Review of whole course

1 / 30
About This Presentation
Title:

Review of whole course

Description:

A thumbnail outline of major elements Intended as a study guide Emphasis on key points to be mastered REFER TO LAST YEAR S EXAM POSTED – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: mitEdu69
Learn more at: http://ardent.mit.edu

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Review of whole course


1
Review of whole course
  • A thumbnail outline of major elements
  • Intended as a study guide
  • Emphasis on key points to be mastered
  • REFER TO LAST YEARS EXAM POSTED

2
Major Elements Covered (1st half)
  • Modeling of production possibilities
  • Valuation Issues
  • over time DR as opportunity cost, CAPM
  • evaluation criteria
  • Optimization of production and cost
  • marginal analysis
  • constrained optimization
  • Decision Analysis
  • Trees and Analysis
  • Value of Information

3
Modeling of Production Possibilities
  • Basic Concept Production Function
  • locus of technical efficiency
  • defined in terms of technology only
  • Characteristics
  • marginal products, marginal rates of substitution
  • isoquants -- loci of equal production
  • returns to scale ( ? economies of scale!)
  • convexity of feasible region? Know when!
  • Generally defined by systems models that
    calculate performance of possibilities

4
Trade Space
5
Valuation Issues -- over time
  • Resources have value over time
  • Discount rate (DR) , r /period
  • Formulas ert for continuous compounding
  • Choice of discount rate defined by best
    alternatives, at the margin
  • DR 10 or more ? long term benefits beyond 20
    years have little consequence
  • Money may change value via inflation
  • Make sure you compare like with like

6
Valuation Issues CAPM
  • Capital Asset Pricing Model Adjusts Discount Rate
    to reflect risk aversion
  • Accounts for Unavoidable (market) risks
  • Assumes Project risks can be avoided
  • for investors, not so simple for owners
  • Discount rate adjusted for relative volatility
    (by beta)
  • r r (risk free) (beta) risk (market)
    - risk (free)

7
Valuation Issues WACC
  • Weighted Average Cost of Capital reflects past
    experience based on historical data
  • It is an average for organization
  • as such, it may be appropriate for average
    projects
  • Only reflects future opportunity costs to the
    extent that past trends extrapolate to future
  • Is a reasonable first approximation

8
Valuation issues-- criteria
  • Many types -- none best for all cases
  • Net Present value -- no measure of scale
  • Benefit / Cost -- sensitive to recurring
    costs
  • Cost / Effectiveness -- no notion of value
  • Internal Rate of Return -- ambiguous, does not
    reflect actual time value of
    money
  • Pay-Back Period -- omits later returns
  • Choose according to situation (if allowed)
  • In practice, people may use several criteria
  • Including VARG, Capex, Robustness

9
Optimization -- Marginal Analysis
  • Economic efficiency merges technical
    opportunities (Prod. Fcn) and Values (Costs)
  • For continuous functions, convex feasible region
    in domain of isoquants
  • Optimization subject to Constraints
  • Optimum when MP/MC ratios all equal
  • Expansion path is locus of resources that define
    optimal designs
  • Cost function Cost f(Optimum Production)
  • Economies of Scale (? increasing returns to
    scale)
  • Good Concepts, often not applicable in detail

10
Recognition of Uncertainty
  • Psychology Resistance to this basic fact
  • Descriptively Forecast always wrong
  • Reasons surprises, trend-breakers
  • Examples technical, market, political
  • Theoretically Forecasts gt house of cards of
    difficult to defend assumptions about
  • Data range
  • Drivers of phenomenon (independent variables)
  • Form of these variables
  • Equation for model

11
Analysis under Uncertainty
  • Primitive Models
  • sensitivity to irrelevant alternatives, states
  • sensitivity to basis of normalization
  • Decision Analysis
  • Organization of Tree
  • Analysis
  • Results
  • ? those on Average forecasts (flaw of averages)
  • Middle road, that provides flexibility to respond
  • Second best choices, flexibility costs

12
Value of Information
  • Extra information has value
  • Value taken as improvement over base case
  • Is compared to cost of getting information
  • Value of Perfect Information
  • Purely hypothetical / Easy to calculate
  • Provides easy upper bound
  • Value of Sample information
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Repeated calculations
  • Worthwhile in important choices

13
Major Elements Covered (2nd half)
  • Concept Option right, but not obligation
  • Financial, on and in systems
  • Lattice for future evolution
  • Dynamic Programming for Optimization
  • Path independence
  • Cumulative return function
  • Arbitrage pricing of options
  • Concept, development of Black-Scholes Approach
  • Meaning of q risk-neutral probabilities
  • Issues in the choice of methods

14
Options
  • Concept
  • A right but not an obligation
  • to do something (buy, sell, change design)
  • Acquired with some effort (design change or cost)
  • Financial -- those referring to traded assets
  • Calls, Puts ( insurance) // American, European
  • Real -- Applied to physical projects
  • on and in projects
  • The Mantra of the 3 types of options above

15
Spreadsheet Analysis
  • Simplistic but transparent
  • The Case of the Parking Garage
  • Requires some decision rule for exercise
  • Appears to provide good motivation
  • Value at Risk and Gain (VARG) curves
  • Cumulative distribution functions
  • Show chance for any result or less or more
  • Illustrate how options -- Reduce Downside Risk
    Increase Upside Opportunity
  • Complement Expected NPV metric

16
Lattice Analysis
  • Like a Decision Tree
  • Binomial approach ? recombination cell merges
    ? analysis linear in N, stages
  • Easily reproduces Normal and LogNormal
    distributions assumed associated with random
    events
  • Formulas for u, d, and p depend on
  • Sigma, the standard deviation
  • nu, the average rate of growth
  • p 0.5 0.5 (?/s)v?T u esv?T 1/d

17
Expected Value with Lattice
  • Since Lattice provides easy way to represent
    distribution
  • Can be used to show effect of uncertainty on
    value of project
  • A (relatively) easy way to demonstrate
  • Importance of considering Uncertainty
  • Possibility of Major gains and losses
  • Motivates Analysis of Options

18
Dynamic Programming
  • Based on concept of independent stages that can
    assume variety of states
  • Easiest to visualize as time, space sequences
  • Can apply to separate projects
  • Implicitly enumerates all possibilities
  • Thus, works over non-convex feasible regions
  • Crucial for situations with exponential growth
  • Basic formula cumulative return function
  • fS (K) Max or Min of giXi , fS-1 (K)

19
DP Valuation of Option
  • DP is the way to value options in lattice
  • Proceeds from end states
  • Knowing these possibilities, can calculate best
    choice for previous stage
  • Repeats to beginning
  • Obtains best choice for each state in each stage
  • Calculation of best choice
  • do nothing versus exercise option values
  • value discounted expected value of outcomes

20
DP in practice
  • REFER TO BINOMIAL TREE MODEL.xls
  • Know how to do this manually!
  • (for sure!!!)

21
Arbitrage Valuation of Options
  • This is the theoretically correct view
  • Assumes
  • Market for asset
  • replicating portfolio (RP) can be constructed
  • RP defines a value for Option which is NOT
    expected value it is Arbitrage Enforced
  • Valuation
  • At Risk-free discount rate (because of Arbitrage)
  • Of properly weighted proportion of asset, loan
  • ? Black-Scholes formula

22
Black-Scholes
  • Black-Scholes formula
  • C S N(d1) - K e- rt N(d2)
  • Understand intuition behind it
  • Weighting of
  • owning Asset (S) and
  • having a loan (K) that you will have to repay

23
Arbitrage Enforced Valuation
  • In Lattice, same procedure as previously
    presented
  • However, special features
  • q risk-neutral probability (1 rf) d
    /(u d)
  • discount at each stage using risk-free rate rf
  • This approach is
  • Standard basis for all valuations of financial
    options
  • Limited application to options in systems, for
    which no markets may exist
  • Unclear when suitable for options on systems

24
Valuation of Options Practice
  • For Real options, finance theory may not work
  • No traded assets, so arbitrage-enforced not
    right
  • no statistical history, to determine sigma, nu
  • Understand range of Alternative approaches
  • Decision Tree (Kodak)
  • Simulation (Antamina)
  • Hybrid (Ford -- Neely)
  • Calculation issues
  • What design element should be flexible
    (Bartolomei)
  • Path Dependent Analysis (Wang)

25
Valuation of Real Options Issues
  • What is the asset involved modeling?
  • NPV of project?
  • What drives or affects that value?
  • What is variability of project?
  • Historical Data may not exist
  • Data may not be random
  • How do we develop results?
  • What can engineering team handle?
  • How to we explain results?
  • What can client or audience handle?

26
Research issues in Options
  • What method best in practice?
  • Formal real options analysis
  • decision analysis
  • net present value in some form?
  • How to apply in specific areas, depending on
  • Economies of Scale
  • Path dependency over time
  • Interactions between design features
  • How to present results to owners/managers of
    major projects?

27
Some Closing Thoughts
  • System designers need to
  • Think beyond technical mechanics to performance
    of system in context
  • Communications Satellites
  • technically brilliant but abysmal failure as
    system
  • Value Flexibility systematically
  • Monitor System, to know when to use option
  • Maintain flexibility to act dont let yourself
    get locked into a fixed plan

28
Take-Away 1Standard Design Practice Wrong
  • Standard Design Practice optimizes to fixed
    parameters (oil price, etc) on basis of
    deterministic criteria (e.g., NPV)
  • This is wrong for 2 reasons
  • We can do better because we live in uncertain
    world, we must deal with expectations, and
    recognize that deterministic optimum is usually
    not highest expected value (Jensens Law)
  • Deterministic optimization gives misleading idea
    that flexibility costs -- when flexibility can
    in fact reduce costs as examples have
    demonstrated

29
Take-Away 2New Paradigm Better
  • New design paradigm recognizes parameters are
    uncertain (oil price, etc) and need to focus on
    expectations (e.g., E NPV)
  • We can thus improve in several ways
  • Increase value (over optimized design)
  • Decrease cost, thus improving rate of return
  • Recognize and exploit ability to manage system
    evolution intelligently, avoiding downside and
    taking advantage of upside opportunities
  • Real Options in systems
  • enable win-win designs

30
Best Wishes on Examand for rest of your studies!
  • The teachers really hope you will do excellently!
  • (and make us look good!)
  • Weve enjoyed being with you and
  • hope our relationship
  • can grow over time
  • Richard
  • Mike, Richard-Duane, Reza
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)