Title: Southern African Regional Poverty Network Funding Presentation
1Politics and the PRS Approach in Southern
Africa
Benjamin Roberts
Conference on the Political Dimensions of Poverty
Reduction Holiday Inn, Lusaka 9-11th March 200
5
2Scope of presentation
- Aim
- Provide a desk-based review of emerging findings
on the political dimensions of the PRSP approach
in the sub-region
- Builds upon recent research by the Overseas
Development Institute (ODI, London)
- Outline
- Coverage of the PRSP initiative in the
sub-region
- Emergent themes from the process of development
and ongoing implementation of PRS
- Limitation
- Formulation versus implementation (evidence
base)
3PRSPs in Africa
- PRSPs dominant vehicle for development policy in
SSA.
- Sub-Saharan Africa (48)
- 19 full PRSPs
- 9 I-PRSPs
- 8 not eligible
- 12 no (I-)PRSP
- Southern Africa (14)
- 5 full PRSPs
- 1 I-PRSP
- 6 not eligible
- 2 no (I-)PRSP but started process
Full PRSP
I-PRSP
Not eligible
4PRSPs in Southern Africa Experience to date
5Source World Bank, UNDP (2004)
6(No Transcript)
7Creating Spaces Opening up policymaking processes
- PRSP formulation conceived as being conducted in
consultation with a broad range of stakeholders.
- Opening new spaces for domestic policy dialogue
one of potentially most salient contributions of
PRSP process
- Southern Africa Some supporting evidence that
process of formulating PRS begun to encourage
opening up of policy spaces.
- Representation of CS in PRSP processes has
commonly assumed the form of the participation of
NGOs, both in institutional structures overseeing
PRSP formulation and local consultations. - Process catalyst for establishment of new
national networks of CSOs to engage with poverty
policy (e.g. MEJN, CSPR) Pre-existing umbrella
organizations also instrumental (e.g. LCN).
8Creating Spaces Opening up policymaking processes
- Predominant form of CS participation through
district, regional and national consultations.
- Varied in coverage and depth from 7 zonal
workshops in Tanzania to, consultations in 200
villages in Lesotho.
- Engagement with CSOs varied in level of
inclusiveness and representation Collaboration
less frequent, and joint decision-making
extremely rare (Eberlei, 2001). - Fast trcak PRSPs (Tan, Moz) appear less
consultative in nature than some more recently
produced PRS (Zam, Les).
- Relative inexperience of govts desire to secure
debt relief.
- Despite positive achievements, concerns that PRSP
process may have by-passed politics in some
countries and established forms of representation
that do not necessarily advance the interests of
the poor over the longer term. - Problem key actors and institutions (parliament,
politicians, and political parties) marginally
involved
- What organizations, interest groups or social
forces have managed to take advantage of the
political space?
9Political Timing of PRSPs
- Launch of the PRSP approach by IFIs and
subsequent adoption by countries in Southern
Africa corresponded to different national
political events and processes. - Political timing can be either more or less
favourable to the PRS process.
- Some instances relatively fortuitous concurrence
between national and international timetables,
allowing both governments to use ongoing domestic
processes to feed into PRSP formulation, helping
to shape them as nationally owned strategies. - Less favourable in the face of electoral
politics, the PRSP initiative may produce a
tension between the desire for a deep,
participatory process on the one hand and the
urgency of finalizing the PRSP quickly in order
for poor countries to access debt relief
10Political Timing of PRSPs
- Tanzania
- 2000 was an election year President Mkapa keen
to be seen to be doing something about poverty
and debt burden.
- The PRSP/HIPC initiative provided President and
CCM with a crucial opportunity in run-up to the
elections
- Decision to eliminate primary school fees
politically popular policy change
- Accessing debt relief
- Theme of his re-election campaign.
- Next elections scheduled for October 2005
Election calendar is again coinciding with the
development of the second PRSP.
11Political Timing of PRSPs
- Mozambique Timing proved to be of mixed favour.
- Political deadlock following disputed Dec-99
electoral outcomes deteriorated into riots in
Nov-00. Increasing focus on these events crowded
out time and space for political dialogue on
poverty reduction policy during a key phase of
the PRSP process. Consequently, neither
parliament nor political parties were brought
into the PRSP process. - Nonetheless, fortuitous coincidence betw.
national and international timetables govt use
Action Programme for the Reduction of Absolute
Poverty 2000-2004 (PARPA) as basis of I-PRSP and
PRSP formulation, thus helping to shape them as
nationally owned strategies.
12Political Timing of PRSPs
- Zambia
- PRSP process coincided with debacle and
fragmentation of the ruling party following
President Chilubas attempt (late 00/early 01)
at changing constitution to allow for a third
term. - Also occurred alongside Dec 2001 electoral
campaign. Impact parties and candidates notably
absent from the PRSP debate. Fear that the PRSP
would be perceived as a political platform for
political parties to gain unnecessary mileage.
This made it difficult to invite parties to PRSP
conferences. - Malawi
- I-PRSP preparation understood simply as a
requirement for reaching the HIPC Decision
Point.
13Political Timing of PRSPs
- Lesotho potential political risks to PRSP
process emerged around May 2002 elections (in
middle of PRS formulation)
- Concern result in insufficient attention being
paid to developing the PRSP affect participatory
process quality and timeliness of final document
(disruption of process). - Concern change in government may affect
commitment to PRSP (ownership).
- Community consultations occurred weeks before
Election Day were not disrupted.
- Timing of Parliamentary briefings during the
preparation of the 2002 General Elections not
ideal.
14PRS Implementation and Good Governance
- When governments perform poorly resources are
wasted, services go undelivered, and citizens are
denied social, legal, and economic protection.
- Emphasis on good governance underlies PRSP
approach and the associated process
conditionality
- Latent political objective of PRSP approach by
encouraging good governance, the state will
become more responsive to the needs of the
citizenry, especially the poor - Lingering questions
- Is there any indication that governments are
becoming more responsive to citizen demands
across a range of policy areas?
- Are neopatrimonial structures beginning to weaken
and consequently facilitate progress in reducing
poverty?
- Examining existing documentation together with
attitudinal data from Afrobarometer series
rather tentative conclusions
15PRS Implementation and Good Governance
- Limitation in most instances, 1 year is probably
insufficient time to see significant results.
16State Responsiveness Economic Reform
- Management of the national economy in 2002/03 is
viewed in a moderately positive light in all
countries except Malawi.
- Tanzania 68 say government handling
macroeconomic affairs fairly/very well 50 in
Zambia 48 in Mozambique.
- Malawi two-thirds feel that economy being
managed fairly/very badly.
- Specific economic policies generally negative
appraisal
- 53 of Tanzanians feel government is doing well
at keeping inflation stable, a third or less
think so in the other three countries.
- In all 4 countries, government is rated as doing
poorly in creating employment and narrowing gaps
between the rich and the poor, especially Malawi
and Zambia. - Tanzanians, Mozambicans think mass living
standards have improved since the adoption of
economic structural adjustment and the PRSP while
in Zambia and Malawi the converse is true. - Agreement that economic reform has reduced the
availability of job opportunities and led to
inequality. especially pronounced in Malawi and
Zambia (nearly 80 perceive a worsening trend).
17State Responsiveness Economic Reform
- Growing social inequalities emerge as a driving
force for popular dissatisfaction with
market-oriented economic reforms.
- Majority think governments economic policies
have hurt most people and that reforms have
only benefited a few.
- Zambia 3 times as many people think that
economic reform incurs more costs than benefits.
- Moz slim majority believe that the governments
economic policies have helped most people
possibly reflects relatively robust per capita
economic growth 1993 - 2003 (5.7). - Trends little change with majority still
perceiving adverse impact.
Perception of Economic Policies
18State Responsiveness Economic Reform
- While one might anticipate that, under such
circumstances, people would support abandoning
market-driven economic policies reality is more
mixed. - Tanzanians and Zambians remarkable degree of
economic patience, with 58 and 50 respectively
willing to accept some hardships nowin order
for the economy to get better in the future - Malawians (40) and Mozambicans (37) are the
less patient, and in the former case there is
majority support (55) for an overhaul of
economic policy. - Economic patience positive in that it gives
policymakers time to achieve results, negative in
that it may be sign of uncritical acceptance of
status quo
19State Responsiveness Social Reform
- After more than 2 years experience in
implementing PRS in Tanzania and approx. 1 year
in other 3 cases Remains great variation in
perceived state responsiveness, as measured by
the level of difficulty in accessing certain
types of state provided services. - Relatively easy to get a place in a school for a
young child but difficult to access HH services,
business loans or welfare payments
- Perceived state responsiveness subsequently
influences the overall assessment of governments
social performance.
- All cases majority believe government doing a
good job in terms of addressing educational needs
and improving basic health services.
- Tanzania approximately three-quarters give a
positive appraisal.
- More negative assessment is reported in relation
to the delivery of water to the household.
20State Responsiveness
- Limited level of agreement in these countries
that elected leaderslook after the interests of
people like (me) or listen to what people like
(me) have to say. - Despite participatory PRSP processes, upwards of
two-thirds of citizens in the PRSP countries
acknowledge that the agents of the state are
unresponsive to popular needs (esp. high in Zam,
Mal)
21State Responsiveness Summing Up
- Economic domain Deeply entrenched view among
citizens in the 4 countries that governments
economic policies continue to hurt most people,
related to real concerns about the shortage of
wage-paying jobs and about the poverty,
destitution, and shortages of food that often
accompany unemployment. - Social front some signs that pro-poor spending
is increasing the assets of the poor through the
provision of social services (e.g. abolition of
school fees in Tanzania). - Tension between the two dynamics PRS likely to
exacerbate this (old wine in new bottles
debate) unless pro-poor growth achieved.
- Tendency of PRS to privilege social sector
spending (educ, health) while longer-term
structural issues (e.g. employment, agriculture)
tend to be underempahsised - Result increasing disaffection, and belief that
state is not listening to what people have to
say and responding to their needs.
22Clients or citizens? Political Values
- 2002/03 Afrobarometer round Some tension between
democratic and neopatrimonial political values
- Strong desire to influence the decisions taken by
political leaders and belief in equal treatment
by leaders (rejection of neopatrimonialsm),
- Apparent contradiction 60 - 69 still tend to
see themselves as the clients of big men.
- Perceived Govt performance w.r.t. allowing
ordinary people to influence government and treat
people fairly?
- Results indicate that further institutional
development is required in these areas.
- 73 Malawians think democratic transition
improved ability of ordinary people to influence
what government does compared with half of
Tanzanians, Mozambicans and Zambians. - Even less (47-56) perceive gains in equal and
fair treatment for all people by the government
since democratization.
- Appears to be emerging an increasing demand for
political accountability. However, despite this,
there is still substantive room for improvement
on the supply side in enabling the citizenry to
influence government and promoting the equal
treatment of all.