CS5263: IT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

CS5263: IT

Description:

... of Singapore ... to well known entrepreneur's observations about Singapore vs US ... Entrepreneurship in Singapore: Technopreneurship 21, EISC ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:112
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: compN
Category:
Tags: cs5263 | slovenia

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CS5263: IT


1
CS5263 IT Entrepreneurship Semester II
2002-2003 6 Mar 2003 Week 8
Week 8
  • School of Computing
  • National University of Singapore
  • Lecturer Associate Professor Francis Yeoh
    (francis_at_gdis.com.sg)
  • Co-ordinator/Tutor Mr Koh Chung Haur
    (kohch_at_comp.nus.edu.sg)

2
Invited Guests
  • Richard Lai 20 Feb
  • CEO, dollarDEX
  • Dr Tan Eng Siong 6 Mar
  • Founder, Thirdvoice Inc
  • Dr Foong Wai Keong 13 Mar
  • CEO, Ecquaria Pte Ltd
  • Ng Kai Wa 20 Mar
  • Co-founder Creative Technology
  • Chairman CEO, Innomedia Pte Ltd

3
Agenda for Invited Guest Sessions
  • Previous Group presents post-mortem (15 min)
  • Current Group presents background on guest (15
    min)
  • Group moderates QA with Invited Guest (1 hour)

4
Writing to the Press
  • Contribution to a larger audience
  • Exercising of entrepreneurial qualities
  • Seize the opportunity for gain
  • Act quickly
  • Understand the environment
  • Carry out critical analysis
  • Communicate clearly
  • (press is a proxy for the market/investors)

5
Critique of Forum Letters
  • What is good?
  • What is not so good?
  • Can it be improved?
  • How original is the contribution?
  • Why do you think it was chosen for publication?

6
Straits Times Forum Page 3 Mar 2003
  • Start with how people view rules
  • I REFER to the article, 'Minister aims for
    culture of risk taking' (ST, March 1). I am glad
    to see that Mr Raymond Lim has been chosen for
    the challenging post of the Minister of State in
    charge of Entrepreneurship, and that he has a
    strong mandate from the Government.
  • In his book, Chaotic Thoughts From The Old
    Millennium, Creative Technology chairman and
    chief executive officer Sim Wong Hoo pointed out
    how the people of Singapore needed rules before
    they felt they had the right to do something. He
    also observed that this attitude existed in
    Singapore culture at all levels of thinking and
    in every segment of people's lives.
  • However, he noted that in the United States, the
    opposite was true - if there are no rules, you
    can do something.
  • Innovation cannot thrive when you need to check
    constantly with the authorities whether there are
    rules about doing a certain thing. And
    entrepreneurship is all about innovations.
  • I believe that it will take a few generations
    before we can remove this attitude completely.
  • But I hope that Mr Lim will look into what Mr
    Sim has observed, as this mindset stifles
    innovative thinking and the appetite for risk in
    Singaporeans.
  • With this hurdle removed, the long-term goal of
    creating a risk-taking culture can be achieved.
  • RAYMOND HENG KOK WEI

7
Critique 1
  • Latches onto something current appointment of
    Minister for Entrepreneurship
  • Makes reference to well known entrepreneurs
    observations about Singapore vs US
  • Reinforces the key point innovation cannot
    thrive if one has to keep checking the rule book
  • Reiterates the importance of changing mindset
  • Originality? No, but makes valid point which fits
    well into context
  • Improvement? Make an original point, integrate
    or synthesise

8
Straits Times Forum Page 4 Mar 2003
  • Right policies important
  • INTERVENTION by the Government to create the
    right climate for entre-preneurship will help.
  • The Government can play the role of the investor
    (for example, in the Seeds programme) and
    facilitator. Financial and managerial support
    will help a company get under way and help it to
    be more successful.
  • However, the challenge here is formulating the
    right policies and to make them work in
    practice.
  • The concept of using entrepreneurship as an
    economic-development tool is an extremely
    attractive one, especially during this economic
    downturn when so many people are out of work.
  • However, if the Government wants to avoid
    putting resources into programmes that do little
    to promote entrepreneurial activity, it needs to
    continually ask critical questions about what it
    is that it expects to accomplish through
    entrepreneurial development and how to go about
    it.
  • Some questions that the Government should
    consider seriously
  • How is promoting entrepreneurship different
    from 'traditional' economic development?
  • Are there prerequisites for entrepreneurial
    policy to be effective?
  • Does it have the right mix of people to
    perform the task of designing and delivering the
    right assistance to the right people at the right
    time to make a difference in entrepreneurial
    behaviour?
  • MONICA LIM WAN LIN (MS)

9
Critique 2
  • Accepts proposition that government has a role to
    play in developing entrepreneurship (sets the
    stage)
  • Expands on value of using entrepreneurship as an
    economic development tool in the current context
    of high unemployment (relates to something of
    current concern)
  • Develops key point How do we know what we do is
    going to be effective?
  • Proposes some questions to ask as a checklist
  • Originality? Not specifically, but focuses on
    the aspect of effectiveness of policies, which
    may be neglected
  • Improvement? Mention lessons learnt from
    elsewhere?

10
Straits Times Forum Page 4 Mar 2003
  • Ease the bonds that shackle scholars
  • IT WAS encouraging to read in the article,
    'Science whiz set to stir up telecom revolution'
    (The Sunday Times, March 2), that a scholar was
    allowed to take no-pay leave to venture out of
    the Defence Ministry and try out his new idea.
  • His bosses saw his vision and did not hold him
    back. Their reaction is a great contrast to
    previous situations where government scholars had
    their names published in the newspapers for
    breaking their bonds.
  • His bosses exercised good judgment in
    considering the principles involved, rather than
    focusing on Dr Desmond Lim's legal commitment to
    complete his bond. It was clear that they
    followed the spirit of the law rather than the
    letter.
  • What a difference a flexible mindset made in
    this case!
  • In the past, the Government has been very
    successful in wooing the best and the brightest.
    These scholars might have had the chance to
    innovate if they had not been restricted by their
    bonds.
  • In the light of recent events, no iron rice
    bowls for government jobs and a focus on
    Singapore being an entrepolis, people may be
    encouraged to try out new things, irrespective of
    success or failure.
  • In view of this, I hope that scholarships
    offered in future might have less restrictive
    bonds. The likes of Dr Lim in the private sector
    will attract more business and investments to
    Singapore.
  • This should more than offset the cost of a
    scholar's bond and allow better utilisation of
    our scarce resource, human talent.
  • JOACHIM NATHAN

11
Critique 3
  • Latches onto something recently reported
  • Contrast it with the controversial practice of
    publicly shaming bond breaking scholars
    (controversial topics always guarantee
    attention)
  • Makes main point follow spirit of the law rather
    than the letter
  • Explains why this is important with reference to
    the new challenges facing Singapore no iron rice
    bowl, value of entrepreneurial culture
  • Originality? No, an old point actually already
    in report but good attention catching topic
  • Improvement? Perhaps cite some examples of
    successes?

12
Team Project Business Plan
  • The class will be divided into 10 teams
  • Team members will assume the roles of founders of
    a start-up company CEO, CTO, CFO, VP
    Engineering, VP Marketing etc.
  • Each team will develop a business plan, a set of
    presentation foils and a 2 minute elevator pitch
  • Each team will make a 12/15 presentation a 2
    min elevator pitch to the class
  • The business plan presentation slides are to be
    submitted for grading

13
Team Project Grading
  • Team project will make up 40 of total course
    grade
  • Grading will be based on
  • Quality of the business plan (15)
  • Quality of the presentation slides (10)
  • Effectiveness of class presentation (10)
  • Effectiveness of elevator pitch (5)
  • Business Plan must not exceed 50 pages, excluding
    annexes
  • Presentation slides to be limited to no more than
    12
  • Class presentation and elevator pitch will be
    assessed by the class
  • A single grade will be given to the team

14
Team Project Dates
  • Teams will draw lots on when they will present
  • 5 teams will present on 27 Mar and the other 5
    teams on 3 Apr
  • Presentation foils business plan to be
    submitted before presentation (hard copy to Koh
    Chung Haur)

15
Business Plan Project Tips
  • Work on something as real as you can probably
    easier to do a service than a product
  • Check out Druckers 7 sources of innovation for
    ideas
  • Propose hiring of credible people if necessary
    but must be realistic
  • Pick out your own shortcomings before others pick
    them out for you
  • Have specific strategies and plans rather than
    motherhood statements

16
Business Plan for Magnus
  • Real situation, ideal learning opportunity

17
CS5263 Course Outline
Updated 30 Jan 2003
18
Readings for Week 9
  • A Venture Capitalists View of Engineers
  • by Brian Kinard, IEEE Spectrum Dec 2001
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com