Reflections on Motivational Interviewing

1 / 53
About This Presentation
Title:

Reflections on Motivational Interviewing

Description:

Title: Global Rating of MI Style [All Data Points] Author: William R. Miller Last modified by: William Miller Created Date: 11/2/2002 8:49:37 PM Document presentation ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reflections on Motivational Interviewing


1
  • Reflections on Motivational Interviewing

Cardiff September 27, 2011
2
1983

3
1991
MI-1

4
2002
MI-2

5
2008

6
2012
MI-3

7
2022
MI-4

8

9
Generalized Principles of MI
X
  1. Express Empathy
  2. Develop Discrepancy
  3. Avoid Argumentation
  4. Roll with Resistance
  5. Support Self-Efficacy

10
Two Phases of MI
X
  • Phase 1 Strengthen motivation for change
  • Phase 2 Consolidate commitment to change

11
RESISTANCE

12
The Underlying Spirit of MI
Partnership Evocation Acceptance Compassion
13
Change is Broader than Behavior
  • Decision to make a choice
  • Forgiveness, Leaving or staying
  • Attitude - to become a different person
  • To be more Compassionate, Assertive etc.
  • Resolution - Acceptance
  • Complicated grief
  • Finding peace regarding a decision
  • Tolerance for anxiety, uncertainty etc.

14
Four Fundamental Processes in MI

15
Relational Motivational
Foundation Interviewing

1. Engaging
2. Focusing
3. Evoking
4. Planning
16
The processes are somewhat linear ... .
  • Engaging necessarily comes first
  • Focusing (identifying a change goal) is a
    prerequisite for Evoking
  • Planning is logically a later step
  • Engage Focus Evoke Plan

17
. . . . and yet also recursive
  • Engaging skills (and re-engaging) continue
    throughout MI
  • Focusing is not a one-time event re-focusing is
    needed, and focus may change
  • Evoking can begin very early
  • Testing the water on planning may indicate a
    need for more of the above

18

Planning
Evoking Evoking
Focusing Focusing Focusing
Engaging Engaging Engaging Engaging
Four Foundational Processes
19
Is it MI Yet?
20
Can it be MI without . . .
  • Engaging ?
  • Focusing ?
  • Evoking ?
  • Planning ?

No No No Yes
21
So it becomes MI when . .
  • 1. The communication style and spirit involve
    person-centered, empathic listening (Engage)
  • AND
  • 2. There is a particular identified target for
    change that is the topic of conversation (Focus)
  • AND
  • 3. The interviewer is evoking the persons own
    motivations (or plans) for change (Evoke)

22
A continuum of styles that can be used in all
four processes
Directing ltgt Guiding ltgt Following
23
Core counseling skills that can be used in all
four processes
  • Open questions
  • Affirmation
  • Reflection
  • Summary
  • Offering information and advice

24
Direction Language
  • Directing as a counselor behavior
  • Direction as focus
  • Directional (not directive) as a
    description of MI as goal-oriented

25
Three Essential Elements in any Definition of MI
  1. MI is a particular kind of conversation about
    change (counseling, therapy, consultation, method
    of communication)
  2. MI is collaborative (person-centered,
    partnership, honors autonomy, not
    expert-recipient)
  3. MI is evocative, seeks to call forth the persons
    own motivation and commitment

26
Definitions of MI
  • Three levels of definition (of increasing
    specificity)
  • 1. A laypersons definition
  • (Whats it for?)
  • 2. A pragmatic practitioners definition
    (Why would I use it?)
  • 3. A technical therapeutic definition
  • (How does it work?)

27
1. A laypersons definition(Whats it for?)
  • Motivational interviewing is a collaborative
    conversation style for strengthening a persons
    own motivation and commitment to change

28
2. A pragmatic practitioners definition (Why
would I use it?)
  • Motivational interviewing is a person-centered
    counseling method for addressing the common
    problem of ambivalence about change

29
3. A technical therapeutic definition (How
does it work?)
  • Motivational interviewing is a collaborative,
    goal-oriented style of communication with
    particular attention to the language of change.
    It is designed to strengthen personal motivation
    for and commitment to a specific goal by
    eliciting and exploring the persons own reasons
    for change within an atmosphere of acceptance and
    compassion.

30
Counseling with Neutrality
  • Neutality is not a therapist attribute (like
    equanimity composure, balance, emotional
    stability)
  • Neutrality is the conscious clinical decision to
    try not to influence a clients direction of
    choice or change
  • Neutrality can be about
  • Focusing (whether to pursue a change goal)
  • Planning (how to pursue a change goal)

31
Counselor Aspiration
  • Should I proceed strategically to favor the
    resolution of the clients ambivalence in a
    particular direction?
  • or
  • Do I want to maintain neutrality and not
    intentionally or inadvertently steer the person
    in one particular direction?
  • MI was originally developed for the former
    situation

32
Engaging and Focusing
Identification of Change Goal
A conscious choice
Aspiration
Equipoise
Evoking Planning
Decisional Balance
Both choices involve partnership, acceptance and
compassion
33
Equipoise is where a classic decisional balance
makes sense
Giving intentionally balanced, equal attention
to pros and cons in Inquiry Elaboration
Affirmation Reflection Summaries
34
2 x 2 Decisional Balance Grid PROs and CONs of
Change
Status Quo or Option A Change or Option B
Advantages Good things about Status Quo or Option A CON Good things about Change or Option B PRO
Disadvantages - Less-good things about Status Quo or Option A PRO Less-good things about Change or Option B CON
35
Change Talk
  • Change talk is any client speech that favors
    movement in the direction of change
  • Previously called self-motivational statements
    (Miller Rollnick, 1991)
  • Change talk is by definition linked to a
    particular behavior change goal
  • DARN CATs

36
Preparatory Change TalkFour Examples
  • DARN
  • DESIRE to change (want, like, wish . . )
  • ABILITY to change (can, could . . )
  • REASONS to change (if . . then)
  • NEED to change (need, have to, got to . .)

37
Mobilizing Change TalkReflects resolution of
ambivalence
  • CATs
  • COMMITMENT (intention, decision, promise)
  • ACTIVATION (willing, ready, preparing)
  • TAKING STEPS

38
Yet another metaphor
MI Hill
Preparatory Change Talk
Mobilizing Change Talk
Preparation
Action
Contemplation
(Pre-)
39
Responding to Change TalkAll EARS
  • E Elaborating Asking for elaboration, more
    detail, in what ways, an example, etc.
  • A Affirming commenting positively on the
    persons statement
  • R Reflecting, continuing the paragraph, etc.
  • S Summarizing collecting bouquets of change
    talk

40
Change Talk and Sustain Talk
  • Opposite Sides of a Coin

41
Examples of Sustain TalkThe other side of
ambivalence
  • I really like marijuana (D)
  • I dont see how I could give up pot (A)
  • I have to smoke to be creative (R)
  • I dont think I need to quit (N)
  • I intend to keep smoking and (C) nobody can
    stop me
  • Im not ready to quit (A)
  • I went back to smoking this week (T)

42
What is Resistance?
X
  • Sustain Talk Discord

43
Sustain Talk and Discord
  • Sustain Talk is about the target behavior
  • I really dont want to stop smoking
  • I have to have my pills to make it through the
    day
  • Discord is about your relationship
  • You cant make me quit
  • You dont understand how hard it is for me
  • Both are highly responsive to counselor style

44
What is Discord?
  • Behavior
  • Interpersonal (It takes two to have discord)
  • A signal of dissonance in your relationship
  • Predictive of (non)change

45
Some Discord Signals
  • Defensiveness
  • Arguing
  • Challenging Discounting Hostility
  • Interrupting
  • Talking over the counselor
  • Ignoring
  • Inattention Changing the subject

46
MI in Child Protection Services

47
Dual Roles in CPS
  • To facilitate change in the caregivers
  • To protect and serve the childrens best
    interests
  • Similar to dual roles in probation/parole
  • Fulfilling role 1 serves role 2

48
The Righting Reflex
  • Righting is serious business in CPS
  • Passion or anxiety to protect can easily create
    an adversarial role in which
  • The worker advocates for change
  • The client is defensive and resistive
  • This is the quintessential clinical dilemma for
    which MI was developed

49
Engaging
  • An early and important task in MI
  • Promoted primarily by OARS
  • Can occur relatively quickly
  • An opposite style from fact-questioning
  • Research question Does MI-based engaging yield
    critical information more honestly and quickly
    than asking questions?

50
Focusing
  • Sometimes the worker must set the focus
  • Violence
  • Attending school
  • Substance abuse
  • Challenge How to avoid rapid focus problems
    and unconstructive adversarial interactions when
    you must address it?
  • One key Engage first

51
Evoking
  • MI is all about confrontation
  • Self- confrontation - Donald
    Forrester
  • Open questions and reflection help people look in
    the mirror
  • Evoking clients own change talk
  • Challenge Practice may jump quickly to planning
    in CPS due to urgency

52
Planning
  • With engagement and focus in place,
  • and evoking as much motivation and commitment to
    the goal as feasible
  • Develop a specific plan and elicit an
    implementation intention
  • Challenge Clearly and compassionately explain
    the consequences

53
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)