AlphaCor Outcomes Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 18
About This Presentation
Title:

AlphaCor Outcomes Update

Description:

AlphaCor Outcomes Update – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:53
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 19
Provided by: IAAF
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: AlphaCor Outcomes Update


1
AlphaCor Outcomes Update
R Doyle Stulting MD PhD On behalf of the
AlphaCor Scientific Advisory Board GJ Crawford1,
J Dart2, G Grabner3, CR Hicks1, EJ Holland4, RD
Stulting5, D Tan6. 1 Lions Eye Institute, Perth,
Australia 2 Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK 3
Landesaugenklinik, Salzburg, Austria 4 Cincinnati
Eye Institute, Cincinnati, USA 5 Emory Laser
Vision, Atlanta, USA 6 Singapore National Eye
Center, Singapore Presenting author has no
financial interest. Authors Hicks and Crawford
have a financial interest with the manufacturer
of AlphaCor, CooperVision Surgical, through
support of departmental funding, travel and
research. AlphaCor is cleared by FDA and has
international approvals but some aspects of
patient management have never been specifically
approved for use in conjunction with any KPro.
2
Purpose and Background
  • Review AlphaCor data to evaluate device safety
    and efficacy
  • AlphaCor is a 7.0 mm diameter, one-piece,
    non-rigid synthetic cornea for those at too high
    risk for PK with donor tissue standard and
    aphakic powers
  • Central transparent optic chemically fused with
    surrounding biointegratable skirt
  • Implanted within the corneal stroma

3
Study Design and Surgery
  • Prospective, non-randomized
  • Pre-op and post-op data compiled and updated
  • All cases included, pre and post regulatory
    approvals
  • Stage I (typically 35-50 minutes)
  • Lamellar pocket created and 3.5 mm opening
    trephined in central posterior lamella
  • AlphaCor positioned and pocket closed
  • Stage II (after 3 months)
  • Opening of anterior lamella of cornea

4
Data
  • This presentation based upon data to 28th Sep
    2005
  • Includes all 277 AlphaCor implantations by 78
    surgeons 46 trial cases, 231 post-trial
  • 21.7 Australasia, 11.2 Europe, 67.1 Americas
  • 88.8 for on-label indications, 11.2 off-label
  • Includes 14 second devices 1 bilateral
    implantation

5
Follow-up (device in situ)
  • Ranges from 0.1 months to 83 months
  • Mean follow-up is 14.6 months, median 12.0

6
Pre-operative Patient Profile
  • 61.0 male, 39.0 female
  • Age 1-91y, mean 58.1 years
  • 13.0 Afro-Caribbean, 14.8 Asian/Inuit, 72.2
    Caucasian
  • 16.2 diabetic (9.7 IDDM)
  • 16.6 systemic hypertension

7
Pre-op Profile
  • 18.1 aphakic, 54.5 PC IOL, 6.1 AC, iris or
    sutured
  • 56.0 glaucoma (0.4 laser, 9.4 trabeculectomy,
    24.9 tube)
  • 36.8 history bullous keratopathy
  • 6.9 aniridia
  • 24.9 history trauma/chemical
  • 12.1 history bacterial keratitis, 1.3 fungal
    keratitis
  • 1.8 Descemetocoele, 2.2 silicone oil, 1.8
    ICE
  • 8.0 HSV
  • 2.4 severe dry eye/SJS, 14.1 moderately dry

8
Previous Failed Grafts
AlphaCor recipients had a mean of 2.4 prior
failed grafts
9
Outcomes ComplicationsStromal melting
  • Falling incidence (24.7 2003, 10.6 2004)
  • Off-label dry eyes at increased risk (p lt 0.001)
  • MPG-therapy significantly protective (p lt 0.001)
  • History of HSV and cataract surgery not risk
    factors if MPG prescribed
  • Progressive melts treated with lamellar graft or
    reversed to PK

10
Outcomes ComplicationsRPM
  • An inflammatory/fibrous re-closure of the
    posterior lamellar opening in 14.4 cases
  • Associations Afro-Caribbean (p 0.001),
    systemic HT (p 0.014), DM no longer a
    significant risk factor, possibly reflecting
    successful prevention by steroids in this
    previously high-risk group
  • Managed by NdYag or surgery /- heparin and rTPA

11
Outcomes ComplicationsOptic spoliation or damage
  • Intra-gel deposit
  • brown, 3.2 (smoking, p 0.019)
  • calcific, 5.4 (concurrent prescription of
    topical steroids and beta-blockers, p lt 0.001)
  • fungal invasion 1 confirmed case (0.4) in RGP
    wearer)
  • Damage to optic necessitating replacement in 1
    case (0.4)
  • Surface spoliation (5.4) related to dry eye (p lt
    0.001) appears prevented by bandage lens and may
    be removable with CL cleaners

12
Outcomes ComplicationsPoor primary
biointegration
  • 8 cases (2.9) where aqueous leakage noted at
    Stage II, or fluid seen on imaging and stage II
    deferred
  • Imaging fluid track or poor apposition/over-large
    pocket
  • Associated with reported perioperative
    difficulties (p lt 0.001) no other significant
    associations
  • Natural history is slow resolution additional
    sutures helpful in some cases

13
Outcomes ComplicationsOther
  • Glaucoma data suggest control does not worsen
    after AlphaCor history glaucoma does not affect
    probability AlphaCor retention
  • Vitritis 2 cases (0.7), no identified risk
    factors
  • Endophthlamitis 2 cases (0.7), after prolonged
    melt/leak
  • Rhegmatogenous RD 1 case (0.4), related to
    RPM surgery

14
AlphaCor Probability of Survival
  • 1-year 81
  • 2-year 60

15
Visual Acuity Outcomes
  • Pre-op
  • Range PL- 20/200
  • Mean HM
  • (pre-existing macular disease 26.0, glaucoma
    56.0 no view 21.4)
  • Best BCVA post-op
  • Range PL- 20/20
  • Mean 20/200
  • Mean gain 2 lines BCVA
  • Mean BCVA matches mean BCVA achieved from
    previous graft before failure (paired t-test)

16
Comparison with 1 year graft survival after gt4
PFG
AlphaCor data (MPG-Rx, on-label cases, N
44) PK data from ACGR 2004 Report N 79 with 4
or more PFG
17
Conclusions
  • With 337 patient-years of experience, many risk
    and protective factors have been identified
    demonstrates merits of continued and inclusive
    data collection
  • Low risk of sight-threatening complications
    reversible procedure does not worsen/provoke
    glaucoma
  • Better chance of success than donor PK in high
    risk cases
  • Mean VA achieved matches that from previous graft
  • Long term data must continue to be collected for
    better understanding of the benefits and
    limitations of this technology

18
The Scientific Advisory Board Gratefully
Acknowledges Contributors of Data
  • Aasly K, Afshari N, Akpek E, Aldave A, Aquavella
    J, Awwad S, Bleckmann H, Bobrow J, Bokosky J,
    Caparossi A, Caudill J, Channa P, Chen P, Chern
    K, Chodosh J, Cohen I, Cohen S, Conners M, Cowden
    J, Crawford G, Dart J, Daya S, Dhaliwal D, Downie
    N, Dunn S, Eguchi H, Eiferman R, Fulcher S,
    Geerling G, Gillette T, Goins K, Gondhowiardjo T,
    Goodwin L, Gorovoy M, Grabner G, Gritz D, Gulani
    A, Hamilton S, Hardten D, Hirst L, Holland E,
    John T, Karbassi M, Katsev D, Kaufman H, Kim J,
    Lahner W, Lam D, Leahey A, Macsai M, Mah F,
    Malecha M, Manche E, Mayers M, McCaa C, Moshifir
    M, Pangalinan R, Parker J, Pflugfelder S, Price
    F, Prosdocimo G, Raber I, Randleman B, Rapisarda
    A, Rapuano C, Remejier L, Rodriguez L, Roszival
    P, Rotkis W, Silverstein S, Snibson G, Song J,
    Stulting RD, Sutphin J, Sutton G, Taravella T,
    Tauber S, Tan D, Tran U, Wang M
  • Honorary member Scientific Advisory Board
  • Clinical Investigator in Regulatory Trials
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com