Title: Basel II Creating Value for your Organization
1Basel II Creating Value for your Organization
- A Post-Basel II/Economic Capital
- Audit Approach
Jacob Fleming Conferences, Barcelona Johan
Feijen, Rabobank Nederland 25/26th February,
2008
2QUIZ
Based on your score just stay for the BIS II
Tour or have a break for coffee!
3Program
- Risks Economic Capital
- Risk Economic Capital
- Integrated risk solvency management
- Regulatory Capital Approach under BIS II
- 2. A Post-Basel II/Economic Capital Audit
Approach - Basel II Building Blocks
- An integrated Internal Audit Approach
4The risk landscape of banks
- How popular will my products be?
- How much will people be willing to pay for them?
- Will an internet bank target my customers?
- Will borrowers repay their debt?
Business/ Strategic Risk
- Will a foreign borrower be able to obtain the
convertible currency required to repay his debt?
- Will I incur losses due to unfavourable market
movements?
- Will my IT system fail ?
- Will someone rob the bank?
- Will I have employess as Nick Leeson or
Jérôme Kerviel?
- Will interest rates change unfavourably?
Operational Risk
- Will I be able to meet short term obligations
and will all transactions be settled on time?
4
5Risk Economic Capital
Complex, integrated method All risksRisk
sensitiveAlligned to target credit rating Risk
diversification
Complex method Credit, Market and Operational
Risk Internal modelling allowedMore risk
sensitiveIRB/AMA approach
Simple methodCredit , Market risk Crude risk
weightingNot very risk sensitive
6Risk Economic Capital
6 Economic Capital Analytics
7Risks Economic Capital
Historical loss profile
Loss distribution
7
8Risk Adjusted Return On Capital (RAROC)
RAROC Risk Adjusted Return (RAR)
100 Average Economic Capital (EC)
- Revenue s 1.000
- Minus Operating Expenses 350
- Gross operating result 650
- Adjustment for actual minus expected Losses
(90) - Adjustment for double counting Work-Out Costs in
LGD and PL (10) - Adjustment for interest costs due to under- or
overcapitalization - (actual capital minus normal economic
capital) interest-free interest rate (50) - Result after correction for normal
capitalization 500 - Tax (e.g. 25) (125)
- Risk Adjusted Return (A) 375
- Economic Capital (derived from economic capital
models) (RAR) 1.500 - Net Realized Risk Adjusted Return on Capital
(RAROC) (A/B 100) 25 -
9Risk Adjusted Return On Capital (RAROC)
Integrated Risk Solvency Management
10The Basel II Accord
Pillar 1
Pillar 2
Pillar 3
Minimum solvency requirements
Market Discipline
Supervisory Review
Minimum solvency requirement for credit-, market
and operational risk approval of models by
supervisor
Qualitative review of risk management, internal
solvency management process and embedding in the
internal organisation
Disclosure of information on capital structure,
risk profile and risk management
Financial Institutions
Financial Market
Supervisors
11Approaches under Pillar 1
12Solvency requirement Credit Risk
Solvency requirements under the Standardized
Approach
Exposure
Risk-weight
8
Minimum solvency
x
x
Exposure at Default (EAD)
PD
LGD
EAD
M
8
Minimum solvency
x f
x
Solvency requirements under the Internal Rating
Based Approach
PD Probability of Default likelihood of
non-recourse of payments by counterpart () LGD
Loss Given Default loss on collateral in case
of default () EAD Exposure at Default the
amount of exposure including insolvency costs M
Maturity maturity of loan facilities (time)
13Credit Risk Components
WorkoutCosts
Product
Collateral Value
Collateral Type
Limit
Utilisation
Rating
Customer Segment
Loss given default (LGD)
Exposure atDefault (EAD)
Probability ofDefault (PD)
Expected Loss
X
X
How much of this are we likely to lose?
What will be our exposure at this point in time?
What is the probability that a counterparty will
default?
CounterpartySpecific
TransactionSpecific
PD () LGD ( EAD () Expected Loss (EL)
14Example Expected Loss
- Expected Default counterpart(PD) 0,5 (0,005)
- Outstanding amount EUR 450K
- Remaining loan facility EUR 25K
- Work Out Costs EUR 25K
- Collateral/risk mitigants none
- Loss expectation of collateral (Loss Given
Default) 100 - Expected Loss
- PD EAD LGD 0,005 (450K 25K 25K)
1,00 2500 (50 bpt.) -
-
Exposure at Default EUR 500K
- Expected Default counterpart (PD) 0,5 (0,05)
- Outstanding amount EUR 450K
- Remaining loan facility EUR 25K
- Work Out Costs EUR 25K
- Collateral pledge of receveivables EUR 500K
- Loss expectation of collateral (Loss Given
Default) 40 - Expected Loss
- PD EAD LGD 0,005 (450K 50K) 0,40
1000 (10 bpt.) -
-
Exposure at Default EUR 500K
Conclusion creating a win-win situation with the
counterpart is achievable!
14
15Steering Regulatory Economic Capital
- Impact of better rated client on EL and EC big
- In this example 30 reduction on EL and 38 on EC
16Steering Regulatory Economic Capital
- Impact of collateral on EL and EC
- In this example double coverage reduction both
on EL and on EC of 18.
17Risk Economic Capital - summary
- Economic Capital is a managerial tool for
- Capital measurement
- Capital allocation (source asset!)
- Capital Planning
- Limit Setting
- Risk Adjusted Return on Capital (RAROC) serves
- To measure performance in a risk-based and
uniform manner - Risk based pricing
- Support in credit acceptance process
- Capital Portfolio Management
Economic Capital/RAROC is alligned to Value
Management
18Program
- Risks Economic Capital
- Risk Economic Capital
- Regulatory Capital Approach under BIS II
- 2. A Post-BIS II/Economic Capital Audit Approach
- BIS II building blocks
- An integrated Internal Audit Approach
- BIS II risk assessement
19Basel II Building Blocks
Risk Capital Strategy
BIS (Project) Governance Framework
Implementation
Data quality Management
Risk Models Methods
Systems
Solvency Reporting
Internal Data
Credit Risk
BU IT systems Central IT systems Interfacing
Solvency Management
Market Risk
Internal Reporting
External Data
Operational Risk
External Reporting
Business Integration
20Basel II Project Goverance Implementation
- Project governance
- Buy-in senior management
- Sound project structure
- Clear roles responsibilities
- Project Management Implementation
- Sound analysis of BIS II requirements gaps
- Clear action plans
- Reporting on progress, milestones and actions
- Adequate hand-over procedures from project to
regular operations - Clear and timely communication to stakeholders
(Project Board/ Steering Committee, Supervisor,
Local Management, etc.)
21Data quality management
22Data quality management
Key objectives Completeness Consist
ency Accuracy Correct model use Timeliness
Continuity Reliable risk solvency
reporting Adequate risk solvency management
23The model lifecycle
(Re)development
1
Review
Validation
5
Model Governance
2
4
3
Approval
Implementation
24The model audit approach
(Re)development - Business Units
Documentation
Documentation
Validation - Validation team
Model governance
Policies for model development -validation
Segregation of responsibilities Model coverage
Monitoring Business Unit Validation team
Documentation
Documentation
Approval (Committee)
Implementation - Business Unit IT
25Basel II System Audits
- Exposures derived from risk systems, not from
financial systems - Exposure reconciliations are key
- Exposures according to Portfolios - Models
Solvency Reporting - Exposures according to financial systems and risk
systems - Adequacy/robustness
- data base structure
- Automated data quality
- integrity controls
- Interface controls
- Continuity change
- management
-
Reference source COBIT and COSO/Basel II IT
controls
26Solvency Management Process (ICAAP)
- Capital management plan capital target
- Senior management involvement
- Risk based and comprehensive all material risk
categories covered - Forward looking aspects
- Impact of stress-testing
- Contigency planning
- Periodical review of ICAAP including risks and
capital
27Basel II internal audit planning
28Summary
- The financial sector is in a new era of
Integrated Risk Management and solvency
management - Embedding sound risk management techniques in the
business processes and performance measurement
are key elements - A Building Blocks approach for the internal audit
can add assurance value to your organization
29Questions?
- j.h.s.feijen_at_rn.rabobank.nl