Quarantine Treatments and Systems Approach to Quarantine Security - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Quarantine Treatments and Systems Approach to Quarantine Security

Description:

Quarantine Treatments and Systems Approach to Quarantine Security – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:133
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: robertl51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Quarantine Treatments and Systems Approach to Quarantine Security


1
Quarantine Treatments and Systems Approach to
Quarantine Security
  • Robert L. Mangan
  • Crop Quality and Fruit Insect Research
  • USDA-ARS, Weslaco, Texas, USA

2
Quarantine Goal
  • Prevent undesirable pest introduction
  • Allow transport of commodities

3
Importance of Quarantine Treatments
  • Industrial nations need more variety in diet and
    improved nutrition
  • Access to Markets for Fruits and Vegetables

4
Quarantine security
  • confidence that there will be no pest
    introduction capable of reproduction in an
    imported commodity

5
Fruit Flies
  • introductions are usually by transport of fruit
    with immature insects
  • immature stages are usually clustered in fruit
  • probit 9 requirement was devised to account for
    this clustering (Baker 1939)

6
Probit 9 (as applied to quarantine of insects)
  • 95 confidence that less than 0.00032 of treated
    insects will survive

7
Historical Development of Systems Approach
  • Withdrawal of quarantine treatments
  • Ethylene dibromide 1984
  • Methyl bromide phase-out 1992-present
  • No acceptable quarantine treatments
  • Cost, damage, new commodities
  • Questionable need for quarantine treatments
  • Infestation very rare
  • Production and marketing system meets quarantine
    requirements

8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
the integration of those preharvest and
postharvest practices used in production,
harvest, packing and distribution of a commodity
which cumulatively meet the requirements for
quarantine security. E. B. Jang and H. R.
Moffitt (1994)
11
(No Transcript)
12
Components of a Systems ApproachJang and Moffitt
1994 vs ISPM 14
  • Pre-plant
  • Pre-harvest
  • Harvest
  • Post-harvest treatment and handling
  • Transportation and distribution
  • Production
  • Preharvest treatments
  • Postharvest treatments
  • Inspection and Certification
  • Marketing and Distribution

13
Pre-harvest vs Post-Harvest Treatments
  • Pre-harvest treatments that control the pest
    usually reduce the number of fruit infested but
    not the number of pests per infested fruit.
  • Post-harvest treatments usually kill individual
    pests in the fruit thus reducing the number of
    pests per fruit.

14
A. ludens infesting Mangos- Baja CA. 1992
15
Frequency Distribution A. ludens in Oranges
Baja Ca. Sur 1992
16
(No Transcript)
17
Perform dose - response tests
  • Statistically determine treatment that will
    achieve required mortality

18
(No Transcript)
19
Confirmatory Tests
  • Confirm effectiveness of propose treatment under
    conditions similar to commercial use.
  • Data must be analyzed statistically to
    demonstrate confidence that required mortality
    level is achieved.
  • Precise methods used in confirmatory tests must
    be approved by importing country.

20
Experimental Hot Forced Air Unit USDA ARS Weslaco
Texas
21
Experimental Unit Hot Water Treatment
22
Heat Treatments
23
Experimental Units Modified Atmosphere/Heat Treatm
ents
24
Radiation Treatments Screwworm Sterilization Kerrv
ille Tx. 1946-51?
Fruit Irradiation Moore Airbase USDA PPQ
25
Commercial Radiation Treatment Hilo Hawaii
26
Fumigation Treatments
27
Commercial Hot Forced Air Chamber Montemorelos
Mexico
28
Dose-Response Treatments Controlled Atmosphere
  • Pupal survival drops fastest at 10-15 days
    treatment.
  • Variability is highest below 12 days.

29
Number of Dead A. ludens Larvae after Exposure to
46C
Z. Grapefruit artificially infested with 25 live,
3rd instar larvae
30
Radiation Dose-Mortality Pupae Anastrepha
obliqua Hallman 1997
  • Mortality is sigmoid-maximum chnge in survival at
    5-gt10 g.
  • Variance in mortality is highest at 50 mortality.

31
Advantages of Post Harvest Quarantine Treatments
  • Mortality is known from dose-response and
    confirmatory tests.
  • Mortality rate is independent of other systems
    approach factors.
  • At appropriate doses, variability in the system
    can be greatly reduced.

32
Product Quality Certain yellow varieties of
mangoes, immature tissue converts starch to
fibrous material in place of sugar. Temperate
Fruits more sensitive to heat treatments
33
Summary and Recommendations
  • The systems approach was developed in as an
    alternative to post harvest quarantine
    treatments.
  • Operation of post harvest treatments is
    independent of production, and marketing
    conditions, can be monitored at treatment
    facility and provides a known level of pest
    mortality.
  • Post harvest treatments treat individual pests
    infesting the commodity and reduce variation in
    infestation rate per commodity.
  • Many post harvest treatments for other purposes
    such as hot water dips for disease control, cold
    storage and controlled atmosphere for shipping
    and radiation for sanitation cause high pest
    mortality and should be considered as systems
    approach components.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com