Streamlined Sales Tax

1 / 46

About This Presentation

Title:

Streamlined Sales Tax

Description:

Title: Streamlining State and Local Sales Taxes Author: dg01018 Last modified by: torian.kathy Created Date: 6/30/2006 12:08:03 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:21

Avg rating:3.0/5.0

Slides: 47

Provided by: dg01

Learn more at: http://www.law.fsu.edu

more less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Streamlined Sales Tax

1
Streamlined Sales Tax

Overview and Update
July 2007

2
Introduction and Background

45 states plus District of Columbia impose sales
and use taxes.
Over 7,000 local jurisdictions impose sales and
use taxesadministered by the state except in AL,
CO and LA.
Retailers required to collect and remit sales tax
to states where retailer has physical presence.
Use tax is owed by consumer when retailer does
not collect the sales tax.

3
Why doesnt seller always collect sales tax?

For decades, states have sought to require
out-of-state retailers to collect their tax.
1992 Supreme Court decision in Quill Corp. v.
North Dakota held requiring collection of tax by
out-of-state retailers with no physical presence
in a state would be burden on interstate commerce
and would therefore violate Commerce Clause of
U.S. Constitution.

4
Remote sales What is at stake?

Compliance with sales tax laws by multi-state
corporations is too complex.
Local merchants suffer from lack of level playing
field.
Significant losses of revenue expected due to
growth in electronic commerce and inability of
states to administer use tax with consumers.

5
Remote sales What is at stake?

"State and Local Sales Tax Revenue Losses from
E-Commerce, July 2004 update to report by Dr.
Bill Fox at Univ. of Tennessee State and local
governments lost between 15.5 billion and 16.1
billion in 2003 as states are unable collect
sales taxes from online sales.
Trend increases By 2008 revenue projected loss
for state and local governments range between
21.5 billion and 33.7 billion, with the
greatest losses occurring in states that rely
most heavily on the sales tax as a revenue
source.

6
History of Streamlined Sales Tax Effort

1999 National Governors Association and
National Conference of State Legislatures
requested tax administrators to assist in
addressing sales tax system issues
Make system less complex.
Address unlevel playing field for merchants.
Address loss of revenue from states unable to
collect taxes already imposed.

7
Whos Involved

44 States, DC and Puerto Rico
Legislative Branch
Executive Branch
Local Governments.
Tax Practitioners.
Business community.

8
What makes the system complex?Ask the people
trying to comply

One level of tax administration per state no
locally administered sales taxes.
Have one rule that establishes who has the right
to tax a transaction.
Do not have so many different tax rates within
each state and locality.
Do not have different state and local tax bases.
Work on common definitions of the same term.
Do not make the retailer be the policeman to
determine if an exempt sale is valid.

9
Goals of the Streamlined Effort

Create a simpler system for administering the
various state and local sales taxes.
Where something could not be made more simple,
make it uniform.
Balance the interests of a states sovereignty.
with the interests of simplicity and uniformity.
Leverage the use of technology to ease tax
collection.

10
Results Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement
(SSUTA)

SSUTA approved November 2002 by the states, and
amended since.
Provisions are based on simplification,
uniformity and technology principles
Simplification (e.g., state-level administration
of tax).
Uniformity (e.g., uniform definition of lease,
lease sourcing rule.
Technology (e.g., certification of tax
calculation software).
Balancing interests of state sovereignty.

11
Results Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement
(SSUTA)

SSUTA effective October 1, 2005.
15 full member states.
Full member status
Full member state has made all changes to
statutes and rules to comply with the provisions
of the SSUTA.
Kansas, Kentucky, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan,
Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, North Carolina,
North Dakota, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, South
Dakota, Vermont, West Virginia.
7 associate member states.
Associate member status
For new associate states, changes to states
statutes, rules, regulations or other authorities
necessary for compliance take effect no later
than 12 months after becoming an associate state.
For existing associate states, changes to states
statutes, rules, regulations or other authorities
necessary for compliance take effect on or before
January 1, 2008 or
state has achieved substantial compliance with
the terms of the Agreement taken as a whole, but
not necessarily each provision as required by
Section 805, and there is a reasonable
expectation that the state will achieve
compliance by January 1, 2008.
Arkansas, Nevada, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah,
Washington, Wyoming.

12

Streamlined State Status 7-01-07

Full Member States
Advisory States Not Conforming
Non-sales tax states
Associate Member States flex to full
Project states Not Advisory
Assoc. Members that re-petition
Non-participating state
13
New Member States

Vermont
Associate member from 8/29/06 to 12/31/06.
Full member on 1/1/07.
Rhode Island-Full member 1/1/07.
Washington
Associate member from 7/1/07 to 6/30/07.
Full member on 7/1/08.
Advisory states
Anticipated new states in 2007
Wisconsin

14
Governance of SSUTA

All member states have seat on the Governing
Board.
Governing Board formed non-profit entity
Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board, Inc.
Governing Board advised by
State and Local Advisory Council.
Business Advisory Council.

15
Governance of SSUTA
16
Governing Board

Interpretations of and Amendments to SSUTA
¾ vote requirement
Certifies tax technology systems and service
providers.
Reviews state compliance with SSUTA.
Implements of Administrative mechanisms
Vendor compensation
Multi-state audit procedures
Handles dispute resolution.

17
State and Local Advisory Council

Provides means by which states and local
governments not on the Governing Board have input
into the process.
Ex officio membership on Governing Board
Chair Diane Hardt (WI)
Vice Chair Sherry Harrell (TN)
Develops new definitions and analyzes proposed
amendments.
Develops rules and advises on requests for
interpretations.
Works with Business Advisory Council (BAC).

18
Business Advisory Council

Voice of business community members.
Provides input to Governing Board and State and
Local Advisory Committee related to
administration, interpretation, compliance with
and amendments to the agreement.
Members include businesses, associations, and
practitioners.
Two ex officio seats on Governing Board
Stephen Kranz, COST
Richard Prem, Amazon.com

19
SSUTA Key Features

State level administration of local sales and use
taxes.
Rate simplification
Allows one general state rate per state.
Allows second rate on food and drugs, electricity
delivered by the seller rate could be zero.
Allows single local rate per jurisdiction.
No caps and thresholds.

20
SSUTA Key Features

Common state and local tax bases within a state.
Common tax base for local jurisdictions.
Uniform sourcing rule for goods and services
Destination based.
Uniform sourcing rule for
Telecommunications.
Lease or rental of property.
Direct mail.

21
SSUTA Key Features
Uniform Definitions

Food and food ingredients
Prepared food
Candy
Soft drinks
Dietary supplement
Clothing
Lease or rental
Tangible personal property
Bundled Transaction

Drugs
Durable Medical Equipment
Computer Software
Prewritten Computer Software
Delivered Electronically
Load and Leave
Sales Price

22
SSUTA Key Features

Uniform treatment of bank holidays.
Uniform rules for sales tax holidays
limited to defined products and within
administrative guidelines.
Uniform drop shipment rule.
Uniform rule for bad debt credits.

23
SSUTA Key Features

Simplified electronic tax return.
Uniform exemption certificate and simplified
exemption processing.
Uniform rounding rule.

24
SSUTA Key Features

Central Registration System
www.sstregister.org/sellers.
Must register for all full member states.
May register for associate member states.
When new states are added as full members,
sellers receive notice from the Governing Board
and automatically become registered to collect
taxes in those states.
Must register on Central Registration System to
be eligible for AMNESTY.

25
SST Agreement Key Features Amnesty Provisions

Sellers who voluntarily register to collect tax
receive amnesty against liability for prior sales
regardless of nexus.
Not available to any seller that has received an
audit notice from a state.
Available from date state joins Governing Board
until one year after it has been a full Member
State.
Unavailable to sellers who are registered with
state during preceding year or who are being
audited.
Must remain registered for 36 months.
Sales tax liability only.

26
Amnesty

Must register for all full Member States.
Unavailable to sellers who are registered with
state during preceding year or who are being
audited or have received notice of intent to
audit.
Expired for the first full Member States on
October 1, 2006.
Currently available in all the Associate States
and in the full member states of Rhode Island and
Vermont.

27
Technology Implementation

States must provide
Database matching tax rates to local
jurisdictions.
Database of boundary information for local
jurisdictions.
Taxability matrix that identifies whether defined
products are exempt or taxable under the states
laws.

28
Technology Implementation

Certification of sales tax administration
software.
Central registration system.

29
Taxability matrix

A state database that tells sellers what is and
what is not taxable.
To start with, a list of uniformly defined
products and services, but will eventually
include more.
Sellers are not liable for errors in how
something is taxed if they follow what is in the
taxability matrix.

30
Technology Implementation

Model 1 Sellers use services of a Certified
Service Provider (CSP).
Model 2 Sellers use a Certified Automated System
(CAS).
Model 3 sellers have an in-house (Proprietary)
System.

31
SSTP Technology Model One The Certified Service
Provider (CSP)

CSP is a third party that provides cradle to
grave tax service that includes liability
determination, return filing and tax remittance.
CSP software applications must apply
certification standards and must receive approval
by the Governing Board
Calculation accuracy standards.
Technology standards (e.g., ISO 17799, SAS70).
Three CSPs have contract with Governing Board
Avalara
Exactor
Taxware
Businesses who volunteer to collect tax in state
may use CSPs at no cost states pay CSP for
services to volunteer sellers.
As of 6/30/07 there were 91 companies using a CSP.

32
CSP - Responsibilities Liabilities

Integration of software with sellers order
processing system.
Applied data tax calculations.
Tax liability statistical reporting.
Funds transfers.
System performance security.

33
SSTP Technology Model Two The Certified Service
Provider (CAS)

CAS is a third party that provides liability
determination tax administration service.
CAS software applications must apply
certification standards and must receive approval
by the Governing Board
Calculation accuracy standards.
Technology standards (e.g., ISO 17799, SAS70).
One CAS has contract with Governing Board
Taxware
Businesses who use CAS pay the CAS for services.

34
CAS - Responsibilities Liabilities

Integration of software with sellers order
processing system.
Applied data tax calculations.
Tax liability statistical reporting.
System performance security.

35
Central Registration System

The Streamlined Sales Tax Registration System
(SSTR) is a web-based system that enables
taxpayers to volunteer to register to participate
in Streamlined Sales Tax.
Taxpayers can use SSTR for both new voluntary
registrations and updates to previously submitted
registration information.
This system is a pass-through system in that the
states will incorporate the data into their state
system.

36
Central Registration System

Updates to taxpayer information can be submitted
by taxpayers using SSTR.
SSTR maintains all taxpayer information for
specific business processes.
The SSTR is web based and a relational database
is used as a back-end for the storage and
retrieval of the data thus providing dynamic
information anytime, anywhere.
An XML file schema is used to exchange data
between the SSTR system and the states.

37
Central Registration System

As of June 30, 2007 there were 1,013 companies
registered on the central registration system.
As of June 30, 2007 those companies had collected
102 million in sales tax for the Streamline
states.

38
Interpretations

2006-01 Amnesty/treatment of taxes already
collected.
2006-02 Amnesty extension for users of CSP
model.
2006-03 Sourcing of down payments on leases.
2006-04 Prepared food/eating utensils.
2006-05 Fur clothing excise tax.
2006-06 Amnesty related to de-registration.

39
Interpretations

2006-07 Guidance on MPU- concurrently
available.
2006-08 Amnesty related to de-registration.
2006-09 Amnesty for predecessor entities.
2006-11 Definition of food sold with eating
utensils provided by the seller.
2006-12 Whether billing invoices, return
envelopes and any additional marketing materials
are included in the definition of direct mail
2007-01 Whether the word drug is limited to an
item or liquid that is consumed internally by the
person or used externally on a person.

40
State and Local Advisory Council Update

Digital products definition
audio visual works
audio works
book
undefined digital products
definition of tangible personal property

41
State and Local Advisory Council Update

Relief for purchasers - - reliance on rate
jurisdiction databases and taxability matrices.
Issue papers converted to rules of Governing
Board
Telecommunication definitions.
Drop shipments.
Exemptions.

42
State and Local Advisory Council Update