Thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism

Description:

She has history of Af with RVR on regular medicine control. ... extremity is subdivided into either calf vein or proximal vein (popliteal, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:981
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: ntuhSi
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism


1
Thrombolytic therapy in pulmonary embolism
  • Presented by Ri ???
  • Instructor P ???

2
Chief complaint
  • A 59 year-old woman, for another treatment to
    pulmonary embolism with respiratory failure
    status post intubation

3
Brief history
  • She has history of Af with RVR on regular
    medicine control.
  • Abdominal fullness was noted in Nov.2005 and
    abdominal echo revealed a solid mass at left side
    of pelvis, 7 cm in size and hydronephrosis.
  • She was transferred to ??? hospital on
    Nov.26.2005. Debulking with retroperitoneal tumor
    excision and LN dissection was done Dec.2.2005.
  • Post operative course was smooth but left leg
    edema was noted.

4
Brief history
  • Sudden onset of shortness of breath was noted on
    Dec.10.2005.
  • Respiratory failure was noted and intubation was
    done.
  • Chest CT showed low density filling defect, 4 cm,
    in the pulmonary trunk , left main pulmonary
    artery and bilateral pulmonary with suspected
    pulmonary embolism.
  • Heparin has been adminstrated since Dec.17.2005.
    She was transferred to NTUH for further
    management on Dec.24.2005.

5
Past history
  • 1. HTN () , DM nil
  • 2. Smoking(-), Alcoholism (-)
  • 3. Surgery Retroperitoneal SCC with right
    inguinal LN metastasis, s/p debulking with
    retroperitoneal tumor excision and LN dissection
    in Dec.2005
  • 4. Allergy denied
  • 5. Family history non-contributory

6
Course and management
  • After transferred to ICU, fever was noted and
    Tazocin was administrated.
  • Fever work-up was done and sputum culture
    revealed Pseudomonus aeruginosa.
  • Cardiac echo revealed LVEF 72 with mild MR and
    moderate TR. Duplex revealed bilateral DVT(LltR).
  • Sudden onset of dyspnea with desasuration was
    noted. Auto peep was found. Ventilator with
    pressure control with muscle relaxant were
    administrated.

7
Course and management
  • Chest, abdomen, pelvis and lower extremity CT
    showed left main trunk embolization, left iliac
    mass at previous OP area and massive thrombus of
    common iliac vein, left femoral, and left
    popliteal vein.
  • IVC filter with t-PA catheter thrombolysis was
    done. Hypotension and deoxygenation were noted,
    in spite of high inotropic agents use.
  • DNR was signed on 12/26. The patient died of
    sepsis, pulmonary embolism and retroperitoneal
    SCC at 1325pm on Dec.26.2005.

8
Introduction
  • Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and acute pulmonary
    embolism (PE) are two manifestations of the same
    disorder, venous thromboembolism.
  • DVT of the lower extremity is subdivided into
    either calf vein or proximal vein (popliteal,
    femoral, or iliac vein) thrombosis.

9
Introduction
  • Proximal vein thrombosis is of greater importance
    clinically, since it is more commonly associated
    with serious disease.
  • Over 90 percent of cases of acute PE are due to
    emboli emanating from the proximal veins of the
    lower extremities.

10
GENERAL OBJECTIVES
  • Prevent further clot extension, acute PE, and
    recurrence of thrombosis, late complications (
    postphlebitic syndrome and chronic thromboembolic
    pulmonary hypertension).
  • Anticoagulant therapy is indicated for patients
    with symptomatic proximal DVT, since pulmonary
    embolism will occur in approximately 50 percent
    of untreated individuals, most often within days
    or weeks of the event

11
Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism and DVT
  • HEPARIN THERAPY
  • -- Unfractionated heparin
  • -- Low molecular weight heparin
  • ORAL ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY
  • -- Warfarin
  • THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY
  • -- Urokinase
  • -- Streptokinase
  • -- Alteplase
  • INFERIOR VENA CAVAL INTERRUPTION

12
HEPARIN
  • Simultaneous initiation of heparin (either
  • unfractionated or low-molecular weight) and
    oral
  • warfarin
  • --The standard anticoagulant regimen for venous
  • thromboembolism in all medically stable
    patients.

13
HEPARIN
  • Monitor the response, using either the activated
    partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or heparin
    levels, and to titrate the dose to the individual
    patient.
  • Critical therapeutic level of heparin, as
    measured by the aPTT, is 1.5 times the mean of
    the control value or the upper limit of the
    normal aPTT range, with a target range (aPTT
    ratio) of 1.5 to 2.5

14
HEPARIN
  • Experimental studies and clinical trials have
  • established that the efficacy of heparin
    therapy
  • depends upon achieving a critical therapeutic
    level
  • of heparin within the first 24 hours of
    treatment,
  • usually via a continuous heparin infusion
  • Heparin infusion of 1000 IU/hr and who had an
  • aPTT ratio of lt1.5 times control for three
    days or
  • more threefold increase in the risk of
    recurrent
  • venous thromboembolism

15
Low molecular weight heparin
  • Greater bioavailability when given by
  • subcutaneous injection
  • The duration of the anticoagulant effect is
  • greater (once or twice daily)
  • The anticoagulant response is highly correlated
  • with body weight, permitting administration
    of a
  • fixed dose
  • -- Laboratory monitoring is not necessary
    except
  • in pregnancy, morbid obesity and renal
    failure
  • Less likely to induce thrombocytopenia

16
THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
17
INDICATIONS
Patients with massive PE associated with
hemodynamic compromise are reasonable candidates
for intravenous thrombolytic therapy.
18
Echocardiography
  • May reveal findings which strongly suggest
    massive and hemodynamically significant PE
  • -- Right ventricular dilation and/or
    hypokinesis. Even in the absence of systemic
    hypotension or profound hypoxemia
  • Such findings suggest the need for aggressive
    intervention, including consideration of
    thrombolytic therapy. This criterion for
    administration of lytic agents is not utilized by
    all practitioners, and remains the subject of
    investigation.

Grifoni, S, Olivotto, I, Cecchini, P, et al.
Short-term clinical outcome of patients with
acute pulmonary embolism, normal blood pressure,
and echocardiographic right ventricular
dysfunction. Circulation 2000 1012817.
19
CONTRAINDICATIONS
  • These should be particularly scrutinized if
    lytic therapy is considered

20
Therapeutic regimens of Acute PE
21
General guidelines for administration
Buller, HR, Agnelli, G, Hull, RD, et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic
disease the Seventh ACCP Conference on
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest
2004 126401S.
22
About administration
  • Intravenous route
  • -- primary method of delivery
  • Rapid infusion
  • -- Shorter regimens may not only prove
    efficacious but also reduce the risk of
    hemorrhagic complications
  • Catheter-directed therapy
  • -- for massive PE, may induce major bleeding

23
Catheter-directed therapy
  • Local delivery of streptokinase
  • -- Extensive lysis (by perfusion scan and
    pulmonary arteriography at 12 to 24 hour
    follow-up)
  • Intrapulmonary versus peripheral alteplase
  • -- no advantage over the intravenous route
  • Direct delivery into clot
  • --Enhanced thrombolysis, relatively low doses
    (in an animal model of PE)
  • -- Could prove advantageous over the
    intravenous route

24
THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
  • Urokinase versus heparin (By Urokinase Pulmonary
    Embolism Trial (UPET) )
  • Thrombolysis was hastened in patients receiving
    UK compared with those treated with heparin when
    pulmonary arteriograms and lung perfusion scans
    were examined 24 hours after treatment
  • -- The difference between the two groups
    diminished
  • -- No difference in the frequency of
    recurrent PE or in mortality rate within two
    weeks of therapy
  • Bleeding complications in this trial were
    relatively high. Further experience with
    thrombolytic therapy has suggested that adverse
    effects are reduced.
  • One limitation to this study small number of
    patients with potentially life-threatening
    embolic disease (only 7 percent classified as
    having massive PE with shock).

The Urokinase Pulmonary Embolism Trial
A national cooperative study. Circulation 1973
47(Suppl II)1.
25
THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
  • Urokinase versus heparin
  • Phase 2 of the UPET evaluated 12 and 24 hour
    infusions of UK and a 24 hour infusion of SK
  • -- No difference in mortality was
    demonstrated among the treatment groups.
  • -- The extent of thrombolysis was greater
    than that in heparin-treated patients.
  • -- Thrombolytic therapy was associated
    with more rapid reduction of vascular obstruction
    and earlier hemodynamic improvement.

Urokinase-Streptokinase Embolism Trial Phase 2
results. A cooperative study. JAMA 1974
2291606.
26
THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
  • Alteplase versus heparin
  • A randomized controlled trial of alteplase plus
    heparin versus placebo plus heparin was conducted
    in 256 patients.
  • -- Therapy with alteplase was associated
    with a decreased need for escalation of therapy
    (10 versus 25 percent )
  • -- In-hospital mortality did not differ
    significantly between groups.
  • Limitations of this study include possible
    undertreatment of the control group, because
    heparin was not dosed according to weight.
  • -- In addition, because only about 30
    percent of patients in each group had
    echocardiographic evidence of right ventricular
    dysfunction, it is possible that the study was
    underpowered to detect a treatment effect
    specific to these patients.

Konstantinides, S, Geibel, A, Heusel, G, et al.
Heparin plus alteplase compared with heparin
alone in patients with submassive pulmonary
embolism. N Engl J Med 2002 3471143
27
THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
  • Alteplase versus urokinase
  • One study compared alteplase (100 mg administered
    intravenously over two hours) with a 24-hour
    infusion of UK (2000 U per pound bolus followed
    by continuous infusion at 2000 U/pound per hour).
    The primary end points were improvement by
    pulmonary arteriography at two hours and by
    perfusion scan at 24 hours.
  • -- Moderate or marked improvement on
    arteriogram at two hours was much more common in
    patients treated with alteplase (59 versus 13
    percent).
  • -- The alteplase-treated patients had
    received the entire dose of thrombolytic therapy
    (100 mg of alteplase) by the time of the two hour
    outcome measurement whereas the UK-treated
    patients had received only part of the total
    dosage to be administered.-- Improvement in lung
    scan reperfusion at 24 hours was identical in the
    two treatment groups.

Goldhaber, SZ, Kessler, CM, Heit, J, et al. A
randomized controlled trial of recombinant tissue
plasminogen activator versus urokinase in the
treatment of acute pulmonary embolism. Lancet
1988 2293.
28
THROMBOLYSIS FOR PE
  • Alteplase versus urokinase
  • At present, the alteplase regimen in which 100 mg
    is administered intravenously over two hours is
    the most rapidly administered protocol that is
    currently approved for use in the United States

29
Long-term outcome
  • Almost all studies have demonstrated the
    superiority of thrombolysis (in particular with
    alteplase) over heparin in terms of resolution of
    both radiographic and hemodynamic abnormalities
    when measurements were made within the first 24
    hours, this advantage appears to be short-lived.
  • Repeat echocardiograms obtained seven days after
    treatment of 40 patients with either heparin or
    alteplase revealed no significant differences in
    ventricular dimensions. In addition, the trials
    have not demonstrated a difference either in
    mortality rate or in resolution of symptoms.

Konstantinides, S, Tiede, N, Geibel, A, et al.
Comparison of alteplase versus heparin for
resolution of major pulmonary embolism. Am J
Cardiol 1998 82966.
30
Long-term outcome
  • Measurement of diffusing capacity and capillary
    volumes at two weeks and one year after treatment
    showed that patients receiving thrombolytic
    therapy had higher diffusing capacity and lung
    capillary volumes compared to those receiving
    heparin.
  • Follow-up of the same group of 23 patients for an
    average of seven years following initial therapy
    showed that patients who had been treated with
    thrombolytic therapy had lower pulmonary artery
    pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance
    compared to patients who had received heparin.
  • The clinical significance of these changes awaits
    further prospective trials.

Sharma, GVRK, Burleson, VA, Sasahara, AA. Effect
of thrombolytic therapy on pulmonary-capillary
blood volume in patients with pulmonary embolism.
N Engl J Med 1980 303842. Sharma, GVRK,
Folland, ED, McIntyre, KM, et al. Longterm
hemodynamic benefit of thrombolytic therapy in
pulmonary embolic disease (abstract). J Am Coll
Cardiol 1990 1565A.
31
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • The use of thrombolytic agents in the treatment
    of venous thromboembolism
  • -- individualized and requires further
    investigation.
  • Hemodynamically unstable PE or massive
    iliofemoral thrombosis
  • -- the best candidates for thrombolytic
    therapy.

32
Conclusion
  • The primary therapy for acute pulmonary embolism
    is anticoagulation with heparin and warfarin to
    prevent additional thromboembolism.
  • Thrombolysis, why not?
  • -- Heparin for well-tolerated PEs extremely
    good prognosis
  • -- Inherent risk of thrombolysis bleeding
  • -- The most effective thrombolytic period
    missed (extensive bronchial collateral
    circulation )

33
Conclusion
  • The role of thrombolytic therapy in the
    management of acute massive pulmonary embolism
    remains controversial
  • Although there is more rapid dissolution of
    venous thromboemboli, the risk of serious
    bleeding with thrombolysis remains a concern(
    intracerebral hemorrhage occurs more frequently
    with thrombolytic agents than with heparin).

34
Conclusion
  • Thrombolytic therapy can play an important role
    in the management of acute pulmonary embolism
  • -- PE associated with systemic hypotension in
    the absence of absolute contraindications.
  • -- Echcardiographic evidence of thrombus in
    the right ventricle
  • -- Severely compromised oxygenation,
    respiratory failure

35
Conclusion
  • Catheter-directed therapy with low-dose
  • thrombolytic therapy can be considered
  • Direct intraembolic therapy may be superior to
    intravenous therapy
  • Acceptable time window for administration
    2 weeks
  • The shorter interval between the onset of
    symptoms and the initiation of therapy, the
    greater response

36
  • Thank you for your attention!

37
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • From the evidence-based recommendations of the
    Seventh American College of Chest Physicians
    (ACCP) Consensus Conference on Antithrombotic
    Therapy

Buller, HR, Agnelli, G, Hull, RD, et al.
Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic
disease the Seventh ACCP Conference on
Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest
2004 126401s
38
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Therapy of acute deep vein thrombosis or
    pulmonary embolism should be initiated with IV
    heparin adjusted to prolong the APTT to a range
    that corresponds to a plasma heparin level of 0.3
    to 0.7 U/mL

39
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Heparin therapy should be continued for at least
    five days.
  • Oral anticoagulation should be overlapped with
    heparin therapy for four to five days.
  • Heparin and warfarin therapy can be initiated
    simultaneously, with heparin therapy discontinued
    on day five or six if the INR has been
    therapeutic for two consecutive days.
  • Longer periods of initial heparin therapy may be
    considered in the case of massive pulmonary
    embolism or iliofemoral thrombosis.

40
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • LMW heparin may be used in place of
    unfractionated heparin.
  • Dosing requirements are individualized for each
    product.

41
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • Long-term anticoagulation should be continued for
    at least 12 weeks using oral anticoagulants to
    prolong the INR to 2.0 to 3.0.

42
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • First thromboembolic event in the context of a
    reversible risk factor
  • -- treated for three to six months
  • Idiopathic first thromboembolic event
  • -- full six months of treatment.
  • Recurrent venous thrombosis or a continuing risk
    factor -- treated indefinitely.

43
RECOMMENDATIONS
  • IVC filter placement is recommended when
  • -- anticoagulation is contraindicated
  • -- recurrent thromboembolism despite adequate
    anticoagulation
  • -- chronic recurrent embolism with pulmonary
    hypertension
  • -- situations with a high-risk of recurrent
    embolization
  • -- conjunction with the performance of
    pulmonary embolectomy or endarterectomy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com