Title: The London Borough of Lambeth
1 The London Borough of Lambeth A visual guide to
permitted development(as amended on 1 October
2008) Written by Steve Speed(Senior Planner,
FastTrack team) 21 July 2009
2 Contents
Section 1 What is permitted development?Legal
Background Section 2 What can be done under
permitted development?Part 1, Classes A to
H Section 3 What are the problems with the
amended legislation?Examples of
Ambiguities Section 4 How is Lambeth addressing
the above problems?Further Information
3 Section 1 What is permitted
development? Legal Background
42 What is permitted development ?
Section 1Legal BackgroundPage 1 of 4
DEVELOPMENT
NOT DEVELOPMENT
Requires planning permission
Does NOT require planning permission
- Some external alterations
- e.g. (normally, but not always) tvaerial,
cat-flap, letterbox, drainpipe, etc - Non-material change of use
- e.g. bedroom into kitchen, baker into grocer, etc
- Internal alterations
- e.g. internal walls, floors, ceilings, curtains,
etc
- Most external alterations
- e.g. extension, patio, rooflight,fences and
walls, satellite dish, etc - Material change of use
- e.g. house into two flats, shop into bank, etc
PERMITTEDDEVELOPMENT
Granted planning permission by the General
Permitted Development Order 1995 GPDO.Works
that are permitted development do NOT require a
planning application,and do NOT fall under the
control of the Councils Planning Department.
52 What does the GPDO cover ?
Section 1Legal BackgroundPage 2 of 4
- The General Permitted Development Order 1995
GPDO contains a number of sections, from Part 1
to Part 40, each containing a number of Classes
of development for which it grants planning
permission. - Many of these Parts relate to works by statutory
undertakers. For example, the GPDO allows
Councils, highways authorities, railway
operators, sewerage undertakers, etc, to install
things such as lampposts, bus shelters, telephone
kiosks, rubbish bins, signs, utility pipes, etc,
without requiring a planning application. - This document looks at Part 1 of the GPDO, which
relates to works to houses, and is the Part meant
when most people talk about permitted
development.
62 What does Part 1 of the GPDO cover ?
Section 1Legal BackgroundPage 3 of 4
- Part 1 of the GPDO
- APPLIES to houses (dwellinghouses).
- Does NOT apply to flats (either purpose built or
converted houses). - Does NOT apply to commercial properties.
- Does NOT apply to houses which have had their
permitted development rights removed (either by
an Article 4 Direction, or by a condition on a
planning permission) - Part 1 of the GPDO contains 8 Classes, from Class
A to Class H. These cover works such as ground
floor extensions, roof extensions, rooflights and
re-roofing, porches, outbuildings, hard surfaces,
chimneys / flues / SVPs, and satellite dishes. - The amendment to the GPDO on 1 October 2008
entirely replaced the previous version of Part 1.
However, the amended legislation is still
referred to asPart 1 of the General Permitted
Development Order 1995 (as amended).
72 What is a Certificate of Lawful Development ?
Section 1Legal BackgroundPage 4 of 4
- Works that are permitted development do NOT
require a planning application, and do NOT fall
under the control of the Councils Planning
Department. - However, if someone undertaking such works wants
confirmation that the works are permitted
development, then they can apply to the Council
for a Certificate of Lawful Development. This is
an optional application. - The assessment of such an application is a
determination in law. The Council has no
discretion, and can not take its policies into
consideration. If the works comply with the
GPDO, then by law the Council must issue a
certificate. - An application for a Certificate of Lawful
Development can be made before undertaking such
works (proposed) or after undertaking such works
(existing). - The London Borough of Lambeth strongly recommends
that people apply for such a Certificate of
Lawful Development before undertaking substantial
works. However, it is an optional application,
and many people choose not to make it.
8 Section 2 What works can be doneunder
permitted development? Part 1, Classes A to H
92 OVERVIEWIntroduction
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 1 of 23
- This section starts with an illustration of how a
house can be significantly altered and extended
under permitted development (Part 1 of the GPDO). - This illustration imagines an owner who wishes to
maximise the size of his house, with little
regard to the aesthetics of the outside of the
house. - All of the works shown would comply with the
amended GPDO, and would therefore be outside of
the control of the Councils Planning Department. - Although this illustration represents an
extreme example of what an owner could lawfully
do under permitted development, it is not
unrealistic, as examples of such types of works
can be found in real life.
102 OVERVIEWProperty as originally built (front
view)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 2 of 23
112 OVERVIEWProperty as fully altered and extended
(front view)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 3 of 23
Re-roofing (Class C)
Side Dormer (Class B)
Rooflights (Class C)
Soil and Vent Pipe (Class G)
Satellite Dish (Class H)
Outbuilding (Class E)
Hardstanding (Class F)
Side extension (Class A)
Porch (Class D)
Alteration to window (Class A)
Satellite Dish (Class H)
122 OVERVIEWProperty as originally built (rear
view)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 4 of 23
132 OVERVIEWProperty as fully altered and extended
built (rear view)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 5 of 23
Rear Dormer(Class B)
Rear Extension(Class A)
Flue(Class G)
142 DETAILSIntroduction
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 6 of 23
- The remaining part of this section details the
work that is permitted by each of the 8 Classes
of the amended Part 1 (Classes A to H). - For each Class, there is an illustration showing
examples of what is permitted, together with
annotations stating the limitations of that
Class. This is then followed by an explanation
of how the amended Class differs from the
previous Class. - Please note that this is an introductory guide,
and should not be used as a definitive source of
legal information. The assessment of whether or
not works would be permitted development should
always be made against the full legislation
itself (see links to the GPDO at the end of this
presentation), rather than against any guidance
document.
152 CLASS A GROUND FLOOR EXTENSIONS Class A
permitsThe enlargement, improvement or other
alteration ofa dwellinghouse (subject to the
limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 7 of 23
NOT allowed forward of a principal or side
elevation that fronts a highway.
MAX Height Limits Not higher than ridge-line
of house. 4m if single storey.EAVES Height
Limits Not higher than eaves of house. 3m
if within 2m of boundary. This rules out
two-storey extensions close to a boundary
50 coverageof garden
- REAR Projection Limits SINGLE storey
- 3m for terrace or semi-detached house.
- 4m for detached house.
- REAR Projection Limits TWO storey
- 3m for all types of house.
- SIDE Projection Limits
- ½ width of main house.
- Note Two storey side extensions are not allowed
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- NO cladding.
- NO side extensions.
- NO two storey rear extensions.
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- Materials of a similar appearance to existing
house. - No veranda, balcony, or raised platform.
- Two storey extension 7m to rear boundary.
162 CLASS A OTHER Class A permitsThe
enlargement, improvement or other alteration ofa
dwellinghouse (subject to the limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 8 of 23
Side windows (upper level) must be obscure-glazed
and non-opening.
Note It is not clear whether cladding is
permitted under the amended Class A. Even if it
is NOT allowed, the painting of any surface
(including brickwork) is still permitted under
Part 2.
Height of decking 30cm.
Materials must be of asimilar appearance to
thoseon the existing house.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- NO cladding.
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- (NO restrictions on the size, position, or
number of windows that can be enlarged, inserted,
or bricked-up).
172 CLASS A GROUND FLOOR EXTENSIONS and OTHER
Main DIFFERENCES between the previous Class A and
the amended Class A
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 9 of 23
182 CLASS B ROOF EXTENSIONS Class B
permitsThe enlargement of a dwellinghouse
consisting of an additionor alteration to its
roof (subject to the limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 10 of 23
Not higher than main ridge-line.
NOT allowed forward of a principal elevation that
fronts a highway.
Set back 20cmfrom eaves Note does not apply
tohip-to-gable extensions
Side windows must be obscure-glazed and
non-opening.
Volume Limits 40m3 for terrace house. 50m3
for semi-detached or detached house.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- NO roof extensionsin Conservation Areas.
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- Materials of a similar appearance to existing
house. - No veranda, balcony, or raised
platform(Juliette balconies are allowed).
192 CLASS B ROOF EXTENSIONS Main DIFFERENCES
between the previous Class B and the amended
Class B
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 11 of 23
202 CLASS C ROOFLIGHTS AND RE-ROOFING Class C
permitsAny other alteration to the roof of a
dwellinghouse(subject to the limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 12 of 23
Not higher than main ridge-line.
Protrusion 15cm.
Side rooflights must be obscure-glazed and
non-opening.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- (NO additional requirements).
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- (NO restrictions on the size, position, or
numberof rooflights that can be inserted). - (NO restrictions on materials, including for
re-roofing).
212 CLASS C ROOFLIGHTS AND RE-ROOFING Main
DIFFERENCES between the previous Class C and the
amended Class C
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 13 of 23
222 CLASS D PORCHES Class D permitsThe
erection or construction of a porch outside any
externaldoor of a dwellinghouse (subject to the
limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 14 of 23
Max Height 3m.
Porch 2m from highway.
Area ofporch 3m2.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- (NO additional requirements).
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- (NO restrictions on materials).
232 CLASS D PORCHES Main DIFFERENCES between the
previous Class D and the amended Class D
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 15 of 23
242 CLASS E OUTBUILDINGS Class E permits
any building or enclosure, swimming or other pool
required for a purpose incidental to the
enjoyment of the dwellinghouse as such
(subject to below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 16 of 23
MAX Height Limits 2.5m if within 2m of
boundary. Otherwise 4m for dual-pitch roofs.
3m for mono-pitch and flat roofs. EAVES Height
Limits 2.5m in all cases.
NOT allowed forward of principal elevation.
Must be single storey.
50 coverageof garden.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- Not permitted between a sideelevation and a
boundary.
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- Not permitted within the curtilage of a listed
building. - No veranda, balcony, or raised platform.
- (NO restrictions on materials or proximity to
house).
252 CLASS E OUTBUILDINGS Main DIFFERENCES
between the previous Class E and the amended
Class E
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 17 of 23
262 CLASS F HARD SURFACES Class F permits The
provision or replacement of a hard surface for
any purpose incidental tothe enjoyment of the
dwellinghouse as such (subject to the
limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 18 of 23
- Any hard surface( gt 5m2) between principal
elevation and a highway must be either - Porous
- or
- Run-off to a porous area within the curtilage of
the house.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- (NO additional requirements).
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- (NO restrictions on hard surfaces that are
notbetween the principal elevation and a
highway,for example at the side or rear of the
house).
272 CLASS F HARD SURFACES Main DIFFERENCES
between the previous Class F and the amended
Class F
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 19 of 23
282 CLASS G CHIMNEYS, FLUES, SVPs Class G
permitsThe installation, alteration or
replacement of a chimney, flue or soil andvent
pipe on a dwellinghouse (subject to the
limitations below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 20 of 23
Not 1m higher than main ridge-line.
Note drainpipes are not normally development,
and therefore do not normally require planning
permission.
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- NOT allowed to install on a principal or side
elevation that fronts a highway.Note if such
works not development then PP not required
anyway
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- (NO other restrictions on the size, position, or
numberof chimneys, flues, or SVPs that can be
installed).
292 CLASS G CHIMNEYS, FLUES, SVPs Main
DIFFERENCES between the previous Class G and the
amended Class G
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 21 of 23
302 CLASS H SATELLITE DISHES Class H
permitsThe installation, alteration or
replacement of a microwave antenna on a
dwellinghouse or within the curtilage of a
dwellinghouse (subject to below)
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 22 of 23
If on chimney length 60cm and no higher than
chimney.
Noteterrestrial tv aerials are not normally
development, and therefore do not normally
require planning permission.
If not on chimney length 100cm
Maximum 2 satellite dishes on a house. one
60cm other 100cm
- CONSERVATION AREAS
- Not allowed on elevation that fronts a highway
(assuming visible from highway). - Not permitted if height of building gt 15m.
- OTHER GENERAL LIMITATIONS
- See full legislation for other restrictions.
- (NO restrictions on the colour of a satellite
dish).
312 CLASS H SATELLITE DISHES Main DIFFERENCES
between the 1995 Class H and the amended Class H
Section 2Part 1, Classes A to HPage 23 of 23
Note The limitations given above are from the
1995 version of Class H. Class H was entirely
replaced in 2005, and the 2008 version is
identical to the preceding 2005 version.
32 Section 3 What are the problemswith the
amended legislation? Examples of Ambiguities
332 AMBIGUITIESIntroduction
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 1 of 19
- This section gives examples of some of the
problems with the amended legislation, including
phrases that are ambiguous and difficult for
local authorities to know how to interpret. - For each of the examples in this section, the
first page sets out the Legislation,
Scenario, and Question, whilst the second
page sets out the Answer. These answers are
based, wherever possible, on guidance from CLG
and on relevant appeal decisions across the
country, which the London Borough of Lambeth has
been actively monitoring. However, for some
questions, the answer is unknown, as no such
guidance has been available. - The 9 examples given in this section represent
only a small number of the ambiguities within the
amended legislation. In October 2008, November
2008, and January 2009, the London Borough of
Lambeth sent a 60-page document to Communities
and Local Government (who produced the
legislation) raising almost 50 questions about
ambiguities. - Please note that this document was written in
July 2009, and therefore the answers given only
represent the position of the London Borough of
Lambeth at that time. This is because the London
Borough of Lambeth is continuing to actively
monitor guidance from CLG and relevant appeal
decisions across the country, and therefore its
position on such issues is liable to be updated
as and when additional information becomes
available.
342 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 1The principal elevation
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 2 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class B, a roof extension is NOT permitted
on a roof slope which forms the principal
elevation and fronts a highway. - However, a roof extension IS permitted on a side
elevation. - SCENARIO
- A house is on a corner such that two of its
elevations front a highway. - One of these elevations contains the main
windows, the other contains the front door. - QUESTION
- For the above house, on which of these two
elevations would a roof extension be permitted
development ?
352 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 1The principal elevation
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 3 of 19
- ANSWER
- The Informal Views from CLG document confirms
that, although most properties will only have one
principal elevation, in exceptional
circumstances a property might have more than one
principal elevation. - Hence, for the above corner house, where one
elevation contains the main windows and the other
elevation contains the front door, it is possible
that BOTH elevations would be classed as the
principal elevation. Hence a roof extension
would NOT be permitted on either elevation. - For a more typical corner house, where the main
windows and front door are on the same elevation,
it is likely there will only be one principal
elevation, and therefore a side dormer would be
permitted.
362 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 2Basements
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 4 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Class A permits, the enlargement, improvement or
other alteration ofa dwellinghouse, subject to
various limitations. - None of these limitations mentions or restricts
the excavation of a basement. - SCENARIO
- A typical house.
- QUESTION
- For a typical house, would the excavation of a
basement be permitted development ?
372 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 2Basements
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 5 of 19
- ANSWER
- Unknown. (No guidance has been provided).
- Under the previous Class A, most Councils
interpreted the (same) phrase the enlargement
of a dwellinghouse to include the excavation of
a basement. - However, CLG have indicated that they intend to
create a new Class specifically relating to
basements. - The London Borough of Lambeth is therefore taking
the cautious option and assuming that basements
are NOT permitted development.
382 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 3Replacement of timber
windows with UPVC windows
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 6 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class A, windows can be replaced or
inserted. - Condition A.3 (a) states that the materials used
in any exterior work shall be of a similar
appearance to those used in the construction of
the exterior of the existing dwellinghouse. - SCENARIO
- A house where all of the existing windows are
timber. - QUESTION
- For the above house, would the replacement or
insertion of a UPVC window be permitted
development ?
392 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 3Replacement of timber
windows with UPVC windows
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 7 of 19
- ANSWER
- Unknown.
- The Informal Views from CLG document states
that this condition does NOT mean that the type
of material needs to be the same or similar, just
that the appearance needs to be similar. It
states that in some cases this condition could be
met where a similar colour is used. However, it
then states that this might not always be
acceptable. - The above guidance still leaves it unclear in
what circumstances the replacement of timber
windows with UPVC windows would be acceptable or
unacceptable.
402 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 4Rear projection limit
on stepped rear elevation
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 8 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class A, a ground floor extension on a
terrace house is NOT permitted development if it
would extend beyond the rear wall of the
original dwellinghouse by more than 3 metres
. - SCENARIO
- A terrace house with a stepped rear elevation
(e.g. a typical Victorian property with a rear
return). - QUESTION
- For the above house, which of the extensions
shown on the right would be permitted development
?
412 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 4Rear projection limit
on stepped rear elevation
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 9 of 19
- ANSWER
- The Informal Views from CLG document confirms
that where the rear elevation is stepped, then
the rear projection limit will be stepped
correspondingly.
422 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 5Wrapping around a
corner
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 10 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class A, a ground floor extension to the
rear is limited to a 3m/4m projection beyond the
original rear wall, and a ground floor extension
to the side is limited to ½ the width of the
original house. - SCENARIO
- A typical detached house.
- QUESTION
- For the above house, which of the extensions
shown on the right would be permitted development
?
432 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 5Wrapping around a
corner
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 11 of 19
- ANSWER
- Unknown. (No guidance has been provided).
- The Appeal Decision for 21 Holmewood Road
(Planning Inspectorate reference
APP/L5240/X/09/2094733) appears to suggest that
wrapping around a corner would NOT be permitted.
However, the Inspector did not appear to identify
any particular limitation to which such a scheme
would be contrary.
442 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 6Eaves
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 12 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class A, a single storey extension within
2m of the boundary is limited to a maximum height
of 4m, and an eaves height of 3m. - SCENARIO
- A typical house, where a single storey extension
would be within 2m of the boundary. - QUESTION
- For the above house, what would be the maximum
height for a flat roof extension (either with or
without a parapet wall) ... ?
452 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 6Eaves
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 13 of 19
- ANSWER
- Unknown. (No guidance has been provided).
- Some Councils have taken the view that a flat
roof extension does NOT have eaves, and that
therefore the amended Class A would permit a flat
roof extension up to 4m along the boundary. - The London Borough of Lambeth is taking the
cautious option and is applying the term eaves
to the top of a flat roof and the top of a
parapet wall, therefore requiring these to be no
higher than 3m.
462 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 7Between a side
elevation and a boundary
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 14 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class E, an outbuilding in a Conservation
Area is NOT permitted if any part of it would be
situated on land between a wall forming a side
elevation of the dwellinghouse and the boundary
of the curtilage of the dwellinghouse. - SCENARIO
- A typical house in a Conservation Area
- QUESTION
- For the above house, which of the outbuildings
shown on the right would be permitted development
?
472 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 7Between a side
elevation and a boundary
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 15 of 19
- ANSWER
- Unknown. (No guidance has been provided).
482 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 8A side elevation
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 16 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Under Class A, a ground floor extension in a
Conservation Area is NOT permitted if it would
extend beyond a wall forming a side elevation of
the original dwellinghouse. - SCENARIO
- A terrace house in a Conservation Area with a
stepped rear elevation (e.g. a typical Victorian
property with a rear return). - QUESTION
- For the above house, would the rear/side infill
extension shown on the right be permitted
development ?
492 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 8A side elevation
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 17 of 19
- ANSWER
- The Appeal Decision for 27 Upper Culver Road
(Planning Inspectorate reference
APP/B1930/X/08/2092380) states that the side wall
of a rear return IS a side elevation, and
therefore such an infill extension in a
Conservation Area is NOT permitted development.
502 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 9Cladding
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 18 of 19
- LEGISLATION
- Class A, Condition A.2 (a) states that in a
Conservation Area, the cladding of any part of
the exterior of the dwellinghouse with stone,
artificial stone, pebble dash, render, timber,
plastic or tiles is NOT permitted. This implies
that outside of a Conservation Area, cladding IS
permitted development. - However, Class A, Condition A.3 (a) requires that
the materials used in any exterior work shall
be of a similar appearance to those used in the
construction of the exterior of the existing
dwellinghouse. This implies that cladding is
NOT permitted development. - SCENARIO
- A house outside of a conservation area.
- QUESTION
- For the above house, would cladding be permitted
development ?
512 AMBIGUITIES EXAMPLE 9Cladding
Section 3Examples of AmbiguitiesPage 19 of 19
- ANSWER
- Unknown. (No guidance has been provided).
- However, even if cladding is NOT allowed, the
painting of any surface (including brickwork) is
still permitted under Part 2.
52 Section 4 How is Lambethaddressing the above
problems? Further Information
532 HOW IS LAMBETH ADDRESSING THE ABOVE PROBLEMS
Section 4Further InformationPage 1 of 2
- ASKING QUESTIONS TO COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL
GOVERNMENT(October 2008, November 2008,
January 2009)The London Borough of Lambeth has
sent a 60-page document to CLG (who produced
the legislation) on the above dates, raising
almost 50 questions about ambiguities. -
- MONITORING ALL RELEVANT APPEAL DECISIONS ACROSS
THE COUNTRY(ongoing)The London Borough of
Lambeth is monitoring all appeal decisions across
the country relevant to the amended GPDO. A
summary of these decisions is forwarded to all
planning officers on a monthly basis. -
- MONITORING OTHER RESOURCES(ongoing)The London
Borough of Lambeth is monitoring various other
resources, including an online PAS forum, to
ensure that it is aware of any additional
information as soon as its available.
542 FURTHER READING
Section 4Further InformationPage 2 of 2
- GPDO Part 1 (as amended on 01/10/2008)http//w
ww.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi_20082362_en_1 - GPDO Parts 1-33 (including previous version of
Part 1)http//www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si1995/Uksi_199
50418_en_1.htm - GPDO Part 40 (as introduced on
06/04/2008)http//www.opsi.gov.uk/si/si2008/uksi
_20080675_en_1 - Informal Views from CLG document (produced Dec
2008, updated Jan 2009)http//www.planningportal
.gov.uk/england/professionals/en/1115316521675.htm
l - Planning Portal guidance pageshttp//www.plannin
gportal.gov.uk/england/genpub/en/1115311947777.htm
lhttp//www.planningportal.gov.uk/england/genpub/
en/1115314762582.html
For the latest version of this document, and for
various other informationrelated to the amended
permitted development legislation, please
visit http//www.planningjungle.com