Title: Kyoto Protocol Bill Menke, December 6, 2005
1Kyoto ProtocolBill Menke, December 6, 2005
2Summary
- Milestones
- 1972 Stockholm Declaration
- 1988 Intergovernmental Panel on
- Climate Change
- 1992 UN Framewor Convention on Climate Change
- 1997 Byrd-Hagel Resolution
- 1997 Kyoto Protocol
- 2005 Kyoto Rulebook
- Statistics
- Reactions
3United Nations Conference on the Human
EnvironmentStockholm Declaration of 1972
4Some Highlights
- protection and improvement of the human
environment is a major issue - developing countries must direct their efforts to
development, bearing in mind their priorities and
the need to safeguard and improve the environment - natural growth of population continuously
presents problems for the preservation of the
environment
5Intergovernmental Panel onClimate
Changeestablished 1988joint program of
theWorld Meteorological Organization and the
United Nations Environment Programme
6Mandate
- Assess scientific, technical and socio- economic
information relevant for the understanding of
climate change, its potential impacts and options
for adaptation and mitigation
7This group publishes the IPCC Reportrs that we
have used previously in this class
8United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate
Change1992
9Highlight
- Ultimate objective stabilize greenhouse gas
concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that
would prevent dangerous interference with the
climate system - Commitments of states
- publish inventories of sources sinks
- formulate implement mitigation plans
- promote scientific exchanges
- United States is a signatory
10(No Transcript)
11Byrd-Hagel ResolutionUS Senate,
1997(non-binding, but passed 95-0)
- The U.S. will not enter into an agreement to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions that will be
detrimental to the economy of the U.S. - The U.S. will not enter into an agreement to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions that does not
require "meaningful involvement" on the part of
developing nations.
12Kyoto Protocolto the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Changenegotiated in
1997open for signature in 1998came into force
February 16, 2005
13Highlights
- The Kyoto Protocol is a agreement under which
industrialized countries will reduce their
collective emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2
compared to the year 1990 - Compared to the emissions levels that would be
expected by 2010 without the Protocol, this
target represents a 29 cut. - The goal is to lower overall emissions from six
greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane,
nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, and
PFCs - calculated as an average over the
five-year period of 2008-12. - National targets range from 8 reductions for the
European Union and some others to 7 for the US,
6 for Japan, 0 for Russia, and permitted
increases of 8 for Australia and 10 for
Iceland. - Sinks can be used to offset emission and emission
credits can be traded. - IPPC analyses used in assessments of sources and
sinks
14Why 10 increase for Iceland?
- In October, 2000 I (B. Menke) participated in a
discussion with President Grimsson of Iceland,
who was visiting LDEO. He said that because of
Icelands heavy reliance on geothermal and
hydroelectric energy, its per-capita emissions
were low. Even opening one new factory would
represent an increase that would be hard to
offset.
15US and Kyoto
- US signed in 1998 (Clinton) but withdrew in in
2001 - "The Kyoto Protocol was fatally flawed in
fundamental ways, but the process used to bring
nations together to discuss our joint response to
climate change is an important one - George W. Bush
- June 11, 2001
16Bushs Criticisms
- emissions targets arbitrary and not based on
science - protocol's binding limits on emissions could harm
the U.S. economy - Several big emitter countries, such as China (the
number 2 emitter) and India (number 6) are
totally exempt.
17Kyoto Rule BookDecember 2, 2005
- Defines how each countrys emissions and sinks
(e.g. reforestation) are accounted - Developed countries can invest in other developed
countries and earn carbon allowances - Establishes the Clean Development Mechanism which
allows developed countries to invest in
sustainable development projects (excl. nukes) in
developing countries
18Status and Projections
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23(No Transcript)
24Various Reactions to Kyoto
25Although every European country says that it
supports ratification of Kyoto, none have
explained what ratification means for their
citizens and their economies. If they were so
confident that these targets could be achieved at
low cost with no serious economic consequences,
they would be more forthcoming with their plans
and analyses. William O'Keefe Marshall Institute
26- The arguments for and against nuclear power have
changed somewhat over the years. Finlands
Minister of Trade and Industry, Ms Sinikka
Mönkäre, who is a Social Democrat and a
physician, argues for the building of a new
nuclear power plant because of Finland's climate
commitments under the Kyoto protocol, and the
price and availability of energy.
27- Why Greenpeace supports Kyoto
- The Kyoto Protocol is the only global action plan
against climate change. It's just the first step
but the way forward is for countries to get on
board and negotiate the next round of emissions
reduction targets. - From the GreenPeace website
28- The president's decision to pull out of the Kyoto
Protocol is going to cost U.S. energy technology
companies millions of dollars. The international
agreement will create a multibillion dollar
market in the developing world for renewable
energy technologies, and the Germans and the
Japanese, participants in Kyoto, are going to
have a leg up in that market. - Philip Clapp
- National Environment Trust
29- Independent of politics, going after reducing CO2
makes real business sense because it usually
means going after energy use. - Kristen Zimmerman
- Spokesperson for
- General Motors Corporation
30- The expansion of palm oil production is one of
the leading causes of rainforest destruction in
south-east Asia. It is one of the most
environmentally damaging commodities on the
planet. Once again it appears we are trying to
solve our environmental problems by dumping them
in developing countries, where they have
devastating effects on local people. - Simon Counsell
- Rainforest Foundation
- due to a European Union laws requiring
conventional fuels to be blended with biofuels