Title: The Clark Group, LLC
1The Clark Group, LLC
Not your Fathers Carbon Market An Update from
Agricultures Point of View
2How would a carbon market work?
3What agricultural practices would qualify?
- No or low till
- Methane capture or flaring from dairies
- Reductions in nitrous oxide emissions from use of
precision agriculture or split application of
fertilizers - Grassland management or forestry
4Overview
- Legislation to Watch
- Politics Process
- Measurement
- Market PotentialA very different scenario
5Legislation to watch
6(No Transcript)
7Why Congress is interested in Ag?
- Ag can play a role in climate reductions because
it can store carbon in soils and biofuels are low
carbon solution
8Each De-carbonizing Wedge represents 25 billion
tons of carbon avoided or reduced. 7 wedges
needed to reach stable carbon emissions.
Source Robert Socolow Stephen Pacala
Scientific American, Sept. 2006
9Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
- 110th Congress 165 climate change bills,
resolutions, amendments introduced by July, 2007 - Some bills -- not all --would allow a role for
agricultural sinks, other agricultural emissions
reductions - 11 major bills in Senate, 10 in House,
would/might provide some credit to agriculture
for emissions reductions activities - Pew Center on Global Climate Change,
www.pewclimate.org
10Key emerging forces
- House Dingell draft billincludes some role for
ag - President Elect Obama is committed despite
economy (as was Senator McCain) - The Supreme Court has opened the door to
regulation of GHGs, which could have an adverse
impact on ag. Cap and trade would override court
decision.
11Lieberman-Warner Bill (Environment Committee)
- Allows GHG emitters to meet up to 15 of their
required reductions by purchasing agriculture
offsets - Provides 5 of emissions allowance for the
agriculture industry (through USDA) to establish
government program to reward carbon-friendly
practices
12Tale of two proposals Cap-and-Trade What Role
for Agriculture?
- S.2191 The Lieberman-Warner Climate Security
Act of 2007 - Offset projects include ag and forestry sinks
- Rigorous project plans, incl. procedures to
monitor, quantify and discount ag and forestry
offset projects - Discount protocols for MMV, leakage,
additionality - Ensure permanence by mitigating and compensating
for reversals annual certification - Procedures for 3rd party verifiers/verification
13Bingaman-Specter Bill (Energy Committee)
- No agriculture offset market
- Provides agriculture industry with 5 of
emissions allowances to establish government
program to reward carbon-friendly agriculture
practices - Contains an economic safety valve which caps
the price of carbon at 12/MTC02e - Allows companies to pay a government fund rather
than offset market or make reductions
14Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
- House Energy and Commerce Committee, led by
Chairman John D. Dingell, introduced the 1st
white paper on Climate Change October 3, 2007,
as we move towards development and eventual
passage of comprehensive climate legislation. - Conclusions The US should reduce GHG emissions
60-80 by 2050. - The central component of this program should be
a cap-and-trade program.
15Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
- Dingell/Boucher White Paper
- The agricultural sectors direct emissions
generally should not be included in the
cap-and-trade program because of difficulties
monitoring emissions and large number of sources
with low emissions. - This sector may present opportunities for
emission reductions that would be measurable and
might then provide offset or credit
opportunities.
16Climate Politics changing
17Major confluence of events
- Democratic Congress
- Business is supportive
- Agriculture sees opportunity for major revenue
stream - Court decision is key
18USCAP urges policy makers to enact a policy
framework for mandatory reductions of GHG
emissions from major emitting sectors . . .
The cornerstone of this approach would be a
cap-and-trade program.
19www.us-cap.org/
20Cap-and-Trade Is Climate Legislation Coming?
- Relevant US-CAP Principles
- Congress should immediately enact cap-and-trade
legislation to reduce emissions 60-80 below
current levels by 2050 - Capped entities should be permitted to meet part
of obligations through purchase of verified
emissions offsets from a range of domestic sinks
and emissions sources
21What do (or should) we want?
- Ag should argue for unlimited agricultural
offsets. This would bring down the cost of
compliancesupport from utilities - Generate potential for billions of revenue for
ag-based GHG reductions - Combination of allowance and offset may be best
optionespecially for early adopter protections
22Stabenow amendment
- Called for 1 billion ton carbon limithigher than
Lieberman Warner - Had support of coalition of ag groups and
utilities - Supported by Lieberman and Warner
- Bipartisan co-sponsorship
- Framework for moving forward
- Workable and verifiable offsets
23The science of sequestration
24Consortium for Agricultural Soils Mitigation of
Greenhouse Gases
- Kansas State University Colorado State
University - Iowa State University Michigan State University
- Montana State University University of Nebraska
- Ohio State University Purdue University
- Texas AM University Pacific NW National Labs
25Duke Standard Measurement Guide
Authors/Advisory Committee from Texas AM
University Colorado State University University
of New Hampshire Institute for Lifecycle
Environmental Assessment Rice University Holland
Hart LLP Environmental Resources
Trust Princeton University Kansas State
University Stanford University Brown
University Duke University
26Whats different this time around?
27A real market is not business as usual
- Carbon per acre prices of 1.50/acre
- No incentives to buy from ag
- Protocols not transparent
- No significant money for aggregators, price is low
- Carbon prices that could generate between 15-25
an acrefor practices - Ag is best low-cost solution for rapid reductions
- Publicly traded commodity
- Potential for ag groups to aggregate and make
28Market potential
29Illustrative Ranking of Carbon as a Crop in U.S.
Per Proposed GHG Limits in Senate Bill 280
(Lieberman-McCain) 1/12/07
Carbon at 10/MT CO2e,
Crop Source USDA - National Agricultural
Statistics Service US Crop Rankings - 1997
Production Year Ranking Based on Value of
Production
30Estimates for a mandatory carbon market
- Mandatory carbon market price estimate
10-20/MMTC. - To get a more realistic picture of potential
market value, lets assume 15 MMTC
31(No Transcript)
32Will any of this be easy? No.
- Major opponents are energy industry
- Some utilities
- Competing policy ideas which would exclude
agriculture - Some pressure on the left which would also
exclude ag
33A little information is not a good thing
- Coal and railroad alliance has amassed a 30
billion war chest - Junk studies (CRA, Searchinger)
- Serious pushback from oil interests who want a
carbon tax (keeps them on top) or safety valve - Alignment against ag offsets continues on the
left - SOMEONE will want to sell offsets-if not ag,
others are looking to cut them out. Splitting ag
makes sense from a strategic point of view
34Myth Energy costs, especially in Rural America,
will skyrocket
- Overall, there is no significant increase
nationwide - In some places, electricity costs will actually
go down. - Rural Co-ops have extra allowances and funding, a
free ride not given to other utilities - States will get billions of dollars for
assistance for low or middle income energy users
35Gas prices will go through the roof
- Gasoline prices gradually go up under S. 2191,
tracking the CO2 allowance price (i.e. 10 a ton
CO2 _at_ 10 cents on a gallon). - However, some models show increasing efficiency
will reduce gas demand, taking pressure off - Other factors will have more impact, MidEast
politics, China etc.
36If you are not at the Table
You ARE on the Menu!