POS 304404: Great Power Politics 03292006 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

POS 304404: Great Power Politics 03292006

Description:

UZBEKISTAN. Overview of the country and it's libraries. WHERE IN THE ... Libraries of Uzbekistan. Total number of libraries 5748. University libraries 44 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: christian4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: POS 304404: Great Power Politics 03292006


1
POS 304/404 Great Power Politics03/29/2006
  • Course Agenda.
  • Research tool ISA Annual Convention Paper
    Archive.
  • Paper assignment 3 distributed due 04/19/2006.
  • Expanded descriptions due/weeklies due.
  • Midterm exams returned at end of class.
  • 03/22 weeklies returned via e-mail tomorrow
    (Thursday).
  • Lecture.
  • Presentations. Cuban Missile Crisis and WMD.
  • Great Powers in Action.
  • Offshore Balancers.
  • United States as test of offensive realism and
    its limits.
  • Haas.
  • Sino-Soviet Split. End of the Cold War.
  • Video Cases
  • McNamara on Cuban Missile Crisis Dec. 1989
    Gorbachev signals collapse of ideological
    distance 1990 Collapse of Soviet State.

2
  • Presentations.
  • Cuban Missile Crisis.
  • Weapons of Mass Destruction.
  • Video McNamara. The Fog of War. 2004 documentary
    - Oscar Winner.
  • Chapters 3 - 7 - 12minutes.
  • Who does Robert McNamara sound like, Mearsheimer,
    Haas, or a unique perspective re Cold War great
    power politics and effect of the nuclear
    revolution?
  • Discussion question.
  • Discussion Question 03/22/06
  • In your opinion which of the two scholars has a
    better theoretical and empirical explanation for
    the "end of the Cold War"?

3
  • Great Powers in Action.
  • Mearsheimer marshals evidence to support
    theoretical offensive realist argument.
  • History of great power politics is clash of
    revisionists.
  • Status quo powers are regional hegemons.
  • Regional hegemony is pinnacle.
  • Global hegemony impossible.
  • Cases
  • Japan.
  • Germany.
  • Soviet Union.
  • United Kingdom.
  • United States.
  • Italy (least of the Great Powers).

4
  • Great Powers in Action.
  • Cases
  • Self Defeating Behavior.
  • Japan and Germany.
  • Nuclear Arms Race/Revolution.
  • US and Soviet Nuclear Policy.
  • Each sought superiority.

5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
  • United States.
  • Offshore balancer, would intervene in other
    regions when regional hegemons began to emerge.
  • Preferred to buck-pass.
  • United States - Internal elements of national
    power.
  • Aggressive expansion to the west.
  • Manifest Destiny and Monroe Doctrine.
  • Power maximization and influence of domestic
    political structures and ideology.
  • America begins as revolutionary state founded in
    anti-colonial struggle - what role does this
    play?
  • Manifest Destiny.
  • Monroe Doctrine.
  • Genocide and Slavery as elements of national
    power.
  • Indigenous population as External Threat.

8
  • Indian Wars.
  • 10,000,000 North of Rio Grande pre-contact.
  • Disease, war, relocation - 300,000 by 1930.
  • Revolutionary War period.
  • Both sides have alliances with indigenous.
  • War of 1812.
  • Removal/Ethnic Cleansing.
  • Removal Treaties.
  • 1818, 1820, 1821.
  • Indian Removal Act 1830.
  • Indigenous removed West of Mississippi.
  • 1850 reservation system established.
  • 1860s-1870s - Large scale resistance and conflict
    between military, settlers, and indigenous.
  • Conclusion - December 1890 Battle of Wounded
    Knee.
  • Sioux warriors, women and children killed.

9
  • Indian Wars.
  • Major campaigns/wars.
  • Miami - 1790-95.
  • Tippecanoe 1811.
  • Creeks - 1813-14, 1836-37.
  • Black Hawk - 1832.
  • Comanches - 1867-75.
  • Apaches - 1873, 1885-86.
  • Little Big Horn 1876-77.
  • Nez Perces - 1877.
  • Bannocks 1878.
  • Cheyennes - 1878-79.
  • Utes - 1879-80.
  • Pine Ridge - 1890-91.

10
(No Transcript)
11

12
  • Ideology and Race.
  • Mearsheimer omission.
  • Howe addresses - More totally than anywhere else
    since first Spanish invasions of the Americas,
    native peoples were physically destroyed or
    marginalized p. 59.
  • Racial hierarchies and ideology.
  • Legitimization for military action.
  • Perception of enemies and threat.
  • Ideology and Race Indian Wars.
  • 400 year low intensity conflict.
  • Indigenous population viewed as impediment to
    American expansion.
  • Savages - treaties merely expedient.
  • treaties were expedients by which ignorant,
    intractable, and savage people were induced
    without bloodshed to yield what civilized peoples
    had the right to possess.... 1830 Governor of
    Georgia
  • Contradictory Impulses.
  • Assimilation vs. Elimination.

13
  • Post-Revolutionary Consolidation.
  • Civil War decides dominant/hegemonic
    faction/network of elites.
  • Displacement/genocide of indigenous population.
  • Lebensraum American style.
  • Ethnic cleansing - racialist ideologies.
  • Example of limited conception of human rights
    19th/20th centuries.
  • Massive immigration and settlement of conquered
    territory.
  • Rapid industrialization and economic expansion.
  • Monroe Doctrine and attempt at isolating Western
    Hemisphere from penetration by other great
    powers.
  • France attempted Mexico.
  • Germany - World War I and World War II - Mexico
    and Latin America.
  • Soviet Union - Cuba and interaction with and
    support for other Marxist and national liberation
    movements.

14
  • United States Strategic Imperative.
  • Realist motivations only?
  • Realism and ideological infrastructure for
    revolutionary/anti-colonial, national liberation
    movements.
  • American Revolution.
  • France and United Kingdom rivalry.
  • Analogies to US and Soviet rivalry.
  • War of 1812.
  • United Kingdom partially motivated to prevent US
    from becoming even more powerful through
    acquisition of Canada.
  • England and Spain provide military assistance to
    indigenous.

15
  • United States Military Interventions.
  • Europe.
  • Period One 1900-1917.
  • US buck-passing relying on Triple Entente.
  • Period 2 1917-1923.
  • World War I, post-War occupation, containment of
    Soviet Union.
  • Period 3 1923-1940.
  • Buck-passing/isolation.
  • Period 4 1940-1945.
  • World War II - Germany.
  • Period 5 1940-1990.
  • Cold War - Soviet Union.
  • Period 6 1991-2001.
  • Enlargement of NATO, Humanitarian Intervention.
  • Period 7 2001-?
  • War on Terror - Anti-Proliferation.

16
  • United States Interventions.
  • Asia.
  • Period 1 1900-early 1930s.
  • Minor deployments of troops.
  • No systematic intervention - no potential
    regional hegemon.
  • Period 2 1930s-1940.
  • Japan ascendant but balanced by UK and China.
  • Period 3 1940-1945.
  • Japan potential hegemon.
  • US flows troop to region before Pearl Harbor.
  • Period 4 1945-1990.
  • Cold War.
  • Period 5 1991-2001.
  • PRC as potential hegemon.
  • Period 6 2001-?
  • War on Terror, WMD, PRC.

17
  • United Kingdom.
  • Offshore balancer to Continental Europe.
  • Period 1 1792-1815 Containment of France.
  • Period 2 1816-1904 - Splendid Isolation.
  • Period 3 1905-1930 - Containment of Germany.
  • Period 4 1930-1939 - Limited Liability.
  • Period 5 1939-1945 - World War II.
  • Period 6 1945-1990 - Cold War containment.
  • Period 7 1991-2001 - NATO/EU enlargement,
    humanitarian intervention.
  • Period 8 2001-? - War on Terror, EU, cooperation
    with US.

18
  • Haas - Sino-Soviet Split.
  • Why the split?
  • Haas admits that case is most obvious (apparent)
    exception to books core claims (146).
  • Conflict over competing interpretations of
    Marxism-Leninism.
  • Maos radicalization amplified split.
  • Realist explanations of formation to a certain
    extent correct.
  • PRC ideological distance from SU and US.
  • Period 1 1953-1958.
  • Split power differential (no-too rapid split).
  • Hundred Flowers (56) and the Great Leap Forward
    (58).
  • Mao increasingly suspicious.

19
  • Haas - End of the Cold War.
  • Diminishment of ideological distance explains
    pacific (relatively) end of the Cold War.
  • Competing Explanations
  • Collapse of Soviet economy and regime
    legitimacy.
  • Declining relative power leads to retrenchment.
  • Ideologies of domestic change key.
  • Soviet Union Old and New Thinkers.
  • Ideology drove threat perception by hardliners
    and reformers.
  • Ideology drove foreign policy decisions.
  • United States.
  • Ideological beliefs remained constant.
  • Reagan and Bush I foreign/natsec/intel. Adapted
    to domestic changes in Soviet Union, not changes
    in power.
  • Video Cases 1989 (signaling ideological shifts)
    1990 reformists survive coup, collapse of SU.

20
  • Discussion Question for 04/04/2006.
  • Posted in course website, under announcements,
    tomorrow (Thursday).
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com