No name - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

No name

Description:

Economist e-Learning Readiness Ranking 2003 ... The college won't survive as a residential institution' Peter Drucker (Forbes, 10 March 1997) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: Ehu9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: No name


1
???? ????? ?????? ?? ???? ?"? ????' ????? ??????
????? ?????? ?????? ?????? ????????
????? ???? ???
2
Economist e-Learning Readiness Ranking 2003
Source http//www-306.ibm.com/services/learning/s
olutions/ideas/whitepapers/eiu_e-learning_readines
s_rankings.pdf
3
Economist e-Learning Readiness Ranking 2003
Source http//www-306.ibm.com/services/learning/s
olutions/ideas/whitepapers/eiu_e-learning_readines
s_rankings.pdf
4
UK (8)
5
Swiss (10)
6
Korea (5)
7
Canada (2)
Government searches for national e-learning
agenda1/22/2004 50000 PM - Industry Canada
points to lack of coordination between online
programs While individual jurisdictions
across Canada are making great strides in the
field of e-learning, stakeholders say there is a
need for an overarching national e-learning
strategy to bring all that effort together. The
federal government had led the way in recent
years, with Industry Canada championing programs
like SchoolNet, which brought Internet
connectivity to schools across Canada. However,
with a new Industry Minister in Lucienne
Robillard and a new Prime Minister in Paul
Martin, the department's e-learning strategy is
currently in a state of flux.
http//www.itbusiness.ca/index.asp?theaction61li
d1sid54598adBannereGovernment
8
Australia (11)
Source http//the.standard.net.au/articles/2004/0
1/13/1073877797807.html
9
North Ireland
10
?????? ??????
?????????
?????????? ????????
??????????????
?
?? ???
  • ??? ? ?????!
  • ???? ????
  • ??? ????

?
  • ????? ?????
  • ?? ??????
  • ?? ???? (ROI)?

????
11
University Functions
1/2
Guidance
Housekeeping
Credentialing
KnowledgeGeneration
Instruction
Based on Eli Noam Electronics and the Dim
Future of the University, Science, Oct. 1995
12
University Functions Decoupling
2/2
Housekeeping
KnowledgeGeneration
Guidance
Credentialing
Future University
Instruction
Based on Eli Noam Electronics and the Dim
Future of the University, Science, Oct. 1995
13
Universities wont Survive
  • Thirty years from now, the big university
    campuses will be relics. Universities wont
    survive.
  • Do you realize that the cost of higher education
    has risen as fast as the cost of health care?
    Such totally uncontrollable expenditures, without
    any visible improvement in either the content or
    the quality of education, means that the system
    is rapidly becoming untenable.
  • Higher education is in deep crisis. Already we
    are beginning to deliver more lectures and
    classes off-campus via satellite or two-way video
    at a fraction of the cost.
  • The college wont survive as a residential
    institution

Peter Drucker (Forbes, 10 March 1997)
14
Preparing for the Revolution
2
  • Faculty free agencies
  • Large lecture courses

http//books.nap.edu/books/030908640X/html/R1.html
pagetop
15
The Shape of the New University?
  • Mass-market manufactures or niche tutors to
    privileged?
  • Full complement of disciplines or specialize and
    share courses in cyberspace?
  • High quality instruction in the era of free MIT
    courseware?
  • Freelance faculty?
  • Transcript of courses from whom rather than
    from where?
  • Mergers or the opposite?
  • Outsourcing of large introductory courses (that
    subsidize the upper level courses)?
  • Globalization? Mainly by private universities?

WM. Wulf, President of the National Academy of
Engineering, The Information Railroad is
Coming, educause, January 2003
16
Powerful Combination of Change Forces
  • A rapid increase in competition. This competition
    comes from colleges and universities within and
    beyond countries and from private providers.
  • A significant decrease in funding from government
    sources. In a number of countries, this decrease
    is associated with two discernible and dramatic
    shifts in perception (1) that education is not
    really a public good but a private benefit, and
    (2) that it is not really an investment but a
    cost.
  • Greater government scrutiny. Australia, like many
    other countries, now has a national
    quality-assurance agency for higher education
    trend data on performance is now in the public
    arena and popular publications produce league
    tables on the performance of higher education
    institutions.
  • A growing consumer rights' movement. As fees
    rise, students are increasingly prepared to
    complain about the quality of what is delivered
    and, in some countries, to engage in litigation.
  • The rapid spread of communications and
    information technology into every aspect of our
    lives, including education and training. Whereas
    universities and colleges once held a monopoly on
    high-quality, up-to-date knowledge, this is now
    available (for a price) on the Internet from all
    manner of providers

Source Effective Change Management in HE, Prof.
Goeff Scott, Educause review, Nov./Dec. 2003
17
Of the 75 institutions founded before 1520 AD
which are still doing much the same things in
much the same places, about 60 are universities.
Clark Kerr, President Emeritus, UC Berkeley,
The Uses of the University, Harvard
University Press, 5th Edition, March 2001
18
Disruption in Education
1
http//www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ffpiu013.pd
f
19
Disruption in Education
  • Over the past 20 years, tuition at our countrys
    four-year colleges and universities has increased
    at a rate of almost 8 percent annually, more than
    double the rate of inflation over the same
    period. Enrollment in four-year programs has
    grown at a snail-like rate of one-half percent
    over the past decade. The United States
    world-renowned higher education system faces a
    severe budgetary crisis at both the state and
    federal levels, and more than 500 institutions
    have closed their doors in the past decade.
  • Meanwhile, distance learning and corporate
    universities are growing at meteoric rates.
    Enrollment in distance learning is growing at
    three times the pace of classroom-based programs
    and is expected to reach five million by
    2005.Corporate training is a 32 billion annual
    industry, with a reported 2,000 corporate
    universities in the United States. The growth in
    the number of corporate universities is
    explosive there were roughly 400 such
    universities at the beginning of the 1990s.
  • How can we reconcile the slow growth and
    struggles in one part of the education industry
    with explosive growth in another? The answer
    lies in the theory of disruptive innovation.

Source Disruption in Education, Clayton M.
Christensen, Sally Aaron, and William Clark,
http//www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ffpiu013.pd
f
20
?????? ??????
?????????
?????????? ????????
??????????????
?
?? ???
  • ??? ? ?????!
  • ???? ????
  • ??? ????

?
  • ????? ?????
  • ?? ??????
  • ?? ???? (ROI)?

????
  • Mobile/Wireless
  • ?????????
  • LOs
  • ????? ??????????
  • ????? ?????? ??????
  • ????? ??????

21
Student Learning
Paradigm Shift
Individualized
Current Practice
Standard
Faculty Practice
Standard
Individualized
Source Innovations in Online Learning
Moving Beyond No Significant Difference
Carol Twigg, 2001
22
  • What would the demise of the traditional lecture
    the verbal imparting of information to a
    relatively passive audience portend for the
    college or university professor?
  • Some say that the role of the faculty member
    might devolve into that of an educational
    consultant.
  • In contrast, I contend that this possibility
    presents faculty with an exciting and stimulating
    opportunity to rethink, and to reinvent, their
    functions and responsibilities and their
    relationships to students.

Source Ahead of the Curve Future Shifts in
Higher Education, Shirley Ann Jackson, President
of RPI, Educause Review, January/February 2004,
Vol. 39, no. 1
23
The Pew Program
24
"????? ????"
???????? ?????? ????????? ??????
  • ???????? (????? ?????? ???)
  • ?????? ????? ???? ?????, ???-?????
  • ?????? ??????
  • ?????? ??????
  • ??????? ???????? ??????, ?????
  • ????? ??????
  • ???? ??????
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com