Title: Marty Basu, Amy Benford, Karl Gunderson, Sean Kramer
1Marty Basu, Amy Benford, Karl Gunderson, Sean
Kramer
RESPONDING TO MUNICIPAL FISCAL
CRISES Bankruptcy, Bailouts, and Stimulus
2QUESTION and OBJECTIVE
- Question
- How should the federal government respond to
municipal fiscal crises? - Objective
- Identify the advantages and disadvantages
associated with various forms of municipal
bailouts and rescues.
3Organization
- Introduction to the Municipal Problem
- Let Municipality Declare Bankruptcy
- Direct Bailout Loan Assistance
- Indirect Bailout Corporate Bailout in
Municipality - Indirect Bailout Infrastructure Spending
- Conclusions
4Introduction
5What is a municipality?
- Political subdivision or
- public agency or
- instrumentality
- of a State.
- Bankruptcy Code 11 U.S.C. Sec.101(40)
6What is a municipality?
- Corporationestablished to provide general
local government for a specific population
concentration in a defined area - All active government units officially
designated as cities, boroughs except AK, towns
except in New England, MN, NY, WI, and
villages. - Census Bureau, 2002 Report v-vi.
-
- Includes special districts schools, water, etc.
7What is a municipality?
- In 2007, U.S. Census of Government identified
89,476 local governments. - 2007 U.S. Census of Government
8What is the problem?
- Fiscal Crisis
- Money In lt Money Going Out
9What is the problem?
- Acute Shocks
- Cash On Hand lt Current Expenses
- Shocks lawsuits, natural disaster, recession,
etc. - Endemic Fiscal Problems
- Expected Revenue lt Expected Expenses
- Accounting Manipulation
- Underestimate expected expenses
- Overestimate expected revenue
10What Causes Fiscal CrisisDecreased Revenue
- Decrease Tax Revenue
- Decreased economic activity (sales tax)
- Fewer taxpayers (residents, firms income,
property taxes) - Tax Cuts (lower tax rates)
- Decrease in Payments Received from State/Federal
Government - State/federal fiscal crisis Budgetary pressures
upstream decrease downstream assistance - Alternating political sentiments toward
assistance
11What Causes Fiscal Crisis Increased Expenses
- Increased Cost of Municipal Labor
- Union labor wages/benefits/pensions
- Larger workforce
- Increased Demand for Services
- Recession increases demand for assistance
payments - Larger population requires more police, fire,
etc. - Increased Cost of Credit
- Increased Demand for Capital Expenditure
- Roads, mass transit, parks, buildings, etc.
12What Causes Fiscal Crisis Other Explanations
- Poor Planning
- Failure to save in boom times to offset busts
- Improper Accounting
- Manipulating how revenue and expenses are
categorized
13How are cities different from corporations?
- Monopoly Power to Tax
- Ability to use coercive power of the state to
collect revenue - Monopoly Power to Provide Services
- Cities have the ability to choose services
- Effective Constraints
- Politics Voters unwilling to pay more taxes, cut
services - Effective Limits on Ability to Tax Taxes drive
people out - State and Federal Law Service mandates prevent
service cuts tax restrictions prevent increases
14Current Climate
- 84 of cities financially distressed
- Up 20 from six months ago
- 92 of cities expect to have trouble meeting
needs - 69 have instituted hiring freezes/layoffs
- 42 are delaying/canceling infrastructure
projects - 22 have made cuts across the board
15Current Climate
- Cities responses
- 50 are increasing charges for services
- 28 are increasing the number of fees
- 14 have increased property taxes
- 6 have increased sales taxes
16What can the federal government do?
- Do Nothing Ch 9 Bankruptcy
- Direct Bailout Loan Assistance
- Indirect Bailout Corporate Bailout in
Municipality - Indirect Bailout Infrastructure Spending
17OPTION 1
- City Enters Chapter 9 Municipal Bankruptcy
18Municipal Bankruptcy What are we talking about?
- Question
- If the federal government does not intervene,
how can the city resolve a current crisis? - Option File Chapter 9 Bankruptcy
- Renegotiate outstanding debt with creditors.
19Introduction to Municipal Bankruptcy
- Chapter 9 Municipal Bankruptcy
- Municipality renegotiates outstanding debt
20Municipal Bankruptcy Quick Facts
- About 500 municipal bankruptcies filed
- Only 15 have been cities, counties, or villages
- Previously use to help cities renegotiate one
large debt - Ex Lawsuits
- Recent Cases
- 1991 Bridgeport, CT (unsuccessful filing)
- 1994 Orange County, CA
- 2008 City of Vallejo, CA
21Steps in Municipal Bankruptcy
- STEP 1 Meet threshold requirements
- STEP 2 File for bankruptcy
- STEP 3 Court files automatic stay
- Prevents creditors from collecting on their debt
- STEP 4 Municipality and creditors negotiate debt
readjustment plan - Municipality has exclusive right to submit plans
- STEP 5 Court confirms plan
- Chapter 11 cram down applies
22Threshold Requirements for Bankruptcy
- Must be a municipality
- Must be insolvent
- Cannot pay debt as it becomes due OR
- Cannot pay debt in the future
- State must specifically authorize bankruptcy by
statute - Must desire to effect a plan of adjustment
- Must negotiate settlement in good faith or show
that negotiation is impracticable
23Effect of Municipal Bankruptcy
- Municipality not required to liquidate assets
- Court cannot interfere with operation of
municipality - Municipality has final say on raising taxes
- Municipality can renegotiate collective
bargaining agreements (CBAs) - Pension agreements
- No guarantees to unsecured creditors
24Past Municipal Bankruptcies
25Past Municipal Bankruptcies Orange County
- Causes
- County Treasurer invested 2 for every 1 on hand
- Exotic securities were inversely related to
interest rates - Interest rates went up, county took 164M loss
- Effects
- Banks seized securities held as collateral for
debt - Refinanced debt through issuance of 880M worth
of new bonds - Won 400M settlement from Merrill Lynch
- Bond interest rates went up .5
26Past Municipal Bankruptcies City of Vallejo
- Causes
- Decreased revenue from property taxes and sales
taxes - Unbudgeted 3.4M in pension costs from unexpected
police officers and firefighters retiring - Cuts in funds from the state
- Effects
- Capped interest rate to 6 on outstanding bank
loans - Police Union agreed to decrease staffing, saving
6M - Professional Workers union has also reached
settlement
27Advantages of Municipal Bankruptcy
28Advantages of Municipal Bankruptcy
- Ability to stop run on municipality funds
- Increased leverage in negotiations
- No protection for unsecured creditors
- Exclusive right of municipality to submit debt
adjustment plan - Gerrymandering of classes of creditors
- Ability to renegotiate pension plans of municipal
retirees
29Disadvantages of Municipal Bankruptcy
30Disadvantages of Municipal Bankruptcies
- Obstacles to getting into Municipal Bankruptcies
- Insolvency requirement leaves municipality in
dire straits - Only 23 states allow municipal bankruptcy
- Ruins credit, ability to raise funds through
bonds - Orange County affected California, Texas, Maine
- Casts stigma for prospective business owners and
residents - Bankruptcy litigation costs are high
- States better equipped to solve the problem
31Map showing States that Allow Bankruptcy
-- Bankruptcy Allowed -- Bankruptcy Not Allowed
32Conclusions
- Helps municipalities in need of renegotiating
CBAs to deal with mounting retirees and pension
payouts - Must weigh the benefits from decreasing debt
against cost of litigation and decrease in credit - Must look at costs to the state and other
municipalities
33OPTION 2
- Direct Bailout through Loan Assistance
34Direct Bailouts What are we talking about?
- Question
- If the federal government is to intervene, how
should they do so to (1) resolve a current crisis
and (2) prevent a reoccurrence of the problem? - Option Provide Direct Loans
- Fill gaps in the citys budget through direct
loan assistance.
35Case Study New York City
36Annual NYC Deficits, 1960-1974(in millions)
37Case Study New York City, New York 1975
- NYC Budget Self-Reporting to U.S. Bureau of the
Census. Debt expected to be higher because of
unfunded pension obligations and misreporting
capital expenditures. (Gramlich 416-7)
38NYC1975 Timeline
- 1960s-70s Various NYC mayors agree to large
wage/benefit increases for local unions, increase
social services, cook city books relying on
short-term debt to pay for deficits - Nov 74-Feb 75 City projects current and future
deficits, begins working to close gap - Mar City averts its first cash flow crisis
- Apr State advances city 400 million
- May President Ford rejects citys pleas for help
saying the city needed to cut its budget
39NYC1975 Timeline
- Jun After another cash flow crisis, state
creates the Municipal Assistance Corporation (Big
MAC) to borrow for the city - Jul City promises to dismiss 40,000 workers,
begins to rehire after sanitation strike and
protests - Sep State creates the Emergency Financial
Control Board, effectively asserting state
control of the citys finances - Oct City two hours from default, receives
assistance from city union pensions
40NYC1975 Timeline
- Nov
- President Ford softens threat to veto bailout
after plans for new taxes and debt deferrals - State passes New York City Emergency Moratorium
Act, imposing a three year moratorium on actions
to enforce any NYC short-term debt - Dec Near default again, State Legislature agrees
to stew of new taxes and President Ford signs
New York City Seasonal Financing Act (P.L.
94-143) to provide loans to the city
41NYC1975 Causes of Crisis
- Proliferating Social Services
- Welfare (1/8 NYC residents)
- City University of NY (free tuition to 266,000
students) - Soaring Salaries/Benefits for City Employees
- Wage/pension benefits increased in response to
union demand - City workforce grew 37 in10 yrs
- Decreased Tax Base
- Poor immigrants replaced wealthy companies and
residents who left city
42NYC1975 Causes of Crisis
- Fiscal Gimmickry
- Accounting for current expenses (salaries) in
capital budget (more than 800 million in one
year) - Skipping 7 yrs of required Rainy Day Fund
payments - Push current expenses into future years, while
accounting for future revenue early e.g. in
1974 the city decided to move water billing up 6
months - Financiers Cut Off Short Term Lending
- After providing NYC with short term debt to cover
budget deficits for years, concerned lenders
raised interest rates and refused to buy new debt
43NYC1975 State and Local Rescue?
- Big MAC (June 1975)
- Created as a separate entity, under state
control, to raise money on behalf of the city - Emergency Financial Control Board (Sep 1975)
- State agency created to impose fiscal discipline
on the city - Before1986, approved city plans, debt, and major
contracts - Still exists to conduct quarterly reviews of
budget plans - New York City Emergency Moratorium Act (Nov 1975)
- Placed a moratorium on actions to enforce city
short-term debt in effect a default itself - Instead, offered an exchange of short-term debt
for long-term debt - Invalidated by NY Court of Appeals in Flushing
National Bank v. Municipal Assistance Corp., 40
N.Y2d 731 (N.Y.1976) under N.Y. Const. art. VIII,
2 (city pledge of full faith and credit)
44NYC1975 Arguments For Federal Bailout
- Failure of banks that hold NYC debt
- Currency devaluation (European loss of confidence
in U.S. assets) - Municipal bond market upheaval
- Severe cuts in services
- Tax increases that will lead taxpayers and
businesses leave to move out of the city to avoid
taxes
45NYC1975 Arguments Against Federal Bailout
- NYC can get itself out of the problem
- Raise taxes and cut spending
- The costs of NYCs problem shouldnt be imposed
on the nation - NYC spends like a drug addicted daughter Would
you help her? Are you going to give her 100 a
day to support her habit? The answer is no. You
tell her shes got to go cold turkey. (President
Fords Press Secretary Ron Nessen)
46NYC1975 Structure of the Bailout
- NYC Seasonal Financing Act of 1975 (PL 94-143)
- Provides 2.3 billion (9.2 in 2008) in loans to
help city meet expenses during mid-year cash
shortfalls - Loans available each fiscal year through 1978
- Loans to be repaid by the end of each year
- GAO given access to records of city and state
- Secretary of Treasury has power to set loan terms
- Loan Agreement
- Required periodic reporting and earmarking loan
repayment funds encouraged accounting system
reform
47NYC1975 Effect of the Federal Bailout
- Loans resolved immediate cash flow problems
- Not an official default
- Loans did little to resolve the citys long-term
fiscal problems - Took until 1986 for the city to balance budget
and enter sunset of direct Financial Control
Board control - Loan terms did not impose greater fiscal
constraint - No effect on municipal debt markets
48NYC1975 Lessons
- Loans can resolve immediate cash flow problems
- To resolve underlying fiscal problems, loans must
come with control conditions that require fiscal
discipline - Include more budget oversight, planning
requirements, and imposition of accepted
accounting principles - Require choices on tax increases or service cuts
more quickly - Direct loans are better than guarantees
- Guarantees have a much larger ability to distort
credit markets - Avoid cash flow problems
- City should have made hard choices sooner
- Determine feasible spending cuts, tax increases
before asking for bailout
49OPTION 3
- Bailout of Local Corporation
50Corporate Bailout What are we talking about?
- Question
- If the federal government is to intervene, how
should they do so to (1) resolve a current crisis
and (2) prevent a reoccurrence of the problem? - Option Bail out Large Regional Employer
- Bail out corporation within region to create
jobs, increase tax revenue, and stimulate local
economy.
51Introduction to Corporate Bailout
Give capital to a regional business to benefit a
faltering municipality
52Motives for Bailouts Municipal Assistance
- Business Tax Revenue
- Individual Tax Revenue
- Property Tax
- Income Tax
- Stimulate Local Economy
- Sales Tax
53Motives for Bailouts Alternate
- Profit
- Predatory investor buys shares of faltering
corporation at below-market price - Social Improvement
- Philanthropist turns insolvent for-profit
corporation into non-profit entity - Socioeconomic Emergency
- US government gives funds to airline industry
because transportation is too big to fail
54Past Corporate Bailouts
55Timeline of Corporate Bailouts
- 1970 Penn Central RR Philadelphia
- 1971 Lockheed California
- 1974 Franklin National Bank New York
- 1979 Chrysler Detroit
- 1984 Continental Bank Illinois
- 2008 Auto Industry Detroit
- 2008 TARP New York
56Chrysler 1979
- Detroit in financial crisis
- Mayor Coleman A. Young
- Chrysler employs 37K Detroiters
- Provides 7 of citys total employment
- Failure would double unemployment to 20
- Impact on budget would be severe
- Could have similarly devastating effect on other
cities
57Chrysler 1979
- Michigan also suffering from worst recession
since Great Depression - Governor William G. Milliken
- Chrysler paid 2.4B in wages in MI in 1978
- Paid an additional 2.4B to MI-based suppliers
- Failure would throw 165K MI people out of work
- Would cost MI more than 200M in annual revenue
- Would raise welfare costs by 460M
58Advantages of Corporate Bailouts
59Advantages of Corporate Bailout
- Prevent corporate migration
- Increase jobs (or at least prevent job loss)
- Increase revenue through taxation
- Corporate income tax
- Personal income and property tax
- Stimulate local spending
- Sales tax
60Advantages of Corporate Bailout
- Avoid moral hazard of direct municipal bailout
- Municipality will not rely on direct federal
bailouts, instead focus on economic growth - Limited ability to increase taxes due to taxpayer
flight - Can limit need for direct bailout
- Corporate assistance not a complete sunk cost
can offset future direct bailout. - Slows regional economic downturn
61Disadvantages of Corporate Bailouts
62Disadvantages of Corporate Bailout
- Municipal assistance dependent on success of
corporate bailout - Municipal benefits down-stream from corporation
- More preventive than restorative
- Bailout can prevent municipal insolvency, but
once insolvent, hard to cure through corporate
bailout
63Disadvantages of Corporate Bailout
- Encourages inefficient corporate behavior
- Municipality would rather have efficient
companies because bailouts may not always be
available - Distorts credit markets for corporate debt
- If the Administration makes private credit
available to one privileged firm, the supply of
credit that is available for all will be
reduced. Alan Greenspan, Nixon economic advisor
during Lockheed bailout
64Conclusions
- In the short run, some benefits to municipality
- Should create jobs and stimulate local economy
- Should increase revenue through larger tax base
- In the long run, not sufficient to revive a
struggling municipality - Success depends on management and allocation of
funds outside of municipalitys control - Corporate bailouts better as preventive measure
- Bailed out corporation can help prevent municipal
insolvency that could be caused by failed
business
65OPTION 4
- Federally Funded Municipal Infrastructure Projects
66Infrastructure What are we talking about?
- Question
- If the federal government is to intervene, how
should they do so to (1) resolve a current crisis
and (2) prevent a reoccurrence of the problem? - Option Provide Money for Infrastructure
- Offset municipal budget expenditures on
infrastructure they need or would otherwise want.
67Federally Funded Infrastructure Spending
- Shovel Ready Projects
- Municipal spending funded and directed by the
federal government - Government infrastructure projects
68Shovel Ready Spending
- The federal government provides money to the
states, cities, and other municipalities for
projects that they prepared to start, but for the
lack of funds - The bulk of proposed projects are roads or
sewers, but proposals also include neon signs and
a frisbee golf course - There is the potential to create 1.6 million jobs
with these projects
69Infrastructure Spending in the Stimulus Bill
- 40.6 billion to balance education budgets,
prevent cutbacks and modernize schools - 6.3 billion in energy efficient grants to state
and local governments - 5 million in grants to states for low-income
housing projects in lieu of credits - 69 million for energy projects in lieu of
credits
70Infrastructure Spending in the Stimulus Bill
- 61.8 billion for transportation and housing,
which includes - 29 billion in grants for highway improvements
- 8.4 billion for public transit improvements and
infrastructure investments
71Intended Effects on Municipalities
- Initial Effects
- Local economic stimulus job creation, business
growth - Less money spent from state or city budgets
- Long Term Effects
- Energy efficiency lowers city bills
- Environmental improvements lowers government
health costs - Multiplier Effects
- Analysts say every 1 billion spent on
transportation projects creates 35,000 jobs - Eliminating traffic congestion that cuts into
worker productivity, delays deliveries, eats up
gasoline and boosts air pollution
72Cases Infrastructure Spending
- Works Progress Administration
- Hoover Dam
73Works Progress Administration
- 11.4 billion (about 175 billion in 2008
dollars) - 4 billion on highway
- 2 billion on public buildings and utilities.
- Direct Economic Benefits
- 8.5 million people to work between 1935 and 1943
- Indirect Economic Benefits
- Built 651,087 miles of roadway
- Built or improved 124,031 bridges
- Constructed125,110 public buildings
- Laid 853 airport runways
74Hoover Dam
- Costs
- 49 million (782 in 2008)
- Repaid from power revenues by 1987
- Maintenance 25 million in 1987 for flood
control - Direct Economic Benefits
- Employed 21,000 men (5522 from Nevada)
- AZ and NV receive 300,000 annually in lieu of
taxes - Indirect Economic Benefits
- Tourist Trap
- Provides electricity to the Southwest
75Advantages of Municipal Infrastructure Spending
76Cities Want to Improve Infrastructure
- Need to improve infrastructure
- 1 out of every 4 bridges is either structurally
deficient or functionally obsolete - America's drinking water infrastructure is
underfunded - Highway congestion costs us 78 billion annually
through the 4.2 billion hours and 2.9 billion
gallons of gasoline we waste each year - States lack funds to help municipalities
- 43 states say they need to cut spending or
increase taxes this coming year
77Public Support Makes Easier to Enact
- Does not exclusively reward cities that make
poor fiscal choices - All cities appear to be treated equally
- Public more willing to support bailout of
municipality that is framed in terms of
infrastructure - People think they benefit as much as others
78Disadvantages of Municipal Infrastructure Spending
79Possibility of creating inefficient infrastructure
- Creates incentives for cities to request an
unnecessary amount - In the short run it creates jobs and stimulates
local business - Can result in increased
- High maintenance costs
- Traffic congestion
- Pollution
- Increased cost of commuting
- Dependence on foreign oil
- Increased susceptibility to damage from natural
disasters - Cities may have to pay for these long term
effects
80Unintended Consequences Hoover Dam and TVA
exacerbating flood control issues?
- That devastating floods keep happening despite
all the engineers efforts has led to a
significant shift in philosophy in recent years.
Many experts have come to believe that many past
flood-control effortshave been
counterproductive, or at least self-defeating. - How much does it matter that efforts are seen as
counterproductive 60-70 years later? - Unknown how much the federal government will
provide in disaster relief
81Limitations on Federal Funding Some projects
require too much lead time
- Energy Efficient Buildings
- If the goal is to save states money, by having
schools or other municipal buildings that use
less energy, this will not completely begin until
the project is finished. - Rail systems
- If we are trying to make commuting more
affordable or make money from tickets, this
requires finishing the project.
82Limitations on Federal Funding Administrative
Inefficiencies
- Except as otherwise provided in this chapter,
the Federal share payable on account of any
project on the Interstate Systemshall be 90
percent of the total cost thereof, plus a
percentage of the remaining 10 percent of such
cost in any State containing unappropriated and
unreserved public lands and nontaxable Indian
lands, individual and tribal, exceeding 5 percent
of the total area of all lands therein, equal to
the percentage that the area of such lands in
such State is of its total area except that such
Federal share payable on any project in any State
shall not exceed 95 percent of the total cost of
such project. 23 USC 120(a)(1).
83Conclusions
- Will create jobs in the short run
- Increases tax revenue
- Infrastructure can have significant long term
effects - Well planned infrastructure can decrease fixed
energy costs - Poorly planned infrastructure can lead to
increased maintenance and other costs - Value depends on
- Need for short term stimulus
- How well planned the infrastructure is
84CONCLUSION
85Summary Chart
86BIBLIOGRAPHIES
87BIBLIOGRAPHY Introduction
- 2002 Census Report, U.S. Census of Government
http//www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/gc021x2.pdf - 2007 Census Organization Phase Report , U.S.
Census of Government http//www.census.gov/govs/w
ww/cog2007.html - 84 of cities in money trouble
http//money.cnn.com/2009/02/04/news/economy/city_
troubles/
88BIBLIOGRAPHY Municipal Bankruptcy
- Michael W. McConnell Randal C. Picker, When
Cities Go Broke, A Conceptual Introduction to
Municipal Bankruptcy, 60 U. Chi. L. Rev. 425
(1993) - Omer Kimhi, Reviving Cities Legal Remedies to
Municipal Financial Crises, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 633
(2008) - Frederick Tung, After Orange County Reforming
California Municipal Bankruptcy Law, 53 Hastings
L.J. 885 (2002) - Nicholas B. Malito, Municipal Bankruptcy An
Overview of Chapter 9 and a Critique of the
Specifically Authorized and Insolvent
Eligibility Requirements of 11 U.S.C.A. 109(c),
17 J. Bankr. L. Prac. 4 Art. 2 (2008) - http//www.dlapiper.com/overview_chapter_9/
- http//query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res9D0
CE5DE1531F937A15754C0A967958260 - http//www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/05/25/america/
Vallejo-Budget-Crisis.php - http//money.cnn.com/2008/10/13/news/economy/Birmi
ngham_brink_Whitford.fortune/index.htm - http//www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28543545/
- http//www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-
11138307_ITM - http//www.nwcn.com/statenews/idaho/stories/NW_022
608IDN_mccall_bankrupt_LJ.2e326f72.html - http//www.erisk.com/Learning/CaseStudies/OrangeCo
unty.asp - http//www.ppic.org/content/pubs/op/OP_398OP.pdf
- http//www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2179765/p
osts - http//money.cnn.com/2009/02/04/news/economy/city_
troubles/
89BIBLIOGRAPHY Direct Bailout
- Joshua Brustein, The Fiscal Crisis After 30 Years
10 October 2005, Gotham Gazette
http//www.gothamgazette.com/article/issueofthewee
k/20051010/200/1612 - Edward M Gramlich, New York Ripple or Tidal
Wave? The New York City Fiscal Crisis What
Happened and What is to Be Done? 66 American
Economic Review, 66 415-429 (1976). - David S. Kidwell and Charles A. Trzcinka, The
Impact of the New York City Fiscal Crisis on the
Interest Cost of New Issue Municipal Bonds,18
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis
381 (1983). - New York City's Fiscal Problems A Long Road
Still Lies Ahead, Comptroler General Report to
the Congress of the United States (Oct 31, 1979)
http//archive.gao.gov/f0902a/110741.pdf - Statement of Elmer B. Staats Comptroller General
of the United States before the Committee on
Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, United States
Senate on The New York City Seasonal Financing
Act of 1975 (Apr 2, 1976). http//archive.gao.gov
/f0202/094641.pdf - Rona B. Stein The New York City Budget Anatomy
of a Fiscal Crisis, Federal Reserve Bank of New
York Quarterly Review, 1 (Winter 1976)
http//www.newyorkfed.org/research/quarterly_revie
w/1976v1/v1n1article1.pdf - Time Magazine Coverage
- How New York City Lurched to the Brink, Time (Jun
16, 1975) http//www.time.com/time/magazine/artic
le/0,9171,917521,00.html - How to Save New York, Time (Oct 20, 1975)(
http//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,9
46554,00.html - One Step Back from the Brink, Time (Nov 24,
1975) http//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0
,9171,913719,00.html - Whipping Up a Stew of Taxes, Time (Dec 1, 1975)
http//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,9
13767,00.html - Last Minute Bailout of a City on the Brink, Time
(Dec 8, 1975) http//www.time.com/time/magazine/a
rticle/0,9171,947546,00.html
90BIBLIOGRAPHY Corporate Bailout
- Adams, Walter and James W. Brock. Corporate
Size and the Bailout Factor Journal of Economic
Issues, 211, 61-85. - Omer Kimhi, Reviving Cities Legal Remedies to
Municipal Financial Crises, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 633
(2008) - http//www.propublica.org/special/government-bailo
uts - http//uspolitics.about.com/od/economy/a/chryslerB
ailout.htm - http//www.kitsapsun.com/news/2008/dec/09/auto-dea
lers-say-big-three-bailout-critical-for/ - http//www.econlib.org/library/Enc/CorporateTaxati
on.html - http//www.examiner.net/homepage/x286839646/Lawmak
ers-hopeful-bill-will-stimulate-local-economy - http//www.redcounty.com/placercountyca/2009/02/to
m-mcclintock---stimulate-the/ - http//rogueeconomistrants.blogspot.com/2008/08/ci
ties-corporations-and-tax-benefits.html - http//money.cnn.com/2009/02/04/news/economy/city_
troubles/ - http//uspolitics.about.com/gi/dynamic/offsite.htm
?zi1/XJsdnuspoliticscdnnewsissuestm114f00
tt2bt1bts0zuhttp3A//www.time.com/time/mag
azine/article/02C91712C9030762C00.html
91BIBLIOGRAPHY Infrastructure
- http//online.wsj.com/article/SB123369271403544637
.html - http//online.wsj.com/public/resources/documents/S
TIMULUS_FINAL_0217.html - http//blog.wired.com/cars/2008/10/wall-street-bai
.html - http//online.wsj.com/article/SB123447510631779255
.htmlarticleTabs3Darticle - http//www.cnbc.com/id/27717424?slide2
- http//www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/History/essays/wo
rkforc.html - http//www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/faqs/powerfaq.htm
l - http//blog.wired.com/cars/2008/10/wall-street-bai
.html - http//www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid20601103si
daR_T22Ls4D6sreferus - http//thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/06/13/high-w
ater-and-the-american-character/