Title: Plant Equipment
1Plant Equipment Systems Safety
- ISA Toronto Section
- September 27, 2007
Simon Fridlyand P. Eng
2Industrial Accidents
3Canadian Statistics
- Fatalities and Casualties in Canadian Work
places. - 1,097 Workplace Fatalities in 2005, up 45.
- 5 per day, 1 in 15,000 dies.
- One of the worst in 29 OECD Countries.
4Who is responsible for compliance?
- Why owner and not manufacturer?
- Owners responsibility
- New equipment PSRs
- Specifying PSRs when purchasing new equipment
- Existing/Old equipment Audits/ Upgrades
5When are the PSRs required to be conducted?
- Flammable liquids
- Machine guarding
- Racks or stacking structures
- Risk of ignition or explosion/ dust collection
- Foundry/ molten metal
- Lifting devices
- Exposure to substances
6Role of an engineer
- Engineer is responsible
- Company Engineer Vs. Outside Consultant
- Manufactures representative
7How to select a PSR provider
- Report shall have
- Hazard Assessment
- Conclusive Statements
- PSR provider shall have
- Multi Disciplines capability
- Proper Liability coverage
- Capable of providing advice
- Capable of assisting in design of solutions
- Ready to accept liabilities for his/her work
8Purchasing specification approach
- In purchasing documentation, specify SAFE
Engineering must ensure equipment compliance - Understand needs of Client OEM - adapt safety
system to needs - Drawings sent to SAFE Engineering
- Risk Assessment as part of design
- SAFE Engineering supports OEM consultation,
design - Equipment is pre-certified before it leaves dock
- Final inspection at installation (SAFE or
contractor)
9History of Bill C-45, Westray Mine disaster
- Known as the Westray Bill
- Establishes OHS legal duty in Criminal Code Bill
- Reform criminal law for organizations
- Applies to federal and provincial workplaces
- In addition to existing OHS legislation
- In force effective March 31, 2004
10New Criminal Code changes related to OHS duties
(Bill C-45)
- OHS legal duty s. 217.1
- Every one who undertakes, or has the
authority, to direct how another person does work
or performs a task is under a legal duty to take
reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that
person, or any other person, arising from that
work or task.
11 Criminal Negligence for Individuals
- Penalties for criminal negligence
- Injury - 10 years in prison
- Death - life imprisonment
12 Criminal Negligence for Organizations
- If acting within the scope of their authority
- 1. One or more representatives commits the
offence of OHS criminal negligence - and
- 2. Senior officer departs markedly from the
standard of care that could reasonably be
expected to prevent a representative from
committing the offence
13Definition of Representative
- Representative
- Is a director, partner, employee, member, agent,
or contractor of the organization
14Definition of Senior Officer
- Senior officer
- Means a representative who plays an important
role in the establishment of the organizations
policies or is responsible for managing an
important aspect of the organizations activities
and, in the case of a body corporate, includes a
director, its chief executive officer and its
chief financial officer.
15OHS Criminal Negligence for Organizations
- Penalties for criminal negligence
- UNLIMITED
- Non-tax deductible
16Due Diligence
- Successful defenses of due diligence demonstrate
- Identified all actual and potential occupational
hazards (applicable to the offence). Facility
Audit - Assessed the risk of exposure of workers to
hazards identified. Hazard Assessment - Eliminated hazard or implemented controls, where
necessary, to minimize risk of exposure to
hazards. Equipment Upgrades. - Communicated hazards, risks and controls to
workers, JHSC and management
17Due Diligence
- Continued
- Monitored workers, work practices and workplace
(equipment, machinery, facilities) - Corrected unsafe work practices and remedied
hazardous situations - Disciplined worker/supervisor if they were in
violation of their legal duties or corporate OHS
policy or procedure - Documented all of the above mentioned steps and
actions
18Consequences
- Industrial mishaps fatalities and injuries
- Exorbitant costs
- Human factors
- Delays in production
- Lower productivity
- Liability
- Consequences occur because Equipment is Not Safe.
19How do you determine?
- How do you demonstrate that your operations are
safe? - How do you demonstrate that your equipment is
safe? - How do you demonstrate that your safety and
protective systems protect against your hazards?
20What is Safe Equipment
- The Basis-Equipment Compliant to Current and
Applicable Standards - Represents best engineering practice
- Due diligence
- IEC61508 -Functional safety of
- electrical/electronic/programmable electronic
- safety-related systems
21What is IEC 61508 ?
- Functional Safety of electrical / electronic /
programmable electronic safety related systems - Mainly concerned with E/E/PE safety-related
systems whose failure could have an impact on the
safety of persons and/or the environment..........
.....could also be used to specify any E/E/PE
system used for the protection of equipment or
product
22IEC 61508 -Key Objectives
- International standard -end users and suppliers
operate internationally - Generically based to facilitate the development
of sector standards (machinery, process plant,
medical, rail) - Technically sound, system based approach, with
sufficient flexibility for the future - Provide confidence to users and regulators
- Risk based, measures proportionate to the risk
reduction required
23IEC 61508 -Key Objectives
- Systematic approach to all safety (Product
Process) lifecycle activities - To enable technological developments to take
place within an overall safety framework - To release the potential of the (PES) technology
to facilitate improvements in both safety and
economic performance - Improved efficiencies in supply chain
24Features of IEC61508
- Generic Standard to be followed by Sector
variants - International standard -end users and suppliers
operate internationally - Improved efficiencies in supply chain
- Guidance on use of Electrical, Electronic and
Programmable Electronic Systems which perform
safety functions - Comprehensive approach involving concepts of
Safety Lifecycle and all elements of protective
systems (Other Technologies) - Risk-based approach leading to determination of
Safety Integrity Levels (S.I.Ls) - Risk based, measures proportionate to the risk
reduction required - Considers the entire Safety Critical Loop (End to
End)
25Safety Integrity
- The likelihood of a safety-related system
achieving the safety functions under all the
stated conditions within a stated period of time.
26The 7 parts of IEC61508
- Part 1 General requirements
- Part 2 Requirements for electrical, electronic,
programmable electronic systems - Part 3 Software requirements
- Part 4 Definitions and abbreviations
- Part 5 Examples of methods for the determination
of safety integrity levels - Part 6 Guidelines on the application of Parts 2
3 - Part 7 Overview of techniques and measures
27Summary of the Key Messages in IEC 61508
- Safety Management System
- life cycle
- planning
- assessing compliance
- supply chain
- Technical Requirements
- choice of technologies
- assessment of risk
- specifications of function integrity level
- Competencies
- roles responsibilities
- skills training
28Examples of safety-related systems
- Process plant emergency shut-down systems
- Fire gas systems
- Crane automatic safe-load indicators
- Railway signalling systems
- Machinery guard/access interlocking system
- Machinery emergency shutdown
- Steam boiler controls
- Fairground roller-coaster control systems.
29Safety ProductivityProductivity Profit
- Safety productivity 2 sides - same coin
- Safety leads to higher productivity
- Payback at least 5 a year
30Contact Information
- S.A.F.E. ENGINEERING INC.
- Your safety and liability shield
- Simon Fridlyand, P.Eng
- 416-447-9757 ext 223
- www. safeengineering.ca