Title: The Argument for a New Federation of Democracies
1 The Argument for a New Federation of Democracies
- John Davenport
- Department of Philosophy
- April 24, 2006.
2Step One How do we justify creating a higher
level of government?
- Using the Federalist Papers as a model, we find
the following three kinds of argument - There are crucial public goods that are not
attainable by market mechanisms, and that can
only be secured by law and/or collective action
at a level higher than the present system of
sovereign states. - A present system of sovereign states is unable to
coordinate effectively to solve problems
concerning these public goods. Because of
various collective action problems, bilateral or
multilateral treaties and cannot provide these
goods. - A higher level of government that could address
these problems ought to be directly answerable to
the people of all its member states.
3American Examples
- Alexander Hamilton,
- co-author of the Federalist Papers
4Problems of the Second Continental Congress
operating under the Articles of Confederation
- Could not effectively coordinate resistance to
the British could not pay veterans after the
war could not provide sufficiently for common
defense - Had difficulty coordinating a common foreign
policy with states making their own foreign trade
pacts - Had trouble introducing a national currency,
resulting in economic inefficiencies from
conversions - Lacked sufficient centralized power to coordinate
national economic policies and fund major
infrastructure development - The Big One could not control the spread of
slavery, which undermined the moral legitimacy of
the new democratic form of government.
5Similar Problems in 20th Century Europe
- Needed to form a common market to produce
economic growth after World War II - Needed to pool strength to resist the USSR
- Needed to form a shared foreign policy, including
the ability to negotiate trade pacts as a bloc - Eventually needed to establish a common currency
to prevent competitive currency pricing
practices - Eventually needed to encourage greater cultural
solidarity social exchange and common law.
6Jürgen Habermas German Philosopher who defends
Transnational Democracy
7Habermass Deliberative Conception of Democratic
Legitimacy
- What distinguishes legislation by majority
rule from mere tyranny of the majority? - The rights of individual citizens when society is
organized through a system of law - Law is an outcome not of an aggregation of
private interests, but rather of collective
reasoning about the common good (ideally, it is
acceptable as reasonable by all interlocutors) - Loyalty to a democratic constitution including
both civil rights and popular sovereignty, rather
than to a particular ethnic or cultural heritage,
is the social glue - Thus legitimate democracy is not limited to
nation-states in the classical sense of
territories unified by their shared ethnic or
cultural heritage it can exist at the
transnational level.
8Step Two The Global Public Goods
- Fundamental Human Rights and Basic Needs
- Definition of a code of basic human rights to
which all nations must adhere, and perceived
violations of which can be appealed to a world
court. - Proactive response teams to prevent genocidal
aggression before it happens. - Unification of democratic nations in resistance
against totalitarian regimes - 1. A framework for imposing binding sanctions
and isolating unjust regimes - 2. A world army to provide a unified,
nonpartisan, immediate and credible deterrence
against outlaw regimes. - Prosecution of crimes against humanity and
operation of war crimes tribunals. - Unified and reliable responses to disease,
famine, refuge problems, and disaster situations
long-term development plans to reduce poverty and
childhood disease.
- 500 Skulls in One Rwandan Site
9Global Public Goods continued
- World Environment Natural Resources
- Preservation of resources in which the whole
world has a stake, e.g. clean oceans, clean air,
fresh water, arable soil, natural wonders,
Antarctica, etc. - Containment of ozone-destroying pollution and
response to global warming. - Controlling use and distribution of limited vital
resources, such as fossil fuels. - Maintenance of endangered animals and their
threatened habitats, such as rainforests,
wetlands, and coral reefs - A regime through which the whole world can
cooperate in sharing the costs of preserving the
environment for future generations, e.g.
compensating impoverished nations for the
sacrifices imposed on them for preservation.
10Global Public Goods continued
- Management of a global economy for sustainable
growth with fairness -
- Maintaining stability in relations among
currencies and banking systems, and ultimately,
determining interest rates and monetary policy
for a world currency. - Responding to regional crises and providing
healthy environment for investment and stable
growth to avoid triggering worldwide
cascade-effect recessions. - Assuring fairness in relations of immigration and
movement of seasonal labor across existing
national borders. - Providing a framework to open markets to imports
and exports and resolve trade disputes with
binding authority (currently the function of the
World Trade Organization). - Laying the basis for a regime of international
labor law, e.g. to help trade unions to
internationalize their organizations in response
to the emergence of multinational corporate
giant' companies with vast holdings and
influence. - Control of arms sales and transfers of dangerous
technologies, including powerful weapons. - Elimination of tax havens, international tax
fraud, and linkage of tax regimes across nations. - Providing minimal industry standards for fair
labor and safe work conditions.
11Global Public Goods continued
- Transnational Crime Control
- Unified systems for containing the growth of drug
trafficking and attacking international narcotics
rings. - Investigation of international monetary fraud and
elimination of safe havens for the leadership
of global crime rings. - Combined world efforts to eliminate black
markets for illegal arms, trafficking in human
beings, etc. - Global Science and Communications
- Promoting academic exchanges and expansion of
educational opportunities for talented students
from poor nations. - Pursuit of scientific projects in which the whole
of humanity has a stake, and which can be done
most efficiently by avoiding duplication, e.g.
particle accelerators, space stations and space
exploration, genetic databases, etc. - Managing the system of international
telecommunications, from the function and
placement of satellites to the Internet and the
free flow of information.
12Step Three A world government capable of
securing the global public goods?
- At present, there seem to be two main
alternatives for global governance - American Unilateralism
- The US is the de facto leader in world system of
nation-states, and directs responses to crises
through NATO - 2. The United Nations system
- The UN Security Council is the legitimate source
of international law U.N. agencies such as the
World Bank, World Health Organization, and U.N.
Commission for Human Rights coordinate global
responses to problems.
13Which Alternative? Neither
- Lets focus on just one public good the
enforcement of basic human rights - The United States is not democratically
authorized by the worlds peoples to act as
global policeman - Without assistance of a large network of powerful
allies, our resources are also grossly unequal to
the job (our armed forces are maxed out, and our
government is 1.1 trillion in debt, including
what it owes to the Social Security Trust Fund). - However, the U.N. system, which was the best
achieveable after WW II, is now broken. The U.N.
has failed to stop atrocities in Yugloslavia,
East Timor, Rwanda, Congo, Sudan, and elsewhere,
let bring tyrants, warlords, and dictators down
and develop legitimate democratic regimes. Yet
tyranny is the single biggest cause of poverty in
the world.
14The U.N.s flaws
- The U.N. is not directly elected by citizens of
its member-states it is a mere treaty
organization, like the Continental Congress (and
thus weak). - The U.N. is not democratic the Security
Councils permanent members with veto include
China, and its rotating members frequently
include dictatorships, theocracies, and
monarchies that systematically deny rights. - The U.N. is out of date in 1946, power was
equally divided in the world today, the worlds
democracies collectively hold the balance of
power. - Its Charter cannot be amended without the
approval of all five permanent members of the
Security Council, which prevents the needed
reforms.
15A New Alternative A Federation of the Worlds
Democratic Nations
- A permanently binding alliance of the worlds
democracies would be both more legitimate and
more powerful than the U.N. security council, and
could provide the coordination necessary to
secure key global public goods. Its governing
council would be directly elected by citizens of
the member states, and its enumerated powers
would include - Maintaining a standing armed forces, raised from
all member states proportionate to population, to
intervene swiftly under joint DF command when
necessary to prevent genocide, ethnic cleaning,
and similar atrocities. - Providing a new, firmer foundation for
international law and the operation of
international courts, to ensure the legitimacy of
entities like the World Court, the ICC, the Hague
Tribunal, and to make their judgments
enforceable. - The general enforcement of human rights,
including (when possible) the removal and
prosecution of tyrants and warlords, and the
punishment of crimes against humanity - The defeat of international terrorist
organizations and international crime rings, and
the monitoring of all nuclear weapons and
weapons-material available on the planet. - The commonly undertaken and collectively funded
defense of all democratic member states from
hostile incursion or attack by outlaw states or
terrorists - The exertion of unified diplomatic pressure on
non-democratic regimes to democratize. - The nation-building activities necessary to
assure all peoples on Earth a stable democratic
nation-state of their own, with a working legal
system free from corruption of the authorities, a
liberal educational system free from
fundamentalist indoctrination, and a decent
standard of living in whatever economic system
they choose. - The adoption of new member-states according to
collectively accepted criteria.