Kyoto Protocol Bill Menke, December 6, 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Kyoto Protocol Bill Menke, December 6, 2005

Description:

Why 10% increase for Iceland? ... with President Grimsson of Iceland, who was visiting LDEO. He said that because of Iceland's heavy reliance on geothermal and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:88
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: ldeoCo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Kyoto Protocol Bill Menke, December 6, 2005


1
Kyoto ProtocolBill Menke, December 6, 2005
2
Summary
  • Milestones
  • 1972 Stockholm Declaration
  • 1988 Intergovernmental Panel on
  • Climate Change
  • 1992 UN Framewor Convention on Climate Change
  • 1997 Byrd-Hagel Resolution
  • 1997 Kyoto Protocol
  • 2005 Kyoto Rulebook
  • Statistics
  • Reactions

3
United Nations Conference on the Human
EnvironmentStockholm Declaration of 1972
4
Some Highlights
  • protection and improvement of the human
    environment is a major issue
  • developing countries must direct their efforts to
    development, bearing in mind their priorities and
    the need to safeguard and improve the environment
  • natural growth of population continuously
    presents problems for the preservation of the
    environment

5
Intergovernmental Panel onClimate
Changeestablished 1988joint program of
theWorld Meteorological Organization and the
United Nations Environment Programme
6
Mandate
  • Assess scientific, technical and socio- economic
    information relevant for the understanding of
    climate change, its potential impacts and options
    for adaptation and mitigation

7
This group publishes the IPCC Reportrs that we
have used previously in this class
8
United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate
Change1992
9
Highlight
  • Ultimate objective stabilize greenhouse gas
    concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that
    would prevent dangerous interference with the
    climate system
  • Commitments of states
  • publish inventories of sources sinks
  • formulate implement mitigation plans
  • promote scientific exchanges
  • United States is a signatory

10
(No Transcript)
11
Byrd-Hagel ResolutionUS Senate,
1997(non-binding, but passed 95-0)
  • The U.S. will not enter into an agreement to
    reduce greenhouse gas emissions that will be
    detrimental to the economy of the U.S.
  • The U.S. will not enter into an agreement to
    reduce greenhouse gas emissions that does not
    require "meaningful involvement" on the part of
    developing nations.

12
Kyoto Protocolto the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Changenegotiated in
1997open for signature in 1998came into force
February 16, 2005
13
Highlights
  • The Kyoto Protocol is a agreement under which
    industrialized countries will reduce their
    collective emissions of greenhouse gases by 5.2
    compared to the year 1990
  • Compared to the emissions levels that would be
    expected by 2010 without the Protocol, this
    target represents a 29 cut.
  • The goal is to lower overall emissions from six
    greenhouse gases - carbon dioxide, methane,
    nitrous oxide, sulfur hexafluoride, HFCs, and
    PFCs - calculated as an average over the
    five-year period of 2008-12.
  • National targets range from 8 reductions for the
    European Union and some others to 7 for the US,
    6 for Japan, 0 for Russia, and permitted
    increases of 8 for Australia and 10 for
    Iceland.
  • Sinks can be used to offset emission and emission
    credits can be traded.
  • IPPC analyses used in assessments of sources and
    sinks

14
Why 10 increase for Iceland?
  • In October, 2000 I (B. Menke) participated in a
    discussion with President Grimsson of Iceland,
    who was visiting LDEO. He said that because of
    Icelands heavy reliance on geothermal and
    hydroelectric energy, its per-capita emissions
    were low. Even opening one new factory would
    represent an increase that would be hard to
    offset.

15
US and Kyoto
  • US signed in 1998 (Clinton) but withdrew in in
    2001
  • "The Kyoto Protocol was fatally flawed in
    fundamental ways, but the process used to bring
    nations together to discuss our joint response to
    climate change is an important one
  • George W. Bush
  • June 11, 2001

16
Bushs Criticisms
  • emissions targets arbitrary and not based on
    science
  • protocol's binding limits on emissions could harm
    the U.S. economy
  • Several big emitter countries, such as China (the
    number 2 emitter) and India (number 6) are
    totally exempt.

17
Kyoto Rule BookDecember 2, 2005
  • Defines how each countrys emissions and sinks
    (e.g. reforestation) are accounted
  • Developed countries can invest in other developed
    countries and earn carbon allowances
  • Establishes the Clean Development Mechanism which
    allows developed countries to invest in
    sustainable development projects (excl. nukes) in
    developing countries

18
Status and Projections
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
(No Transcript)
24
Various Reactions to Kyoto
25
Although every European country says that it
supports ratification of Kyoto, none have
explained what ratification means for their
citizens and their economies. If they were so
confident that these targets could be achieved at
low cost with no serious economic consequences,
they would be more forthcoming with their plans
and analyses. William O'Keefe Marshall Institute
26
  • The arguments for and against nuclear power have
    changed somewhat over the years. Finlands
    Minister of Trade and Industry, Ms Sinikka
    Mönkäre, who is a Social Democrat and a
    physician, argues for the building of a new
    nuclear power plant because of Finland's climate
    commitments under the Kyoto protocol, and the
    price and availability of energy.

27
  • Why Greenpeace supports Kyoto
  • The Kyoto Protocol is the only global action plan
    against climate change. It's just the first step
    but the way forward is for countries to get on
    board and negotiate the next round of emissions
    reduction targets.
  • From the GreenPeace website

28
  • The president's decision to pull out of the Kyoto
    Protocol is going to cost U.S. energy technology
    companies millions of dollars. The international
    agreement will create a multibillion dollar
    market in the developing world for renewable
    energy technologies, and the Germans and the
    Japanese, participants in Kyoto, are going to
    have a leg up in that market.
  • Philip Clapp
  • National Environment Trust

29
  • Independent of politics, going after reducing CO2
    makes real business sense because it usually
    means going after energy use.
  • Kristen Zimmerman
  • Spokesperson for
  • General Motors Corporation

30
  • The expansion of palm oil production is one of
    the leading causes of rainforest destruction in
    south-east Asia. It is one of the most
    environmentally damaging commodities on the
    planet. Once again it appears we are trying to
    solve our environmental problems by dumping them
    in developing countries, where they have
    devastating effects on local people.
  • Simon Counsell
  • Rainforest Foundation
  • due to a European Union laws requiring
    conventional fuels to be blended with biofuels
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com