Gold Fields' Shares Drop amid Various Allegations - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gold Fields' Shares Drop amid Various Allegations

Description:

As the JSE's all share index has claimed record highs almost weekly since the beginning of the year, shares in mining company Gold Fields have halved in value on the back of a struggling gold price and heightened labour tensions -- | – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gold Fields' Shares Drop amid Various Allegations


1
Gold Fields' Shares Drop amid Various Allegations
  • http//marthajosi.weebly.com/1/post/2013/10/gold-f
    ields-shares-drop-amid-various-allegations.html

2
  • As the JSE's all share index has claimed record
    highs almost weekly since the beginning of the
    year, shares in mining company Gold Fields have
    halved in value on the back of a struggling gold
    price and heightened labour tensions.
  • But besides these factors, which affect the gold
    industry as a whole, Gold Fields, Africa's
    second-biggest miner, is also trying to fight off
    the US Securities Exchange Commission's (SEC)
    investigation into alleged corruption and bribery
    activity related to a black economic empowerment
    (BEE) deal concluded three years ago.

3
  • Last week the SEC, which regulates companies
    listed on the US stock exchanges, confirmed that
    it was investigating whether Gold Fields was in
    contravention of the US Foreign Corrupt Practices
    Act (FCPA) after the company awarded R2,1bn worth
    of shares and cash payments to senior leaders of
    the ANC, as well as members of parliament and
    people linked to President Jacob Zuma, as part of
    a BEE deal announced in 2010.
  •  
  • The act authorises the prosecution of entities
    and individuals suspected of making payments to
    "foreign government officials to assist in
    obtaining or retaining business", says the US
    department of justice on its website.
  • The law, passed by Congress in 1977, has
    jurisdiction over companies based anywhere in the
    world that do business in the US - including
    having a listing or raising funds.

4
Sibanye Gold's empowerment deal
  • Gold Fields has American depositary receipts
    listed on the NYSE Euronext, which falls under
    the regulatory authority of the SEC, and
    consequently the anti-bribery provisions of the
    FCPA.
  •  
  • Gold Fields unbundled most of its SA assets into
    Sibanye Gold earlier this year in a move meant to
    hedge the company from the risks associated with
    operating some of the world's deepest, most
    dangerous and labour intensive gold mines.
  •  
  • The only SA operation to survive was South Deep,
    a mechanised mine with about 66 of the group's
    minerals in reserve. Gold Fields' other
    operations are in Ghana and Latin America.

5
  • It is alleged that the company awarded shares to
    people connected to the SA government to secure
    mining rights in SA.
  • Gold Fields announced the BEE deal early in 2010,
    and in August that year received its new-order
    mining rights for its South Deep assets.
  •  
  • Members of the BEE consortium were awarded free
    shares and an upfront "dividend" of about R73m as
    part of the deal. The BEE deal was a prerequisite
    of the SA government for the granting of
    new-order mining rights to South Deep mine, which
    is about 45km south-west of Johannesburg.

6
Politicians getting benefits
  • The company recently admitted that ANC chairman
    Baleka Mbete holds a stake worth R25m in the
    Invictus Gold consortium, which owns 9 of Gold
    Fields' largest asset, South Deep.
  •  
  • Mbete served as SA's deputy president for a year
    until May 2009 and as speaker of parliament from
    2004 to 2008.
  •  
  • At least two other members of parliament at the
    time of the deal - or their proxy representatives
    - were named as beneficiaries of the R2,1bn deal,
    as was Jerome Brauns, a lawyer who had
    represented Zuma in court. The son of Mendi
    Msimang, the ANC's former treasurer-general Dudu
    Myeni, the executive chairman of the Jacob Zuma
    Foundation and deputy president Kgalema
    Motlanthe's life partner are also listed as
    beneficiaries.

7
  • In addition, Gold Fields hired Gayton McKenzie
    and Kenny Kunene, who had been convicted of
    robbery and fraud respectively, to organise the
    transaction, paying them millions in shareholder
    funds for doing so.
  •  
  • The SEC has fined large international companies
    billions of dollars for corrupt behaviour.
    German-based Siemens has been fined in the past
    and it now has drug makers Novartis and
    GlaxoSmithKline in its spotlight for alleged
    corrupt practices in China, where they are
    accused of hiring relatives of influential
    politicians to improve their chances of doing
    business in that country. Retailer Walmart is
    also being investigated for its business
    practices in Mexico.

8
Pressure placed on Gold Fields says Holland
  • Earlier this year senior executives at Gold
    Fields seemed to acknowledge that they might have
    engaged in activity that would not pass FCPA
    scrutiny, or even SA's own Prevention and
    Combating of Corrupt Activities Act.
  • Former Gold Fields chairman Mamphela Ramphele
    told Business Day in March that government had
    "shoved the list of some" Invictus shareholders
    down Gold Fields' throat "with an ultimatum that
    if the preferred individuals were not taken on
    board, it would be denied a mining licence".
  • Chief executive Nick Holland, who declined to be
    interviewed by Financial Mail, has also said the
    company was under pressure to include certain
    people in the deal.

9
  • Holland told Business Day there were certain
    people at the department who had decided they had
    a lot of power and authority and were going to
    wield it. "We got into a position where we were
    delayed being granted the mining right." Gold
    Fields had to go along with the demands to
    continue being in business.
  •  
  • Though the spotlight has fallen squarely on the
    company's management team, questions remain about
    what role the board of directors played in
    landing Gold Fields in such a predicament.

10
Questions remain unanswered
  • Did the independent board members, whose job it
    is to oversee management, ask the right questions
    and sufficiently scrutinise the deal? Whose
    interests were they looking out for when they
    recommended that investors approve the
    transaction? Did they exercise the due care and
    diligence vested on them by the Companies Act
    when they approved the transaction? And why did
    they agree to hide the names of most of the
    beneficiaries of the deal from the public,
    including the company's own investors?
  •  
  • The Companies Act clearly states that the board
    must place the interests of the company above
    anything else, including that of management.
  •  
  • But the deal's inclusion of parliamentary policy
    makers and senior politicians, including those
    linked to the presidency, had the potential to
    severely undermine the country's BEE policy and
    carried moral and legal risks for the company -
    something the board of directors should have
    flagged and scrutinised.

11
  • The company's chairman, Cheryl Carolus, sent the
    FM a statement through public relations company
    Brunswick, saying that the board, when examining
    the BEE deal, received information from a range
    of sources and advice from a number of legal and
    other advisers who collectively influenced its
    decisions.
  •  
  • "The board has acted deliberately and
    appropriately and in full compliance with the
    law," says Carolus.
  •  
  • The paradox is that she, like Ramphele, made a
    name for herself as a freedom fighter and
    political activist who championed clean
    governance and transparency.
  •  
  • The FM sent Gold Fields a list of questions
    inquiring whether individuals with
    well-publicised histories of fraud, robbery and
    corruption were deemed to be best qualified to
    handle billions of rand in investors' money. The
    FM also asked the company to name the government
    officials who allegedly forced it to choose
    certain beneficiaries for the deal and to state
    the benefit or contribution those individuals
    brought to the company.

12
Payments questioned
  • Also, why did Gold Fields deem it necessary to
    pay out R73m in cash to these beneficiaries in
    2010 when they had never contributed financially
    to the company in any way?
  • The only response was the press release from
    Brunswick and the fact that neither the board nor
    management was prepared to speak to the FM
  • The SEC probe raises further uncomfortable
    questions on whether the board was complicit in
    the alleged corrupt activities for which the
    company is now being investigated.

13
  • Some investors are willing to give the company
    the benefit of the doubt. "It is important to
    remember that the SEC accusations against Gold
    Fields are accusations at this stage there is no
    proof yet," says David Couldridge, a senior
    investment analyst at Element Investment Managers
  •  
  • Regarding Holland's claims of having been
    pressured by government into accepting
    politically connected people into the deal,
    Couldridge says shareholders are never privy to
    the goings-on behind the scenes, where
    negotiations for licences happen. "You don't know
    what pressure is being put on management. As a
    miner, if you have no mining rights, you have no
    business," he says.
  •  
  • The department of mineral resources has
    consistently denied any wrongdoing by its
    officials. "The department participated and
    co-operated fully during the investigation by
    Gold Fields' independent attorneys, and
    articulated the role of the department, as well
    as the administrative processes that were
    followed to convert Gold Fields' old-order mining
    rights in respect of its South Deep mine," says
    spokesman Ayanda Shezi

14
  • Making no attempt to answer the FM's questions
    sent to the department, Shezi said "all the
    questions" being asked by the media were put to
    the department during the investigation by a US
    law firm hired by Gold Fields to probe the deal.
  • "Nothing untoward has been found by the
    appointed law firm in relation to the
    department's role, or any of its officials, in
    the conversion process," says Shezi.
  •  
  • Last year, however, Holland named individuals in
    the department, including former deputy
    director-general Jacinto Rocha, as those who had
    unfairly pressured him into what now seems
    illegal activity. Rocha told Business Times this
    week that the department "never dictated to them
    on the nature of the deal and who to include".

15
  • Couldridge says that the legal and moral
    challenges facing Gold Fields will "now
    hopefully, at the end of it all, encourage a move
    towards a more sustainable form of BEE, where
    people who really need the empowerment benefit".
  •  
  • Read more
  • http//www.valueinvestingnews.com/tana-goldfields-
    company
  • http//www.bookrix.com/searchkeywords2020tana
    20goldfields,searchoptionbooks.html
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com