Title: Lets Free IT Support Materials
1Lets Free IT Support Materials!
- Brian Kelly
- UK Web Focus
- UKOLN
- University of Bath
Co-authors Gareth Knight, AHDS Jo Casey,
University of York Marieke Guy, UKOLN
Acknowledgments We are grateful to JISC for
funding the QA Focus project described in this
paper
Email B.Kelly_at_ukoln.ac.uk URL http//www.ukoln.ac.
uk/
UKOLN is supported by
2Contents
Introduction
- Introduction
- Case Study QA Focus
- Creative Commons What Can it Provide?
- Implementation
- Application Elsewhere
- Conclusions
- Questions
3About Me
Introduction
- Brian Kelly
- UK Web Focus a Web advisory post for UK HE and
FE and cultural heritage communities - Based at UKOLN a national centre of expertise
in digital information management - Project manager for JISC-funded QA Focus project
- Funding by JISC (Joint Information Systems
Committee) and MLA (Museums, Libraries and
Archives Council)
4About This Paper
Introduction
- This paper
- Describes the JISC-funded QA Focus project
- Explains the reasons why it was decided to give
away the project deliverables - Describes the Creative Commons licence and why it
was felt to be applicable - Summarises the implementation issues
- Outlines other areas in which this case study can
be applied - Gives recommendations to
- Funding bodies
- Organisations
5QA Focus
QA Focus
- QA Focus
- JISC-funded project
- Developed a quality assurance framework to
support JISCs digital library programmes - Provided by UKOLN (University of Bath) and AHDS
(Kings College London) - Funded from Jan 2002-July 2004
- Successfully
- Developed a lightweight QA framework
- Published a range of support materials
- Described approaches in peer-reviewed papers
(EUNIS 2003, ichim03, ECDL 2004) - See lthttp//www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/gt
6QA Focus Exit Strategies (1)
QA Focus
- QA Focus
- Initially funded from Jan 2002 - Dec 2003
- Extended from Jan-Jul 2004
- Our challenge
- Explore options for exit strategy
- Implement chosen solution
- The context
- Project partners had developed v. effective
working relationships - Area of work closely linked with core missions
- Partners keen to exploit expertise gained in
other areas - Desire to embed QA framework more widely
7QA Focus Exit Strategies (2)
QA Focus
- The main options
- Continued funding
- Discussed possibility with JISC, but no
additional funding available - Income generation options
- Unlikely to generate significant income
- Would be time-consuming to implement
- Give resources away
- Would help to maximise impact
- Could help sustainability of resources
- Reflects culture of sharing (e.g. open source,
open access, )
8Open Access Decision
QA Focus
- QA Focus project partners
- Agreed to give resources away
- Decision made for business (and not ideological)
reasons - Maximise impact of QA framework (e.g. to
institutions hosting JISC projects and not just
the projects) - Maximise outreach to other sectors (e.g. museums,
libraries archives international digital
library community ..) - Potential for sustainability of resources (others
maintain resources and develop new ones) - Then had to decide how to give resources away
9Open Access Options
QA Focus
- The main options
- Putting resources in public domain
- What does this mean?
- Does it provide flexibility we may need?
- GNU, BSD, ... style licence
- Mature licences with clear licence conditions
- Creative Commons licence
- Under development during QA Focus life
- Provides rich set of licence conditions
- Enables machine-readable licences to be provided
10Creative Commons
- Creative Commons
- Legal mechanism for assigning rights to others
- Can assign various (11) rights
- Commercial/non-commercial attribution
- Can describe rights in machine-readable form
(RDF) - CC-aware search engines can be used to search
CC-space
Creative Commons
11Implementation
QA Focus
- Implementation issues we needed to address
- Scope What resources would be covered?
- Selected (70) briefing documents and not case
studies - Selected briefing documents authored in-house
- Ownership Could project members make this
decision on their own? - Decision agreed by UKOLN/AHDS management groups
and host institutions - Timeliness CC licence not ratified for UK use
- Discussed implications with JISC Legal service
- CC (then) had no legal status
- Chose to have clear statement alongside CC
licence - (Low) risk would be taken by users of CC-licensed
resources and not ourselves
12Wider Application - UCISA
- Clear potential for wider use of CC licences
- We made contact with UCISA TLIG (Teaching
learning and Information Group) committee - National body whose remit includes IT Service
support materials - Has provided a document sharing archive for 15
years - Author was committee member in early 1990s
- UCISA TLIG experiences can help inform wider IT
Services community
UCISA Document Sharing Archives
13UCISA-TLIG Document Archive
http//www.ucisa.ac.uk/groups/tlig/docs/docshare.h
tm
- The UCISA-TLIG document sharing archive
- Centralised set of links to IT Services document
catalogues - Departments can chose to join scheme (11
currently)
Note that pre-Web departments had to upload
documents to central locations
14UCISA-TLIG Document Archive
- The archive reflects spirit of sharing across the
community. - But the document archive has had limited
effectiveness (only 11 orgs., broken searching,
) due to - Uncertainty of legal issues
- Can I give stuff away how do I do this
- Uncertainty of institutional view
- Are we in competition with other institutions
are we expected to generate income - Centralised approach
- Centralised maintenance, indexing, resource
issues - Things have now changed
- Benefits of open access, open source widely
accepted - Legal issues more clear
- Distributed approaches now possible
UCISA Document Sharing Archives
15Benefits To Be Gained
- How can IT Service departments benefit from more
actively participating with a re-launched
archive - Can help promote your institution (cf MITs
decision to make its courseware) - Can free staff resources for other tasks
- Gain experience of issues in other
(mission-critical) areas e.g. open access for
teaching learning and research resources - Gain experiences in technical issues e.g.
managing, indexing, RDF version of licences - Other benefits
- Avoiding duplication benefits funder, tax-payer,
gives back-office savings (cf. Gershon
review)
UCISA Document Sharing Archives
16Possible Concerns
- Possible concerns
- My stuff is being stolen
- OTOH you will benefit from stuff you use
- Maximises benefits of public funding
- You can chose to go down this route
- My competitors get my stuff for free
- Legitimate concern, esp. if envisage exploitation
of resources - QA Focus chose non-commercial use CC licence to
avoid use by others in bids - Deskilling staff
- IT staff continually have to learn new skills
- Provides new opportunities for staff
17Wider Potential
- Benefits of Creative Commons licences can be
obtained in other areas - Maximise impact of national initiatives (e.g.
JISC-funded development programmes, ) - Staff development initiatives (e.g. )
- And can provide unexpected benefits
- Clarification of legal issues for long-term
archiving of project deliverables (current work
requires project holders to sign form that rights
issues have been clarified) - Avoidance of vexatious rights owners
- More general clarification of ownership issues
18Complementing Approaches
- Additional technologies have been used to help
maximise impact resources - RSS feeds of QA Focus documents
- Allows metadata to be embedded by third parties
19Conclusions
- To conclude
- Projects can maximise impact by 'giving'
resources away (with appropriate licence) - Creative Commons can provide variety of licence
conditions and searching mechanisms - These experiences (and benefits) are also
applicable to IT services - Such decisions can be made based on sound
business reasons - Do it!
QA Focus briefing document are available (under
CC licence) from lthttp//www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/
documents/briefings/gt (including "An Introduction
To Creative Commons" )
20Questions