The Clark Group, LLC

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

The Clark Group, LLC

Description:

President Elect Obama is committed despite economy (as was Senator McCain) ... Montana State University University of Nebraska. Ohio State University Purdue ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: sarahessen

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Clark Group, LLC


1
The Clark Group, LLC
Not your Fathers Carbon Market An Update from
Agricultures Point of View
  • Laura Sands

2
How would a carbon market work?

3
What agricultural practices would qualify?
  • No or low till
  • Methane capture or flaring from dairies
  • Reductions in nitrous oxide emissions from use of
    precision agriculture or split application of
    fertilizers
  • Grassland management or forestry

4
Overview
  • Legislation to Watch
  • Politics Process
  • Measurement
  • Market PotentialA very different scenario

5
Legislation to watch
6
(No Transcript)
7
Why Congress is interested in Ag?
  • Ag can play a role in climate reductions because
    it can store carbon in soils and biofuels are low
    carbon solution

8
Each De-carbonizing Wedge represents 25 billion
tons of carbon avoided or reduced. 7 wedges
needed to reach stable carbon emissions.
Source Robert Socolow Stephen Pacala
Scientific American, Sept. 2006
9
Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
  • 110th Congress 165 climate change bills,
    resolutions, amendments introduced by July, 2007
  • Some bills -- not all --would allow a role for
    agricultural sinks, other agricultural emissions
    reductions
  • 11 major bills in Senate, 10 in House,
    would/might provide some credit to agriculture
    for emissions reductions activities
  • Pew Center on Global Climate Change,
    www.pewclimate.org

10
Key emerging forces
  • House Dingell draft billincludes some role for
    ag
  • President Elect Obama is committed despite
    economy (as was Senator McCain)
  • The Supreme Court has opened the door to
    regulation of GHGs, which could have an adverse
    impact on ag. Cap and trade would override court
    decision.

11
Lieberman-Warner Bill (Environment Committee)
  • Allows GHG emitters to meet up to 15 of their
    required reductions by purchasing agriculture
    offsets
  • Provides 5 of emissions allowance for the
    agriculture industry (through USDA) to establish
    government program to reward carbon-friendly
    practices

12
Tale of two proposals Cap-and-Trade What Role
for Agriculture?
  • S.2191 The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security
    Act of 2007
  • Offset projects include ag and forestry sinks
  • Rigorous project plans, incl. procedures to
    monitor, quantify and discount ag and forestry
    offset projects
  • Discount protocols for MMV, leakage,
    additionality
  • Ensure permanence by mitigating and compensating
    for reversals annual certification
  • Procedures for 3rd party verifiers/verification

13
Bingaman-Specter Bill (Energy Committee)
  • No agriculture offset market
  • Provides agriculture industry with 5 of
    emissions allowances to establish government
    program to reward carbon-friendly agriculture
    practices
  • Contains an economic safety valve which caps
    the price of carbon at 12/MTC02e
  • Allows companies to pay a government fund rather
    than offset market or make reductions

14
Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
  • House Energy and Commerce Committee, led by
    Chairman John D. Dingell, introduced the 1st
    white paper on Climate Change October 3, 2007,
    as we move towards development and eventual
    passage of comprehensive climate legislation.
  • Conclusions The US should reduce GHG emissions
    60-80 by 2050.
  • The central component of this program should be
    a cap-and-trade program.

15
Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
  • Dingell/Boucher White Paper
  • The agricultural sectors direct emissions
    generally should not be included in the
    cap-and-trade program because of difficulties
    monitoring emissions and large number of sources
    with low emissions.
  • This sector may present opportunities for
    emission reductions that would be measurable and
    might then provide offset or credit
    opportunities.

16
Climate Politics changing
17
Major confluence of events
  • Democratic Congress
  • Business is supportive
  • Agriculture sees opportunity for major revenue
    stream
  • Court decision is key

18
USCAP urges policy makers to enact a policy
framework for mandatory reductions of GHG
emissions from major emitting sectors . . .
The cornerstone of this approach would be a
cap-and-trade program.
19
www.us-cap.org/
20
Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
  • Relevant US-CAP Principles
  • Congress should immediately enact cap-and-trade
    legislation to reduce emissions 60-80 below
    current levels by 2050
  • Capped entities should be permitted to meet part
    of obligations through purchase of verified
    emissions offsets from a range of domestic sinks
    and emissions sources

21
What do (or should) we want?
  • Ag should argue for unlimited agricultural
    offsets. This would bring down the cost of
    compliancesupport from utilities
  • Generate potential for billions of revenue for
    ag-based GHG reductions
  • Combination of allowance and offset may be best
    optionespecially for early adopter protections

22
Stabenow amendment
  • Called for 1 billion ton carbon limithigher than
    Lieberman Warner
  • Had support of coalition of ag groups and
    utilities
  • Supported by Lieberman and Warner
  • Bipartisan co-sponsorship
  • Framework for moving forward
  • Workable and verifiable offsets

23
The science of sequestration
24
Consortium for Agricultural Soils Mitigation of
Greenhouse Gases
  • Kansas State University Colorado State
    University
  • Iowa State University Michigan State University
  • Montana State University University of Nebraska
  • Ohio State University Purdue University
  • Texas AM University Pacific NW National Labs

25
Duke Standard Measurement Guide
Authors/Advisory Committee from Texas AM
University Colorado State University University
of New Hampshire Institute for Lifecycle
Environmental Assessment Rice University Holland
Hart LLP Environmental Resources
Trust Princeton University Kansas State
University Stanford University Brown
University Duke University
26
Whats different this time around?
  • We will have a market

27
A real market is not business as usual
  • Carbon per acre prices of 1.50/acre
  • No incentives to buy from ag
  • Protocols not transparent
  • No significant money for aggregators, price is low
  • Carbon prices that could generate between 15-25
    an acrefor practices
  • Ag is best low-cost solution for rapid reductions
  • Publicly traded commodity
  • Potential for ag groups to aggregate and make

28
Market potential
29
Illustrative Ranking of Carbon as a Crop in U.S.
Per Proposed GHG Limits in Senate Bill 280
(Lieberman-McCain) 1/12/07
Carbon at 10/MT CO2e,
Crop Source USDA - National Agricultural
Statistics Service US Crop Rankings - 1997
Production Year Ranking Based on Value of
Production
30
Estimates for a mandatory carbon market
  • Mandatory carbon market price estimate
    10-20/MMTC.
  • To get a more realistic picture of potential
    market value, lets assume 15 MMTC

31
(No Transcript)
32
Will any of this be easy? No.
  • Major opponents are energy industry
  • Some utilities
  • Competing policy ideas which would exclude
    agriculture
  • Some pressure on the left which would also
    exclude ag

33
A little information is not a good thing
  • Coal and railroad alliance has amassed a 30
    billion war chest
  • Junk studies (CRA, Searchinger)
  • Serious pushback from oil interests who want a
    carbon tax (keeps them on top) or safety valve
  • Alignment against ag offsets continues on the
    left
  • SOMEONE will want to sell offsets-if not ag,
    others are looking to cut them out. Splitting ag
    makes sense from a strategic point of view

34
Myth Energy costs, especially in Rural America,
will skyrocket
  • Overall, there is no significant increase
    nationwide
  • In some places, electricity costs will actually
    go down.
  • Rural Co-ops have extra allowances and funding, a
    free ride not given to other utilities
  • States will get billions of dollars for
    assistance for low or middle income energy users

35
Gas prices will go through the roof
  • Gasoline prices gradually go up under S. 2191,
    tracking the CO2 allowance price (i.e. 10 a ton
    CO2 _at_ 10 cents on a gallon).
  • However, some models show increasing efficiency
    will reduce gas demand, taking pressure off
  • Other factors will have more impact, MidEast
    politics, China etc.

36
If you are not at the Table
You ARE on the Menu!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)