Incarceration and Child Support: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Incarceration and Child Support:

Description:

Texas % Inmates in State Jails 13% (excluding those needing paternity or order ... Genetic testing in prisons and jails (IL, MA, TX) ... In 2 Houston jails: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:181
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: jessica9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Incarceration and Child Support:


1
Incarceration and Child Support
  • Working with Incarcerated and Released Parents
    Lessons from OCSE Grants and State Programs
  • Jane Venohr, Ph.D.
  • Center for Policy Research
  • Denver, Colorado 80218
  • www.centerforpolicyresearch.org.
  • ACF 10th Annual Research and Evaluation Conference

2
Federal Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE)
  • Funded research (TO 38)
  • Published reports
  • http//www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/cse/pubs/
  • index.htmlannual
  • Incarceration, Reentry and Child Support Issues
    National and State Research Overview
  • Working with Incarcerated and Released Parents
    Lessons from OCSE Grants and State Programs
    Resource Guide

3
Selected Inmate Characteristics(Source BJS
except where noted)
  • Child Support Issues
  • 55 of male inmates have a child under age 18
  • 48 of parents in state prisons are unmarried
  • 55-92 families of incarcerated parents receive
    or received Medicaid/public assistance (TX, MA)
  • Employment Barriers
  • 40 of parents had no HS diploma or GED 31 had
    only a GED
  • 54 of parents reported a personal income under
    1000 in month before arrest
  • Health Issues

4
The Problems
  • IDENTIFICATION of PARENTS
  • No communication/agreements between OCSE and DOC
    and other criminal justice agencies to identify,
    reach and treat inmates
  • ORDER AMOUNTS CHILD SUPPORT DEBT
  • Courts/CSE treat incarceration as voluntary
    unemployment and not a change of circumstances
  • Arrears interest charges build during prison
  • Opportunities for debt leveraging/flexibility are
    limited
  • Child support agencies are burdened with
    uncollectible debt
  • MODIFICATION OF ORDERS
  • Review and adjustment procedures are difficult
    and long
  • Incarcerated NCPs dont request a modification
  • OUTREACH. Limited CSE outreach to incarcerated
    NCPs
  • EX-OFFENDERS
  • Ex-offenders face limited employment/earnings
    options
  • Wage attachments enforcement actions are stiff

5
10 OCSE Projects Dealing with Child Support and
Incarceration
Washington (2001-03) N 1,472
Minnesota (2001-03) N 102
Massachusetts (2002-03) N 1,200
Illinois (2002-04) N 190
California (2003-04) N 42
DC (2001-02) N 82
Missouri (2001-03) N 400
Colorado (1999-01) N 898 Colorado (1999-02) N
350
Texas (2002-04) N 317
6
Types of Programs OCSE Projects Dealing with
Child Support Incarceration
  • Employment after release (CA, DC)
  • Child Support Services
  • Modify orders (CO, IL, MA, WA)
  • Reduce inmate arrears (MN)
  • Parenting Skills to Inmates (MO)
  • Child Support and Reintegration in Prison Setting
    (TX)
  • One-Stop for Reentry Help (CO)

7
Child Support Arrears Rise During Incarceration
  • Without intervention, child support arrears
    increase about 60 during prison
  • With penalties and interest, the increase may be
    even higher
  • Mass Colorado
  • (n530) (n245)
  • Average child support arrears at prison
    entry 10,543 10,249
  • Percent of arrears owed to the state 52 71
  • Average monthly support obligations 220 171
  • Average arrears owed by parolees 16,430 16,651
  • Percent increase in arrears during
    incarceration 56 63
  • Range in arrears due 0-306,641 168-111,622
  • Average amount of interest due 3,932 0
  • Average amount of penalty due 1,966 0
  • Average total due 19,371 16,651

8
Common MythsThe inmate says, I dont have to
pay child support because
  • My child support stops when incarceration starts.
  • I didnt know I had a child support order.
  • I never signed the birth certificate.
  • My family buys diapers for the baby.
  • She spends the money on herself.
  • Shes on public assistance.
  • She wont let me see my kid.
  • Child support wont be able to find me.

9
Identifying Inmates/Parolees with CSE Issues
  • Electronic Match of DOC-CSE Caseloads
  • Colorado Inmates known to CSE 26
  • Parolees known to CSE 28
  • Mass Inmates known to CSE 26
  • Texas Inmates in State Jails 13
  • (excluding those needing paternity or order
    establishment)
  • Data Match Issues
  • often miss inmates in county jail, community
    corrections, etc.
  • Problems with aliases, false SSNs, DOBs, dated
    info on facility or release date
  • Key data items Name, DOB, SSN, Inmate ID,
    Current Facility, Date Current Incarceration
    Began, Earliest Projected Release Date

10
Partnerships and Collaborations
  • Criminal Justice Agencies
  • Matching automated databases between DOC and CSE
    (CO, MA, TX)
  • Placing CSE personnel in criminal justice
    facilities (MA)
  • Regular CSE presentations to inmates and parolees
    (CO, IL, MA, TX, WA)
  • CSE brochures, and videos given to DOC personnel
    (CO, IL, TX, WA)
  • Genetic testing in prisons and jails (IL, MA, TX)
  • CSE holds one-on-one meetings with inmates (IL,
    MA, MN, TX, WA)
  • CSE trains DOC and parole staff on child support
    (CO, IL, MA, WA)
  • Courts
  • Court personnel serve on project advisory board
    (IL)
  • Judges and masters explain child support to
    inmates in facilities (TX)
  • CSE presents information on inmate child support
    at judges meeting (TX)
  • CSE designs affidavits as substitutes for
    personal appearance (MA, MN)
  • CSE designs simplified modification forms for
    inmate requests (WI)

11
How to Communicate Child Support Information to
Inmates
  • Printed brochures and Q/A sheets (TX, WA)
  • Videos (WA, MN, TX)
  • Columns in inmate newsletter (TX)
  • Printed handbook in prison libraries (CO)
  • Collect telephone calls/video conference to CSE
    agencies (MN)
  • Live presentations by CSE staff at reception
    centers, pre-release, pull-out programs (CO, IL,
    MA, TX, WA)
  • Train facility staff but be prepared to address
    their CSE issues and overcome some resistance
  • Use multiple approaches and follow through with
    actions!

12
Expediting Modification Requests
  • If granted, modifications take 3.1-7.2 months
  • Simplify forms/Use SASE/No notary (Milwaukee, WI)
  • Passive consent procedures (Los Angeles)
  • Fast-track inmate requests (IL)
  • Accept collect calls to special CSE staff
    (Minneapolis)
  • Affidavit instead of inmate appearance at court
    (MA)
  • Treat incarceration as a change of circumstance
  • 0 orders (reserve orders) for inmates with
    monthly income of 200 or less with return to
    pre-incarceration order 60 days after release
    (Oregon, Milwaukee)
  • Modify to standard, minimum order 50-80 (MA, CO)

13
Promoting Family Relationships
  • In 2 Houston jails
  • 209 inmates attended 313 group sessions on
    reintegration The average inmate attended 8.3
    sessions
  • Sessions dealt with Personal responsibility,
    Avoiding destructive behavior, Breaking patterns
    of abuse and neglect
  • Case managers made 2,000 calls to families
    agencies for inmates to re-establish
    communication and obtain services
  • Following release reporting no contact with
    children dropped from 28 to 10, 87 said they
    saw their children as frequently or more often
    than before going to jail
  • In 2 Missouri prisons
  • 323 attended Proud Parent (fatherhood) sessions
  • 147 began Long Distance Dads classes (12
    sessions) with 78 completing
  • 335 attended Parents Fair Share sessions in
    workforce readiness
  • 327 inmates attended group sessions on child
    development parenting
  • 20 couples attended Relationship Enrichment
    Skills Training (3-hour class)
  • 57 inmates 5 couples attended mediation
    sessions
  • Volunteer drivers transported families to prisons
    for visits

14
Employment and Earnings For Ex-Offenders
Extremely Limited
  • Texas Only 34 of 253 released jail inmates had
    any employer-reported earnings 7.5 months
    following release with mean and median earnings
    at 695 and 1,482 per quarter
  • Illinois Only 78 of 167 offenders in release
    programs found jobs earning mean and median
    salary of 1,102 and 960 per month
  • Colorado Only ½ of 350 ex-offenders at WFC were
    employed full time earning an average salary of
    9/hour
  • Employment programs for inmates and ex-offenders
    are often unavailable and ineffective.

15
Working with Paroled/Released Offenders
  • One-Stop model
  • Assistance with employment, child support,
    housing, transportation etc.
  • Occupational skills training, placement help,
    strong employer outreach
  • Child support modification, paternity testing,
    drivers license reinstatement
  • Higher earnings, better child support payments,
    reduced rates of return to prison
  • 133 Clients of the Denver Work and Family Center
    (WFC)
  • Seen within 90 days of release and potentially
    out for 12 months
  • 6 mos 6 mos 12 mos
  • pre WFC post WFC post WFC
  • Percent employed 43 77 71
  • Average earnings per quarter for
    employed 3,007 3,122 4,110
  • Average support paid in 6 and 12
    months 308 681 1,247
  • Support paid as a percent of support
    due 17 39 38
  • Percent making no payments 60 25 26
  • Percent back in prison 29
  • (Colorado DOC reported one

16
Addressing Child Support Arrears
  • Some flexibility in dealing with hard-to-serve
    populations
  • Informal procedures to hear complaints and
    requests re arrears (WA Conference Boards)
  • Statute in 2001 allowing retroactive modification
    of arrears accumulated during incarceration for
    offense other than nonpayment and NCP lacked
    ability to pay(MN Repeal 1/1/07)
  • Regulation (2004) granting CSE flexibility to
    adjust or settle uncollectible arrears owed to
    state by incarcerated NCPs. Terms of settlement
    might include regular payment of support or
    participation in job search, fatherhood (MA)
  • Legislation allowing CSE to reduce arrearages by
    50 after 12 months of payments and 100 after
    24 (MD HB 1264, Passed House 138 to 0,
    Unfavorable in Senate)
  • Other examples of flexibility in standard
    practice for newly released NCPs Protected
    Inmate Bank Accounts (OR), Rapid License
    Reinstatements (MD), Minimum Orders
    Self-Support Reserves based on FPL (CO, Wash DC)

17
Summary of Helpful Policies and Programs
  • Collaborate with DOC and Judiciary
  • Involve county/state-level personnel at upper
    levels
  • Develop MOUs on methods of identification and
    treatment of inmates and access to them
  • Educate judiciary on growth of inmate arrears,
    review and adjust needs and treatment
  • Identify prisoners/parolees with child support
    issues.
  • Automated data matches
  • DOC and CSE and/or CSE and Parolee Boards
  • Screen for CSE status at Prison Intake
  • Inform prisoner about child support and review
    adjustment.
  • Specialized CSE staff
  • CSE video, handbook, inmate newspapers
  • Inmate reception centers and prisons
  • Train prison staff
  • Develop simple processes for review and
    adjustment.
  • Simplify request and response requirements
  • Assist inmates in filing request and affidavit
  • Use affidavit as testimony avoid court
  • Special worker to handle prisoner requests
  • Accept collect phone calls
  • Make passivity work
  • Respond to prisoner requests for review and
    adjustment.
  • Treat incarceration as change in circumstances
  • Set orders to 0 or minimum per month
  • Deal with paroled/released offenders.
  • Create one-stop reentry programs with CSE
  • Modify orders to fit new wage levels
  • Reduce arrears/interest accrued in prison
  • Use effective employment programs
  • Cultivate employer
  • Promote family connections
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com