Title: Thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism
1Thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism
- Presented by Ri ???
- Instructor P ???
2Chief complaint
- A 59 year-old woman, for another treatment to
pulmonary embolism with respiratory failure
status post intubation
3Brief history
- She has history of Af with RVR on regular
medicine control. - Abdominal fullness was noted in Nov.2005 and
abdominal echo revealed a solid mass at left side
of pelvis, 7 cm in size and hydronephrosis. - She was transferred to ??? hospital on
Nov.26.2005. Debulking with retroperitoneal tumor
excision and LN dissection was done Dec.2.2005. - Post operative course was smooth but left leg
edema was noted.
4Brief history
- Sudden onset of shortness of breath was noted on
Dec.10.2005. - Respiratory failure was noted and intubation was
done. - Chest CT showed low density filling defect, 4 cm,
in the pulmonary trunk , left main pulmonary
artery and bilateral pulmonary with suspected
pulmonary embolism. - Heparin has been adminstrated since Dec.17.2005.
She was transferred to NTUH for further
management on Dec.24.2005.
5Past history
- 1. HTN () , DM nil
- 2. Smoking(-), Alcoholism (-)
- 3. Surgery Retroperitoneal SCC with right
inguinal LN metastasis, s/p debulking with
retroperitoneal tumor excision and LN dissection
in Dec.2005 - 4. Allergy denied
- 5. Family history non-contributory
6Course and management
- After transferred to ICU, fever was noted and
Tazocin was administrated. - Fever work-up was done and sputum culture
revealed Pseudomonus aeruginosa. - Cardiac echo revealed LVEF 72 with mild MR and
moderate TR. Duplex revealed bilateral DVT(LltR). - Sudden onset of dyspnea with desasuration was
noted. Auto peep was found. Ventilator with
pressure control with muscle relaxant were
administrated.
7Course and management
- Chest, abdomen, pelvis and lower extremity CT
showed left main trunk embolization, left iliac
mass at previous OP area and massive thrombus of
common iliac vein, left femoral, and left
popliteal vein. - IVC filter with t-PA catheter thrombolysis was
done. Hypotension and deoxygenation were noted,
in spite of high inotropic agents use. - DNR was signed on 12/26. The patient died of
sepsis, pulmonary embolism and retroperitoneal
SCC at 1325pm on Dec.26.2005.
8Introduction
- Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and acute pulmonary
embolism (PE) are two manifestations of the same
disorder, venous thromboembolism. - DVT of the lower extremity is subdivided into
either calf vein or proximal vein (popliteal,
femoral, or iliac vein) thrombosis.
9Introduction
- Proximal vein thrombosis is of greater importance
clinically, since it is more commonly associated
with serious disease. - Over 90 percent of cases of acute PE are due to
emboli emanating from the proximal veins of the
lower extremities.
10GENERAL OBJECTIVES
- Prevent further clot extension, acute PE, and
recurrence of thrombosis, late complications (
postphlebitic syndrome and chronic thromboembolic
pulmonary hypertension). - Anticoagulant therapy is indicated for patients
with symptomatic proximal DVT, since pulmonary
embolism will occur in approximately 50 percent
of untreated individuals, most often within days
or weeks of the event
11Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and DVT
- HEPARIN THERAPY
- -- Unfractionated heparin
- -- Low molecular weight heparin
- ORAL ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY
- -- Warfarin
- THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY
- -- Urokinase
- -- Streptokinase
- -- Alteplase
- INFERIOR VENA CAVAL INTERRUPTION
12HEPARIN
- Simultaneous initiation of heparin (either
- unfractionated or low-molecular weight) and
oral - warfarin
-
- --The standard anticoagulant regimen for venous
- thromboembolism in all medically stable
patients. -
13HEPARIN
- Monitor the response, using either the activated
partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or heparin
levels, and to titrate the dose to the individual
patient. - Critical therapeutic level of heparin, as
measured by the aPTT, is 1.5 times the mean of
the control value or the upper limit of the
normal aPTT range, with a target range (aPTT
ratio) of 1.5 to 2.5
14HEPARIN
- Experimental studies and clinical trials have
- established that the efficacy of heparin
therapy - depends upon achieving a critical therapeutic
level - of heparin within the first 24 hours of
treatment, - usually via a continuous heparin infusion
- Heparin infusion of 1000 IU/hr and who had an
- aPTT ratio of lt1.5 times control for three
days or - more threefold increase in the risk of
recurrent - venous thromboembolism
15Low molecular weight heparin
- Greater bioavailability when given by
- subcutaneous injection
- The duration of the anticoagulant effect is
- greater (once or twice daily)
- The anticoagulant response is highly correlated
- with body weight, permitting administration
of a - fixed dose
- -- Laboratory monitoring is not necessary
except - in pregnancy, morbid obesity and renal
failure - Less likely to induce thrombocytopenia
16THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
17INDICATIONS
Patients with massive PE associated with
hemodynamic compromise are reasonable candidates
for intravenous thrombolytic therapy.
18Echocardiography
- May reveal findings which strongly suggest
massive and hemodynamically significant PE - -- Right ventricular dilation and/or
hypokinesis. Even in the absence of systemic
hypotension or profound hypoxemia - Such findings suggest the need for aggressive
intervention, including consideration of
thrombolytic therapy. This criterion for
administration of lytic agents is not utilized by
all practitioners, and remains the subject of
investigation.
Grifoni, S, Olivotto, I, Cecchini, P, et al.
Short-term clinical outcome of patients with
acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure,
and echocardiographic right ventricular
dysfunction. Circulation 2000 1012817.
19CONTRAINDICATIONS
- These should be particularly scrutinized if
lytic therapy is considered
20Therapeutic regimens of Acute PE
21General guidelines for administration
Buller, HR, Agnelli, G, Hull, RD, et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic
disease the Seventh ACCP Conference on
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest
2004 126401S.
22About administration
- Intravenous route
- -- primary method of delivery
- Rapid infusion
- -- Shorter regimens may not only prove
efficacious but also reduce the risk of
hemorrhagic complications - Catheter-directed therapy
- -- for massive PE, may induce major bleeding
23Catheter-directed therapy
- Local delivery of streptokinase
- -- Extensive lysis (by perfusion scan and
pulmonary arteriography at 12 to 24 hour
follow-up) - Intrapulmonary versus peripheral alteplase
- -- no advantage over the intravenous route
- Direct delivery into clot
- --Enhanced thrombolysis, relatively low doses
(in an animal model of PE) - -- Could prove advantageous over the
intravenous route
24THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
- Urokinase versus heparin (By Urokinase Pulmonary
Embolism Trial (UPET) ) - Thrombolysis was hastened in patients receiving
UK compared with those treated with heparin when
pulmonary arteriograms and lung perfusion scans
were examined 24 hours after treatment - -- The difference between the two groups
diminished - -- No difference in the frequency of
recurrent PE or in mortality rate within two
weeks of therapy - Bleeding complications in this trial were
relatively high. Further experience with
thrombolytic therapy has suggested that adverse
effects are reduced. - One limitation to this study small number of
patients with potentially life-threatening
embolic disease (only 7 percent classified as
having massive PE with shock).
The Urokinase Pulmonary Embolism Trial
A national cooperative study. Circulation 1973
47(Suppl II)1.
25THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
- Urokinase versus heparin
- Phase 2 of the UPET evaluated 12 and 24 hour
infusions of UK and a 24 hour infusion of SK - -- No difference in mortality was
demonstrated among the treatment groups. - -- The extent of thrombolysis was greater
than that in heparin-treated patients. - -- Thrombolytic therapy was associated
with more rapid reduction of vascular obstruction
and earlier hemodynamic improvement.
Urokinase-Streptokinase Embolism Trial Phase 2
results. A cooperative study. JAMA 1974
2291606.
26THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
- Alteplase versus heparin
- A randomized controlled trial of alteplase plus
heparin versus placebo plus heparin was conducted
in 256 patients. - -- Therapy with alteplase was associated
with a decreased need for escalation of therapy
(10 versus 25 percent ) - -- In-hospital mortality did not differ
significantly between groups. - Limitations of this study include possible
undertreatment of the control group, because
heparin was not dosed according to weight. - -- In addition, because only about 30
percent of patients in each group had
echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular
dysfunction, it is possible that the study was
underpowered to detect a treatment effect
specific to these patients.
Konstantinides, S, Geibel, A, Heusel, G, et al.
Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin
alone in patients with submassive pulmonary
embolism. N Engl J Med 2002 3471143
27THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
- Alteplase versus urokinase
- One study compared alteplase (100 mg administered
intravenously over two hours) with a 24-hour
infusion of UK (2000 U per pound bolus followed
by continuous infusion at 2000 U/pound per hour).
The primary end points were improvement by
pulmonary arteriography at two hours and by
perfusion scan at 24 hours. - -- Moderate or marked improvement on
arteriogram at two hours was much more common in
patients treated with alteplase (59 versus 13
percent). - -- The alteplase-treated patients had
received the entire dose of thrombolytic therapy
(100 mg of alteplase) by the time of the two hour
outcome measurement whereas the UK-treated
patients had received only part of the total
dosage to be administered.-- Improvement in lung
scan reperfusion at 24 hours was identical in the
two treatment groups.
Goldhaber, SZ, Kessler, CM, Heit, J, et al. A
randomized controlled trial of recombinant tissue
plasminogen activator versus urokinase in the
treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Lancet
1988 2293.
28THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
- Alteplase versus urokinase
- At present, the alteplase regimen in which 100 mg
is administered intravenously over two hours is
the most rapidly administered protocol that is
currently approved for use in the United States
29Long-term outcome
- Almost all studies have demonstrated the
superiority of thrombolysis (in particular with
alteplase) over heparin in terms of resolution of
both radiographic and hemodynamic abnormalities
when measurements were made within the first 24
hours, this advantage appears to be short-lived. - Repeat echocardiograms obtained seven days after
treatment of 40 patients with either heparin or
alteplase revealed no significant differences in
ventricular dimensions. In addition, the trials
have not demonstrated a difference either in
mortality rate or in resolution of symptoms.
Konstantinides, S, Tiede, N, Geibel, A, et al.
Comparison of alteplase versus heparin for
resolution of major pulmonary embolism. Am J
Cardiol 1998 82966.
30Long-term outcome
- Measurement of diffusing capacity and capillary
volumes at two weeks and one year after treatment
showed that patients receiving thrombolytic
therapy had higher diffusing capacity and lung
capillary volumes compared to those receiving
heparin. - Follow-up of the same group of 23 patients for an
average of seven years following initial therapy
showed that patients who had been treated with
thrombolytic therapy had lower pulmonary artery
pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance
compared to patients who had received heparin. - The clinical significance of these changes awaits
further prospective trials.
Sharma, GVRK, Burleson, VA, Sasahara, AA. Effect
of thrombolytic therapy on pulmonary-capillary
blood volume in patients with pulmonary embolism.
N Engl J Med 1980 303842. Sharma, GVRK,
Folland, ED, McIntyre, KM, et al. Longterm
hemodynamic benefit of thrombolytic therapy in
pulmonary embolic disease (abstract). J Am Coll
Cardiol 1990 1565A.
31RECOMMENDATIONS
- The use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment
of venous thromboembolism - -- individualized and requires further
investigation. - Hemodynamically unstable PE or massive
iliofemoral thrombosis - -- the best candidates for thrombolytic
therapy. -
32Conclusion
- The primary therapy for acute pulmonary embolism
is anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin to
prevent additional thromboembolism. - Thrombolysis, why not?
- -- Heparin for well-tolerated PEs extremely
good prognosis - -- Inherent risk of thrombolysis bleeding
- -- The most effective thrombolytic period
missed (extensive bronchial collateral
circulation )
33Conclusion
- The role of thrombolytic therapy in the
management of acute massive pulmonary embolism
remains controversial - Although there is more rapid dissolution of
venous thromboemboli, the risk of serious
bleeding with thrombolysis remains a concern(
intracerebral hemorrhage occurs more frequently
with thrombolytic agents than with heparin).
34Conclusion
- Thrombolytic therapy can play an important role
in the management of acute pulmonary embolism - -- PE associated with systemic hypotension in
the absence of absolute contraindications. - -- Echcardiographic evidence of thrombus in
the right ventricle - -- Severely compromised oxygenation,
respiratory failure
35Conclusion
- Catheter-directed therapy with low-dose
- thrombolytic therapy can be considered
- Direct intraembolic therapy may be superior to
intravenous therapy - Acceptable time window for administration
2 weeks - The shorter interval between the onset of
symptoms and the initiation of therapy, the
greater response
36- Thank you for your attention!
37RECOMMENDATIONS
- From the evidence-based recommendations of the
Seventh American College of Chest Physicians
(ACCP) Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic
Therapy
Buller, HR, Agnelli, G, Hull, RD, et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic
disease the Seventh ACCP Conference on
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest
2004 126401s
38RECOMMENDATIONS
- Therapy of acute deep vein thrombosis or
pulmonary embolism should be initiated with IV
heparin adjusted to prolong the APTT to a range
that corresponds to a plasma heparin level of 0.3
to 0.7 U/mL
39RECOMMENDATIONS
- Heparin therapy should be continued for at least
five days. - Oral anticoagulation should be overlapped with
heparin therapy for four to five days. - Heparin and warfarin therapy can be initiated
simultaneously, with heparin therapy discontinued
on day five or six if the INR has been
therapeutic for two consecutive days. - Longer periods of initial heparin therapy may be
considered in the case of massive pulmonary
embolism or iliofemoral thrombosis.
40RECOMMENDATIONS
- LMW heparin may be used in place of
unfractionated heparin. - Dosing requirements are individualized for each
product.
41RECOMMENDATIONS
- Long-term anticoagulation should be continued for
at least 12 weeks using oral anticoagulants to
prolong the INR to 2.0 to 3.0.
42RECOMMENDATIONS
- First thromboembolic event in the context of a
reversible risk factor - -- treated for three to six months
- Idiopathic first thromboembolic event
- -- full six months of treatment.
- Recurrent venous thrombosis or a continuing risk
factor -- treated indefinitely. -
43RECOMMENDATIONS
- IVC filter placement is recommended when
- -- anticoagulation is contraindicated
- -- recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate
anticoagulation - -- chronic recurrent embolism with pulmonary
hypertension - -- situations with a high-risk of recurrent
embolization - -- conjunction with the performance of
pulmonary embolectomy or endarterectomy