

42
Back-fitting the BAC
  • When drinking stops, alcohol levels in the blood
    (and therefore in oral fluid and breath) fall at
    about 0.015 BAC per hour and a half
  • Thus, a BAC of 0.08 when tested at 1 am could be
    used to estimate the BAC at 10 pm of
    approximately 0.11, assuming that drinking had
    stopped about 9 pm

43
EtG and EtS Testing
  • Ethylglucuronide (EtG) and ethylsulfate (EtS) are
    metabolites of ethyl alcohol, which may be
    present in the urine for up to 7 days after heavy
    drinking and for up to 1 day after a single
    drink
  • EtG is a marker of recent alcohol use
  • EtG is not useful in identifying impairment
  • EtG can be synthesized by bacteria if alcohol is
    present in urine
  • EtS is only positive after alcohol consumption
    not after fermentation in urine containing
    glucose or alcohol

44
EtG Formation
  • Via conjugation of ethanol with activated
    glucuronic acid in the presence of membrane bound
    mitochondrial UDP glucuronyl transferase (UGT)

Seidl S., Wurst F.M., Alt A. Skipper, G.
Addiction Biol 6, 2001
45
EtS Formation
  • Via conjugation of ethanol with sulfa catalyzed
    by sulfo transferase in cytoplasm.

46
Uses of EtG and EtS
  • EtG and EtS are only useful in monitoring
    programs when no alcohol use is the standard
    e.g., after treatment or in the criminal justice
    system
  • EtG in urine is new and widely available at a
    cost of about 10-25 and EtS costs an additional
    50 cents per test
  • Breath testing for alcohol may be ineffective in
    monitoring because the tests are negative a few
    hours after alcohol use has stopped

47
The False Positive Problem with EtG and EtS
  • EtG and EtS tests are occasionally positive at
    the cut-off of 100 ng/ml for EtG or 25 ng/ml for
    EtS as a result of innocent exposure to low
    levels of alcohol in products such as
    alcohol-containing hand washes, mouth washes, and
    other common products
  • In clinical settings the vast majority of
    positives reflect recent alcohol beverage
    consumption
  • To minimize the problem of false positives, do
    not rely on a single positive EtG test when
    severe consequences are imposed, and educate
    donors about the importance of avoiding products
    that contain alcohol
  • Perform EtS test to help clarify when needed

48
Summary of Incidental Ethanol Exposure
49
The Bottom Line on EtG and EtS Testing
  • A negative EtG and/or EtS test establishes that
    no significant alcohol use has occurred by the
    donor in the prior several days
  • This evidence of no alcohol use is valuable to
    the donor and to the monitor
  • A positive EtG or EtS test raises a red flag of
    possible recent alcohol use and deserves careful
    follow-up investigation
  • Many donors admit use when confronted
  • Useful in excluding fermentation in ethanol
    positive urines containing glucose

50
In a community sample among drug users
  • Annual Users 55
  • Monthly Users 37
  • Daily Users 8

DuPont, R.L. Random Student Drug Tests Are They
Effective for Identifying Occasional Users?
Rockville, MD Institute for Behavior and
Health, Inc., 2003.
51
Who Tests Positive?
  • At any testing frequency
  • About 52 of positive tests are from Daily Users
  • About 41 are from Monthly Users
  • Only 7 are from Annual Users

DuPont, R.L. Random Student Drug Tests Are They
Effective for Identifying Occasional Users?
Rockville, MD Institute for Behavior and
Health, Inc., 2003.
52
Likelihood of Identifying Drug-Users at Varied
Testing Frequencies
DuPont, R.L. Random Student Drug Tests Are They
Effective for Identifying Occasional Users?
Rockville, MD Institute for Behavior and
Health, Inc., 2003.
53
Help with Drug Testing
  • You dont need to be a toxicologist to wisely use
    drug and alcohol tests
  • When in doubt get help
  • ASAM Textbook three good articles on drug
    testing (in various settings)
  • The laboratory or the manufacturer of the device
    you are using get to their toxicologist with
    your question
  • Call a local MRO
  • Call colleagues in ASAM
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com