Critical Design Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 41
About This Presentation
Title:

Critical Design Review

Description:

Critical Design Review – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:591
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 42
Provided by: Sar9197
Category:
Tags: critical | design | ibex | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Critical Design Review


1
Critical Design Review
  • West Point-Beemers SLI Vehicle and Payload
    Experiment Criteria

2
Mission Statement
  • Experimental Test of Boyles Law with a 1 mile
    high power rocket launch
  • Requirements
  • Launch vehicle to an altitude of one mile
  • Collect useful scientific data
  • Successfully recover rocket
  • Accomplish all other goals of the NASA SLI
    program
  • Mission Success Criteria
  • Launch vehicle to an altitude of one mile
  • Collect useful scientific data
  • Successfully recover rocket
  • Accomplish all other goals of the NASA SLI
    program

3
Design at System Level
  • Design Review at a system level
  • A. Updated Drawings and Specifications of
    systems
  • I. Recovery
  • Recovers rocket safely in compliance with NFPA
    1127. See recovery subsection
  • II. Payload
  • Accomplishes scientific goal of flight, details
    in payload section
  • IIV. Electronics
  • Perfectflite MAWD Drogue charge at apogee, main
    charge at 500
  • Ozark Aerospace ARTS 2.0 Drogue 1 second after
    apogee, main charge at 450
  • BeeLine GPS in booster section
  • Standard BeeLine for backup in the payload
    section
  • Data Recorder
  • Remote Launcher
  • IV. Stability/Booster
  • Three ¼ Plywood fins built into an interlocking
    structure that makes up the whole booster.
    Enclosed in a tube that is removable.
  • V. Ignition
  • Remote launch system.
  • 9.07 x 10 -9 percent chance of being
    inadvertently activated by another user of the
    same type of system.
  • Operates on 433.92Mhz

4
Pictures
  • Electronics, Remote Launch System

5
Testing
  • 3.71 Scale Test Flight, 12-17-06, success by all
    measures.

6
Testing
  • Fins Structure (Actual will only have 3 fins)

7
Testing
  • Electronics bay model

8
Preliminary Motor Selection
  • Animal Motor Works K975. Extremely unlikely that
    a smaller motor will be selected, 75mm and L
    motors cannot be used for various reasons

9
Demonstration of vehicle meeting all system level
functional requirements
  • Current analysis and tests that have been
    performed on the booster, electronics and
    recovery sections show that all systems function
    as intended and as required to achieve mission
    success.

10
Relation of approach to workmanship and mission
success
  • Care to ensure mission success will be in mind at
    all times during construction, testing, prepping
    and flying. Sloppy jobs and rushed work will not
    be accepted and will be redone until it is
    acceptable to achieve mission success.

11
Additional testing to be performed
  • Ejection charge and parachute deployment tests
  • Confirmation of the inability of the radio
    controlled ignition units capability of being
    inadvertently actuated
  • Ground tests of all electronics before flight
  • Possibility of functional tests on motor igniters
    (tube representing motor core and nozzle with
    pressure and temperature sensors)
  • CP/CG relationship confirmation with fully loaded
    rocket
  • Fox Hunt with trackers
  • Simulate to the best of our ability the flight
    loads on the nose, body and fins that the vehicle
    will see in flight (apply estimated forces to
    proper areas)
  • Full scale flight test with all systems
    operational

12
Status and plans of remaining manufacturing
  • Complete final booster unit and electronics bay.
  • Paint rocket
  • Install all electronics and science

13
Integrity of design
  • A. Fin shape and style for mission
  • 1/4 plywood fins of similar size have flown to
    the speeds and experienced the loads that will be
    placed on our fins during flight. No concerns are
    foreseen
  • B. Proper use of structural elements
  • The been reviewed by engineers and the feedback
    provided was that 1/8 plywood could be used for
    everything but the fins themselves. Due to
    material availability, 1/4 plywood will be used
    throughout and will be sufficient for the flight.

14
Integrity Of DesignContinued
  • C. Proper assembly procedures, attachment and
    alignment, solid connection points, proper load
    paths.
  • The precision fit interlocking structure used
    throughout most of the vehicle automatically
    align when assembled. TiteBond II, a type of
    alphaic resin, will be used for all wood to wood
    and wood to cardboard connections. These are the
    only type of glue connections in the rocket, and
    the use of wood glue on precision fit parts is
    nearly foolproof. The loads from the motor thrust
    will be distributed from the thrust ring on the
    motor, to the aft ring in the fin unit, to the
    body tube and truss structure, to the upper body
    tube and electronics bay, through the body tube
    to the nose.
  • D. Motor mounting and retention
  • An internal masking tape ring will be used to
    retain the motor. The motor has no way to move
    within the rocket unless the fins, body tube and
    lower centering rings all fail, which is highly
    unlikely.
  • E. Status of verification
  • The Perfectflite MAWD will be used to verify the
    altitude. It will be operational for flight as it
    is essential to vehicle operation.

15
Safety And Failure Analysis
16
Recovery Subsystem
  • Kevin Rich, a licensed parachute rigger for
    man-rated parachutes will be assisting us with
    the recovery of the vehicle. With a final vehicle
    weight of about 21 pounds ready to fly, a
    parachute that can handle that weight and still
    recover at a safe rate of under 20 feet per
    second will be required.
  • Due to their extreme reliability and durability,
    a Rocketman R14-C, which can handle rockets from
    20-35 pounds, has been chosen. A Rocketman R3-C
    will be used as a drogue at apogee and the main
    R14 will deploy at 500 AGL. The MAWD and ARTS
    will fire independent ejection charges housed in
    PVC caps to separate the body sections and allow
    the parachutes to come out. Calculations and
    tests will be done to determine the mass of the
    4fg black powder required to reliably deploy the
    parachutes.
  • www.the-rocketman.com

17
Recovery SubsystemContinued
  • The R3 will be attached to approximately 30 feet
    of 9/16 tubular nylon climbing webbing which
    will be attached to an eye-bolt in the top of the
    motor and a eye-bolt on the bottom of the
    electronics bay. A water knot with no quick links
    will be used for attachment. The main parachute
    will be attached in a similar manner using 20 of
    9/16 webbing attached to the eye-bolt on the top
    of the electronics bay. No quick links will be
    used in any part of the system as they only add
    more failure points and more things to forget.
  • The R14 will be packed in a custom made
    deployment bag that the team will work on with
    Kevin Rich. A small pilot parachute is likely to
    be used to pull the bag out of the tube and
    deploy the parachute. At this time, it is
    currently unknown whether or not the bag, pilot
    and nose will recover attached to the top of the
    canopy or separately.

18
Mission Performance Predictions
  • Criteria Propel the vehicle to 1 mile (5280
    feet) in a strait, stable flight that does not
    put forces on the vehicle that the vehicle cannot
    handle and successfully recover the vehicle
    within the fields perimeter without violating
    the FAA waiver.

19
Flight Profile Simulations
  • Maximum altitude 5760 Ft.-K975 in no wind
  • Maximum altitude 5710 Ft.-K975 in 10 mph wind
  • Maximum altitude 5598 Ft.-K975 in 20 mph wind

20
Validity of Simulations
  • The simulations show that ample extra altitude
    will be achieved unless the vehicle is more than
    3 pounds overweight. Test flights with the actual
    vehicle will be used to tune the altitude and
    make sure that the Huntsville flight will achieve
    nearly exactly 1 mile
  • A static margin of 1.67, with the CG at about 57
    and the CP at about 66, is sufficient for stable
    flight

21
Stability
22
Payload Integration
  • A. Integration plan
  • The electronics/payload bay is specifically
    designed for easy integration of the payload and
    deployment electronics. The data collection
    device will be simply bolted to one of the 3
    trusses that span the length of the payload bay.
    The 9v battery that it will run on will also be
    mounted with zip-ties to a truss. The data
    collection tubes will slide in precision cut
    holes in the two rings inside the bulkhead. To
    slide them in, one of the bulkheads on either end
    of the electronics bay will be removed by
    removing the eye-bolt on that end. This will
    expose the holes that the tubes slide into. They
    will then be slid in, secured with rings of
    masking tape to prevent them from sliding and the
    bulkhead and the eye-bolt will be replaced.
  • B. Interface
  • The final outside diameter of the data collection
    tubes has not been finally determined at this
    point however it is known that it will be below
    1.5. 4 1.5 holes will easily fit in the
    electronics bay as shown in the picture earlier.
    The diameter of the holes in the final bay will
    be determined by using a caliper to measure the
    O.D. of the data collection tubes and put that
    value in AutoCAD so that the parts can be cut out
    accurately with the water cutting machine.

23
Payload IntegrationContinued
  • C .Compatibility
  • The separate parts will be separated by 1/4
    trusses and should not pose any problems to each
    other. The ARTS will have aluminum foil to
    protect it from RF interference from the Beeline
    Tracker. Experience has shown that in close
    proximity they will interfere with each other and
    cause the ARTS to operate improperly. Other
    incompatibility issues are not expected due to
    previous experience
  • D. Integration
  • No simpler way of integrating the payload has yet
    been found. If any method is found that makes it
    easier to integrate the payload, consideration of
    a design change may be made, however, at this
    point, that is unlikely.

24
Launch Concerns and Operation ProceduresVehicle
Prep
  • Unpack shipping containers and verify packed
    contents are present.
  • Inspect all parts for damage. If damage is found,
    fix it if possible.
  • Assemble motor according to manufactures
    instructions.
  • Assemble electronics and payload bay
  • Set up lower electronics bay
  • Prep and install motor
  • Pack Recovery System
  • Slide lower tube onto booster section and secure
    with screws.
  • Slide upper tube onto coupler section of booster
    and secure with shear pins.
  • Install rail buttons
  • Give rocket final visual inspection and resolve
    any problems that may exist.
  • Verify from the Range Safety officer that the
    field conditions still meet acceptable launch
    criteria.

25
Launch Concerns and Operation ProceduresLaunching
  • Set up launch pad and launch controller.
  • Clear dry grass or other materials within the
    radius required by NFPA 1127.
  • Confirm that electronics (except tracking devices
    and the data recorder) are turned off.
  • Bring rocket out to the launch pad.
  • Load rocket on launch rail.
  • Power-up electronics
  • Confirm continuity on all 4 altimeter output
    channels and all 4 recording input channels. Also
    confirm tracking signals from both trackers.
  • Verify launch angle will place recovered rocket
    within the launch field. Adjust angle if needed.
  • Confirm all near-pad video recording devices are
    ready for flight
  • Power up remote launching device and confirm
    continuity from launch control.
  • Clear all non-essential personnel from the safety
    radius around the launch pad.
  • Install igniter into motor. Confirm igniter is
    all the way to the top of the motor to insure
    proper motor ignition.
  • Confirm continuity on all channels and trackers
    one final time.
  • Retreat to launch control area.
  • Alert everybody of the impending launch and make
    sure proper safety radius around the vehicle is
    clear.
  • Check continuity. Turn of continuity checker
    after check is done.
  • Arm launcher.
  • Count down from 5.
  • Launch vehicle.

26
Launch Concerns and Operation ProceduresPost
Flight-Operations
  • Track rocket using primary GPS tracker and find
    rocket location. If GPS tracker is not sending a
    correct signal, use the backup tracker.
  • Go to location of vehicle
  • Approach vehicle perpendicular to center tubing
    section
  • Disarm all electronics. (Tracking and data
    recording electronics can be left on.)
  • Carefully confirm that all ejection charges have
    fired. (Use a mirror on a stick with a flashlight
    to look into tubes. Do not put face or other body
    parts over ends of tubes prior to confirmation).
  • If charges have all fired, disconnect recovery
    system. Transport the rocket back to the launch
    area.
  • Remove and clean motor case when it has cooled
    down.
  • Unscrew and remove airframe tubes from
    electronics bay.
  • Download flight and experiment data to laptop
    computer.
  • Turn off GPS and backup trackers and any other
    electronics that have not yet been turned off.
  • Remove any other non-shippable rocket components.
  • Pack rocket back in shipping container for trip
    home.

27
Safety And Environment
  • Andrew is our safety officer. He has experience
    in risk mitigation in complex, high risk high
    power rocket construction and flight. All
    participants will be required to show the
    necessary knowledge of our safety plan.

28
Failure Modes
29
Prevention of Inadvertent Activation of Remote
Control Devices
  • Devices will utilize shunts and switches that
    break the circuit to prevent current flowing to
    igniters when device isnt armed.
  • Devices will not be able to be actuated unless a
    unique 60ms code is received.
  • 9 x 10 -9 chance of inadvertent activation by
    a non involved part

30
Personal Hazards
31
Personal HazardsContinued
  • Always wear safety glasses when dealing with
    rocket parts containing small hardware or
    pyrotechnic charges.
  • Never look down a tube with live pyrotechnic
    charges in it.
  • Always point rocket and pyrotechnic charges away
    from body and other people.
  • Avoid carrying devices that have live electrical
    contacts (radios, cell phones, etc.) while
    prepping live pyrotechnic charges.
  • Never arm electronics when rocket isnt on pad
    unless the area has been cleared and everyone
    knows that pyrotechnic continuity checks are
    being done.
  • Always follow the NAR/TRA safety codes.
  • Always follow all applicable local, state and
    national laws and regulations.
  • Only the Level 2 certified mentor may handle the
    motor (CPSC regulations).
  • Do not allow smoking or open flames within 25
    feet of the motor or pyrotechnics.
  • Avoid horseplay and idle conversation, focus on
    properly completing the task at hand.
  • Make sure the checklist is followed and all steps
    are completed properly in a though, workmanlike
    manner to assure mission success.
  • Since the motor for the flight utilizes snap
    rings to retain the ends of the motor, care must
    be taken when installing and removing snap rings.
    Snap rings can be sent flying at high speeds in
    unpredictable directions even if reasonable care
    is being taken, thus, all personnel within 25
    feet of a snap ring installation or removal
    procedure will be required to wear safety glasses
    or move out of the area and keep eyes turned away
    from motor.

32
Environmental Concerns
  • All waste materials will be disposed of using
    proper trash receptacles, biodegradable and flame
    resistant recovery wadding will be used.
    Practice launches will only occur with local fire
    department permission if dry grass conditions
    exist. Bureau of Land Management regulations
    will be followed when doing test launches on BLM
    land. Solid rocket motor manufactures
    instructions will be followed when disposing of
    any rocket motor parts. Consideration of
    environmental ramifications will be made
    regarding applicable activities.

33
Payload Criteria
  • We have determined after continued testing that a
    syringe will not provide a sufficient force to
    push a liner potentiometer. That moves us to our
    third measuring design. We will use a strain
    gauge on a flexible diaphragm at the end of our
    gas sample tubes. This device will have to be
    calibrated for pressure to resistance ratios, and
    we will be testing the ideal gas law (PVnRt)
    with changing pressure as our variable instead of
    changing volume. Strain gauges are on order and
    should be delivered next week. Until then we are
    testing with a disassembled digital scale. We
    are very interested in seeing the effects of the
    launch on the flexible diaphragm end and gauge.
    We will use 12 X 1 pvc tubes as our sample
    chambers and rubber sheeting as the diaphragm

34
The custom data recorder!
35
Specs on recorder
  • Sample rate 20Hz
  • Channels 6 analog
  • Memory 262144bits, 32768bytes, 16384samples
  • Sample size 12bit
  • Recording time 136.5 seconds
  • Size 1x2in
  • Power requirement 5.5V-12V(9V nominal)
  • Processor Microchip PIC16F88 (see
    www.microchip.com)
  • Oscillator speed 8MHz
  • Download connection RS232 serial at 9600baud
  • Recording start trigger Break wire, start on open

36
Payload Concept Features and Definition
  • Proposed science payload will test different
    gasses to confirm that they behave according to
    Boyles Law. By testing various gasses in the
    range of pressures and temperatures found in a
    rocket flight to 1 mile, we hope to accomplish
    this.
  • We havent seen any other teams attempt a science
    experiment like this. We feel that because of
    that, it is unique and that it will provide a
    suitable challenge to us for this project.
  • The problems that we have encountered with
    measuring the changes in the gases has shown us
    that there is considerable challenge in this
    project

37
Science Value
  • Comparison of theoretical calculations of gas
    behavior to results of launch test will confirm
    success of the experiment. Variables such as
    barometric pressure and temperature on launch day
    will need to be recorded and factored into the
    projected results of the experiment. Projected
    results will be calculated using proven behaviors
    of the various gasses used in the experiment.
    Matching results between the collected data and
    calculated projection will determine success of
    the flight. The variables would be the
    temperature and pressure of the gas and the
    original amount of gas on ground level will be
    the control. Our predicted data will be graphed
    against our actual results after the flight using
    a spreadsheet program.

38
Safety and Environment
  • Andrew is our safety officer. Andrew has more
    experience with rockets than anyone else on the
    team.
  • Our current main concern is in the attachment of
    the strain gauges to the diaphragm. We will have
    to calibrate each tube individually to maintain
    accuracy. We will mount our tubes with the
    strain gauges facing to the top of the rocket so
    inertia does not rip them off during launch.

39
Outreach
  • We have had our Rocket display at the local
    library for the month of December.
  • We are teaching rocketry to the 4-H club in
    Beemer on January 27th.
  • We will be discussing our rocketry and our
    project with the West Point Optimists club on
    February 14th
  • We are sharing some resources with the Benson SLI
    team

40
Activity Plan
  • Budget 2,750. We hope to get a local grant to
    cover the extra expenses or raise the money
    elsewhere.
  • Timeline
  • First test flight preliminarily planned for Feb.
    24
  • Continuing to order parts and do construction as
    things are finalized
  • Flight Readiness Review
  • Full timeline in CDR Document

41
Summary
  • In summary we feel that we are still on track
    both budget and time wise for successful
    completion of this project.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com