Lets Free IT Support Materials - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Lets Free IT Support Materials

Description:

We are grateful to JISC for funding the QA Focus project described in this paper ... Information Systems Committee) and MLA (Museums, Libraries and Archives Council) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: brian89
Category:
Tags: free | lets | materials | support

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lets Free IT Support Materials


1
Lets Free IT Support Materials!
  • Brian Kelly
  • UK Web Focus
  • UKOLN
  • University of Bath

Co-authors Gareth Knight, AHDS Jo Casey,
University of York Marieke Guy, UKOLN
Acknowledgments We are grateful to JISC for
funding the QA Focus project described in this
paper
Email B.Kelly_at_ukoln.ac.uk URL http//www.ukoln.ac.
uk/
UKOLN is supported by
2
Contents
Introduction
  • Introduction
  • Case Study QA Focus
  • Creative Commons What Can it Provide?
  • Implementation
  • Application Elsewhere
  • Conclusions
  • Questions

3
About Me
Introduction
  • Brian Kelly
  • UK Web Focus a Web advisory post for UK HE and
    FE and cultural heritage communities
  • Based at UKOLN a national centre of expertise
    in digital information management
  • Project manager for JISC-funded QA Focus project
  • Funding by JISC (Joint Information Systems
    Committee) and MLA (Museums, Libraries and
    Archives Council)

4
About This Paper
Introduction
  • This paper
  • Describes the JISC-funded QA Focus project
  • Explains the reasons why it was decided to give
    away the project deliverables
  • Describes the Creative Commons licence and why it
    was felt to be applicable
  • Summarises the implementation issues
  • Outlines other areas in which this case study can
    be applied
  • Gives recommendations to
  • Funding bodies
  • Organisations

5
QA Focus
QA Focus
  • QA Focus
  • JISC-funded project
  • Developed a quality assurance framework to
    support JISCs digital library programmes
  • Provided by UKOLN (University of Bath) and AHDS
    (Kings College London)
  • Funded from Jan 2002-July 2004
  • Successfully
  • Developed a lightweight QA framework
  • Published a range of support materials
  • Described approaches in peer-reviewed papers
    (EUNIS 2003, ichim03, ECDL 2004)
  • See lthttp//www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/gt

6
QA Focus Exit Strategies (1)
QA Focus
  • QA Focus
  • Initially funded from Jan 2002 - Dec 2003
  • Extended from Jan-Jul 2004
  • Our challenge
  • Explore options for exit strategy
  • Implement chosen solution
  • The context
  • Project partners had developed v. effective
    working relationships
  • Area of work closely linked with core missions
  • Partners keen to exploit expertise gained in
    other areas
  • Desire to embed QA framework more widely

7
QA Focus Exit Strategies (2)
QA Focus
  • The main options
  • Continued funding
  • Discussed possibility with JISC, but no
    additional funding available
  • Income generation options
  • Unlikely to generate significant income
  • Would be time-consuming to implement
  • Give resources away
  • Would help to maximise impact
  • Could help sustainability of resources
  • Reflects culture of sharing (e.g. open source,
    open access, )

8
Open Access Decision
QA Focus
  • QA Focus project partners
  • Agreed to give resources away
  • Decision made for business (and not ideological)
    reasons
  • Maximise impact of QA framework (e.g. to
    institutions hosting JISC projects and not just
    the projects)
  • Maximise outreach to other sectors (e.g. museums,
    libraries archives international digital
    library community ..)
  • Potential for sustainability of resources (others
    maintain resources and develop new ones)
  • Then had to decide how to give resources away

9
Open Access Options
QA Focus
  • The main options
  • Putting resources in public domain
  • What does this mean?
  • Does it provide flexibility we may need?
  • GNU, BSD, ... style licence
  • Mature licences with clear licence conditions
  • Creative Commons licence
  • Under development during QA Focus life
  • Provides rich set of licence conditions
  • Enables machine-readable licences to be provided

10
Creative Commons
  • Creative Commons
  • Legal mechanism for assigning rights to others
  • Can assign various (11) rights
  • Commercial/non-commercial attribution
  • Can describe rights in machine-readable form
    (RDF)
  • CC-aware search engines can be used to search
    CC-space

Creative Commons
11
Implementation
QA Focus
  • Implementation issues we needed to address
  • Scope What resources would be covered?
  • Selected (70) briefing documents and not case
    studies
  • Selected briefing documents authored in-house
  • Ownership Could project members make this
    decision on their own?
  • Decision agreed by UKOLN/AHDS management groups
    and host institutions
  • Timeliness CC licence not ratified for UK use
  • Discussed implications with JISC Legal service
  • CC (then) had no legal status
  • Chose to have clear statement alongside CC
    licence
  • (Low) risk would be taken by users of CC-licensed
    resources and not ourselves

12
Wider Application - UCISA
  • Clear potential for wider use of CC licences
  • We made contact with UCISA TLIG (Teaching
    learning and Information Group) committee
  • National body whose remit includes IT Service
    support materials
  • Has provided a document sharing archive for 15
    years
  • Author was committee member in early 1990s
  • UCISA TLIG experiences can help inform wider IT
    Services community

UCISA Document Sharing Archives
13
UCISA-TLIG Document Archive
http//www.ucisa.ac.uk/groups/tlig/docs/docshare.h
tm
  • The UCISA-TLIG document sharing archive
  • Centralised set of links to IT Services document
    catalogues
  • Departments can chose to join scheme (11
    currently)

Note that pre-Web departments had to upload
documents to central locations
14
UCISA-TLIG Document Archive
  • The archive reflects spirit of sharing across the
    community.
  • But the document archive has had limited
    effectiveness (only 11 orgs., broken searching,
    ) due to
  • Uncertainty of legal issues
  • Can I give stuff away how do I do this
  • Uncertainty of institutional view
  • Are we in competition with other institutions
    are we expected to generate income
  • Centralised approach
  • Centralised maintenance, indexing, resource
    issues
  • Things have now changed
  • Benefits of open access, open source widely
    accepted
  • Legal issues more clear
  • Distributed approaches now possible

UCISA Document Sharing Archives
15
Benefits To Be Gained
  • How can IT Service departments benefit from more
    actively participating with a re-launched
    archive
  • Can help promote your institution (cf MITs
    decision to make its courseware)
  • Can free staff resources for other tasks
  • Gain experience of issues in other
    (mission-critical) areas e.g. open access for
    teaching learning and research resources
  • Gain experiences in technical issues e.g.
    managing, indexing, RDF version of licences
  • Other benefits
  • Avoiding duplication benefits funder, tax-payer,
    gives back-office savings (cf. Gershon
    review)

UCISA Document Sharing Archives
16
Possible Concerns
  • Possible concerns
  • My stuff is being stolen
  • OTOH you will benefit from stuff you use
  • Maximises benefits of public funding
  • You can chose to go down this route
  • My competitors get my stuff for free
  • Legitimate concern, esp. if envisage exploitation
    of resources
  • QA Focus chose non-commercial use CC licence to
    avoid use by others in bids
  • Deskilling staff
  • IT staff continually have to learn new skills
  • Provides new opportunities for staff

17
Wider Potential
  • Benefits of Creative Commons licences can be
    obtained in other areas
  • Maximise impact of national initiatives (e.g.
    JISC-funded development programmes, )
  • Staff development initiatives (e.g. )
  • And can provide unexpected benefits
  • Clarification of legal issues for long-term
    archiving of project deliverables (current work
    requires project holders to sign form that rights
    issues have been clarified)
  • Avoidance of vexatious rights owners
  • More general clarification of ownership issues

18
Complementing Approaches
  • Additional technologies have been used to help
    maximise impact resources
  • RSS feeds of QA Focus documents
  • Allows metadata to be embedded by third parties

19
Conclusions
  • To conclude
  • Projects can maximise impact by 'giving'
    resources away (with appropriate licence)
  • Creative Commons can provide variety of licence
    conditions and searching mechanisms
  • These experiences (and benefits) are also
    applicable to IT services
  • Such decisions can be made based on sound
    business reasons
  • Do it!

QA Focus briefing document are available (under
CC licence) from lthttp//www.ukoln.ac.uk/qa-focus/
documents/briefings/gt (including "An Introduction
To Creative Commons" )
20
Questions
  • Any questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com