Title: EBM for Novice
1EBM for Novice
- Maria Kwok, MD, MPH
- Assistant Clinical Professor
- Section of Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Morgan Stanley Childrens Hospital of New York
Presbyterian
2Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
3Why is EBM Important?
- MEDLINE
- 400,000 new entries added each year
- To keep up-to-date
- Need to read 6,000 articles each day
4Why is EBM Important?
- Lag time from time of knowing to time of
implementation - 13 years for thrombolytic therapy
- 10 years for corticosteroids for acceleration of
fetal lung maturity - (Antman EM, JAMA, 1992)
5Traditional Approaches
- Self-reported reading time per week.
(University setting) - Medical students 60 min.
- Interns none
- Senior residents 10 min.
- Fellows 45 min.
- Attendings graduating
- Post 1975 60 min.
- Pre 1975 30 min.
6There is simply no way we can keep up to date in
medicine using traditional approaches!
7Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM?
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
8Quiz Define EBM
A) A means of camouflaging biostatistics in
medical training
B) An annoying and overused catch phrase
C) The conscientious, explicit, and judicious use
of current best evidence in making decisions
about the care of individual patients
9Research Evidence
Decision Making
Patient Preference
Clinical Expertise
10Evidence Based Medicine A Process
Patients
Ask Questions
Searching
Appraise
11Validity Results Applicability
12Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
13Whats the difference between foreground and
background questions?
14Asking the Precise Question
- Background questions
- Basic aspect of a disease
- Pathophysiology
- Etiology
- Basic treatment
- Who, what, when, how
- Foreground questions
- Specific knowledge
- Have 4 parts
- Patient/problem
- Intervention
- Comparison intervention
- Clinical outcomes
15Background or Foreground?
- What is asthma?
- Is prednisone helpful in asthma?
- What are the newest medication for asthma?
- Does atrovent used acutely make you feel better?
16Background or Foreground?
- What is asthma? (B)
- What are the newest medication for asthma? (B)
- Does atrovent used acutely make you feel better?
(F) - Is prednisone helpful in asthma? (F or B)
- Foreground if compare to other drugs
- Background if interested in how it works
17Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
18Structure of a Well-built Question
- Patient or population
- Be specific to capture the group you want
- Ex Children w/ asthma
- Intervention
- Be specific
- Comparison group (if any)
- Compare to standard therapy or test
- Outcome
- Be precise
- What are the outcome of interest
19Formulating the Clinical Question
PICO
20Can You Identify PICO?
- In children under 6 months, how does sleeping on
back compared to sleeping on the stomach in terms
of risk of SIDS?
- In children under 6 months (P), how does sleeping
on back (I) compared to sleeping on the stomach
(C) in terms of risk of SIDS (O)?
21Can You Form a PICO Question?
Clinical scenario 5 yo with moderate
persistent asthma now in severe acute asthma
exacerbation. Intern gave 2 albuterol and
orapred with minimal improvement. Intern asks
why how good is atrovent?
22Searchable PICO Question
P Population I Intervention/diagnostic
test/risk factor C Comparison O Outcome
In children with acute asthma exacerbation (P),
will the addition of atrovent (I) to albuterol
(C) decrease the rate of hospitalization (O)?
23Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
24Searching Superhero
Best Bets
25The Evidence Pyramid
26(No Transcript)
27Pre-appraised Resources
- Cochrane
- http//www.cochrane.org/cochrane/revabstr/maininde
x.htm - Very high quality reviews
- Mostly questions of therapy
- National Guideline Clearinghouse
- http//www.guideline.gov/
- Guidelines of varying levels of quality
- Do broad searches
- PEM database
- http//researchinpem.homestead.com/homepage.html
- Not pre-appraised
28Pre-appraised Resources
- Best Evidence Topics
- http//www.bestbets.org
- Developed in the ED of Manchester Royal Infirmary
in UK - Usually EM topics
- Free
- Clinical Evidence (CE Concise)
- http//www.clinicalevidence.com
- From UK
- Focus mostly on therapy
- Free
29Primary Search Engines
30Primary Search Engines
- Both PubMed and Ovid
- Contains MEDLINE and other bibliographic
databases (Cochrane, EMBASE, etc) - Sells access to the databases to libraries
31PubMed MEDLINE vs. Ovid MEDLINE
- Same DATABASE
- Different SEARCH ENGINES
- Searching differently may get you slightly
different results - If you search both databases EXACTLY the same,
your results will be the same
32What is MEDLINE?
- MEDLINE is a DATABASE
- MEDLINE is produced by the National Library of
Medicine - MEDLINE is available free via Pubmed
- MEDLINE is sold to many vendors, like Ovid, who
search the DATA in MEDLINE through different
search engines
33Database Producer
Vendors
Medline EMBASE CINAHL
Ovid Pubmed Dialog LEXIS/NEXIS
Personal PC Library PC
34PubMed Clinical Queries
- Pre-filtered searching
- Search on questions of
- Therapy
- Diagnosis
- Etiology
- Prognosis
- Or, search for Systematic Reviews
Limit any of the categories to sensitivity
(broad) or specificity (narrow)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38Sensitivity vs. Specificity
- SPECIFICITY
- Narrower search
- More relevant items
- Possibility of losing some useful citations
- LESS information to weed through
- SENSITIVITY
- Broader search
- More irrelevant items
- Less chance of losing useful citations
- MORE information to weed through
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43OVID
- Most librarians favor this search engine
- Allow you to tailor your search
44(No Transcript)
45Design Execute Search Strategy
- MeSH terms
- How articles are indexed
- Predefined categories from the National Library
of Medicine - Explode
- MeSH all items underneath
- Focus
- MeSH only
46Design Execute Search Strategy
- Limiters
- Limit by languages, human, age, etc
- Hedges
- Clinical trials for therapy
- Sensitivity Specificity for diagnostic
tests - Cohort studies for prognosis
47More on Searching Tips
- Term
- Search engines will look for occurrences of the
word with any combination of letters following.
(Ex Hospital will include hospitalization,
hospitals, hospitalized) - Exp for explode
- Term.tw.
- Allow search engine to look in the titles and
abstract
48More on Searching Tips
- Term.af
- Search all fields
- ..pg term
- Perge/delete
49For More Searching Tips
Ask your librarians!
50Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
51Appraise (Validity)
- http//www.cebm.utoronto.ca/teach/materials/dx.htm
- http//www.cebm.utoronto.ca/teach/materials/therap
y.htm
52Validity of Therapy Articles
- Randomized?
- Blinded?
- Were the subjects similar at the start of the
trial? - Were all subjects treated the same except for the
treatment of interest? - Were all patients accounted for at the end of the
trial?
53Validity 1. Were the Subjects Randomized?
Methods section
54Validity 2. Were They Blinded?
Methods section
55Validity 3. Were the Subjects Similar at the
Start of the Trial?
Results section
56Validity 4. Were All Subjects Treated the
Same except for the Treatment of Interest?
57Validity 5. Were All Patients Accounted for
at the End of the Trial?
Results section
58Validity of the Article
- Was the study randomized?
- Were the subjects blinded?
- Were the subjects similar at the start of the
trial? - Were all subjects treated the same except for the
treatment of interest? - Were all patients accounted for at the end of the
trial?
59Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
60Step 4 Appraise Therapy Study
- Therapy study
- Number Needed to Treat (NNT) to prevent an
adverse outcome - Mathematically
- NNT 1/ARR (absolute risk reduction)
- ARR Risk of adverse outcome in the control
group (CER) those in the experimental group
(EER) - ARR CER EER
- ARR Absolute risk reduction
- CER control event rate
- EER experimental event rate
61More on NNT
- Variables must be dichotomous
- Cannot calculate NNT from continuous variables
- For NNT to be meaningful, the difference between
the 2 groups must be significant
62Lets Calculate NNT
30
3
0.5
200
5
20
CER Control Event Rate EER Experimental Event
Rate ARR Absolute Risk Reduction NNT Number
Needed to Treat NNT1/ARR
63Step 4 Appraise Therapy Articles
- ARR CER EER
- NNT 1/ARR
- ARR 52.6-37.5 15.1
- NNT 1/15.1 x 100 7
64Step 5 Decision Making
- Atrovent
- Low cost medication
- Minimal to no side effects
- Every 7 children with severe asthma exacerbation,
1 hospitalization will be prevented - The benefits outweigh the risks. Therefore it
would be worth treating the child with Atrovent
in the emergency department.
65Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
66Appraise (Validity)
- http//www.cebm.utoronto.ca/teach/materials/dx.htm
- http//www.cebm.utoronto.ca/teach/materials/therap
y.htm
67Validity of Diagnostic Articles
- Was there an independent, blind comparison with a
reference (gold) standard of diagnosis? - Was the diagnostic test evaluated in an
appropriate spectrum of patients (like those in
whom it would be used in practice)?
68Validity of Diagnostic Articles
- Was the reference standard applied regardless of
the diagnostic test result? - Was the test (or cluster of tests) validated in a
second, independent group of patients?
69A B
C D
A C
B D
70Sensitivity Specificity
The proportion of people with the target disorder
(AC) who have a positive test (A) A/(AC)
If a test has a high sensitivity, a negative
result rules out the disease
71A B
C D
A C
B D
72Sensitivity Specificity
The proportion of people without the disease
(BD) who have a negative test (D) D/(BD)
When a test has a high specificity, a positive
result rules IN the diagnosis
73A B
C D
A C
B D
74Predictive Values
- Positive Predictive Value
Proportion of people with a positive test (AB)
who have the target disorder A/(AB)
- Negative Predictive Value
Proportion of people with a negative test (CD)
who are free of the disease (D) D/(CD)
75A B
C D
A C
B D
76What is Likelihood Ratio?
- A likelihood that a given test result would be
expected in a patient w/ the target disorder
compared w/ the likelihood that the same result
would be expected in a patient w/o the target
disorder
77Likelihood Ratio
- Likelihood ratio (LR) of 1 means
- The test result identifies patients w/ the
disorder at the same rate as identifying patients
w/o the disorders - LR gt1
- The test result identifies patients w/ the
disorder at a faster rate likelihood goes ? - LR lt1
- The test result identifies patients w/ the
disorder at a slower rate likelihood goes ?
78LR of 3 means
The result is 3 times more likely to occur in a
patient w/ the target disease than in a patient
without.
In general, the LR for a test result is the
percentage of disease patients identified by
that result divided by the percentage of disease
patients so identified.
79(a/X) (b/Y)
a/X
b/Y
(c/X) (d/Y)
c/X
d/Y
What rate are Dis patients identified by Result
A? What rate are Dis - patients identified by
Result A? What is the LR for Result A?
80X A C
Y B D
At what rate are Dis patients identified by a
test ?
A/X
At what rate are Dis patients identified by a
test?
B/Y
What is the LR for a positive test result?
(A/X) (B/Y)
81Positive Likelihood Ratio (LR )
- LR sensitivity/(1 specificity)
- True pos rate/False pos rate
82X A C
Y B D
At what rate are Dis patients identified by a
- test ?
C/X
At what rate are Dis patients identified by a
- test?
D/Y
What is the LR for a negative test result?
(C/X) (D/Y)
83Negative Likelihood Ratio (LR-)
- LR - (1 sensitivity)/specificity
- False neg rate/True neg rate
84Guide to Likelihood ratios
85Why Do We Care About LR?
- Allow us to think about pre-test and post-test
probabilities so that we can personalize the test
to our patients
86Test Treatment Thresholds in the Diagnostic
Process
Test threshold
Treatment threshold
0
100
Testing completed treatment starts
No test needed
Further testing needed
87Step 1 Pre-test Probability
The number of events (instances of a given
disease or other condition) in a given population
at a designated time.
It is not a rate.
It is used as pre-test probability
It is the number of disease patients to the
total
88Pre-test Probability
- 5 sources to determine this
- Clinical experience
- Regional or national prevalence statistics
- Practice databases
- Original report on accuracy of the test
- Studies that calculate pre-test probability
89Step 3 Calculate LR
- Pretest probability is 30
- LR ?
Amir, 1994
Rapid Strep
LR TP rate/FP rate (65/75) ? (18/90) 4.35
LR - FN rate/TN rate (10/75) ? (72/90) 0.16
90Fagan Nomogram Pre-test probability on the left
hand column LR in the middle Post-test
probability on the right hand column
91Translation
- You see a 4 yo child who comes in c/o sorethroat,
no other complaints - Your pre-test probability is that she has a 30
chance of having strep throat - You wonder how good is rapid strep
- You look up an article (Amir, 1994) and find its
sensitivity (86.5) and specificity (80)
92Translation
- Your patient rapid strep is positive
- You calculated the LR to be 4.35
- You determined the post-test probability to be
66 - Is that enough of a threshold for you to treat or
would you rather do more test?
93Test Treatment Thresholds in the Diagnostic
Process
Test threshold
Treatment threshold
0
100
Testing completed treatment starts
No test needed
Further testing needed
94A Different Article Showed
- What if the LR is 12?
- What is the post-test probability?
95(No Transcript)
96Diagnostic Summary
- Use the 2 x 2 table to determine likelihood ratio
(LR) - LR True pos rate/False pos rate
- LR - False neg rate/True neg rate
- Use Fagan Nomogram
97Outline
- Why is EBM important?
- What is EBM
- Understand foreground vs. background questions
- Formulate PICO questions
- Find resources, do searches
- Validity of an article
- Appraise Therapy articles
- Appraise Diagnostic articles
98Knowledge is of two kinds we know a subject
ourselves or we know where we can find
information upon it. - Samuel Johnson