Giving Feedback on Student Writing

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Giving Feedback on Student Writing

Description:

GIVING FEEDBACK ON STUDENT WRITING Lecture 4 Teaching Writing in EFL/ESL Joy Robbins – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:11
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: S3465

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Giving Feedback on Student Writing


1
Giving Feedback on Student Writing
  • Lecture 4
  • Teaching Writing in EFL/ESL
  • Joy Robbins

2
Todays Session
  • Looks in detail at Hyland Hylands (2001)
    investigation into how 2 teachers gave feedback
    to their students on their writing, and how the
    students responded

3
The Role of Feedback
  • Teachers may be fulfilling several different and
    possibly conflicting roles as they give feedback
    sometimes acting as teacher, proofreader,
    facilitator, gatekeeper, evaluator, and reader at
    the same time. (Hyland Hyland 2001 187)
  • What do Hyland Hyland mean by this? How can a
    teacher act as teacher, proofreader, facilitator,
    gatekeeper, evaluator, and reader when giving
    feedback?
  • Are there any other roles which you think
    feedback fulfils?

4
Feedback the Student Teacher Relationship
  • In addition, the teachers personal knowledge
    of the writer is usually greater than it would be
    between for example a book reviewer and an
    author, and they probably have more interest in
    creating and maintaining a good face-to-face
    relationship with the student. (Hyland Hyland
    2001 187)

5
Hylands Informants Data
  • 6 international students (3 undergrad, 3
    postgrad) on pre-sessional courses at a New
    Zealand university
  • Students from China, Japan, Korea, Taiwan,
    Thailand
  • 2 teachers (1 for undergrad class, 1 for postgrad
    class), both experienced writing instructors
  • Hyland analyzed teachers comments written at the
    end of each piece of writing for (1) praise (2)
    criticism and (3) suggestion

6
Praise
  • Praise is defined as an act which attributes
    credit to another for some characteristic,
    attribute, skill, etc., which is positively
    valued by the person giving feedback. (Hyland
    Hyland 2001 186)
  • Example of teacher comment offering praise
  • Vocabulary is good

7
Criticism
  • Criticism is defined as an expression of
    dissatisfaction or negative comment on a text.
    (Hyland Hyland 2001 186)
  • Example of teacher comment offering criticism
  • Poor spelling

8
Suggestion
  • Suggestion is defined as coming from the more
    positive end of a continuum. Suggestions differ
    from criticisms in containing an explicit
    recommendation for remediation, a relatively
    clear and accomplishable action for improvement,
    which is sometimes referred to as constructive
    criticism. (Hyland Hyland 2001 186)
  • Example of teacher comment offering suggestion
  • You need a more general statement to introduce
    the topic

9
Drafts vs. Final Essays (1)
  • Do you/Should you give students different kinds
    of feedback on their writing, depending on
    whether theyre writing a first draft or the
    final version of their essay? Why (not)?

10
Drafts vs. Final Essays (2)
  • Feedback offered at a draft stage will often be
    different from feedback on a final product,
    intended to perform a different function. Many
    teachers view feedback on drafts as more
    developmental and so offer more critical comments
    on specific aspects of the text, while feedback
    on a final product is likely to give a holistic
    assessment of the writing, praising and
    criticising more general features. (Hyland
    Hyland 2001 188)

11
Types of Comments on Drafts vs. Final Essays ()
Draft Final Total
Praise 26.2 73.8 100
Criticism 54 46 100
Suggestion 46.6 53.4 100
Totals 39.2 60.1 100
12
Drafts vs. Final Essays (3)
  • nearly three quarters of all praise was
    reserved for final drafts. Interviews with the
    two teachers revealed that Nadia felt happier
    offering critical comments on drafts where there
    was potential to improve them, and Joan was
    uncomfortable making critical comments on drafts
    without appending a positive comment. In final
    versions, it seems that praise was extensively
    used to motivate the students in their next
    writing. Although the type of feedback the
    students received most often overall was praise,
    the feedback they received most on first drafts
    was criticism. (Hyland Hyland 2001 194)
  • Do you agree with Nadia and Joans comments?

13
Sugaring the Pill Mitigation in Feedback
  • baldly negative comments such as Poor
    spelling or Referencing is inadequate were
    rare. In fact, 76 of all criticism and 64 of
    suggestions were mitigated in some way. Praise
    was presented baldly 75 of the time but was
    itself widely used to tone down the negative
    effect of comments. (Hyland Hyland 2001 194)

14
Sugaring the Pill Strategies
  • What different ways can you think of to sugar the
    pill when giving (negative) feedback? In other
    words, how can you make students feel a little
    better about themselves?

15
4 Ways Hylands Informants Sugared the Pill
  • Hyland identifies 4 ways the 2 teachers in her
    study sugared the pill
  • (1) Paired act patterns
  • (2) Hedges
  • (3) Personal attribution
  • (4) Interrogative syntax
  • Lets look at them in turn

16
(1) Paired Act Patterns
  • This is when critical feedback is combined with
    praise, suggestion, or both praise and
    suggestion.
  • Criticism was combined with praise in 20 of the
    teachers remarks, with suggestion in 15 of
    remarks, and with a combination of praise and
    suggestion in 9 of remarks.

17
Criticism Praise Example Comments
  • Vocabulary is good but grammar is not accurate
    and often makes your ideas difficult to
    understand.
  • The idea is OK, but the problem with this essay
    is the difficulty of finding the main idea.
    (Hyland Hyland 2001 195)

18
Criticism Suggestion Example Comments
  • This conclusion is all a bit vague. I think it
    would be better to clearly state your conclusions
    with the brief reasons for them.
  • This is a very sudden start. You need a more
    general statement to introduce the topic. (Hyland
    Hyland 2001 195)

What do you think of using paired act patterns
when you give feedback?
19
(2) Hedges
  • Examples of hedges include perhaps, slightly, and
    a little, and are used to tone down criticisms
    and reflect a positive, sympathetic relationship
    with student-writers.
  • Theyre NOT used here to lessen possibility, but
    to mitigate the interpersonal damage of critical
    comments. (Hyland Hyland 2001 196-7)

20
Hedges Examples
  • Where are the hedges in the comments below?
  • Some of the material seemed a little long-winded
    and I wonder if it could have been compressed a
    little.
  • Tomoko wrote well on this, you might ask to read
    hers.
  • It might also be good to change the order of your
    paragraphs/ideas. (Hyland Hyland 2001 197)

21
(3) Personal Attribution
  • judging anothers work is always an inherently
    unequal interaction because the power to evaluate
    is nonreciprocal and lies exclusively with the
    teacher. By expressing their commentary as a
    personal response, however, teachers can make a
    subtle adjustment to the interactional context
    and perhaps foreground a different persona. It
    allows them to relinquish some of their authority
    and adopt a less threatening voice. In other
    words, personal attribution allows teachers to
    react as ordinary readers, rather than as
    experts, and to slightly reposition themselves
    and their relationship to the student-writer.
    The personal expression of criticism, then,
    reminds the reader that the comment carries only
    the view of one individual, thereby conveying the
    limitation of the criticism. (Hyland Hyland
    2001 198)

22
Personal Attribution Examples
  • Im sorry, but when reading the essay, I couldnt
    see any evidence of this really. Perhaps you
    should have given me your outline to look at with
    the essay.
  • (Contrast the impersonal construction it was
    hard to see any evidence of this)
  • I find it hard to know what the main point of
    each paragraph is.
  • (Contrast the impersonal construction it is
    hard to know what the main point is)

23
(4) Interrogative Syntax
  • Questions are a means of highlighting knowledge
    limitations and can be used to weaken the force
    of a statement by making it relative to a
    writers state of knowledge. While they generally
    seek to engage and elicit a response from the
    reader, questions also express the writers
    ignorance or doubt and, therefore, can mitigate
    the imposition of a suggestion or a criticism.
    (Hyland Hyland 2001 198-9)

24
Interrogative Syntax Examples
  • The first two paragraphsdo they need joining?
  •  
  • In addition, questions are also useful when one
    wishes to protect oneself or ones reader from
    the full effects of what might be considered
    serious allegations.
  • You only mention Ward once in the essay. Are all
    the other ideas your own? You need to make it
    clear which are yours and which are hers.
  • Did you get some help with the editing? (Hyland
    Hyland 2001 198-9)
  • What serious allegation do Hyland Hyland have
    in mind here?

25
Sugaring the Pill Your Views
  • Do you use mitigating strategies when you correct
    students work?
  • If so, do you use the same strategies as the
    teachers in Hyland Hylands study? If you use
    alternative strategies, what are they? Why do you
    use them?
  • Do mitigating strategies work? (In other words,
    do they make students feel a little better?) How
    do you know whether they work or not? How could
    you find out?
  • What would make you change the way you give
    feedback to students on their writing?

26
Teachers Reasons for Sugaring the Pill (1)
  • Hyland Hyland show how interviews with the
    teachers revealed the reasons for mitigating
    criticism
  • Joan mentioned an experience on a previous
    course which had affected the way she gave
    feedback, making her less willing to be directly
    critical
  • I had a Korean student who was kind of a
    fossilisation problem, I guess. And her writing
    was just full of errors and like you didnt even
    have paragraphs and it was very short. On the
    very first test, I think I made some
    criticismand she wrote in her journal that she
    found this very devastating and please try and
    encourage me and so after that I modified my
    feedback to try and be more positive. . (Hyland
    Hyland 2001 199-200)

27
Teachers Reasons for Sugaring the Pill (2)
Plagiarism
  • Another possible reason for mitigating the force
    of comments was to minimise the possible threat
    which criticism carries for the face or public
    self-image of students. This was particularly
    evident in cases where teachers dealt with
    plagiarism, a very sensitive issue for feedback
    and something teachers are often unwilling to
    address directly. (Hyland Hyland 2001 200-1)

28
Plagiarism (contd.)
  • The teachers sensitivity towards this issue is
    revealed by think-aloud data. The teachers speak
    into a tape recorder while writing their
    feedback
  • It doesnt sound like her wordsI hate accusing
    people of plagiarism, but when you think it is,
    what do you do?
  • Joan wrote as her feedbackWhere did you get
    this information? Have you used quotations?and
    considered the interrogative form a subtle way
    of doing it. Unfortunately, the students
    retrospective interview revealed that she failed
    to identify these as rhetorical questions and to
    detect the underlying criticism and the implicit
    suggestion. The offending text remained in her
    final draft. (Hyland Hyland 2001 201)

29
Students Reactions to Praise
  • How do students react to praise/positive
    feedback?
  • Does this vary from culture to culture? What
    other factors might affect how students respond
    (e.g. age, gender, etc.)?
  • As a language learner, were you ever asked what
    kind of feedback you wanted on your writing? If
    so, what happened?
  • If youre a teacher, have you ever asked your
    students what kind of feedback they wanted? If
    so, what did they say?

30
Student Reactions to Praise Hyland Hyland
  • Students reactions varied
  • Some thought such feedback served no useful
    function. A student in Nadias class, Zhang, for
    example, believed positive remarks were useless
    unless they were backed up by serious comments
    that he could act on.  
  • This view of positive comments was reinforced by
    another student in Nadias class, Mei Ling, who
    said she discounted positive comments because I
    want to know my weaknesses most. (Hyland
    Hyland 2001 201-2)

31
Students Reactions (2)
  • Mei Ling explained what she meant in her
    interview
  • She spoke against positive feedback as a waste
    of time what she wanted was what she termed
    negative feedback highlighting her problems.
    For her, positive comments were insincere and,
    therefore, worthless 
  • Sometimes maybe the teacher doesnt mean it,
    but they just try to encourage you. Because
    there is always but after the positive.
    Sometimes the teacher just tries to find
    something good in my essay and then may be that
    strength is not the main point. (Hyland Hyland
    2001 202)

32
Students Reactions (3)
  • However, other students enjoyed receiving praise.
    Another student said
  • If teacher give me positive comments it means I
    succeed. (Hyland Hyland 2001 202)

33
Responding to Student Reactions
  • Heres one reaction by a teacher to Hyland
    Hylands student informants comments
  • Its clear they dont know what kind of
    feedback they want and what kind of feedback they
    need. I wouldnt change a thing. The students
    cant make up their minds.
  • Whats your response to these comments?
  • What light do these students comments throw on
    the best way of giving feedback?
  • If the students in your class had said the things
    Hyland Hylands student informants did about
    feedback, how would you conduct feedback in
    future? What changes would you make from what you
    do now (if any)?

34
Lesson different students like different types
of feedback
  • Hyland Hylands (2001) study demonstrates that
    different students want different types of
    feedback, confirming earlier studies by
    Enginarlar (1993) and Radecki Swales (1988)
  • Hence Goldstein (2005) argues persuasively that
    its important for us as teachers to find out
    exactly what type of feedback different students
    in our classes want, otherwise dissatisfaction
    can be the result

35
Finding out what feedback students want
  • Here are some of Goldsteins (2005) ideas for
    finding out what students feedback preferences
    are
  • First, we can ask students to write
    autobiographies, detailing their past experiences
    as writers, including as complete a description
    as possible of the types of feedback they have
    received from previous teachers, what they did
    and did not like about this feedback, and what
    they did after they received this feedback. If
    they have saved any of their work that has
    teacher commentary on it, students can be
    encouraged to attach this work. We can also
    devise questionnaires in which we ask students
    about their preferences. (pp.50-1)
  • Goldstein (2005) recommends that teachers also
    discuss with students all the different ways
    feedback can be done, so they realize they dont
    necessarily have to like the way theyve been
    given feedback in the past

36
Mitigated Feedback Miscommunication
  • it soon became clear during the student
    interviews that they were often unable to
    understand the teachers mitigated comments.  
  • Each case study provided several examples
    where students failed to understand, or only
    partly understood, such mitigated comments.
    (Hyland Hyland 2001 202-3)

37
Miscommunication Example 1
  • Our first example comes from Nadias response to
    Zhangs assignment where she wanted him to define
    a term which he used throughout the essay. She
    drew his attention to this with a bald criticism
    followed by an interrogative suggestion
  • My concern in this essay is that you introduce
    several terms in the introduction but do not
    provide a definition for any. I should like to
    know more about macroscopicis this what you
    are talking about in your conclusion?
  • However, in his final draft of the essay, the
    term was still being used without a definition,
    and Nadia commented that this aspect still
    hasnt changed in this version. Zhang was
    surprised and somewhat put out to read this
    comment and said that he didnt understand what
    she wanted. (Hyland Hyland 2001 202-3)

38
Miscommunication Example 2
  • Joan felt that Keith was repeating himself and
    tried indirectly to alert him to the fact that
    certain information was superfluous with a hedged
    criticism
  • Joans tape-recorded comments when writing her
    feedback show how she tries to mitigate her
    criticism
  • It seems funny to have this repeatedoh so this
    second part is like a summarythis just seems
    like a summaryits not necessary. I might just
    writeThe second section seemed like a summary of
    the previous information. (Hyland Hyland 2001
    204)

39
Miscommunication Example 2 (contd.)
  • But when the student was interviewed about Joans
    comments, it was clear he had misunderstood what
    she wanted
  • R Why did you change this part?
  • K Because hereYour second section seemed like
    a summary. Because in my proposal, this includes
    two parts, so I think this is very necessary. At
    the end of part one I make, like Joan says, a
    summary. So also I have put in another summary
    in here.
  • R Right so now you have two summaries at the
    end of each part?
  • K Yes. (Hyland Hyland 2001 204)

40
Miscommunication Conclusions
  • while teachers often have laudable
    interpersonal and pedagogic reasons for
    mitigating their feedback, tentative comments
    have the very real potential to cloud issues and
    create confusion. it seems that mitigated
    criticism was most opaque to students and a
    source of particular confusion, especially when
    it was phrased interrogatively and not coupled
    with an explicit suggestion for revision.
    Indirectness frequently seems to be
    counter-productive to the aim of clearly
    conveying the point the teacher wishes to make
    and is often reinterpreted by students according
    to their own writing concerns and agendas. In
    other cases, failure to understand implied
    criticisms or toned down praise leads the student
    to revise aspects of the text which are not
    problematic. (Hyland Hyland 2001 206)

41
Miscommunication Solutions
  • In the light of Hyland Hylands finding that
    sugaring the pill often leaves students confused
    or uncertain what they need to do to improve
    their writing, is it best not to mitigate
    criticism at all?
  • Has Hyland Hylands study changed your attitude
    to feedback? Why (not)?
  • Should you sugar the pill less or more when
    dealing with lower level learners? Why?
  • How should you deal with plagiarism? Is it
    necessary to be more direct? (This is not your
    own work. This is cheating.)

42
Helpful examples of feedback
  • The following chapter by Ferris features several
    helpful examples of comments on student texts,
    and models and suggestions you could use
  • Ferris, D.R. (2008) Feedback issues and options.
    In P. Friedrich (ed.), Teaching Academic Writing.
    London Continuum, pp.93-124.

43
Task
  • One thing we havent done yet on this course is
    look at a range of ELT textbooks, to determine
    the approach they use to teach writing
  • Id like you to begin looking at a selection of
    ELT textbook writing activities, speculating
    whether the materials writer favours product,
    process, post-processor a combination, or even
    none of these approaches! Finish looking at the
    material before next week.
  • Next time well discuss the materials together

44
References
  • Enginarlar H (1993) Student response to teacher
    feedback in EFL writing. System 21 193-204.
  • Goldstein LM (2005) Teacher Written Commentary in
    Second Language Writing Classrooms. Ann Arbor
    University of Michigan Press.
  • Hyland F Hyland K (2001) Sugaring the pill
    praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal
    of Second Language Writing 10 185-202.
  • Radecki P Swales J (1988) ESL student reaction
    to written comments on their written work. System
    16 355-365.
  • This weeks reading
  • Casanave CP (2003) Looking ahead to more
    sociopolitically-oriented case study research in
    L2 writing scholarship (But should it be called
    post-process?) Journal of Second Language
    Writing 12 85-102.
  • Ferris, D.R. (2008) Feedback issues and options.
    In P. Friedrich (ed.), Teaching Academic Writing.
    London Continuum, pp.93-124.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)