Artificial Minds Ian Fairholm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Artificial Minds Ian Fairholm

Description:

In normal primate vision, signals travel from the retina to the thalamus and then to V1. ... hypothesize that the NCC in primates is in the ventral stream. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:154
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: peter953
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Artificial Minds Ian Fairholm


1
Artificial MindsIan Fairholm
  • Neural Correlates of Consciousness

2
Aims
  • To define what neural correlates of consciousness
    (NCCs) are and explain why we might expect to
    find them.
  • To identify the methods used in looking for NCCs.
  • To present Milner and Goodales Two Visual
    Brains Theory and the evidence for it.
  • To identify how close we are to finding the NCC
    for visual consciousness.

3
Objectives
  • To be able to define NCCS and explain why we
    might expect to find them.
  • To be able to describe the methods used in
    looking for NCCs.
  • To be able to describe Milner and Goodales Two
    Visual Brains Theory and the evidence for it.
  • To be able to come to a conclusion as to how
    close we are to finding the NCC for visual
    consciousness.

4
Why do we expect to find NCCs?
  • If consciousness is a product of the brain then
    we should expect to find that conscious
    experience, or particular elements of it,
    correlates with activity in the brain.
  • Hence, the definition a specific pattern of
    brain activity that correlates with particular
    conscious experiences (Rees et al., 2002)
  • Important to remember that a correlation isnt
    the same as a cause.

5
  • In attention research, the focus is on visual
    attention.
  • Perhaps we need top focus on visual consciousness.

6
  • Prosopagnosia
  • Implicit recognition

7
Conscious and Unconscious Vision
  • Because much of our conscious experience is of a
    visual nature, most of the work on NCCs has
    focused on visual consciousness.
  • Cases of blindsight suggest a kind of vision
    exists that is different from conscious vision.
  • Individuals like DB, with damage to the primary
    visual cortex (area V1) in one hemisphere, lack
    visual awareness in the contralateral part of the
    visual field (their blindfield).

8
Blindsight
  • But, these individuals have been shown to have
    residual, unconscious, visual function in their
    blindfield - blindsight.
  • When given certain visual forced choice tasks,
    involving a stimulus presented in their
    blindfield, these patients are unable to
    consciously see the stimulus at all.
  • But when forced to guess the right answer, they
    are correct far more often than would be expected
    by chance, sometimes as much as 90-95 of the
    time.

9
The Basis Of Blindsight
  • How is blindsight possible? In normal primate
    vision, signals travel from the retina to the
    thalamus and then to V1.
  • This is the main pathway from the eyes to the
    brain and provides the fine-grained information
    needed for the identification and analysis of
    visual images.
  • However, there are several other pathways.

10
The Basis Of Blindsight (2)
  • A particularly important one is the
    evolutionarily older subcortical pathway that
    carries information from the retina to the
    superior colliculus.
  • This visual pathway is fast and unconscious. It
    provides only rough information about the
    location identity of stimuli it cannot resolve
    fine detail.
  • Its also particularly sensitive to stimuli
    falling on the periphery of the retina (i.e. the
    corner of the eye).

11
The Basis Of Blindsight (3)
  • Movement or stimuli in the periphery can
    automatically capture attention, and the
    colliculus directs a quick reflex eye movement to
    the stimulus.
  • This rapid response is thought to have evolved to
    support predator avoidance or prey capture.
  • This collicular pathway may underlie blindsight.
  • Blindsight is paradoxical only if one regards
    vision as a unitary process (Milner and Goodale,
    1995, p. 86).

12
Milner and Goodales Two Visual Brains
  • Blindsight suggests a dissociation between fast
    motor reactions and conscious perception.
  • Milner and Goodale (1995) offer their explanation
    for this, that there are two vision systems
    visual perception and visuomotor control. Only
    the former is involved in conscious awareness.
  • They map onto the two neural streams in the
    primate visual system the ventral and dorsal
    streams.

13
The Dorsal Stream
  • Provides automatic, unconscious vision for
    action, e.g. returning a tennis ball
    instinctively that has been served to us.
  • Responsible for visually guiding online
    movements that are made in the here and now.
  • Ends in the posterior parietal cortex, and is the
    evolutionarily older of the two cortical
    pathways.

14
The Ventral Stream
  • Supports conscious visual experience, enabling
    recognition of visual objects and selection of
    appropriate behaviour towards them, e.g. knowing
    what a tennis ball is and what to do with it.
  • Linked with learning and memory, it underlies
    visual planning and decision making.
  • Ends in the inferotemporal cortex, and is the
    evolutionarily newer of the two cortical
    pathways.

15
Dorsal and Ventral Streams
  • The two visual brains arent totally independent
    but act together in everyday life.
  • Evidence for the two streams comes from patients
    with visual form agnosia (e.g. DF) and optic
    ataxia (Balints patient).
  • Milner and Goodale hypothesize that the NCC in
    primates is in the ventral stream.

16
Testing the Milner and Goodale hypothesis
  • To test their hypothesis more directly we need a
    method that allows us to differentiate conscious
    and unconscious brain activity for the same
    stimuli.
  • We need a visual stimulus that doesnt change
    physically but appears to change while we
    consciously perceive it.
  • Examples Ambiguous Figures and Binocular Rivalry.

17
Ambiguous Figures
  • There are many ambiguous figures. They all give
    rise to bistable percepts
  • A single pattern of retinal input gives rise to
    two alternating perceptual interpretations.
  • Because these changes occur in the absence of any
    change in the stimulus itself, they are related
    directly to subjective conscious awareness.

18
Binocular Rivalry
  • Found when different images are presented to the
    two eyes.
  • First reported by the inventor of the
    stereoscope, Sir Charles Wheatstone, in 1838.
  • He found that when two letters or patterns are
    presented in a stereoscope, so that only one can
    be seen by each eye, they do not fuse into one
    image but instead compete for visual awareness.
  • Sometimes the image from one eye is consciously
    seen, sometimes its the other image, and
    sometimes the two images overlap.

19
Binocular Rivalry (2)
  • Logothetis et al. have used binocular rivalry to
    look for the neural correlate of visual
    consciousness in monkeys.
  • Monkeys trained to squeeze different levers when
    confronted with two different images at once.
  • Electrodes inserted in various areas of their
    brains to record activity of single neurons.
  • The goal to find the areas where activity
    corresponded to the changing perceptions reported
    by the monkeys behaviour.

20
Findings of Logothetis et al.
  • Cells in early visual cortex, e.g. V1, responded
    to unchanging input, but their behaviour didnt
    change when the monkeys perception changed.
  • Further along the visual pathway, e.g. in MT and
    V4, some cells responded to what the monkey
    reported seeing.
  • In the inferotemporal cortex (IT), almost all of
    the cells responded to what the monkey reported
    seeing (percept-related neurons).

21
So does the NCC of visual consciousness lie in IT?
  • Activity in this area does appear to correspond
    to what the monkey was consciously seeing, rather
    than what was in front of its eyes.
  • IT is part of the ventral stream, providing
    support for Milner and Goodales hypothesis.
  • However, this assumes that monkey perceptions are
    conscious in the same way that human perceptions
    are.

22
Further Research
  • Lumer, Friston and Rees (1998) used fMRI to
    detect changes during binocular rivalry in human
    brains.
  • Findings indicated that activity in the parietal
    and prefrontal cortices might be associated with
    visual awareness, areas already implicated in
    selective attention.
  • Again, suggests that conscious visual experiences
    are correlated not with activity in V1 and other
    early parts of the sensory pathways but with more
    central areas.

23
However
  • It seems that several areas are necessary for
    normal visual consciousness (you cant have
    consciousness without them when you are
    conscious this area is activated)
  • But not sufficient for normal visual
    consciousness (in isolation it doesnt produce
    consciousness activation of this area isnt
    always accompanied by consciousness).
  • For example, we know that V1 is necessary for
    conscious vision (e.g. cases of blindsight), but
    other work suggests that it isnt sufficient.

24
Conclusions?
  • No single area, pathway or locality appears to be
    the NCC for visual consciousness.
  • However, its widely agreed that the ventral
    pathway, interacting with areas of prefrontal and
    parietal cortex, is an important part of it.
  • Unfortunately this fails to touch on the central
    mystery how is consciousness generated in the
    first place, whether by one brain area or many?
  • Maybe the whole enterprise is misconceived
    (Blackmore, 2002 2003).

25
Recommended Reading
  • Blackmore, S. (2003). Consciousness An
    Introduction. London Hodder and Stoughton.
    (Chapters 3 and 16)
  • Metzinger, T. (ed.) (2000). Neural Correlates of
    Consciousness empirical and conceptual
    questions. Cambridge, Mass. London MIT Press.
  • A précis of Milner, D. A. and Goodale, M. A.
    (1995). The Visual Brain In Action. Oxford
    Oxford University Press is available at
    http//psyche.cs.monash.edu.au/v4/psyche-4-12-miln
    er.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com