Genetics for Nurses in Obstetric Disciplines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 48
About This Presentation
Title:

Genetics for Nurses in Obstetric Disciplines

Description:

Newborn with large head and deformed bones with fractures by x-ray ... Now a rapid FISH test is available that does not require stimulation of cell ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:114
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: GWil78
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Genetics for Nurses in Obstetric Disciplines


1
Genetics for Nurses in Obstetric Disciplines
  • A guide to recognition and referral of congenital
    and genetic disorders
  • AUTHORS
  • Golder N. Wilson MD PhD,1 Vijay Tonk PhD,2
  • REVIEWERS
  • Shirley Karr BSN RN,3 Joanna K. Spahis BSN CNS,4
    Shirley Myers,5 RNC, MSN, FNP, and Sherry
    Letalian RN6
  • 1Clinical Professor of Pediatrics, Texas Tech
    University Health Science Center at Lubbock and
    Private Practitioner, KinderGenome Genetics,
    Dallas Texas 2Professor of Pediatrics and
    Obstetrics-Gynecology Director, Cytogenetics
    Laboratory, Texas Tech University Health Science
    Center at Lubbock3Genetics Coordinator,
    Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Genetics, Texas Tech
    University Health Sciences Center at
    Amarillo4Pediatric Clinical Nurse Specialist in
    Genetics and Coordinator of the Down Syndrome
    Clinic, Department of Genetics, Childrens
    Medical Center of Dallas5Womens Health Nurse
    Practitioner, Maternal-Fetal Medicine and
    Genetics, Texas Tech University Health Sciences
    Center at Amarillo6Pediatric Clinic Coordinator,
    Department of Pediatrics, Texas Tech University
    Health Sciences Center, Lubbock
  • Acknowledgement
  • This presentation was designed as part of the
    GEN-ARM (Genetics Education Network for Nursing
    Assessment, Recognition, and Management) for the
    Mountain States Region Genetics Collaborative
    (MSRGCC) contact www.mostgene.org or Ms. Joyce
    Hooker at joycehooker_at_mostgene.org

2
Genetic Disorders are Common
Genetic diseases affect 5-10 of children Nurses
can recognize and refer genetic disorders without
need for esoteric genetic knowledge We will now
present cases where your nursing skills and
alertness (REYDARRecognize, EYDentify, Assess,
Refer) can greatly benefit children with genetic
diseases. These cases will introduce you to
simple principles of genetics that will give you
confidence in recognizing these patients and
foster a medical home These cases and
principles are geared to the nursing genetics
primer and resources on the GENARM CD
3
Think genetics when something is unusual or
extreme
  • Case example 1 A term AGA newborn product of a
    pregnancy with little prenatal care has an
    enlarged and distorted head, blue-gray sclerae
    (whites of the eyes), and deformed limbs. X-rays
    show multiple fractures, and the mother blames
    this on an auto accident at 7 months gestation.
    Do you agree?

Newborn with large head and deformed bones with
fractures by x-ray
4
This unusual presentation should prompt REYDAR
for a genetic disease
  • More detailed family history would be useful,
    although many genetic disorders occur as new
    changes (new mutations)
  • The symptoms of blue sclerae and multiple
    fractures could be searched on the website Online
    Mendelian Inheritance in Man (go to
    http//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/ or enter OMIM
    in search engine). They point to a disorder
    called osteogenesis imperfecta (166210).
  • OMIM contains gt6000 diseases that can be searched
    by symptom, name, or number associated databases
    contain genetic education, medical literature
    (PubMed), and even the complete human genome
    sequence/gene map.
  • Also useful is the companion database
    www.genetests.org that lists testing (when
    available) for the particular genetic disease (go
    to the clinical laboratory section and search by
    disease name

5
Suspicion of genetic disease underlying this
unusual infant led to referral and genetic
counseling for this autosomal dominant
diseasemothers guilt about her accident was
assuaged and she learned she had a 50 chance
each of her future children would have OI
The family history indicated that the mother and
other relatives had mild features of osteogenesis
imperfecta or brittle bone disease (see Chapter 2)
Family history
Pedigree
6
  • Note that simple recognition and assessment of
    possible genetic disease, not sophisticated
    knowledge, optimized nursing care of this family.
  • Nurses with additional interest in genetics can
    learn to construct pedigrees, interpret
    inheritance mechanisms, and provide recurrence
    risks for the parents (genetic counseling)
  • Nurses are ideally positioned to be genetic
    counselors with their hands-on contact, emphasis
    on education, and focus on prevention
  • Read chapters 2-4 in the primer to acquire the
    skills for genetic counseling

7
Genetic disease can be defined by abnormal genes,
tissues, or chromosomes (genetic testing)
Categories of genetic disease relate to the steps
from gene to family (genetic hierarchy)
  • A family has people with unusual symptoms
  • A person has abnormal form or function (disease)
  • A tissue (cell to organ) has abnormal structure
    (metabolic disorders)
  • A chromosome is extra or missing (chromosome
    disorders)
  • Several genes (plus environment) are abnormal
    (multifactorial disorders or susceptibilities)
  • A gene (DNA to RNA to protein) is abnormal
    (Mendelian disorders

8
Categories of genetic or congenital disease
9
  • Mendelian diseases like osteogenesis imperfecta
    have distinctive family patterns
  • The pattern of affected relatives is caused by
    transmission of single genes, each with a unique
    position (locus) on the chromosome.
  • The paired chromosomes 1-22 and XX in females
    imply paired genes except for X and Y genes in
    the male
  • Dominant or recessive diseases result when one or
    both gene partners (alleles) are abnormal.
  • Abnormal alleles can be predicted (genetic risks)
    and sometimes diagnosed through their abnormal
    DNA sequence or RNA/protein expression.

10
  • Sickle cell anemia is recessive, requiring both
    ß-globin alleles to be abnormal (SS versus AS
    trait or AA normal).
  • Sickle cell anemia can be predicted (25 risk for
    next child) and tested (abnormal S protein or
    gene)
  • Other inherited anemias can be related to
    different abnormal globin alleles (C, D, E,
    thassemias).

A or S
11
  • OI is caused by one abnormal allele at a collagen
    gene (genotype Oo)
  • Different phenotypes of OI relate to different
    collagen alleles
  • The gt6000 Mendelian diseases thus relate to a
    similar number of different genes and abnormal
    alleles.
  • Characterization of abnormal alleles provides DNA
    testingfew of the gt1600 characterized disease
    genes are available to the clinic.
  • Simultaneous analysis of multiple genes (DNA
    chips, arrays) is not yet practical in the way
    that karyotypes define any abnormal chromosomes

12
Know categories, not rare diseases
  • Mendelian diseases reflect transmission of single
    genes (abnormal alleles) DNA diagnosis
  • Single genes altering development cause birth
    defects and syndromes
  • Single genes altering enzyme pathways cause
    inborn errors of metabolism
  • Single genes altering organ function(s) produce
    extreme or earlyonset
  • examples of common disease (e.g.,
    neonatal diabetes)

Multifactorial diseases reflect multiple abnormal
genes plus environment DNA/HLA markers
Many genes altering development cause isolated
birth defects like cleft palate Many genes
altering enzyme pathways cause common metabolic
diseases (e.g., adult-onset
diabetes, hyperlipidemia) Many genes altering
organ function(s) produce adult diseases (e.g.,
schizophrenia)
Chromosomal diseases imbalance multiple genes
and cause multiple birth defects Karyotype
13
REYDAR of common obstetric presentations
Recognition ? Category ? Referral ? Medical home
  • Case 9Padolescent female with unplanned
    pregnancy
  • Case 10PDiabetic woman who is 10 weeks pregnant
  • Case 11PA pregnant couple and cystic fibrosis
    screening
  • Case 12PA pregnant couple with infertility and
    two miscarriages
  • Case 13PCouple with maternal history of mental
    retardation
  • (see Chapter 1)

14
Case 9P. Adolescent female with unplanned
pregnancy A 16-year-old female was referred to
obstetric clinic from the emergency room after a
diagnosis of malnutrition and a positive
pregnancy test. She had been brought in by the
police for vagrancy and alcoholism, exhibiting
poor hygiene and nutrition on examination. Fetal
ultrasound revealed a fetus of about 3 months
gestation with very small head circumference,
abnormal head shape, and intrauterine growth
retardation. Her obstetric RN recognized two
likely diagnoses, and referred her to
maternal-fetal medicine for evaluation including
level II ultrasound.
REYDAR of common obstetric presentations
Recognition ? category ? referral and management
15
Poor breast-feeding may signal syndromes or
congenital disorders
Case 9P (cont) The intrauterine growth
retardation and small head circumference would be
consistent with fetal alcohol syndrome. However,
the unusual head shape and severe microcephaly by
ultrasound raised the possibility that the fetus
had anencephaly (OMIM 206500, others). Had this
young female remained in pediatric care, she
could have benefited from counseling regarding
the importance of preconception/prenatal care.
Preconceptional supplementation of folic acid can
reduce the incidence of neural tube defects like
anencephaly or spina bifida by 2/3. It is likely
that this young woman had poor nutrition with low
folic acid as part of her street lifestyle and
alcoholism.. Recognition of her social history
was the key to REYDAR, not knowledge of a rare
disease.
16
Case 10P. Diabetic woman who is 10 weeks pregnant
  • A 25-year-old woman with juvenile diabetes
    presents to her obstetrician at approximately 10
    weeks of pregnancy. She has had several
    hospitalizations for diabetic control and states
    that her blood sugars have been high for the past
    few weeks. The obstetric nurse discusses the
    risks of hypoglycemia, respiratory distress, and
    polycythemia for infants of poorly controlled
    diabetic mothers, but does not mention another
    risk for the fetus, which is?

17
  • Women with poorly controlleddiabetes have a 3-5
    fold increased risk for congenital anomalies in
    their fetus that can be remembered by
    3Cscranial, cardiac, and caudal anomalies.
    Cranial defects can include anencephaly as in
    case 9P or holoprosencephaly (photo at right)
    caudal defects underdevelopment of the
    sacrum/lower limbs (caudal regression) or spina
    bifida. Anomaly patterns like the VATER
    association (192350) or Goldenhar syndrome
    (164210) also occur at higher frequency in
    infants of diabetic mothers.

18
Preconception counsel
  • Stringent diabetic control in later pregnancy can
    eliminate neonatal physiologic changes like
    hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, polycythemia, and
    respiratory problems. Lowering the risks of
    diabetic pregnancy illustrates the potential
    collaboration of pediatric and obstetric nurses
    in preconception counsel.

19
Case 11P A pregnant couple and cystic fibrosis
screening A 26-year-old Caucasian woman with no
chronic illnesses presents to an obstetric nurse
practitioner for her initial prenatal visit. Her
last menstrual period was three weeks ago and a
home pregnancy test was positive. She has no
prior miscarriages or infertility and her family
history is normal. Her husband is also age 26,
Caucasian, and in good health with a normal
family history. What general risks and tests
should the nurse consider for this pregnancy and
what precautions should be mentioned regarding
significance of the test results?
20
  • Case 11P Discussion
  • The couples general risk for birth defects will
    be 2-3--that for an average pregnancy with no
    risk factors from family illness, maternal age,
    or chronic maternal disease. The nurse must
    discuss screening tests that are available,
    including those for chromosome or single gene
    disorders. Screening has classically been
    performed when an early diagnosis would make a
    difference in disease treatment or cure, but new
    genetic and reproductive monitoring technologies
    bring new options for pregnant couples.
    Ultrasound combined with fetal markers in
    maternal blood (triple test, quad screen) now
    detects 87 of fetuses with Down syndrome when
    applied in the first trimester.

21
  • Case 11P Discussion (cont)
  • Fetal chromosome testing by chorionic villus
    sampling (8-10 weeks) and amniocentesis (15-18
    weeks) can recognize over 200 chromosome
    disorders, but risks for miscarriage and costs
    have restricted these tests to women with
    increased risk (age over 35, prior miscarriages).

22
  • Routine chromosome analysis (karyotype) can be
    performed on cells fromblood (white blood cells)
    obtained from individuals or fetuses (by
    fetoscopy), chorionic villus sampling (dividing
    villus cells) or amniotic fluid (amniotic
    fibroblasts). This testing requires at least 5-7
    days for results.

23
  • Now a rapid FISH test is available that does not
    require stimulation of cell division and gives
    results within 2-4 hours. Rapid FISH highlights
    chromosomes commonly involved in disorderse.g.,
    13 (Patau syndrome), 18 (Edwards syndrome), or 21
    (Down syndrome), showing three versus the normal
    two FISH signals in each cell nucleus (X and Y
    probes also show Turner syndrome or document sex
    in cases of ambiguous genitalia)

24
  • Case 11P Discussion
  • The nurse should mention early ultrasound and
    quad screening as options, but point out that
    screening tests can miss abnormal fetuses or
    raise anxiety through abnormal results with
    normal fetuses. Furthermore, abnormal quad
    screens require clarification by amniocentesis,
    an invasive procedure where abnormal results give
    options for pregnancy termination rather than any
    fetal treatment. The nurse should make sure that
    the couple understands the mental disability
    associated with many chromosome disorders, the
    positive aspects of rearing children with
    disabilities, and the couples tolerance for
    ambiguous reslts or options like pregnancy
    termination.

25
  • Case 11P Discussion
  • Complementing chromosome analysis is DNA
    technology that allows screening for common
    mutations in certain ethnic groupse. g., cystic
    fibrosis (OMIM 219700) for Caucasians,
    hemoglobinopathies (e.g., sickle cell anemia--
    OMIM 603903) for Africans or Asians, Tay-Sachs
    disease (OMIM 272800) for Jews. Cystic fibrosis
    has an incidence of about 1 in 1600 Caucasion
    infants, with a 1 in 20 chance that the average
    Caucasian parent will be a carrier. The nurse can
    inform her Caucasian patient of cystic fibrosis
    screening but also discuss the consequences of a
    positive resulttesting the husband to see if he
    too is a carrier, then considering amniocentesis
    to test fetal DNA for the 1 in 4 chance the fetus
    will have cystic fibrosis. Although DNA testing
    is highly accurate, rare cystic fibrosis
    mutations that confer mild disease and composite
    mutations (compound heterozygotes) can limit
    predictions of putative disease severity in the
    fetus. Women should also be informed that DNA
    analysis may reveal non-paternity.

26
  • Case 11P Discussion
  • The nurse should also emphasize that DNA testing
    is not comprehensive in the sense that a routine
    chromosome study (karyotype) can find over 200
    different chromosome disorders. DNA testing must
    be directed at the disease of interest. Costs and
    volume considerations have limited DNA testing by
    commercial laboratories (Quest, LabCorp) to the
    more common conditions like cystic fibrosis or
    sickle cell anemia.. Available DNA tests and the
    laboratories performing them can be reviewed by
    accessing the website www.genetests.org, going to
    the clinical laboratories section, and entering
    the disease of interest. Until DNA chips are
    developed that screen for hundreds of diseases,
    couples should know that the 2-3 risk for birth
    defects/genetic diseases in the average pregnancy
    remains even after specific DNA testing.

27
Rules from Chapter 1
  • RULE 7 Pregnancy planning and preconception
    counsel are important priorities because
    recognition of pregnancy by a missed period (3-4
    weeks embryonic age) may be too late for
    preventive measures
  • RULE 8 Pregnant couples should be advised of
    increasing options for gene/chromosome screening
    as well as the limitations (e.g., false
    positives/negatives) and consequences (e.g.,
    amniocentesis, elective abortion) that may ensue.

28
Chromosome disorders
  • Miscarriages (50-60), liveborn children (0.5),
    cancer tissue (many have diagnostic
    changes)--over 200 chromosomal diseases due to
    extra or missing chromosome or parts of
    chromosomes (p small or q long arms)
  • Hallmarks are multiple major or minor anomalies
    (unusual appearance) with mental disability
  • Most recognized by a routine karyotype, but FISH
    is required to detect submicroscopic deletions
    (e.g., DiGeorge) or the 3 of suspect children
    who have changes on subtelomere FISH after normal
    karyotypes
  • Individual submicroscopic deletions are found in
    Williams (7q), hereditary retinoblastoma (13q),
    Prader-Willi (15q), Shprintzen-DiGeorge spectrum
    (22q), and 15 others.
  • Consider chromosomes in any child with
    unexplained mental disability and/or multiple
    birth defects, couples with gt2 miscarriages,
    prenatal diagnosis for women over age 35
  • Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome disorders can be
    performed by preimplantation diagnosis (first
    week), chorionic villus sampling (10-12 weeks),
    or amniocentesis (15-18 weeks).
  • See Chapter 7 for more information

29
Case 4N Sudden deterioration and unusual odor in
a newborn after 24 hours of feeding.
  • Case 12P Pregnant couple with infertility and
    two miscarriages
  • A couple present to an obstetric nurse early in
    pregnancy. They are each 28 years old and have
    been trying for a successful pregnancy for 4
    years. They have had two early miscarriages at 7
    and 9 weeks, neither showing abnormalities by
    gross inspection. Both are in good health without
    chronic illnesses, and neither has any family
    history of birth defects or miscarriages. What
    concerns should the nurse address?

30
Inborn errors of metabolism
  • Case 12P Discussion
  • A history of recurrent abortion, particularly
    when coupled with infertility, should raise
    concern about chromosome aberrations. Couples
    with three or more miscarriages will have an
    approximate 3 chance to carry a chromosome
    aberration. Most likely are balanced
    translocations where two chromosomes have joined
    together and result in no extra or missing
    chromosome material. However, the joined or
    balanced chromosomes may not segregate
    appropriately during meiotic formation of
    gametes, producing a conceptus with unbalanced
    chromosomes. The chromosome imbalance may have
    severe consequences as a miscarriage or survive
    to be born as a child with mental disability and
    birth defects.

31
  • Case 12P Discussion
  • The nurse should offer chromosome testing to
    couples with two or more miscarriages, explaining
    the implications for explaining their
    infertility/pregnancy loss or for chromosome
    aberrations in their current pregnancy.
    Additional considerations would be maternal
    causes of pregnancy loss like chronic disease or
    clotting abnormalities that can lead to
    antiphospholipid syndrome and maternal illness.
    Couples with infertility and/or multiple
    miscarriages should also be referred to
    maternal-fetal medicine or reproductive
    endocrinologists for examination of hormone
    deficiencies (e.g., premature ovarian failure),
    clotting abnormalities (e.g., certain prothrombin
    mutations detectable by DNA analysis), or
    antiphospholipid antibodies (e.g., lupus
    anticoagulant) that can cause lethal HELLP
    syndrome (Hemolysis, Elevated Liver enzymes, Low
    Platelets-- OMIM 189800) in pregnant women.

32
Inborn errors of metabolism
  • Over 300 disorders with overall frequency 1 in
    600.
  • Nearly all are Mendelian autosomal or X-linked
    recessivethe abnormal alleles cause their
    encoded enzyme to be defective with build-up of
    chemicals before the block and deficiency of
    those after the block
  • Children with inborn errors usually have a normal
    appearance with abnormal blood chemistries (low
    glucose, anion gap, high ammonia, high lactic
    acid)
  • Early recognition is key before organ damage
    occurs from acidosis, seizures, or chemical
    build-up dietary treatment is often available

33
. Case 13P Couple with maternal history of
mental retardation Bob and June present to a
nurse practitioner for prenatal care at an
estimated 6 weeks of pregnancy. Bob is 26, June
24, and they had a normal daughter Karen two
years ago with no pregnancy or delivery problems.
Both are healthy and of Caucasian ancestry, and
Bobs family history is normal The nurse finds
that June is an only child, but that her mother
Gail has two brothers who have mental
retardation. In addition, Gail has a sister Joan
with with two boys and a girl, and one boy Eric
has mental retardation thought due to birth
injury. Gails other sister Jill has three boys
and two girls, and her eldest son Jim has mental
retardation of unknown cause. One of Jills
daughters has also had learning problems that
caused her to drop out of high school, and she
has a preschool son Bert with speech delay. What
concerns should the nurse address?
34
  • Case 13P Discussion
  • Besides the usual options for genetic and fetal
    screening (ultrasound, quad screen, cystic
    fibrosis screening), the nurse should recognize
    the positive family history and recommend genetic
    evaluation. The presence of several relatives
    with the same condition (mental disability)
    brings up the possibility of Mendelian disease,
    and sketching of the family pedigree (below)
    would suggest an X-linked disorder associated
    with mental retardation. Genetic evaluation would
    inform June that her mother Gail has a 50 chance
    and she a 25 chance to be a carrier for the
    X-linked disease.

35
  • Case 13P Discussion
  • The X-linked fragile X syndrome (OMIM 300624) is
    the most common genetic cause of mental
    disability with an estimated incidence of 1 in
    2000 males. Since June is early in her pregnancy,
    a fragile X DNA test could be performed on one of
    her male relatives to confirm or exclude this
    diagnosis. It would be ideal if one of her
    affected male relatives could be evaluated by a
    clinical geneticist so that the diagnosis of
    fragile X syndrome or another of the gt20
    syndromes associated with X-linked mental
    disability could be suspected.

36
  • If the diagnosis of fragile X were confirmed in a
    male relative, June could have fragile X DNA
    testing to determine if she was a carrier. If her
    relatives were not available, or if their
    evaluation could not be accomplished in a time
    frame to accomplish Junes testing and options
    for prenatal diagnosis, then June could have the
    fragile X DNA test but realize that a negative
    result would not exclude other X-linked mental
    retardation syndromes. Preconception knowledge of
    fragile X syndrome in her family with recognition
    of her carrier status would have allowed Jill and
    Bob to consider other options such as surrogate
    egg donor or in vitro fertilization with
    preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and
    implantation of an unaffected embryo. Their case
    emphasizes the value of recognizing suspect
    family histories as early as possible in order to
    provide genetic counseling and reproductive
    options.

37
Rules from Chapter 1
  • RULE Early screening of pregnant couples for
    positive family histories (miscarriages,
    infertility, multiple affected relatives) allows
    timely evaluation of family members and
    appropriate preconception/prenatal testing.
  • RULE Common conditions like mild mental
    disability often exhibit multifactorial
    determination with lower recurrence risks (2-3)
    than the more extreme and unusual Mendelian
    conditions.

38
Common disorders (like mild mental or learning
disabilities often exhibit multifactorial
determination
  • Case 13P Discussion
  • If Jill or Bob had only one relative with mental
    disability with no obvious pedigree pattern, then
    multifactorial determination of the mental
    disability would be most likely. The odds of
    multifactorial disability would be increased if
    the affected person was mild and did not have an
    unusual appearance or biochemical abnormalities.
    Multifactorial disorders confer a 2-3 risk for
    primary relativesi.e., siblings/parents/children.
    Since Jill and Bob had normal intellect, their
    risks from one relative with mental disability
    would be less than 2-3.

39
Multifactorial Disorders
Table 4.1. Multifactorial Disorders in the
United States
Ranks first for neonatal causes of death
approximate scale (100 of predisposition
due to genetic factors as for Mendelian
disorders) to (20 of predisposition due to
genetic factors)
40
Multifactorial Disorders
  • Most isolated birth defects like cleft palate,
    hypospadias, heart defects, spina bifida
  • Many common diseases like diabetes mellitus,
    hypertension, mental illness, mild
    mental/learning disabilities
  • Multiple genes involved, giving lower
    transmission risks (about 3 for offspring of
    affected parent, sibling to affected child)
  • Therapeutic goals are to manipulate environment
    (e.g., folic acid) either generally or for
    specific high-risk individuals identified by
    associated DNA markers (more diverse and
    sensitive than HLA haplotypes

41
Multifactorial disorders For some (e.g.,
coronary artery disease), single genes of major
effect (e.g., those regulating cholesterol) are
good risk markers)
Recognizing at-risk children or adolescent
females provides important opportunities for
nursing education and prevention (see chapter 4)
42
Review Questions
  • 1-2. A 21-year-old female was referred to
    obstetric clinic from the emergency room after a
    diagnosis of malnutrition and a positive
    pregnancy test. She had been brought in by the
    police for vagrancy and alcoholism, exhibiting
    poor hygiene and nutrition on examination. She
    also was affected with cystic fibrosis, having a
    milder disease course, and a sister had a child
    with spina bifida. Fetal ultrasound revealed a
    fetus of about 3 months gestation with very small
    head circumference, abnormal head shape, and
    intrauterine growth retardation.

43
  • 1. The poor malnutrition and unplanned pregnancy
    caused the young woman to miss the following
    standards of care
  • Amniocentesis because of higher risks for
    chromosome abnormalities and cystic fibrosis
  • Triple/Quad screening with ultrasound to screen
    for fetal chromosome abnormalities
  • Preconception counsel including provision of
    vitamins with folic acid
  • Prosecution because of suspected alcoholism
    causing damage to the fetus
  • Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of to avoid the
    high risk for fetal cystic fibrosis
  • 2. Which of the following birth defects would be
    most likely to occur in this situation?
  • Congenital heart defect
  • Omphalocele
  • Anencephaly
  • Tracheo-esophageal fistula
  • Anal atresia

44
  • Questions 3-4
  • 3. A Caucasian couple in the 20s comes in for
    preconception counseling regarding their first
    pregnancy. They have had no prior miscarriages or
    infertility and their family histories are
    normal. This lack of risk factors means that
    their risk for fetal abnormalities in this
    pregnancy is approximately
  • 50
  • 25
  • 10
  • 2-3
  • lt1
  • 4. Which of the following genetic screening tests
    should be considered for this couple?
  • Alpha-thalassemia
  • Beta-thalassemia
  • Tay-Sachs disease
  • Sickle cell anemia
  • Cystic fibrosis

45
  • Questions 5-6
  • 5. A couple present to an obstetric nurse for
    counseling because they have had three early
    miscarriages at 6-8 weeks gestation. Both are in
    good health without chronic illnesses, and
    neither has any family history of birth defects
    or miscarriages. Which of the following is an
    important contributor to miscarriages that can be
    tested in this couple?
  • Autosomal dominant disorders
  • Chromosomal disorders
  • Multifactorial disorders
  • Mitochondrial disorders
  • X-linked recessive disorders
  • 6. Which of the following results is most
    plausible for this couple, along with its
    likelihood given their history?
  • Trisomy, 1
  • Trisomy, 10
  • Translocation, 2-3
  • Translocation 20-30
  • Turner syndrome, 10

46
Answers 1-C 2-C
  • Questions 1-2.
  • The importance of preconception counsel is
    recognized by the American College of Obstetrics
    and Gynecology (ACOG). Provision of folic acid
    prior to conception (the embryo will be at least
    3 weeks along when mother misses her menstrual
    period) lowers the risk of neural tube defects
    (spina bifida, anencephaly) by 2/3. Neural tube
    defects exhibit multifactorial determination (see
    Chapter 4) with increased risk (0.5-1) to
    relatives. The woman is affected with cystic
    fibrosis (219700--autosomal recessive) and would
    be a homozygote (genotype ccsee Chapter 3) but
    the father would be unlikely to be a carrier (at
    least 19/20 chance) and thus there would be no
    indication for prenatal diagnosis. A planned
    pregnancy could have included carrier screening
    for cystic fibrosis in the father.

47
Answers 3D 4E
  • Questions 3-4
  • The risk for any type of congenital anomaly or
    genetic disease is 2-3 for the average
    pregnancy. This risk becomes 5-6 for disease
    when children are examined at age 2-3 years
    (e.g., developmental disabilities). Caucasians
    have an increased frequency of cystic fibrosis

48
Answers 5B 6C
  • Questions 5-6
  • Balanced translocations in a parent are a cause
    for recurrent miscarriages because unbalanced
    gametes can be produced during meiosis, causing
    extra or missing chromosomes and developmental
    abnormalities in the conceptus (see Chapter 7).
    Couples with three miscarriages have an
    approximate 2-3 chance that one of them will
    carry a balanced translocation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com