Title: Giving Feedback on Student Writing
1Giving Feedback on Student Writing
- Lecture 4
- Teaching Writing in EFL/ESL
- Joy Robbins
2Todays Session
- Looks in detail at Hyland Hylands (2001)
investigation into how 2 teachers gave feedback
to their students on their writing, and how the
students responded
3The Role of Feedback
- Teachers may be fulfilling several different and
possibly conflicting roles as they give feedback
sometimes acting as teacher, proofreader,
facilitator, gatekeeper, evaluator, and reader at
the same time. (Hyland Hyland 2001 187) - What do Hyland Hyland mean by this? How can a
teacher act as teacher, proofreader, facilitator,
gatekeeper, evaluator, and reader when giving
feedback? - Are there any other roles which you think
feedback fulfils?
4Feedback the Student Teacher Relationship
- In addition, the teachers personal knowledge
of the writer is usually greater than it would be
between for example a book reviewer and an
author, and they probably have more interest in
creating and maintaining a good face-to-face
relationship with the student. (Hyland Hyland
2001 187)
5Hylands Informants Data
- 6 international students (3 undergrad, 3
postgrad) on pre-sessional courses at a New
Zealand university - Students from China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan,
Thailand - 2 teachers (1 for undergrad class, 1 for postgrad
class), both experienced writing instructors - Hyland analyzed teachers comments written at the
end of each piece of writing for (1) praise (2)
criticism and (3) suggestion
6Praise
- Praise is defined as an act which attributes
credit to another for some characteristic,
attribute, skill, etc., which is positively
valued by the person giving feedback. (Hyland
Hyland 2001 186) - Example of teacher comment offering praise
- Vocabulary is good
7Criticism
- Criticism is defined as an expression of
dissatisfaction or negative comment on a text.
(Hyland Hyland 2001 186) - Example of teacher comment offering criticism
- Poor spelling
8Suggestion
- Suggestion is defined as coming from the more
positive end of a continuum. Suggestions differ
from criticisms in containing an explicit
recommendation for remediation, a relatively
clear and accomplishable action for improvement,
which is sometimes referred to as constructive
criticism. (Hyland Hyland 2001 186) - Example of teacher comment offering suggestion
- You need a more general statement to introduce
the topic
9Drafts vs. Final Essays (1)
- Do you/Should you give students different kinds
of feedback on their writing, depending on
whether theyre writing a first draft or the
final version of their essay? Why (not)?
10Drafts vs. Final Essays (2)
- Feedback offered at a draft stage will often be
different from feedback on a final product,
intended to perform a different function. Many
teachers view feedback on drafts as more
developmental and so offer more critical comments
on specific aspects of the text, while feedback
on a final product is likely to give a holistic
assessment of the writing, praising and
criticising more general features. (Hyland
Hyland 2001 188)
11Types of Comments on Drafts vs. Final Essays ()
Draft Final Total
Praise 26.2 73.8 100
Criticism 54 46 100
Suggestion 46.6 53.4 100
Totals 39.2 60.1 100
12Drafts vs. Final Essays (3)
- nearly three quarters of all praise was
reserved for final drafts. Interviews with the
two teachers revealed that Nadia felt happier
offering critical comments on drafts where there
was potential to improve them, and Joan was
uncomfortable making critical comments on drafts
without appending a positive comment. In final
versions, it seems that praise was extensively
used to motivate the students in their next
writing. Although the type of feedback the
students received most often overall was praise,
the feedback they received most on first drafts
was criticism. (Hyland Hyland 2001 194) - Do you agree with Nadia and Joans comments?
13Sugaring the Pill Mitigation in Feedback
- baldly negative comments such as Poor
spelling or Referencing is inadequate were
rare. In fact, 76 of all criticism and 64 of
suggestions were mitigated in some way. Praise
was presented baldly 75 of the time but was
itself widely used to tone down the negative
effect of comments. (Hyland Hyland 2001 194)
14Sugaring the Pill Strategies
- What different ways can you think of to sugar the
pill when giving (negative) feedback? In other
words, how can you make students feel a little
better about themselves?
154 Ways Hylands Informants Sugared the Pill
- Hyland identifies 4 ways the 2 teachers in her
study sugared the pill - (1) Paired act patterns
- (2) Hedges
- (3) Personal attribution
- (4) Interrogative syntax
- Lets look at them in turn
16(1) Paired Act Patterns
- This is when critical feedback is combined with
praise, suggestion, or both praise and
suggestion. - Criticism was combined with praise in 20 of the
teachers remarks, with suggestion in 15 of
remarks, and with a combination of praise and
suggestion in 9 of remarks.
17Criticism Praise Example Comments
- Vocabulary is good but grammar is not accurate
and often makes your ideas difficult to
understand. - The idea is OK, but the problem with this essay
is the difficulty of finding the main idea.
(Hyland Hyland 2001 195)
18Criticism Suggestion Example Comments
- This conclusion is all a bit vague. I think it
would be better to clearly state your conclusions
with the brief reasons for them. - This is a very sudden start. You need a more
general statement to introduce the topic. (Hyland
Hyland 2001 195)
What do you think of using paired act patterns
when you give feedback?
19(2) Hedges
- Examples of hedges include perhaps, slightly, and
a little, and are used to tone down criticisms
and reflect a positive, sympathetic relationship
with student-writers. - Theyre NOT used here to lessen possibility, but
to mitigate the interpersonal damage of critical
comments. (Hyland Hyland 2001 196-7)
20Hedges Examples
- Where are the hedges in the comments below?
- Some of the material seemed a little long-winded
and I wonder if it could have been compressed a
little. - Tomoko wrote well on this, you might ask to read
hers. - It might also be good to change the order of your
paragraphs/ideas. (Hyland Hyland 2001 197)
21(3) Personal Attribution
- judging anothers work is always an inherently
unequal interaction because the power to evaluate
is nonreciprocal and lies exclusively with the
teacher. By expressing their commentary as a
personal response, however, teachers can make a
subtle adjustment to the interactional context
and perhaps foreground a different persona. It
allows them to relinquish some of their authority
and adopt a less threatening voice. In other
words, personal attribution allows teachers to
react as ordinary readers, rather than as
experts, and to slightly reposition themselves
and their relationship to the student-writer.
The personal expression of criticism, then,
reminds the reader that the comment carries only
the view of one individual, thereby conveying the
limitation of the criticism. (Hyland Hyland
2001 198)
22Personal Attribution Examples
- Im sorry, but when reading the essay, I couldnt
see any evidence of this really. Perhaps you
should have given me your outline to look at with
the essay. - (Contrast the impersonal construction it was
hard to see any evidence of this) - I find it hard to know what the main point of
each paragraph is. - (Contrast the impersonal construction it is
hard to know what the main point is)
23(4) Interrogative Syntax
- Questions are a means of highlighting knowledge
limitations and can be used to weaken the force
of a statement by making it relative to a
writers state of knowledge. While they generally
seek to engage and elicit a response from the
reader, questions also express the writers
ignorance or doubt and, therefore, can mitigate
the imposition of a suggestion or a criticism.
(Hyland Hyland 2001 198-9)
24Interrogative Syntax Examples
- The first two paragraphsdo they need joining?
-
- In addition, questions are also useful when one
wishes to protect oneself or ones reader from
the full effects of what might be considered
serious allegations. - You only mention Ward once in the essay. Are all
the other ideas your own? You need to make it
clear which are yours and which are hers. - Did you get some help with the editing? (Hyland
Hyland 2001 198-9) - What serious allegation do Hyland Hyland have
in mind here?
25Sugaring the Pill Your Views
- Do you use mitigating strategies when you correct
students work? - If so, do you use the same strategies as the
teachers in Hyland Hylands study? If you use
alternative strategies, what are they? Why do you
use them? - Do mitigating strategies work? (In other words,
do they make students feel a little better?) How
do you know whether they work or not? How could
you find out? - What would make you change the way you give
feedback to students on their writing?
26Teachers Reasons for Sugaring the Pill (1)
- Hyland Hyland show how interviews with the
teachers revealed the reasons for mitigating
criticism - Joan mentioned an experience on a previous
course which had affected the way she gave
feedback, making her less willing to be directly
critical - I had a Korean student who was kind of a
fossilisation problem, I guess. And her writing
was just full of errors and like you didnt even
have paragraphs and it was very short. On the
very first test, I think I made some
criticismand she wrote in her journal that she
found this very devastating and please try and
encourage me and so after that I modified my
feedback to try and be more positive. . (Hyland
Hyland 2001 199-200)
27Teachers Reasons for Sugaring the Pill (2)
Plagiarism
- Another possible reason for mitigating the force
of comments was to minimise the possible threat
which criticism carries for the face or public
self-image of students. This was particularly
evident in cases where teachers dealt with
plagiarism, a very sensitive issue for feedback
and something teachers are often unwilling to
address directly. (Hyland Hyland 2001 200-1)
28Plagiarism (contd.)
- The teachers sensitivity towards this issue is
revealed by think-aloud data. The teachers speak
into a tape recorder while writing their
feedback - It doesnt sound like her wordsI hate accusing
people of plagiarism, but when you think it is,
what do you do? -
- Joan wrote as her feedbackWhere did you get
this information? Have you used quotations?and
considered the interrogative form a subtle way
of doing it. Unfortunately, the students
retrospective interview revealed that she failed
to identify these as rhetorical questions and to
detect the underlying criticism and the implicit
suggestion. The offending text remained in her
final draft. (Hyland Hyland 2001 201)
29Students Reactions to Praise
- How do students react to praise/positive
feedback? - Does this vary from culture to culture? What
other factors might affect how students respond
(e.g. age, gender, etc.)? - As a language learner, were you ever asked what
kind of feedback you wanted on your writing? If
so, what happened? - If youre a teacher, have you ever asked your
students what kind of feedback they wanted? If
so, what did they say?
30Student Reactions to Praise Hyland Hyland
- Students reactions varied
- Some thought such feedback served no useful
function. A student in Nadias class, Zhang, for
example, believed positive remarks were useless
unless they were backed up by serious comments
that he could act on. - This view of positive comments was reinforced by
another student in Nadias class, Mei Ling, who
said she discounted positive comments because I
want to know my weaknesses most. (Hyland
Hyland 2001 201-2)
31Students Reactions (2)
- Mei Ling explained what she meant in her
interview -
- She spoke against positive feedback as a waste
of time what she wanted was what she termed
negative feedback highlighting her problems.
For her, positive comments were insincere and,
therefore, worthless - Sometimes maybe the teacher doesnt mean it,
but they just try to encourage you. Because
there is always but after the positive.
Sometimes the teacher just tries to find
something good in my essay and then may be that
strength is not the main point. (Hyland Hyland
2001 202)
32Students Reactions (3)
- However, other students enjoyed receiving praise.
Another student said - If teacher give me positive comments it means I
succeed. (Hyland Hyland 2001 202)
33Responding to Student Reactions
- Heres one reaction by a teacher to Hyland
Hylands student informants comments - Its clear they dont know what kind of
feedback they want and what kind of feedback they
need. I wouldnt change a thing. The students
cant make up their minds. - Whats your response to these comments?
- What light do these students comments throw on
the best way of giving feedback? - If the students in your class had said the things
Hyland Hylands student informants did about
feedback, how would you conduct feedback in
future? What changes would you make from what you
do now (if any)?
34Lesson different students like different types
of feedback
- Hyland Hylands (2001) study demonstrates that
different students want different types of
feedback, confirming earlier studies by
Enginarlar (1993) and Radecki Swales (1988) - Hence Goldstein (2005) argues persuasively that
its important for us as teachers to find out
exactly what type of feedback different students
in our classes want, otherwise dissatisfaction
can be the result
35Finding out what feedback students want
- Here are some of Goldsteins (2005) ideas for
finding out what students feedback preferences
are - First, we can ask students to write
autobiographies, detailing their past experiences
as writers, including as complete a description
as possible of the types of feedback they have
received from previous teachers, what they did
and did not like about this feedback, and what
they did after they received this feedback. If
they have saved any of their work that has
teacher commentary on it, students can be
encouraged to attach this work. We can also
devise questionnaires in which we ask students
about their preferences. (pp.50-1) - Goldstein (2005) recommends that teachers also
discuss with students all the different ways
feedback can be done, so they realize they dont
necessarily have to like the way theyve been
given feedback in the past
36Mitigated Feedback Miscommunication
- it soon became clear during the student
interviews that they were often unable to
understand the teachers mitigated comments. - Each case study provided several examples
where students failed to understand, or only
partly understood, such mitigated comments.
(Hyland Hyland 2001 202-3)
37Miscommunication Example 1
- Our first example comes from Nadias response to
Zhangs assignment where she wanted him to define
a term which he used throughout the essay. She
drew his attention to this with a bald criticism
followed by an interrogative suggestion -
- My concern in this essay is that you introduce
several terms in the introduction but do not
provide a definition for any. I should like to
know more about macroscopicis this what you
are talking about in your conclusion? -
- However, in his final draft of the essay, the
term was still being used without a definition,
and Nadia commented that this aspect still
hasnt changed in this version. Zhang was
surprised and somewhat put out to read this
comment and said that he didnt understand what
she wanted. (Hyland Hyland 2001 202-3)
38Miscommunication Example 2
- Joan felt that Keith was repeating himself and
tried indirectly to alert him to the fact that
certain information was superfluous with a hedged
criticism -
- Joans tape-recorded comments when writing her
feedback show how she tries to mitigate her
criticism - It seems funny to have this repeatedoh so this
second part is like a summarythis just seems
like a summaryits not necessary. I might just
writeThe second section seemed like a summary of
the previous information. (Hyland Hyland 2001
204)
39Miscommunication Example 2 (contd.)
- But when the student was interviewed about Joans
comments, it was clear he had misunderstood what
she wanted - R Why did you change this part?
- K Because hereYour second section seemed like
a summary. Because in my proposal, this includes
two parts, so I think this is very necessary. At
the end of part one I make, like Joan says, a
summary. So also I have put in another summary
in here. - R Right so now you have two summaries at the
end of each part? - K Yes. (Hyland Hyland 2001 204)
40Miscommunication Conclusions
- while teachers often have laudable
interpersonal and pedagogic reasons for
mitigating their feedback, tentative comments
have the very real potential to cloud issues and
create confusion. it seems that mitigated
criticism was most opaque to students and a
source of particular confusion, especially when
it was phrased interrogatively and not coupled
with an explicit suggestion for revision.
Indirectness frequently seems to be
counter-productive to the aim of clearly
conveying the point the teacher wishes to make
and is often reinterpreted by students according
to their own writing concerns and agendas. In
other cases, failure to understand implied
criticisms or toned down praise leads the student
to revise aspects of the text which are not
problematic. (Hyland Hyland 2001 206)
41Miscommunication Solutions
- In the light of Hyland Hylands finding that
sugaring the pill often leaves students confused
or uncertain what they need to do to improve
their writing, is it best not to mitigate
criticism at all? - Has Hyland Hylands study changed your attitude
to feedback? Why (not)? - Should you sugar the pill less or more when
dealing with lower level learners? Why? - How should you deal with plagiarism? Is it
necessary to be more direct? (This is not your
own work. This is cheating.)
42Helpful examples of feedback
- The following chapter by Ferris features several
helpful examples of comments on student texts,
and models and suggestions you could use - Ferris, D.R. (2008) Feedback issues and options.
In P. Friedrich (ed.), Teaching Academic Writing.
London Continuum, pp.93-124.
43Task
- One thing we havent done yet on this course is
look at a range of ELT textbooks, to determine
the approach they use to teach writing - Id like you to begin looking at a selection of
ELT textbook writing activities, speculating
whether the materials writer favours product,
process, post-processor a combination, or even
none of these approaches! Finish looking at the
material before next week. - Next time well discuss the materials together
44References
- Enginarlar H (1993) Student response to teacher
feedback in EFL writing. System 21 193-204. - Goldstein LM (2005) Teacher Written Commentary in
Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor
University of Michigan Press. - Hyland F Hyland K (2001) Sugaring the pill
praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal
of Second Language Writing 10 185-202. - Radecki P Swales J (1988) ESL student reaction
to written comments on their written work. System
16 355-365. - This weeks reading
- Casanave CP (2003) Looking ahead to more
sociopolitically-oriented case study research in
L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called
post-process?) Journal of Second Language
Writing 12 85-102. - Ferris, D.R. (2008) Feedback issues and options.
In P. Friedrich (ed.), Teaching Academic Writing.
London Continuum, pp.93-124.