Title: Power Exchange Operations
1Power Exchange Operations
- S.C. Saxena
- National Load Despatch Center
2Presentation Outline
- Review of Fundamentals
- Power Exchanges
- Concepts
- Implementation in India
- Regulatory Framework
- Procedures for Collective Transactions
- Congestion Management
- Market Splitting
- Sharing of Available Margins amongst the Power
Exchanges - Experience Gained in India
- Trading of Renewable Energy Certificates in the
Power Exchanges - Taking the Markets to the Next Level
- Proposal For Evening Market
- Sub-Hourly (15 Minute) Market in Power Exchange
- Recent International Experience
3Review of Fundamentals
4Market
- A mechanism through which buyers and sellers
interact to determine prices and exchange goods
and services - Entire set of conditions surrounding production,
transport and distribution of a product - Size determined by geography, transport, costs,
etc.
5In a market everything has a price !!!
- Price
- is the value (not cost) of the good/service in
terms of money - represents the terms on which voluntary exchange
of goods services takes place - Serves as signal to the producers and consumers
6Demand
- Need Purchasing power Demand
- Law of downwardsloping demand
- When price of a commodity is raised, buyers tend
to buy less of the commodity, other things
remaining constant (e.g., purchasing power,
related goods, preferences, environment, etc.)
7Supply Curve
- The supply curve shows the relationship between
its price and the amount of that commodity that
producers are willing to produce and sell, other
things held constant (e.g., cost of production,
technological advancement, related goods, etc.)
8Equilibrium
- Quantity demanded is equal to quantity supplied !
9Shift in equilibrium
10Price elasticity of demand
Change in Quantity Demanded in response to change
in Price
More Elastic
Elastic
Perfectly Inelastic
Less elastic
Perfectly elastic
11Power Exchanges Concepts
12Bilateral (OTC) Markets
- Common price through a co-operative approach
- Major Concerns
- Price Discovery
- Price Discrimination
- Liquidity
- Transaction Costs
13Power Exchanges - Definition
- An electricity Power Exchange provides a spot
market, mainly day-ahead, for electricity, which
like any other market matches demand and supply
for each time block, while providing a public
price index
14Power Exchange Characteristics (1)
- A Market Place
- Voluntary or Mandatory
- Anonymous auction platform
- Neutral
- Liquidity
- A competitive wholesale spot trading arrangement
- Energy Only Markets
- Do not account for any technical constraints or
capacity payments - Bids
- Sale Bid Quantum and Minimum price
- Buy Bid Quantum and Maximum price
15Power Exchange Characteristics (2)
- Price Discovery
- Common price achieved through non co-operative
approach - Price Discovery by matching of demand-supply
- Price signals
- Benchmark reference price
- Congestion Management
- Implicit Auction
- Market Splitting
16Power Exchange Characteristics (3)
- Standardized specifications
- Contract structure
- Robust Clearing Settlement systems
- Counter party credit risk absorbed
- Risk Management
- Payment Security
- Standard margining system
- Eliminates credit rating
- Fair, Safe, orderly market
- Rigorous financial standards and surveillance
procedures
17Bilateral (OTC) Contract vs. Power Exchange
OTC contract Exchange Traded
Available to limited market participants Liquid market wider market participation
Bilateral/ Customized Contracts Standardized contracts
Counter party credit risk Counter party risk assumed by exchange
Is an involved participant Platform is Neutral
Opaque dealing Transparent price discovery mechanism
Bilateral dispute settlement mechanism Well defined dispute settlement mechanism
Difficulty in reporting and regulating various trades The exchange is the central reporting and regulating entity
18Interplay PX Bilateral Markets (OTC)
- Rivals
- Competition between two types of markets
- Complementary
- Competition limited to day-ahead
- Preference to OTC in longer time frame
- Inter-dependent
- Prices on the PX OTC must be very close else
arbitrage occurs - Hedging
19The PX Clearing House
- Subordinate to the PX
- Intermediary for transactions
- Tracks all transactions
- Primary role
- Guarantee financial reliability to the
participants - Participants required to maintain margin accounts
- Effectively hedges against credit risk
20Advantages PX
- Promotes trade and competition
- Reliable price discovery
- Reference for bilateral contracts
- PX recognizes value of the commodity
(electricity) - Does not guarantee lower prices
- Optimal utilization of sparse resources
- Generation
- Transmission
- Credit risks covered by the PX
- Congestion Management
- Facilitates trading of short term arising on
account of uncertainty in demand forecasting
21Auction Models
MCP
22Social Welfare Maximization
Accepted Purchase Bids (gt MCP) (Consumers
Discount)
Accepted Sale Bids (lt MCP) (Generators Surplus)
23Price Calculation Algorithm -Day ahead Hourly
Bids
PRICE-paise/kWh 0 100 200 230 250 270 300 400 500 600 700
PARTY A-ZONE-1 600 600 600 400 400 400 400 200 150 100 100
PARTY B-ZONE-1 600 600 400 400 300 200 0 0 -50 -100 -200
PARTY C-ZONE-2 0 -100 -100 -100 -200 -300 -400 -500 -500 -500 -500
PARTY D-ZONE-2 0 0 -200 -300 -300 -300 -400 -500 -500 -500 -600
SUM, PURCHASE 1200 1200 1000 800 700 600 400 200 150 100 100
SUM, SALES 0 -100 -300 -400 -500 -600 -800 -1000 -1050 -1100 -1300
NET TRANSACTION 1200 1100 700 400 200 0 -400 -800 -900 -1000 -1200
AGGREGATED SALE BIDS
AGGREGATED PURCHASE BIDS
Market Clearing Price (MCP) 270 p Market
Clearing Volume (MCV) 600MW
24Types of Bids
- Single bids
- Price Quantity pairs, one for each hour
- Block Bids
- A Block bid is all or none type of a bid i.e. bid
will get accepted by the system only if price and
volume condition is getting satisfied. - Can cause unpredictable movements of prices and
volumes
25Power Exchange Implementation in India
26The Milestones
- July 2006
- Staff Paper by CERC
- February 2007
- CERC Guidelines for establishment of Power
Exchange - August 2007
- In principle approval to the first power exchange
in the country - January 2008
- Revised Regulations for Open Access in
Inter-state Transmission, Effective 1st April
2008 - June 2008
- Procedure for Scheduling of Collective
Transactions by CTU - Commencement of operations
- October 2008
- Second Exchange begins operations
27Power Exchange in India Salient Features
- Multiple Power Exchanges
- Competition amongst Exchanges
- Voluntary participation
- Double sided bidding
- Uniform pricing
- Day-ahead exchange
- Hourly bids
- Congestion management by market splitting
28Regulatory Framework
29Regulators Approach
- CERC Guidelines for setting up of a Power
Exchange - The general approach of the Commission is to
allow operational freedom to the PX within an
overall framework. The regulation would be
minimal and restricted to requirements essential
for preventing derailment/accidents and
collusion. Private entrepreneurship would be
allowed to play its role. The Commission shall
keep away from governance of PX, which would be
required to add value and provide quality service
to the customers
30CERC Power Market Regulations, 2010 (1)
- Scope Extent
- OTC Markets
- Power Exchange Market
- Other Power Exchange Markets
- Derivatives
- Types of Contracts
- Delivery based OTC Contracts
- Financially settled electricity derivatives
contracts transacted in OTC market - Delivery based contracts transacted on Exchange
- REC Contracts
- Capacity, Ancillary, Derivative based contracts
(future)
31CERC Power Market Regulations, 2010 (2)
- Prior to grant of permission to Power Exchange,
CERC may examine - Type of contract (day ahead, term ahead etc)
- Price Discovery methodology and matching rules
proposed - Transaction period When transaction shall
commence and for what tenure transaction session
shall continue before delivery commences - Risk Management mechanism
- Margining mechanism
- Final Price Settlement mechanism
- Delivery mechanism, delivery duration
32CERC Power Market Regulations, 2010 (3)
- Objectives of the Power Exchange (Regulation 10)
- Ensure fair, neutral, efficient and robust price
discovery - Provide extensive and quick price dissemination
- Design standardised contracts and work towards
increasing liquidity in such contracts - Explanation Liquidity is a measure of ease of
entering or exiting into a transaction (generally
large transaction) with minimal impact in the
market price of the transacted contract.
33CERC Power Market Regulations, 2010 (4)
- Principles of Price Discovery (Regulation 11)
- The economic principle of social welfare
maximisation and to create buyer and seller
surplus simultaneously during price discovery. - The bidding mechanism shall be double sided
closed bid auction on a day ahead basis. - The price discovered for the unconstrained market
shall be a uniform market clearing price for all
buyers and sellers who are cleared - In case of congestion in transmission corridor,
market splitting mechanism shall be adopted. - The delivery / drawl of power shall be considered
at the regional periphery.
34CERC Power Market Regulations, 2010 (5)
- Other Provisions
- Prudential Norms
- Governance Issues
- Ownership Patterns
- Registration Fees
- Membership
- Clearing House
- Interface with System Operator
35Open Access Regulations, 2008
- Earlier Regulations notified in February 2004
(amended in 2005) stand repealed - Covers Short Term Open Access Transactions only
- Categories of Transactions
- Bilateral
- Collective Transactions discovered on a Power
Exchange - Nodal Agency
- Bilateral RLDCs
- Collective NLDC
36Open Access Regulations, 2008 Provisions For
Collective Transactions
- Transmission Charges
- Shift from Contract Path to Point of
Connection - Both buyers and sellers to pay
- IR Links no separate treatment
- Transmission Losses
- Applicable on both buyers and sellers
- Disbursement of Transmission Charges
- 25 retained by CTU
- 75 to be credited to long-term customers
37Open Access Regulations, 2008 Provisions For
Collective Transactions
- Thrust on Empowerment of SLDCs
- SLDC Concurrence Clause 8(2)
- NOC/Standing Clearance to be obtained by State
Utilities/Intra-State Entities from the SLDC for
trading through PX - SLDC to respond within 3 days
- SLDCs may charge appropriate fee for such
NOC/Standing Clearance (as per SERC or Rs. 5000
if not notified by SERC)
38Procedures for Scheduling of Collective
Transactions
39Eligibility Conditions
- Entities scheduled by RLDCs
- Deemed Regional Entity
- Entities whose metering and energy accounting
done by RLDCs - Entities scheduled by SLDCs
- SLDCs to assess TTC/ATC for their State system
- Prior Consent from respective SLDCs
- Standing Clearance / NOC
- New Entities
- To Satisfy conditions as laid down in IEGC
- Obtain Prior Approval from RLDCs/SLDCs as per
jurisdiction
40Commercial Conditions (1)
- Charges for Collective Transactions payable to
SLDCs - Transmission Charges As per SERC, if notified or
else Rs. 80/MWh - Operating Charges Rs. 2,000 per day for each
point of transaction - Each point of injection and drawl to be counted
separately by SLDCs - PX to settle SLDC charges directly with
respective SLDC
41Commercial Conditions (2)
- Charges for Collective Transactions payable to
NLDC - Application Fee
- _at_ Rs. 5,000/-, payable by PX to NLDC at the time
of application - Transmission Charges
- Applicable for each point of injection and drawl
- Charges for use of ISTS _at_ Rs. 100 per MWh
- Operating Charges
- _at_ Rs. 5,000/- per day per group involved
- Buyers and Sellers in a State to be clubbed into
separate groups - Each group to be counted as a single entity by
NLDC - Payment by PX to NLDC
- Transmission and Operating Charges By next
working day - Preferred Mode Electronic Fund Transfer
42Treatment Of Losses
- Average transmission losses of the respective
region to be applied, both on Buyers and Sellers - Sellers to inject extra power (MW) in addition to
contracted power (Contracted Power Losses) - Buyers to draw less power (MW) than contracted
power (Contracted Power Losses) - Applicable losses to be declared in advance
- Intra-State losses to be taken care of by the
respective SLDCs - Additional losses for wheeling, if necessary
- To be notified in advance by NLDC
- Applicable only for Injection
43Real Time Congestion Management
- Curtailment
- By RLDCs at the periphery of Regional Entities
- SLDCs to further incorporate this curtailment
for State Utilities/Intra-State Entities - Settlement
- Transmission Charges Pro-rata refund by NLDC to
PX - Operating Charges Not to be revised
- Direct settlement between PX and its participants
44Information Exchange
Power Exchange
Constraints, if any
Acceptance by NLDC
Information exchanged over leased line between
NLDC and PX
Request for Scheduling
Provisional Solution
N L D C
Over WAN
Trades
Schedules
RLDCs
Over Internet (RLDC Website)
Schedules
SLDCs
Final Trade Results for State Utilities Intra
State Entities to be sent by PX directly to SLDCs
45Congestion Management
46Demarcation into Bid Areas
Area Region States
N1 North JK, HP, CHD, PUN, HAR
N2 North RAJ,DEL, UP, UTT
W1 West MP, CHTG
W2 West MAH,GUJ, GOA, DD,DNH
S1 South AP, KAR, GOA
S2 South TN, KER, PONDY
E1 East WB, SIK, BIH, JHAR
E2 East ORISSA
A1 North-East TRIP, MEGH, MANI, MIZO
A2 North-East AS, AP, NAGA
47SKEWED LOAD GENERATION BALANCE
- Scenarios
- 4D
- 3D 1S
- 2D 2S
- 1D 3S (Congestion)
- 4S
48Congestion Management - Market Splitting
Cost of Congestion 2000
49Transmission Congestion Management Methods
- Pricing Based
- Explicit Auction
- Implicit Auction
- Market Splitting
- Remedial
- Counter Trade
- Re-dispatching
50Congestion Management in Multi Exchange Scenario
(1)
- ISSUE
- Sharing of available margins
- Possible Methods
- Priority Based Rules
- Explicit Auction
- Merging of Bids
- Priority Based Rules
- Lowest MCP
- Highest MCV
- Highest MCP X MCV
- Maximization of Social Welfare, consumer surplus,
etc. - May not lead to an overall economy
51Congestion Management in Multi Exchanges Scenario
(2)
- Explicit Auctioning amongst Exchanges
- Inter-dependencies in the Indian scenario
- Difficult to implement
- Merging of bids obtained by each Power Exchange
- Equivalent to system operator interfacing with
only one Exchange - Confidentiality issues
- Pro rata rationing of available margins
- Simple to implement
- Sub-optimal method
- Possibility of over-estimation of capacity
- Further complications
- Arising out of inter-dependencies in the Indian
scenario
52Implementation in India
- Worldwide, one Power Exchange dealing with
physical delivery in one market - Pro-rata sharing of available margins
- Applied on cleared trade volumes on each area and
each corridor - Interim arrangement
- Debate on for a more optimal method
53Discovery of Multiple Prices Interplay
- Prices discovered in Power Exchange
- Reflection of anticipated UI price for the next
day - Multiple Prices
- Collective Transactions
- Two prices one for each exchange
- Two Grids two UI Prices
- In case of congestion, market split
- Area prices
- Multiple exchanges
54Case Study
- No congestion till onset of severe winter
- Occasional congestion after 12th Dec 08
- Foggy conditions in Talcher area
- Case of 12th Dec 2008
- Period of Congestion 0500 0600 Hrs
- Congested Corridor Total import to SR
- TTC to SR reduced from 4000 MW to 3600 MW
- Total provisional requisition 1430 MW
- Total trades cleared 1091 MW
- Market split into NEW Grid and SR Grid
- MCP IEX website
- NEW Grid Rs. 4.80 per kWh
- SR Grid Rs. 6.00 per kWh
- Cost of Transmission discovered
- Rs. 1.20 per kWh
55Experience Gained
56Monthly Energy Traded through Power Exchanges
Data Up to April 2011
57Daily Energy Traded through Power Exchanges
Data Up to April 2011
58(No Transcript)
59Correlation Prices Shortage/ Surplus
Data June-08 to Apr-11 IEX
60Distribution of Prices in Power Exchange (IEX)
61Distribution of Shortage / Surplus (IEX)
62CASE OF MCV INCREASE AFTER CONGESTION
- Day ahead Market saw increase in Cleared Volume
after congestion is declared in particular time
blocks due to - Block bids
- New Sell/Buy bid getting cleared in Final
iteration
SOURCEIEX Website
63Segments in the Short Term Market
64Volumes in the Short Term Electricity Market
Source MMC, CERC
65Renewable Energy Certificates (REC)
66Dealing in Renewable Energy Certificates (1)
- Provisions in the CERC REC Regulations, 2010
- Regulation 8.1
- Unless otherwise specifically permitted by the
Commission by order, the Certificates shall be
dealt only through the Power Exchange and not in
any other manner. - Regulation 8.2
- The Certificate issued to eligible entity by the
Central Agency may be placed for dealing in any
of the Power Exchanges as the Certificate holder
may consider appropriate, and such Certificate
shall be available for dealing in accordance with
the rules and byelaws of such Power Exchange. - Provided that the Power Exchanges shall obtain
prior approval of the Commission on the rules
and byelaws including the mechanism for
discovery of price of the Certificates in the
Power Exchange. -
67Dealing in Renewable Energy Certificates (2)
- Statement 3.7.2 of the SOR on Dealing in the
Certificates states that - The Commission has noted the observations and
would like to reiterate that provision in the
Regulation that REC shall be dealt only in the
Power Exchange is adequate and also legally
sustainable. The nature of operation of Power
Exchange (which essentially is a platform where
buyers and sellers buy and sell at the price
discovered by matching aggregate demand and
supply) is conducive to the development of the
new and emerging concept of REC. The Commission
is well within its jurisdiction under Section 66
of the Act to provide for the specific manner in
which this new concept should be evolved. In any
case this mechanism does not debar the traders
from facilitating transactions in REC as Members
of the Power Exchanges. The final regulations
provide that the bye-laws of power exchange to be
approved by the Commission should include price
discovery mechanism.
68Pricing of Renewable Energy Certificates (1)
- Provisions in the CERC REC Regulations, 2010
Regulation 9.1 - The price of Certificate shall be as discovered
in the Power Exchange. Provided that the
Commission may, in consultation with the Central
Agency and Forum of Regulators from time to time
provide for the floor price and forbearance price
separately for solar and non-solar Certificates.
CERC determined Floor price and Forbearance price
for dealing in Certificates, which shall remain
valid up to FY 2012.
Non Solar REC (Rs/MWh) Solar REC (Rs/MWh)
Forbearance Price 3,900 17,000
Floor Price 1,500 12,000
68
69Pricing of Renewable Energy Certificates (2)
- Statement 3.8.2 of the SOR on Pricing of
Certificates states that - The Commission has noted the observations.
As regards the need for forbearance price, the
Commission would like to emphasize that
forbearance price is necessary to avoid price
volatility which may defeat the very purpose of
facilitating the RPO compliance by utilities
through REC mechanism. The Commission has,
however, acceded to the suggestion of providing
for minimum price for REC along with forbearance
price, to ensure the threshold level of revenue
certainty. This is considered necessary to
instill confidence in the investors towards REC
mechanism. The Commission has also agreed to the
suggestion of providing for broad guiding
principles which the Commission would bear in
mind while determining the forbearance
price.Suitable modifications have accordingly
been made in the draft regulations.
70Trade Redemption (1)
- Price Discovery in Power Exchanges
- Double sided auction
- Closed auction to start with, provision of
continuous trade - Uniform price, with provision for pay-as-bid in
future - Market lot 1 REC
- Trading Sessions
- Monthly for the first year, frequency may be
increased depending on liquidity - Non-Solar and Solar RECs
- Last Wednesday of every month
- Timing 1 PM to 3 PM
71Trade Redemption (2)
- Provisional Results
- By 330 PM from both PX to NLDC
- Max bid volumes, seller wise, to be sent to NLDC
for checking - Post Trade Check
- Sellers to limit total sell in both the PXs to
the total RECs held by the concerned RE Generator
such that the total cleared volume is less than
total RECs held - Checking by NLDC
- For total quantum of bids in both the PXs taken
together - NLDC to revert back by 4 PM.
72Trade Redemption (3)
- Default by Sellers
- In case of default by any Seller(s) in terms of
volume, bids of the defaulter(s) to be rejected
in both the PXs and auction to be run by both PXs
excluding the defaulter(s) bids. - Defaulter can bid in the subsequent auction next
month onwards. In case of three defaults in a
year, report to CERC. - Final Results
- By 5 PM from PX to CA
- Checking and Extinguish
- By the Central Agency by 6 PM
73Schematic Description of Procedure for Redemption
Fully Automated Flow of Information Paperless
Working
74Snapshot REC Inventory (www.recregistryindia.in)
75Information Dissemination
- Central Agency Website www.recregistryindia.in
- List of Registered REC Holders
- Total quantum valid RECs as on date, trend for
the past - Trade Results
- MCP and MCV on Power Exchange Websites
- www.iexindia.com
- www.powerexindia.com
- List of REC Buyers, obligated entities
- PX to give monthly report to CERC/CA
- List of seller defaulters
- PX Website / CA Website
76Moving to the Next Level Some Issues under
Discussion
77Market Snapshot 27th June 2010 (source IEX)
78Missed Opportunity
Due to Congestion
Unmatched Volume
8/9/2014
POSOCO
78
79Potential Volume for Evening Market
8/9/2014
POSOCO
79
80Corridor Utilization
IEX Website
8/9/2014
POSOCO
80
81Prevailing Scenario
- Shortages
- Round the clock and in all regions
- In many hours
- Sale bids gtgt Purchase bids
- Volume lost due to price mismatch is substantial
- Congestion
- During some hours
- Only couple of corridors facing mild congestion
- Margins available on other corridors
- Market split by very low price difference !!
- Need for an Evening Market in the Power Exchanges
8/9/2014
POSOCO
81
82Advantages of the Proposed Evening Market
- Consumers
- More choice and satisfaction
- Sellers
- Another opportunity
- Further optimization of the portfolio
- Take a more informed position in the market
- Better utilization of uncongested and
under-utilized corridors - More economy and efficiency
- Social welfare maximization
- Change in strategy and an overall improvement
- Likely that more volume is cleared
- Movement to the next level
8/9/2014
POSOCO
82
83Fluctuations in Wind Generation
MW
Tamil Nadu Aug 2010
DATE
TIME
84Sharp Price Movements (Aug 10)
8/9/2014
POSOCO
84
8515 Minute bidding in PX (1)
- USP of the Indian Market Structure
- 15 Minute Scheduling
- 15 Minute Metering
- 15 Minute Accounting
- Ramping Rate
- Hour boundary high ramp rate (1000 MW)
- Large Changes in HVDC set points (NEW SR) in
operation - 15 minute bidding
- facilitate gradual ramping up and down
- provide operational ease to the participants
- Better portfolio management
- Better management of imbalances
- Deviations from the schedule
NLDC
85
8615 Minute bidding in PX (2)
- Encourage participation by the Renewable Energy
Sources - Australian Market has adopted 5 minute interval
for facilitation of renewable energy sources - Prices discovered in PX and UI Prices
- Hourly prices on the Power Exchanges
- UI Prices are on a 15 minute interval
- Introduction of 15 minute bidding would make the
two comparable - Both the Morning and the Evening Markets should
have 15 minute bidding interval
NLDC
86
87International Experience
88CIGRE 2010 Study Committee C5 on Electricity
Markets
- Preferential Subject 1
- Challenges of national or state regulations of
transmission and system operators in regional
markets, L. A. Dale - 8 Papers
- Preferential Subject 2
- Impact of intermittent Resources or Demand
Response on Market Designs Andrew L. Ott - 10 Papers
- Preferential Subject 3
- Interactions of environmental incentives and
markets (e.g. carbon) with electricity markets,
Charles F. Zimmermann - 4 Papers
89C5-101 Experience of Indias first
powerexchange and challenges ahead
- Outline of Electricity trading in India
- Features of Power Exchange
- Members and clients
- Delivery and interface with system operator
- Block bids
- Operational experience
- Participation level
- Price trend and volatility
- Issues and challenges
- Propensity to over draw rather than schedule
power - Last priority to power exchanges in transmission
capacity allocation - Price cap on day-ahead transaction
90C5-102 Harmonization of cross border
transmission capacity allocation within the
Central West Europe region
- Presentation of CWE Region (Belgium, France,
Netherlands, Luxembourg and Germany) - harmonisation of the rules for allocating the
transmission capacity within CWE - The establishment of the Joint Auction Office
(JAO) - The scope of activities of the Joint auction
office - allocating the daily capacity on the German
borders - Operating the explicit daily auctions on Belgium
borders - Coupling fallback
- Collecting and sharing the congestion revenue for
the TSOs - Harmonisation and improvement of the auction
rules - Brief of CWE Market Coupling project
91Attempt to Harmonize in Europe (C5-102)
- definitions,
- products to be auctioned,
- participation requirements,
- financial guarantees,
- firmness of both allocated capacities and
nominated programs, - definition of force majeure,
- bids format,
- time schedule of the auctions,
- compensation/reimbursement in case of reduction,
- payment modalities,
- secondary market principles (use it or sell
it), - responsibility of parties,
- the suspension/termination of contract conditions.
92C5-106 Czech and Slovak spot electricity market
coupling on the basis of implicit capacity
allocation
- Daily transactions between the two market areas
take place exclusively in the form of implicit
auctions. - The implicit auction office is a virtual area in
the information system of one of the market
operators it ensures that sell bids and buy bids
in the two market areas are matched. - The virtual office is a part of both information
systems, and the two market operators will
alternate in performing the function of the
virtual office. - Implicit auctions are based on the principle of
price coupling - In the event of capacity constraints at the
interconnection point the market splits, and two
prices are created. - In the event of transactions constrained due to
congestion and market split, the price difference
generates an implicit auction price that
generates revenues allocated between the two
transmission system operators.
93C5-107 Multiple power exchanges in India a
case study
- Study of the experience gained from the operation
of multiple power exchanges in a single physical
delivery market in India - Salient features of PX implementation in India
- Allocation of available transfer margins,
- Congestion management
- Interplay between the bilateral market, day-ahead
market in Power Exchanges and the real time
market. - Issues
- Multiplicity of price signals
- Regulatory overlap forward price signals
- Regulatory uncertainty price caps
- Transmission pricing losses
- Balancing market guiding vector
- Available margins for the PXs
- Impact of block bids
94- Thank You for your attention !!
- saxena.samir_at_gmail.com