Evidence Based Management: The Role of Guidelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 70
About This Presentation
Title:

Evidence Based Management: The Role of Guidelines

Description:

James, Frontiers in Health Services Management1 993. From small q to big Q ... James Dean, Kenan-Flagler School of Business. Onset of Extrasystemic Cause ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:247
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 71
Provided by: kalu8
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evidence Based Management: The Role of Guidelines


1
Evidence Based Management The Role of Guidelines
QI
  • Escola Nacional de Saude Publica Sergio Arouca
  • Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz
  • Rio de Janeiro, RJ
  • June 2004

Arnold D. Kaluzny, Ph.D. Professor of Health
Policy and Administration
2
An Expert on Health Care Evaluates His Own Case
Who is this man?
1919 - 2000
3
An Expert Evaluates His Own Care
Things wont improve until something is done
about the design of the system
The problem stems for a bit of myopia mixed
with ignoranceTheres lip service to quality and
goodness knows, propaganda, but real commitment
is in short supply
4
An Expert Evaluates His Own Care
I think commercialization of care is a big
mistake. Health care is a sacred mission.It is a
moral enterprise and a scientific enterprise but
not fundamentally a commercial. We are not
selling a product. We dont have a consumer who
understands everything and makes rational
choices..
5
The problem is the system and the system belongs
to management. Edward Deming
6
What is Quality?
degree to which health services for
individuals and populations increase the
likelihood of desired health outcomes and are
consistent with current professional
knowledge IOM, 1990
7
Health Care Quality The Challenge
In practice, the knowledge base for both
efficacy and effectiveness of many health
services is weak, our understanding of the link
between the process and outcomes of care and of
the relative importance of the science and art of
care is incomplete. (but getting
better) Kathy Lohr
8
Improving Quality The Challenge
The efficacy of fewer than 20 of all customary
medical practices have been demonstrated with a
randomized clinical trial Berwick, 1989
80-90 of treatments have not been adequately
evaluated in controlled studies it is difficult
to overstate the importance of this issue. In a
field with uncertainty and doubt, the difference
between when in doubt, do it and when in
doubt, stop could easily swing 100 billion a
year. Eddy, 1993
9
The IOMs Six Aims for Improving
Quality(Provided Focus)
  • Safe
  • Effective
  • Patient-centered
  • Timely
  • Efficient
  • Equitable
  • IOMs Committee on the Quality of Health Care
  • in America, Crossing the Quality Chasm, 2001

10
Approaches to Quality Management
Guidelines
CQI
JCAHO
Quality
TQM
EBM
Outcomes
HEDIS
Benchmarking
Breakthrough Improvement
Process
Structure
Academic Detailing
Disease Management
11
How are we doing????
12
What is EBM??
  • The conscientious, explicit judicious use of
    current best evidence in making decisions about
    the care of patients
  • Integrates individual clinical experience with
    best available available evidence from systematic
    research
  • Uses the best evidence available in consultation
    with the patient to decide upon the option which
    best suits the patient

13
Clinical Guidelines The NCI Experience(not
impressive)
  • CHOP-NCI program designed to permit physicians
  • who saw the majority of cancer patients to
    develop patient management guidelines for
    selected cancer sites
  • Follow-up revealed that except for physicians
    most active in the the CHOP committee there was
    no diffusion to other physician or change in
    community practice patterns
  • Ford et. al. JCO,1987

14
Successful Guidelines Based on
  • Evidence based formulated by key physicians
  • Guidelines disseminated to all affected providers
    for critique
  • Implementation includes direct feedback on
    physician performance and system performance
  • Accountability for performance
  • Peer pressure does not require financial
    reward/penalty
  • Smith and Hillner, JCO,2001

15
Further research needed
  • Assess how guidelines are enacted in
    organizations beyond treatment eg prevention
  • Ways to improve compliance of providers not
    committed to change
  • Ways to improve accountability
  • Smith and Hillner,JCO,2001

16
Quality Improvement
  • The challenges and opportunities of continuous
    quality improvement

17
(No Transcript)
18
Professional Vs Managerial
  • TQM OR TWT
  • where
  • TQM - Total Quality Control
  • OR - Operations Research
  • TWT - Total Waste of Time

19
Total Quality Management
  • An organized systematic approach to continuous
    improvement designed to focus on satisfying
    customer expectations, identifying problems,
    building commitment among personnel and promoting
    open decision making.

20
TQM/CQI as a Managerial Innovation?
  • Any program, product or technique which
    represents a significant departure from the state
    of the art of management at the time it first
    appears and which affects the nature, location,
    quality or quantity of information that is
    available in the decision making process
    John Kimberly

21
ComponentsQuality Improvement
  • Find and implement the best
  • Find fault find solutions
  • Process operators use measurement tools to
    eliminate inappropriate variation and to document
    continuous improvement
  • A process is a series of linked steps designed to
    cause some set of outcomes to occur

James, Frontiers in Health Services Management1
993
22
From small q to big Q
  • Traditional view (q)
  • Limited to operations
  • Concern of specialists
  • Based on meeting standards
  • Tactical
  • Stagnant concept
  • Contemporary view (Q)
  • Organization-wide
  • Concern of everyone
  • Based on meeting stakeholder needs
  • Strategic
  • Dynamic concept

James Dean, Kenan-Flagler School of Business
23
Removal of Extrasystemic Cause
System Maintenance Will Prevent This
System Average
Level of Undesirable Attribute
Onset of Extrasystemic Cause
Time
24
Gain is Quality With System Improvement
Old System Average System Average After Change
Level of Undesirable Attribute
Change to the System
Time
25
(No Transcript)
26
The Quality Improvement Process
Diagnose the Process 1. Understand the
process 2. Identify the customers 3. Identify the
requirements 4. Analyze the problem 5. Identify
the root causes
Select a Process 1. Identify the problem 2.
Identify the departments 3. Define the problem 4.
Describe the problem 5. Identify the team 6.
Charter the team
Improve the Process 1. Select a solution 2.
Design the solution 3. Test the solution 4.
Address resistance 5. Implement the solution
Monitor the Process 1. Monitor performance 2.
Improve the process
27
Features of CQI
  • Customer is not just the patient or community
    ...but the many users of work processes including
    other health providers

28
Features of CQI
  • Identification / reduction of variation in work
    performance by inter-disciplinary teams requiring
    continuous and relentless improvement in total
    work process

29
Features of CQI
  • All personnel required to have a clear
    understanding of the work process and its
    relationship to the larger system

30
Features of CQI
  • Changes are based on the needs and desires of
    patients, clients and health professionals
    involved in the entire work process...not simply
    the prevailing values of providers

31
Quality Control Methods
  • Force Field Analysis
  • Control Chart
  • Run Chart
  • Pareto Chart
  • Check Lists
  • Cause and Effect Diagrams
  • Flow Diagrams

32
Group Process Techniques
  • Brainstorming
  • Consensus
  • Nominal Group
  • Multiple Voting
  • Rank Ordering

33
Adopting CQI
  • Inherent Contradictions
  • Barriers

34
Inherent Contradictions
  • Participatory, decentralized yet managed
    top down
  • Paradigm shifting yet
  • adopting one unit at a time
  • Requires low threat and job security yet
    organizations are under siege
  • Adoption depends on results yet
  • outcomes depend on adoption

35
CORPORATE CULTURE
  • Basic pattern of shared beliefs, behaviors, and
    assumptions acquired over time by members of the
    organization.

36
PROFESSIONAL VS CQIAREAS OF CONFLICT
  • PROFESSIONAL
  • Individual responsibility
  • Professional leadership
  • Autonomy
  • CQI
  • Collective/Partici-pative
  • Managerial/Partic-ipative
  • Accountability/organizational

37
Physician-Management Perspectives
  • Organizational purpose
  • Interpersonal skills
  • Work orientation
  • Leadership style
  • Ethnic

Patient health 11 task collegial individual
welfare
Organizational survival 1N process /
design hierarchical utilitarian / collective
welfare
38
IMPROVEImproving Prevention through
Organization, Vision and Empowerment
  • Description CQI initiation in 44 primary care
    clinics( 22 intervention/22 control) to increase
    compliance with prevention guidelines
  • Findings
  • Rate of increase 6 in intervention clinics
  • Great variation among clinics
  • Eg., clinic could be high on mammography and low
    on all others such as smoking, PSA,colo-rectal
  • Solberg,Kottke Brekke, 2006

39
IMPROVEImproving Prevention through
Organization, Vision and Empowerment
  • Lessons Learned
  • High priority commitment to change
  • Improving prevention not high
  • Organization ability to manage change
  • Keep it simple
  • Substantive Change content
  • Ability to make a difference
  • Effective development implementation
  • Inertia
  • Time
  • Reasonable but not too long

40
The Role of Management To fix it !!)
41
The Bottom Line is The Inevitability of
Re-engineering
  • Within health care, some of our processes
    are so bad that we could spend the rest of our
    professional careers trying to continuously
    improve them. We need to throw them out and
    begin with a clean sheet of paper and make sure
    we understand what the elements of each of these
    processes are. We need to REDESIGN them to be
    effective in the long run.
  • (Ellen
    Gaucher, 1994)

42
WHAT IS ORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN?
  • Organizational design is the arrangement of (and
    the process of arranging) activities, roles, or
    positions in the organization in order to
    coordinate effectively the interdependencies that
    exist and to improve the effectiveness of the
    organization.

43
The Problem
  • I was thinking of installing one of those
    openers over the weekend. The directions say,
    Make certain garage door is square and straight
    and that the garage floor is level. Directions
    always read like that. Is everything in your
    house straight, square, and level? If my house
    was straight, square, and level, I would never
    have to fix anything. What we all need is
    directions that tell us what to do when
    everything is crooked, off-center, and all
    screwed up.
  • Andy Rooney

44
WHY IS DESIGN IMPORTANT?
  • Design provides a map reflecting past power
    struggles (clue for future events)
  • Design provides basis for setting realistic
    limits within which a manager operates
  • Design factors are important in affecting
    indicators of performance

45
Implications for Quality!!
  • Changing the process of care at the individual
    level is not the only nor necessarily the best
    means of improving quality of care. To the
    extent that structural characteristics (design)
    determine the quality of care, efforts to improve
    care in the long run through changing the
    structure of care (design) my prove to be more
    cost effective than short-run, quality assurance
    programs.
  • Palmer Reilly,79

46
LEVELS OF DESIGN
INDIVIDUAL POSITION Managers
WORK GROUPS Task Forces
CLUSTER OF WORK GROUPS Medical Staff Organization
TOTAL ORGANIZATION Hospitals
NETWORK OF ORGANIZATIONS Organizations Providing
Services for Geriatric Patients
SYSTEMS A System of Health Services
47
LIMITS OF DESIGN
  • Little agreement on what constitutes
    effectiveness
  • Systemic study of design in health service
    organizations (a recent and limited phenomena)
  • Inability to encompass technical, sociological,
    political, psychological factors involved in
    design and generate creative design solutions

48
SYMPTOMS OF AN INAPPROPRIATEORGANIZATIONAL DESIGN
  • Motivation or morale may be depressed
  • Decision making may be delayed or of poor quality
  • Conflict or lack of coordination
  • Unable to respond rapidly/ innovatively to
    changing circumstances

49
(No Transcript)
50
A FUNCTIONAL DESIGNNursing Home or Chronic Care
Facility
51
FUNCTIONAL DESIGNAdvantage
Disadvantage
  • Promotes skill specialization
  • Uses resources full-time
  • Enhances career advancement
  • Facilitates sup/sub communication (share
    expertise)
  • May raise intrinsic work satisfaction
  • Consistent with high centralization/formalization
  • Too rigid in turbulent environment
  • Emphasizes routine tasks (short-term horizon)
  • Foster parochial perspectives
  • Reduces communication between departments
  • Obscures accountability
  • Stimulate interdepartmental conflict competition

52
A DIVISIONAL DESIGNAn Academic Medical Center
53
PURPOSEFUL/DIVISIONAL DESIGN
  • Advantages
  • Integrates clinical/support services
  • Fosters outcomes perspectives
  • Insures accountability
  • Departmental cohesiveness
  • MD control/autonomy
  • Training of top management
  • Disadvantages
  • Inefficient use of skills
  • Limits career advance of specialists
  • Limits specialists exposure to other specialists
  • Difficult performance evaluation
  • Sub-optimization

54
PRODUCT LINE/MATRIX DESIGN
Women's Care
Oncology
Cardiology
Rehabilitation
Product lines
Substance abuse
Long-term care
Health promotion
55
NCI Division of Cancer Prevention
Peter Greenwald Director Leslie Ford Carolyn
Clifford Co-Acting Deputy Directors Leslie Ford
Assoc. Dir. for Clinical Research
Office of Preventative Oncology Douglas Weed,
Chief
FOUNDATIONS OF PREVENTION RESEARCH GROUPS
Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Lori
Minasian Chief
Chemopreventive Agent Development James
Crowell Acting Chief
Basic Prevention Science Peter Greenwald Acting
Chief
Early Detection John Gohagan Chief
Nutritional Science John Milner Acting Chief
Cancer Biomarkers Sudhir Srivastava Chief
Biometry Philip Prorok Chief
Coordinating Unit
ORGAN SYSTEM RESEARCH GROUPS Breast and
Gynecologic Cancer Karen
Johnson Chief Prostate and Urologic
Cancer Carolyn Clifford
Acting Chief Lung and Upper Aerodigestive
Cancer Eva Szabo Acting
Chief Gastrointestinal and Other Cancer
Ernest Hawk Chief
PROJECT TEAMS
October 10, 2000
56
WHEN IS MATRIX ORGANIZATION APPROPRIATE?
  • When the organization has more than one goal
  • In a complex environment
  • Where there are complex, innovative technologies
  • When a variety of specialized and scarce human
    skills are required

57
MATRIX DESIGN Advantage
Disadvantage
  • May be temporary or permanent
  • Makes specialized/functional knowledge available
    to all projects (maintain reservoir)
  • Forces communication
  • Legitimizes multi-source of power
  • Can adopt to end changes
  • High consensus decisions
  • Difficult to introduce without supportive climate
  • Increase role ambiguities (stress)
  • Rewards political skills vs. technical skills
  • Groupitis
  • Prone to collapse during efficiency push

58
A PARALLEL DESIGN
Board of Trustees (B1)
President (P1)
Functional Structure
Parallel Structure
Example Problems
Vice Presidents
Investigate need for new technology
A3
M3
M4
Examine incidence of drug loss
Middle Managers
A3
A4
Develop public relations strategy for a new
program
Firstline Managers
A2
M2
Develop continuing education programs for
physician managers
Service Providers
B1
P1
F1
59
PARALLEL DESIGN Advantage
Disadvantage
  • Good for problem solving under high uncertainty
  • Flexible
  • Improves inter-departmental relationships
  • Leadership drawn from many levels
  • Confusion who is running the organization
  • May take over too much decision making
  • Too many meeting/extra cost
  • Loss of control by management

60
ADDENDUM
61
Strategies for Improved QualityOutcomes
Academic Detailing
  • A constellation of principles and techniques
    that focus on physician behavioral change,
    including the use of market research to develop
    an understanding of motivational patterns of
    physician use, sociometric identification of key
    decision makers and use of basic learning
    techniques
  • (Soumerai and
    Avorn, 1990)

62
Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Systematically developed statements to assist
    practitioner and patient decisions about
    appropriate health care for specific clinical
    circumstances
  • Most important attribute.. validity.. regarding
  • Health and cost outcomes
  • Strength of relationship between clinical
    recommendation and scientific evidence

63
What are report cards?
  • A summary of statistics (rate, ratio, frequency)
    that
  • provides interpretation
  • compares multiple organizations
  • is publicly available
  • is independently validated

64
Report Cards are derived from measure sets
  • Examples of Hospital Measure Sets
  • Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Health
    Care Organizations (JCAHO) ORYX
  • Quality Improvement Organizations (PROs)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    (AHRQ) Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
    (HCUP) Quality Indicators

65
Quality Improvement Organizations Quality
Indicators
  • Clinical Topics AMI, Breast Cancer,Diabetes,
  • Heart Failure, Pneumonia and Stroke
  • Indicators
  • AMI- eg.,early adm asprin,beta blocker (medical
    records)
  • Breast Cancer-Biennial mammography (Medicare
    claims)
  • Diabetes-eg., Biennial retinal exam,lipid profile
    (Medicare claims)
  • Pneumonia-eg., influenza vaccinations, approp.
    Antibiotics (medical record)

66
Report Cards--No Escape???everyone is using (or
planning to use) them
  • Medicare Choice
  • Federal Employees Benefit Health Plans
  • Purchasers/Employers
  • State governments
  • state health data agencies
  • Medicaid Managed Care
  • state insurance regulators/payers
  • nursing home and home health regulators

67
Public Reporting--A balancing act.
Patient Privacy
Timeliness
Proprietary Concerns
Clinical Information
Accuracy
Relevance
Administrative data
Fairness
68
Resources
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
    www.ahrq.gov
  • Health Care Financing Administration
    www.hcfa.gov
  • Joint Commission on the Accreditation of
    Healthcare Organizationswebsites www.jcaho.com
  • American Association of Health Plans
    www.aahp.org
  • National Committee for Quality Assurance
    www.ncqa.org

69
JCAHO Selected Programs
  • Compliance with Standards
  • ORYX Integrates outcomes data with other
    performance measurements
  • Began 1987------Launched 7/1/02
  • Core Outcome Measures eg.,AMI, Heart Failure
  • Staffing Effectiveness Standards-links clinical
    outcomes to specific staffing indicators

70
JCAHO Staffing Effectiveness
  • Clinical Service Indicators
  • Adverse Drug Events
  • Injuries to Patients
  • Length of Stay
  • Patient Complaints
  • Patient Falls
  • Pneumonia
  • Postoperative Infections
  • Skin Breakdown
  • Urinary Infections
  • Human Resource Indicators
  • Overtime
  • Nursing care hours / patient day
  • Staff Satisfaction
  • Staff Turnover Rates
  • Staff Vacancy Rates
  • Sick Time
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com