Title: International legal terminology, politics and human rights
1International legal terminology, politics and
human rights
- By Dr. Avi Bell, Faculty of Law,Bar Ilan
University - Presented at the NGO Monitor Conference, Begin
Centre, Jerusalem - June 14, 2006
2NGOs (like other actors) may use legal
terminology tendentiously and inaccurately to
- create misimpression of certainty where there is
factual uncertainty - create the misimpression that the law requires
supporting a particular political agenda - support political positions that may even
undermine human rights
3Three examples
- 1. Amnesty International public statement
Israel Must End Unlawful Killings of Palestinians
and Stop Reckless Shelling (AI Index MDE
5/049/2006, 12 June 2006) - 2. Amnesty International report Without
Distinction Attacks On Civilians by Palestinian
Armed Groups (AI Index MDE 02/003/2002, July
2002) - Amnesty International Calls for International
Action to Prevent Human Rights Deterioration in
the West Bank and Gaza Strip (AI Index MDE
15/035/2006, 25 April 2006)
4Example 1 Israel Must End Unlawful Killings of
Palestinians and Stop Reckless Shelling
- Amnesty International is calling on Israel to end
immediately its reckless shelling and air strikes
against the Gaza Strip, ... In the latest such
attack on the afternoon of 9 June 2006, seven
members of the same Palestinian family were
killed and ten of other civilians were injured
when Israeli forces fired several artillery
shells at a beach in the North of the Gaza Strip. - ... The seven members of the Ghalia family were
the most recent among a growing number of victims
of increasingly frequent and disproportionate
Israeli attacks against the Gaza Strip. - ... Israeli authorities have expressed regret for
some of the killings of Palestinian civilians -
usually in cases which attract international
media attention - claiming they occurred as a
result of mistakes. Yet the Israeli authorities,
who are responsible for the conduct of their
armed forces, are fully aware that the use of
certain weapons and munitions in such situations
invariably results in the killing or injuring of
bystanders, including children. - Many killings of Palestinians in reckless
shootings, tank shelling and air strikes by
Israeli forces have been unlawful. They have been
carried out by Israeli forces pursuant to
government policy, evidenced by the knowledge and
approval of government authorities who are fully
aware of the consequences of such practices. - Expressions of regret by the Israeli authorities
ring hollow in the face of their continued
failure to change their forces' practices and to
put in place the necessary safeguards to prevent
such killings.
5Rules of Distinction and Proportionality(First
Protocol Additional to Geneva Conventions of
1949) (1977)
- Distinction
- 51(2) - The civilian population as such, as well
as individual civilians, shall not be the object
of attack. - Proportionality
- 51(5) - an attack is disproportionate if it is
expected to cause incidental loss of civilian
life, injury to civilians, damage to civilian
objects, or a combination thereof, which would be
excessive in relation to the concrete and direct
military advantage anticipated
6Problems with Amnesty Statement
- 1. Assumes facts that are in controversy
- 2. Wrongly states that rule of proportionality
violated if bystanders killed by Israeli weaponry - Fails to note distinction is violated by targets
(here, the Palestinians) when they use civilians
to attempt to shield military objects from attack
(51(7)).
7Example 2 Without Distinction Attacks On
Civilians by Palestinian Armed Groups
- Problems with Amnesty Report
- Selective caution in use of difficult terms.
Very cautious about using the word terrorism
against Palestinians evince no caution in
applying legal term of occupied against Israel - Selective caution in establishing legal standard.
Amnesty not certain whether to apply standard of
laws of war to Palestinian targeting actions
however, it is very certain that Israel cannot
use laws of war in targeting.
8(a) Terminology
- Terrorism, generally
- Duties on states to
- prevent funding of terrorism and commission of
terrorist acts - deny safe haven to terrorists
- bring terrorists to justice
- not support terrorism by organizing, instigating,
assisting, participating or acquiescing in it - (in addition to other duties related to
terrorism, eg, duty not to target civilians in
military acts, not to attempt genocide, etc.)
9Definition in International Convention for the
Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism (1999)
(150 ratifications )
- Any person commits an offence within the meaning
of this Convention if that person ... funds ...
(a) An act which constitutes an offence within
the scope of and as defined in one of the
treaties listed in the annex e.g., Convention
for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of
Aircraft or (b) Any other act intended to cause
death or serious bodily injury to a civilian, or
to any other person not taking an active part in
the hostilities in a situation of armed conflict,
when the purpose of such act, by its nature or
context, is to intimidate a population, or to
compel a Government or an international
organization to do or to abstain from doing any
act
10Duty to Combat Terrorism
- UN Security Council Resolution 1373 (28 September
2001) - Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the
United Nations, - 1. Decides that all States shall (a) Prevent and
suppress the financing of terrorist acts ... - 2. Decides also that all States shall (a)
Refrain from providing any form of support,
active or passive, to entities or persons
involved in terrorist acts, including by ...
eliminating the supply of weapons to terrorists
... (c) Deny safe haven to those who finance,
plan, support, or commit terrorist acts, or
provide safe havens ... - 3. Calls upon all States to ... (d) Become
parties as soon as possible to the relevant
international conventions and protocols relating
to terrorism, including the International
Convention for the Suppression of the Financing
of Terrorism of 9 December 1999
11Amnesty International on Terrorism
- Page 7 of Without Distinction
- Terrorism - this term is commonly used to
describe violent acts by armed groups,
particularly those in which civilians are
targeted. Amnesty International does not use the
term because it does not have an internationally
agreed definition ...
12Occupation, generally
- Special duties apply to states occupying foreign
territory under Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949
and Regulations annexed to Fourth Hague
Convention of 1907, such as - maintaining public order and safety
- ensuring food and medical supplies of population
13Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949
- Article 2 ... the present Convention shall apply
to all cases of declared war or of any other
armed conflict which may arise between two or
more of the High Contracting Parties.... The
Convention shall also apply to all cases of
partial or total occupation of the territory of a
High Contracting Party ... - Article 6 The present Convention shall apply
from the outset of any conflict or occupation
mentioned in Article 2. In the territory of
Parties to the conflict, the application of the
present Convention shall cease on the general
close of military operations. In the case of
occupied territory, the application of the
present Convention shall cease one year after the
general close of military operations however,
the Occupying Power shall be bound, for the
duration of the occupation, to the extent that
such Power exercises the functions of government
in such territory, by specific provisions ... - Article 4 Persons protected by the Convention
are those who, at a given moment and in any
manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a
conflict or occupation, in the hands of a Party
to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they
are not nationals.
14Regulations annexed to Fourth Hague Convention of
1907
- Art. 42. Territory is considered occupied when it
is actually placed under the authority of the
hostile army. The occupation extends only to the
territory where such authority has been
established and can be exercised. - Art. 43. The authority of the legitimate power
having in fact passed into the hands of the
occupant, the latter shall take all the measures
in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as
possible, public order and safety, while
respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws
in force in the country.
15Amnesty International on Occupation
- Page 3 of Without Distinction
- The West Bank and the Gaza Strip are territories
subject to the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention
Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in
Time of War which applies to situations of
occupation. This position is supported by the
International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)
and by numerous resolutions of the United Nations
Security Council. The Israeli government
maintains that it does not regard the Fourth
Geneva Convention as legally applying to the West
Bank and Gaza Strip ...
16(b) Legal Standard
May Sides Invoke Law of War in Targeting? (part
I)
- Maybe Palestinians Can
- Pages 5, 21, 24 of Without Distinction
- The attacks against civilians by Palestinian
armed groups are widespread, systematic and in
pursuit of an explicit policy to attack
civilians.... They may constitute war crimes,
depending on the legal characterisation of the
hostilities and interpretation of the status of
Palestinian armed groups and fighters under
international humanitarian law.... Amnesty
International acknowledges that there is
considerable debate as to whether the violence in
Israel and the Occupied Territories has reached a
scale and intensity whereby the rules of
international humanitarian law on the conduct of
hostilities in international armed conflicts
apply, and if so to what extent... If the
current situation is characterized as one to
which the rules on the conduct of hostilities in
international armed conflict apply, attacks on
civilians would violate international
humanitarian law and would constitute war
crimes...
17May Sides Invoke Law of War in Targeting? (part
II)
- But Israel Can Definitely Not
- Page 19 of Without Distinction
- Israeli forces have assassinated Palestinians
alleged to be responsible for attacks on Israeli
civilians and soldiers, in non-combat situations
when the people could have been arrested such
killings constitute extra-judicial executions and
violate the right to life
18Example 3 Amnesty International Calls for
International Action to Prevent Human Rights
Deterioration in the West Bank and Gaza Strip
- Amnesty International is calling on the
governments of states who are High Contracting
Parties to the Fourth Geneva Convention ... to
prevent a further dramatic worsening of the human
rights situation of Palestinians in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip. The organization is concerned
that the recent decisions by the European Union
(EU) and the United States (US) to sever
financial support to the Palestinian Authority
(PA) could have very serious consequences
impacting on the health, education and other
economic and social rights of Palestinians living
under Israeli occupation. ... all High
Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conventions ...
have an obligation ... to ensure the protection
of the Palestinian population of the West Bank
and Gaza Strip, whose conditions are now expected
to deteriorate significantly because of the very
same governments decisions to cut funding to the
PA ... The EU and the USA must take measures to
ensure their decision to stop funding does not
adversely impact on human rights. They must
ensure that emergency assistance essential to
fulfilling fundamental human rights is never used
as a bargaining tool to further political goals. - ... Also, states parties to the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
and which are in a position to provide
resources to ensure minimum essential levels of
health care, clean water, education, food and
housing are obliged to do so. ...
19Summary of Amnesty International Legal Position
- Gaza is occupied territory under Fourth Geneva
Convention - All parties to Fourth Geneva Convention must
provide funding to self-governing authority in
occupied territory because otherwise economic
conditions might worsen, impacting health and
education - All parties to International Covenant on
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights must provide
international aid to any state or territory whose
economy doesnt ensure minimum levels of
health care, clean water, education, food and
housing. - Control of Palestinian Authority by Hamas does
not relieve states of these alleged duties.
20Problems with Amnesty position
- Security Council Resolution 1373 appears to bar
all state support for the Palestinian Authority - Requires all states to
- Freeze without delay funds and other financial
assets or economic resources of persons who
commit, or attempt to commit, terrorist acts or
participate in or facilitate the commission of
terrorist acts ... - Prohibit their nationals or any persons and
entities within their territories from making any
funds, financial assets or economic resources or
financial or other related services available,
directly or indirectly, for the benefit of
persons who commit or attempt to commit or
facilitate or participate in the commission of
terrorist acts, of entities owned or controlled,
directly or indirectly, by such persons and of
persons and entities acting on behalf of or at
the direction of such persons. ... - Refrain from providing any form of support,
active or passive, to entities or persons
involved in terrorist acts,
21- Doubtful that the Fourth Geneva Convention
applies to Gaza today - Israel does not exercise the functions of
government in such territory. - Additionally, Gaza may not be territory of High
Contracting Party
22- 3. There is no serious support for argument
that Fourth Geneva Convention or International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
require payment of international financial aid by
non-governing states.