Regulatory Aspects of CERC

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Regulatory Aspects of CERC

Description:

... Provisions in Tariff Policy Procurement Options for the Discoms Regulatory Approach in Cost plus Tariff setting Availability Based Tariff CERC s Terms ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:18
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regulatory Aspects of CERC


1
  • Regulatory Aspects of CERC
  • By
  • S.C.SHRIVASTAVA,
  • Joint Chief (Engg)
  • CERC, New Delhi

2
Tariff Regulation In India
  • Till 1998
  • By Govt.
  • Since Aug. 1998
  • By Central State Regulatory Commissions under
    ERC Act 1998
  • Since 2003
  • By Central State Regulatory Commissions under
    EA 2003

3
Tariff Setting In India
  • Prior to 1992-
  • Single part Tariff Cost plus on actuals (Schedule
    6 of E(S) Act 1948)
  • Since 1992 to 2001-
  • For SEBs- Single part Cost plus on actuals
  • For CPSUs IPPs- Two part Cost Plus with
    performance based rate making (KP Rao Committee)

4
Tariff Setting In India
  • Since 2001 to 2003-
  • For SEBs- Single part Cost plus on actuals
  • For CPSUs IPPs- Availability Based Tariff (ABT)
    Cost Plus with performance based rate making
    (CERC Regulation)
  • Since 2003 onward-
  • Availability Based Tariff (ABT) Cost Plus with
    performance based rate making
  • Competitively Bid Tariff

5
Objective- EA 2003
  • An Act to consolidate the lawsfor taking
    measures conducive to
  • development of electricity industry,
  • promoting competition therein,
  • protecting interests of consumers
  • supply of electricity to all areas

6
Statutory Provisions in EA 2003
  • Section 3 4
  • Regulatory Commissions to be guided by the NEP
    and TP.
  • Section 61 Regulatory Commissions to formulate
    Terms and Conditions of Tariff for
    determination of Tariff under Section 62 duly
    considering
  • The factors which would encourage competition,
    efficiency, economical use of the resources, good
    performance and optimum investments
  • The principles rewarding efficiency in
    performance
  • The promotion of co-generation and generation of
    electricity from renewable sources of energy

7
Statutory Provisions in EA 2003
  • Section 62 Provide for determination of Tariff
    for sale of power from a generating company to
    distribution licensees
  • Section 63 Notwithstanding anything contained
    in section 62, the Appropriate Commission shall
    adopt the tariff if such tariff has been
    determined through transparent process of bidding
    in accordance with the guidelines issued by the
    Central Government

8
Provisions in Tariff Policy
  • All future requirement of power should be
    procured competitively by distribution licensees
  • Expansion of existing projects of State
    controlled/owned companies exempted
  • Expansion of generating capacity by private
    developers for this purpose restricted to one
    time addition of not more than 50 of the
    existing capacity.
  • New projects of State controlled/owned companies
    exempted for five years or more till the
    situation is found ripe to introduce such
    competition by the Regulatory Commissions.

9
Provisions in Tariff Policy
  • Clarification issued by the MoP on 9.12.2010 on
    Clauses 5.1 and 7.1 exempting following types of
    PSUs/CPSUs projects from competitive bidding
    route
  •  Expansion projects of already Commission
    projects
  • Projects for which PPA has been sign on or before
    5.1.2011
  • No such relaxation for Pvt Sector

10
Procurement Options for the Discoms
  • From State PSUs/ CPSUs at Cost plus tariff
  • Procurement through competitive bidding route
    under case-1 and Case-2
  • Procure power from traders and discoms under
    bilateral arrangements though Open access
  • Procure Power at the power exchanges through
    collective transactions though Open access(Day
    ahead Market)
  • Procure Power though UI (Real time market up to
    grid frequency 49.7 Hz)

11
Regulatory Approach in Cost plus Tariff setting
  • Cost of Service based on performance linked
    norms
  • Balancing the interest of Generators on one hand
    beneficiaries on the other
  • Transparency
  • Light handed regulation
  • Encourage efficiency Economy
  • Encourage Investment
  • System of incentive and disincentive for
    performance

12
Availability Based Tariff
  • Annual Fixed Charge (Capacity Charges)- Payment
    Linked to availability
  • Energy Charge- Payment linked to scheduled
    generation
  • Unscheduled Interchange (UI) Charge- payment
    linked to grid frequency for deviation from the
    schedule
  • Incentive- For Ex-bus generation in excess of
    ex-bus generation corresponding to the
    availability Norm

13
CERCs Terms and Condition of tariff for 2009-14
  • Provided for Pre-Tax Return on Equity
  • Tightened efficiency norms for the thermal power
    stations
  • For existing 500 MW units Station heat rate norm
    reduced from 2450 kCal/kWh to 2425 kCal/kWH
  • For New units operating margin in Station heat
    rate norm reduced from 9 to 6.5 from the design
    heat rate values
  • Raised performance norms of availability from 80
    to 85 coupled with incentive linked to
    availability
  • Reduced aux energy consumption norm by 0.5 point
    for thermal generating stations.
  • Provide for efficiency performance norms for
    super critical technology units
  • Provide for sharing of benefit of savings in
    secondary fuel oil consumption

14
CERCs Terms and Condition of tariff for 2009-14
  • Renovation Modernization of Thermal power
    Plants
  • Distinct activity recognized in Tariff Policy
  • Aimed at improved efficiency and performance
  • Suggesting Phasing out of very old and
    inefficient units
  • Special allowance after useful life for
    sustaining efficiency and performance parameters
    in well maintained stations Rs.5lakh.MW/Year with
    effect from 2009-10 escalated every year at 5.72.

9/27/2014
CERC
14
15
ABT-Thermal
16
Rationalisation of Performance/Operational Norms
  • Reasonable and achievable
  • Commensurate with technology, unit size, fuel
    used and operating conditions
  • With due regard to industries performance
  • Wherever scope for improvement a reasonable time
    to be allowed

17
Regulatory Scope Under Competitive bidding Route
  • Scope is limited
  • Approval of quantum of capacity/Energy to be
    purchased and approval of fuel price in case of
    fuel specific enquiry
  • Approval of Deviations from the guidelines
  • Notification of escalation indices for evaluation
    and for payment purposes
  • Scrutiny of the process to see whether it
    conforms to the competitive bidding guidelines
  • Approval of the tariff implications arising out
    of change of law

18
Escalation indices for Evaluation
19
Escalation indices for payment
20
Transmission Charges and Losses Matrix
21
CERC Regulated Tariffs
22
CERC Regulated Tariffs
23
Competitive Bid Tariffs
24
Competitive Bid Tariffs
25
Price of Electricity in Bilaterals/PXs/UI
26
Price of Electricity in Bilaterals/PXs/UI
  • Presently the prices in the PXs are going as high
    as Rs. 14 in the southern Region
  • The reasons?
  • Desperate buying by Tamil Nadu due to
  • Increase in Peak Demand by about 10
  • No capacity addition
  • Unable to over draw from the grid as UI
  • Transmission congestion leading to increase in
    prices by Rs. 3 due to congestion charges

27
Success of Competitive Bidding
  • Conducive Environment
  • Uniform bidding guidelines
  • Standard bid documents and PPA
  • Equitable sharing of risk between procurer and
    generator
  • Reasonable penalty and risk mitigation
  • Regulatory certainty
  • State support in getting land, fuel, water, and
    environment clearances
  • Success of bidding process demonstrated in 3 UMPP
    Sasan,Mudra and Krishnapatanam

28
Challenges
  • Extent of State support in future
  • Manner of tackling situations arising out of
    Change of law
  • Abnormal fuel price escalations
  • Development of transmission corridors
  • To early to say that price discovery is
    competitive enough to beat the cost plus prices
  • There is need for advance action by the States to
    start the procurement process with regard to
    their demand projections.

29
  • Thank You
  • E-mail scschandra_at_hotmail.com
  • CERC Web Site www.cercind.gov.in
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)