Title: Cognitive Processes PSY 334
1Cognitive ProcessesPSY 334
- Chapter 11 Judgment and Decision-Making
2Inductive Reasoning
- Processes for coming to conclusions that are
probable rather than certain. - As with deductive reasoning, peoples judgments
do not agree with prescriptive norms. - Bayes theorem describes how people should
reason inductively. - Does not describe how they actually reason.
3Bayes Theorem
- Prior probability probability a hypothesis is
true before considering the evidence. - Conditional probability probability the
evidence is true if the hypothesis is true. - Posterior probability the probability a
hypothesis is true after considering the
evidence. - Bayes theorem calculates posterior probability.
4Burglar Example
- Numerator likelihood the evidence (door ajar)
indicates a robbery. - Denominator likelihood evidence indicates a
robbery plus likelihood it does not indicate a
robbery. - Result likelihood a robbery has occurred.
5Bayes Theorem
- H likelihood of being robbed
- H likelihood of no robbery
- EH likelihood of door being left ajar during a
robbery - EH likelihood of door ajar without robbery
6Bayes Theorem
- P(H) .001 from police statistics
- P(H) .999 this is 1.0 - .001
- P(EH) .8
- P(EH) .01
Base rate
7Base Rate Neglect
- People tend to ignore prior probabilities.
- Kahneman Tversky
- 70 engineers, 30 lawyers vs 30 engineers, 70
lawyers - No change in .90 estimate for Jack.
- Effect occurs regardless of the content of the
evidence - Estimate of .5 regardless of mix for Dick
8Cancer Test Example
- A particular cancer will produce a positive test
result 95 of time. - If a person does not have cancer this gives a 5
false positive rate. - Is the chance of having cancer 95?
- People fail to consider the base rate for having
that cancer 1 in 10,000.
9Cancer Example
Base rate
- P(H) .0001 likelihood of having cancer
- P(H) .9999 likelihood of not having it
- P(EH) .95 testing positive with cancer
- P(EH) .05 testing positive without cancer
10Conservatism
- People also underestimate probabilities when
there is accumulating evidence. - Two bags of chips
- 70 blue, 30 red
- 30 blue, 70 red
- Subject must identify the bag based on the chips
drawn. - People underestimate likelihood of it being bag 2
with each red chip drawn.
11Probability Matching
- People show implicit understanding of Bayes
theorem in their behavior, if not in their
conscious estimates. - Gluck Bower disease diagnoses
- Actual assignment matched underlying
probabilities. - People overestimated frequency of the rare
disease when making conscious estimates.
12Frequencies vs Probabilities
- People reason better if events are described in
terms of frequencies instead of probabilities. - Gigerenzer Hoffrage breast cancer
description - 50 gave correct answer when stated as
frequencies, lt20 when stated as probabilities. - People improve with experience.
13Judgments of Probability
- People can be biased in their estimates when they
depend upon memory. - Tversky Kahneman differential availability of
examples. - Proportion of words beginning with k vs words
with k in 3rd position (3 x as many). - Sequences of coin tosses HTHTTH just as likely
as HHHHHH.
14Gamblers Fallacy
- The idea that over a period of time things will
even out. - Fallacy -- If something has not occurred in a
while, then it is more likely due to the law of
averages. - People lose more because they expect their luck
to turn after a string of losses. - Dice do not know or care what happened before.
15Chance, Luck Superstition
- We tend to see more structure than may exist
- Avoidance of chance as an explanation
- Conspiracy theories
- Illusory correlation distinctive pairings are
more accessible to memory. - Results of studies are expressed as
probabilities. - The person who is frequently more convincing
than a statistical result.
16Decision Making
- Choices made based on estimates of probability.
- Described as gambles.
- Which would you choose?
- 400 with a 100 certainty
- 1000 with a 50 certainty
17Utility Theory
- Prescriptive norm people should choose the
gamble with the highest expected value. - Expected value value x probability.
- Which would you choose?
- A -- 8 with a 1/3 probability
- B -- 3 with a 5/6 probability
- Most subjects choose B
18Subjective Utility
- The utility function is not linear but curved.
- It takes more than a doubling of a bet to double
its utility (8 not 6 is double 3). - The function is steeper in the loss region than
in gains - A Gain or lose 10 with .5 probability
- B -- Lose nothing with certainty
- People pick B
19Framing Effects
- Behavior depends on where you are on the
subjective utility curve. - A 5 discount means more when it is a higher
percentage of the price. - 15 vs 10 is worth more than 125 vs 120.
- People prefer bets that describe saving vs
losing, even when the probabilities are the same.