Title: Bill Dorotinsky
1 Assessing Public Finance System
Performance World Bank Experience with HIPC
Expenditure Tracking
WB-ICGFM Conference November 24, 2003
Bill Dorotinsky
2Approaches
- Black Box Outcomes
- Deficits
- Outcome to Plan
- System Objectives
- 3-level framework
- System Aspects
- Transparency (IMF Fiscal ROSC)
- Equity (PRSP vs. Budget)
3Assessment Approach Expenditure Management
Cycle.
I.8 arrears performance I.9 audit 8 (for ex
ante, 5, 6) I.10 PETS partial substitute for
I.9 I.12 timely reports performance of 7 I.13
tracking classn nature of 7 I.14 closure
nature of 7 I.15 audit timely performance of 8
Relations
Foundations Comprehensiveness (I.1 GFS, I.2
off-budget, I.4 donor, I.11
reconciln) National/sub-national
I.3 outturn relation of 4 6 I.5 bdgt classn
4, 5 I.6 poverty expend subset of 4, 5, 6,
7 I.7 MTEF 3
4The HIPC Expenditure Tracking Assessment centers
around 15 indicators, chosen as benchmarks of PEM
system capabilities deemed necessary for tracking
spending.
Assessment Approach
5Results of the March 2002 Board Paper
Relative need for upgrading PEM Systems
15
Agreed Assessment
(8) Number of Benchmarks met
Bolivia (5) Cameroon (4) Ethiopia (6) Gambia, The
(5) Ghana (1) Guinea (5) Madagascar (7) Malawi
(7) Mauritania (7) Mozambique (5) Nicaragua
(5) Niger (3) Sao Tome Principe (4) Senegal
(4) Zambia (3)
9
Benin (8) Burkina Faso (9) Chad (8) Guyana
(8) Honduras (8) Mali (8) Rwanda (8) Tanzania
(8) Uganda (9)
Substantial Upgrading Required
Some Upgrading Required
Little Upgrading Required
6The HIPC Expenditure Tracking paper illustrated
the need to improve public expenditure management
systems
Results of the March 2002 Board Paper
7Assessment Conclusions
Results of the March 2002 Board Paper
- Execution and reporting relatively weaker
- Institutional reforms
- require continuous engagement and monitoring not
one-off - Country commitment also fundamental
- Unless some of these addressed, other PEM reforms
will have limited impact - With limited policy space for reform, important
to focus on a few key areas, rather than laundry
list
8March 2003 Results
March 2003 Results
- Assessed status of action plan implementation for
21 of the 24 original HIPCs1 - Fourteen countries have initiated or implemented
more than 80 percent of all planned measures in
their action plans - Chad, Mali, and Rwanda initiated or fully
implemented all measures - Ghana has the highest percentage of fully
implemented actions (47 percent) - Seven countries have initiated or implemented all
short-term measures in their action plans.
1 Benin, Bolivia, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Chad,
Ethiopia, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guyana,
Honduras, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mozambique,
Niger, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania, Uganda, and
Zambia. Madagascar.
Source Update on Implementation of Action Plans
to Strengthen Capacity of HIPCs to Track
Poverty-Reducing Spending, March 11, 2003,
SM/03/90 World Bank, March 13, 2003,
IDA/R2003-0043.
9Total Measures Fully Implemented or Initiated by
Country
March 2003 Results
10Examples of fully implemented short-term measures
March 2003 Results and Next Steps
- improving budget classification
- Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ghana, Honduras, Mali, Niger,
and Rwanda - identifying and tagging poverty-reducing spending
- Benin, Bolivia, Chad, Ghana, Guyana, Honduras,
Mali, Mauritania, Uganda, and Zambia - introducing more modern treasury operations
- Ethiopia and Cameroon
- strengthening audit
- Cameroon, Mali, Mauritania, and Niger
11Countries especially active in putting in place
short-term bridging mechanisms
March 2003 Results and Next Steps
- These mainly involve tagging poverty-reducing
expenditures identified in the PRSPs. - eleven countries have completed actions to
improve identification of poverty-reducing
spending - four other countries have initiated similar
actions - Other areas of increased focus have been
- strengthening internal controls and audit systems
- improving in-year budget reporting.
12Progress in Reporting Poverty-Reducing Public
Spending
March 2003 Results and Next Steps
- An increasing number now reporting
poverty-reducing spending - Nineteen countries now compared to four in 2002
- Poverty-reducing spending increasing relative to
GDP and total spending - From 1999 to 2001, outlays increased, on average,
by 1.4 percent of GDP - And increased by 3.9 percentage points as a share
of total government spending - However, many budget systems are unable to
provide disaggregated data by function or program
(e.g., primary education and health) identified
in PRSPs as poverty reducing.
13General conclusion
March 2003 Results and Next Steps
- At March 2002 comprehensive assessment,
countries, on average, met between seven and
eight benchmarks - Based on the number of measures fully
implemented, and assuming no slippage in other
areas, staff would expect that, on average,
countries have met one additional benchmark
14Next Steps
March 2003 Results and Next Steps
- comprehensive reassessment underway, jointly by
the client, Bank and the Fund - next update in late 2004 for 24 countries
- being rolled-out to other countries
- improve and streamline the assessment instrument
- broaden discussion of instrument with other
parties - Have already added a sixteenth indicators on
procurement - include assessment instrument in other analytical
work - Also, work underway to develop more comprehensive
set of indicators
15References
Tracking of Poverty-Reducing Public Spending in
Heavily Indebted Poor Countries, Revision 1,
March 28, 2001, SM/01/16, and World Bank, March
30, 2001, IDA/SECM2001-0052/1 Actions to
Strengthen the Tracking of Poverty-Reducing
Public Spending in Heavily Indebted Poor
Countries, Revision 2, March 21, 2002, SM/02/30,
and World Bank, March 22, 2002, IDA/SECM2002-30/2
Update on Implementation of Action Plans to
Strengthen Capacity of HIPCs to Track
Poverty-Reducing Spending, March 11, 2003,
SM/03/90 World Bank, March 13, 2003,
IDA/R2003-0043. All available at http//www-wbw
eb.worldbank.org/prem/prmps/expenditure/hipc.htm