Title: International Finance
1International Finance
Academy of Economic Studies Faculty of
International Business and Economics
- Lecture III
- The evolution of International Financial System
(2)
Lect. Cristian PAUN Email cpaun_at_ase.ro URL
http//www.finint.ase.ro
2Why did the BW System breakdown?
- The liquidity problem (the Triffin Dillema)
- Lack of Adjustment Mechanism
- The BW System permitted a realignment of FX rates
as a last resort in case of fundamental
disequilibrium of BoP for member states - The countries were to interested for a frequent
devaluation and revaluation of their currency - The fundamental disequilibrium was not defined
- The seigniorage problem
- The US was the major source of international
liquidity - To acquire reserves the rest of the world had to
run surpluses of BoP while US ran deficits - The rest of the world had to consume less it was
producing and US consumed more than it was
producing - Exporting inflation ? Seigniorage controversy
3Triffin Dilemma
- Belgian monetary economist Robert Triffen
described problem of expanding dollar reserves in
his 1960 book Gold and the Dollar Crisis - Problem became known as the Triffin dilemma
- Contradiction between requirements of
international liquidity and international
confidence - Liquidity refers to the ability to transform
assets into currencies - International liquidity required a continual
increase in holdings of dollars as reserve assets - As dollar holdings of central banks expanded
relative to US official holdings of gold,
however, international confidence would suffer - Triffin argued that US could not back up an
ever-expanding supply of dollars with a
relatively constant amount of gold holdings
4The Triffin Dilemma
5IFS after BW Breakdown
- The Jamaica Conference (1976)concerning the IFSs
reform to legitimize floating exchange regime - It was concluded between the European Countries
and the United States in the purpose of reforming
the IFS - Pure floating exchange rate was prohibited for
the member states of the Bretton Woods Agreement
with the derogation from 1973 - Pure/flexible/clean floating exchange rate has
been replaced with dirty/managed floating
exchange rate for two reasons - The growth and the development of international
trade without major fluctuations of the exchange
rate - The avoidance of crises in the world economy (
oil crises) - The modification of the fourth article of the
agreement (ratified in 1978 by two thirds of the
member states - Each country is free to choose its
monetary-foreign exchange rate (except for the
gold exchange standard) - The International Monetary Fund (IMF) will
supervise the monetary and exchange rate policy
of the member states of the system and will work
out / elaborate / draw out action principles - IMF, with a majority of 85, can decide to
reintroduce a system related to the US dollar
(USA have the power to veto the decision) - The diminution of the role played by the gold
exchange standard - The adoption of Special Drawing Rights as the
main reserve asset
6IFS after BW Breakdown
- The Principles adopted in 1977 on IFS
- Each member must avoid the interventions in the
foreign exchange market to prevent the
disequilibrium of Balance of Payments or to
obtain an unfair advantage in international
commercial exchanges - Each member can interfere in diminishing the
eventual crises in the Balance of Payments - In any intervention in the foreign exchange
market, it must be taken into account the member
states interests (including the issuing state) - Plazza Agreement (September 1985)
- Initiated by a group of 5 countries (USA, UK,
Japan, Germany and France) - G5 decided to intervene/interfere in decreasing
the value of the US dollar on the international
markets (considered until then as being
overestimated) - Louvre Agreement (February 1986)
- Initiated by a group of 7 countries (G5 Italy
and Canada) - The us dollar was considered to have reached a
value which reflected the economic realities and
the interventions in the foreign exchange market
were suspended - The countries will interfere without announcement
and only if necessary, in the favour of their
currencies
7IFS after BW Breakdown
- Oil price increases of 1973-1974 caused
substantial balance of payments difficulties for
many countries of the world - In June 1974, the IMF established an oil facility
to assist these countries - Acted as an intermediary, borrowing funds from
oil producing countries and lending them to oil
importing countries - A second oil facility was established in 1975
- Slightly more strict than the first
- In 1976, IMF began to sound warnings about
sustainability of developing-country borrowing
from commercial banking system - Banking system reacted with hostility to these
warnings - Argued Fund had no place interfering with private
transactions - The 1980s began with a significant increase in
real interest rates and a significant decline in
non-oil commodity prices - Increased cost of borrowing and reduced export
revenues
8IFS after BW Breakdown crises in Latin Am.
- In 1982, IMF calculated that US banking system
outstanding loans to Latin America represented
approximately 100 of total bank capital - In August 1982 Mexico announced it would stop
servicing its foreign currency debt - At the end of the month, Mexican government
nationalized its banking system - 1982 also found debt crises beginning in
Argentina and Brazil - Argentina Overvalued exchange rate, used as a
nominal anchor to curb inflationary
expenditures - Brazil Rates of devaluation did not keep up
with rates of inflation, causing an overvalued
real exchange rate
9IFS after BW Breakdown
- International commercial banks began to withdraw
credit from many of the developing countries of
the world - Debt crisis became global
- Involved capital account payments of debtor
countries exceeding capital account receipts - By second half of 1980s, some debt was trading at
discounts in secondary markets - In 1989, US Treasury Secretary Nicholas Brady
proposed a plan in which IMF and World Bank
lending could be used by developing countries to
buy back discounted debt - Amounted to partial and long-needed debt
forgiveness, were approved by the IMF and became
known as the Brady Plan - Also allowed for extending time periods of debt
and provided for new lending
10History of IMF Operations, 1990s
- Starting in the 1990s, private, non-bank capital
began to flow to developing countries in the form
of both direct and portfolio investment - Number of highly-indebted countries began to show
increasing unpaid IMF obligations - In November 1992, a Third Amendment to the
Articles of Agreement allowed for suspension of
voting rights in the face of large, unpaid
obligations - Mexico underwent a second crisis in late 1994 and
early 1995
11History of IMF Operations, 1990s
- In 1997-1998, crises struck a number of Asian
countriesmost notably Thailand, Indonesia, South
Korea, and Malaysia and also Russia - Resulted in sharp depreciations of the currencies
- In the cases of Thailand, Indonesia, and South
Korea, IMF played substantial and controversial
roles in addressing crises - Loan packages were designed with accompanying
conditionality agreements - Supplementary Reserve Facility was introduced to
provide large volumes of high-interest,
short-term loans to selected Asian countries - In October and November 1998, IMF put together a
package to support Brazilian currency, the real - Attempt to prevent Asian and Russian crises from
spreading to Latin America - Still, Brazil was forced to devalue the real in
January 1999
12History of IMF Operations, 1990s
- Recent years have witnessed important changes at
the IMF - In 1997 General Agreement to Borrow was
supplemented by the New Arrangement to Borrow - Involves 25 IMF members agreeing to lend up to
US46 billion to IMF in instances where quotas
prove to be insufficient - In 1999, a new lending facility was added
- Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility was created
to replace the 1987 Enhanced Structural
Adjustment Facility - Represents beginning of an attempt to integrate
poverty reduction consideration into
macroeconomic policy formation of IMF - In 1999, quotas were increased by 45 to a total
of US283 billion
13Reforming the IMF System
- The present system permits countries to adopt
whatever exchange-rate policy they wish providing
that they do not peg their currencies to the
value of gold. - In practice there exists a wide range of
exchange-rate polices from completely free
floating to various pegging arrangements (next
slides). - The present international monetary system has
been called a 'non-system' as there are no clear
sets of exchange-rate arrangements among the
major international currencies (the dollar, yen,
deutschmark and sterling) - The large and dramatic currency swings in the
1970s, 1980s and 1990s between the major
currencies, particularly between the dollar and
other currencies, have led to a variety of
proposals to reform the system. - All the proposals are based upon the view that
it is desirable to limit the exchange-rate swings
between the major currencies - Three of the best-known proposals to bring some
stability to the international monetary system
have been made by John Williamson, Ronald
McKinnon and James Tobin and are worthy of some
consideration.
14Reforming the IMF System
15(No Transcript)
16Reforming the IMF System
- IFS is at the moment a combination of foreign
exchange regimes - 12 countries have adopted EURO which floats
freely on the international markets in the same
way as the US dollar, Canadian dollar, sterling,
yen. - The currencies of the developing countries have
adopted the following kinds of foreign exchange
regimes - 27 countries pegged to the US dollar
- 12 countries pegged to EURO
- 5 countries pegged to other currencies
- 6 countries related to SDR
- 34 countries related to other currency
- 5 countries limited float
- 5 countries crawling peg
- 22 countries exchange rate bands
- 27 countries independent float
17The Williamson Target Zone Proposal
- In a number of papers John Williamson in
conjunction with other authors (1985, 1987, 1988)
has proposed that the exchange rate between the
major international currencies should be managed
within a target zone system. - For each of the major currencies Williamson has
suggested a method to calculate the currency's
'Fundamental Equilibrium Effective Exchange Rate'
(FEEER). - Broadly speaking, the FEEER is a real exchange
rate that is consistent with a sustainable
current account position. - The calculated FEEER would be periodically
adjusted as the economic fundamentals change, for
example relative inflation rates, and should not
therefore be confused with a fixed central rate. - A country's exchange rate would then be allowed
to fluctuate within a system of 'soft edged
bands' of 10 per cent either side of the FEEER. - The idea of soft bands is that the authorities
will not necessarily be committed to buy or sell
the currency if it reaches the upper or lower
limit of its band. - The band will prevent the speculative shocks.
18A. The Williamson Target Zone Proposal
- In a number of papers John Williamson in
conjunction with other authors (1985, 1987, 1988)
has proposed that the exchange rate between the
major international currencies should be managed
within a target zone system. - For each of the major currencies Williamson has
suggested a method to calculate the currency's
'Fundamental Equilibrium Effective Exchange Rate'
(FEEER). - Broadly speaking, the FEEER is a real exchange
rate that is consistent with a sustainable
current account position. - The calculated FEEER would be periodically
adjusted as the economic fundamentals change, for
example relative inflation rates, and should not
therefore be confused with a fixed central rate.
19B. The McKinnon Global Monetary Target Proposal
- Ronald McKinnon (1982, 1984 and 1988) has argued
that much exchange-rate volatility is due to the
process of currency substitution. - He argues that in a world in which there are few
capital controls, multinational corporations and
international investors like to hold a portfolio
of various national currencies. - He argues that demand to hold a portfolio of
national currencies is quite stable but the
composition of the total portfolio can be highly
volatile. - This means that rigid control of the supply of
the individual national currencies in the
portfolio is inappropriate. - He suggests that the Friedman rule for smooth
monetary growth should be shifted from a national
to a carefully defined international level - McKinnon argues that these disruptive real
exchange-rate changes can be avoided by adjusting
money supply in two different countries (ex US
and Germany).
20The McKinnon Global Monetary Target Proposal
- This policy, while leading to changes in national
money stocks, would leave the global money supply
and exchange rates unchanged and leave the two
economies unaffected by the process of currency
substitution - Another suggestion was to adjust the volume of
bonds at international level (the main cause of
currency substitution at the level of investors)
- Say there is a decrease in the demand for US
bonds and an increase in the demand for German
bonds. The appropriate response of the US
authorities to this would be to sell German bonds
and purchase the excess supply of US bonds, this
would leave interest rates and exchange rates
unchanged.
21The McKinnon Global Monetary Target Proposal
- There are numerous problems with the McKinnon
proposal. - Many economists disputed his suggestion that
currency substitution is a the major force in
exchange-rate movements. - Also by fixing the nominal exchange rate at some
PPP level the proposal does not allow for the
possibility of real exchange-rate changes which
some economists believe have been a major force
behind large exchange-rate swings - If Japanese tradeables productivity growth is
higher than US tradeables growth, then over time
there needs to be a real appreciation of the yen
against the dollar. If not, the yen will become
undervalued in relation to the dollar and this
could lead to serious trade frictions.
22C. The Tobin Foreign Exchange Tax Proposal
- James Tobin (1978) has argued that many of the
disruptive exchange-rate movements witnessed
under floating have been caused by destabilizing
short-term capital flows. - He argues that the highly integrated world
capital markets leave very little room for
national authorities to pursue independent
monetary polices. - National economies and national governments are
not capable of adjusting to massive movements of
funds across the foreign exchanges, without real
hardship and without significant sacrifice of the
objectives of national economic policy with
respect to employment, output, and inflation. - Specifically, the mobility of financial capital
limits viable differences among national interest
rates and this severely restricts the ability of
central banks and governments to pursue monetary
and fiscal policies appropriate to their national
economies, (Tobin p. 154) - To reduce these effects, Tobin has suggested that
a tax be imposed on all foreign exchange
transactions, 'to throw some sand in the wheels
of our excessively efficient international money
markets' (p. 154). - The tax would reduce the incentives for
speculators to suddenly flood money into and out
of a currency in response to small interest-rate
changes.
23C. The Tobin Foreign Exchange Tax Proposal
- He argues that a small tax of say 1 per cent
would especially hit short-term capital movements
but not greatly interfere with longer-term
movements. - This would restore some autonomy to domestic
monetary authorities. - Tobin's proposal differs significantly from those
of Williamson and McKinnon in that it is
motivated by the belief that the exchange-rate
regime is not the major problem of the IFS
crisis. - He displays considerable skepticism over the
rationality of foreign exchange market
speculation - Critics
- Clearly not all short-term capital movements are
undesirable and the tax would prevent some
stabilizing movements (ex short term financing
exports / imports activity) - The tax will influence the international trade
- that the tax would easily be circumvented as
financial innovation would lead to a replication
of speculative positions through synthetic
instruments that were unaffected by the tax - in a bid to avoid the tax there could a greater
use of barter trade which is notoriously
inefficient.
24Suggested readings
- McKinnon, R. I. (1981) 'The Exchange Rate and
Macroeconomic Policy Changing Postwar
Perceptions', Journal of Economic Literature,
vol. 19, pp. 531-57. - McKinnon, R. I. (1982) 'Currency Substitution and
Instability in the World Dollar - Standard', American Economic Review, vol. 72, pp.
320-33. - McKinnon, R.I. (1984) An International Standard
for Monetary Stabilization. Institute for
International Economics, Policy Analyses No. 8
(Cambridge, Mass. MIT Press). - McKinnon, R.I. (1988) 'Monetary and Exchange Rate
Policies for International Financial Stability a
Proposal', Journal of Economic Perspectives,
vol. 2, pp. 83-103. - Miller M. and Williamson, J. (1987) 'The
International Monetary System an Analysis of
Alternative Regimes', European Economic Review,
vol. 32, pp. 103148. - Tobin J, (1978), A proposal for International
Monetary Reform, Eastern Economic Journal, vol.
4, pp. 153-9, Reprinted in J. Tobin (1982)
Essays in Economics (Cambridge, Mass. MIT
Press).