Drug Policy Issue for Developing Countries

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Drug Policy Issue for Developing Countries

Description:

Drug/ Pharmaceutical. TREND ON DRUG. RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT (R&D) ... Prescription drugs may be advertised only in medical and pharmaceutical journal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:254
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Drug Policy Issue for Developing Countries


1
LEGISLATION, REGULATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE
ISSUES
  • Drug Policy Issue for Developing Countries
  • Yogyakarta - Indonesia
  • 29 September 9 November 2001

2
National Drug Policy
3
Why Legislations and Regulation on Pharmaceutical
are Necessary ?
  • Pharmaceutical concern the whole population
  • Pharmaceutical involve many parties (patients,
    doctors, other health workers, manufactures,
    distributors, researchers etc)
  • Pharmaceutical involve important health risks
    there are serious consequence from the lack
    or misuse of drugs
  • Informal control are insufficient

4
STAGES OF DRUG DEVELOPMENT
Pre-Clinical Study Stage
Clinical Study Stage
Research on New Molecule ( 5-10 yrs)
Pre-Marketing Evaluation Registration
Marketing Approval
PMS
5
TREND ON DRUG RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT (RD)
Current Approach Molecular Biotech Research
Selection Gen Screening
R D
Drug Design
Biochemical Approach
Clinical Research
Active Substance Test/Analysis
Pre-Clinical Research
Effectiveness Study
Pharmacodynamic Pharmacokinetics Toxicology,
Teratogenicity Mutagenicity, Carcinogenicity
Phase I, II, III
6
Element of a Comprehensive Drug law (1)
  • General Provision
  • Control of Availability and Marketing
  • Drug Registration (Pre-Marketing Authorization)
  • NED List/ National Formulary
  • Scheduling, Prescription, and dispensing
    authority
  • Labeling
  • Generic Labeling, Manufacturing, and Substitution
  • Information and advertising
  • Public Education
  • Imposition of fees
  • Price Control
  • Special Products (herbal medicines, orphan drugs)

7
Elements of a Comprehensive Drug Law (2)
  • Control of Supply Mechanism
  • Importation of drugs
  • Exportation of drugs
  • Controls, incentives, disincentives for local
    manufacture
  • Control of distribution, supply storage, and sale
  • Drug control Administration/Drug Regulatory
    Authority
  • Powers to Make Rules and Regulations
  • Repeals and Transition Provisions
  • Exemptions from provision of the law

8
Stages in the Evolution of Legislative /
Regulation (1)
  • Examples
  • A Drug Registration/Pre-Marketing Authorization
    System
  • Stage 1. Notification Procedure
  • Standard information on all pharmaceuticals for
    sale ? enter into a register.
  • No judgment is made regarding the appropriateness
    of drug for sale

9
Stages in the Evolution of Legislative /
Regulation (2)
  • Stage 2 Basic Authorization Procedures
  • Drugs listed in the register are provisionally
    authorized to remain on sale
  • All new drugs for sale require a license after
    assessment for E, S, Q and completeness of
    packaging information

10
Stages in the Evolution of Legislative /
Regulation (3)
  • Stage 3
  • Full Registration or Licensing Procedures
  • Evaluation of individual products is conducted
    by examining detailed data from the manufactures
    (and from the literature)
  • ? to Assess Q, E, S.
  • Stage 4
  • Re-evaluation of Older Drugs
  • All older drugs on the market are systematically
    reassessed.

11
THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. DRUG LAW
  • Food and drug Act (1906) required only that
    drugs meet standards of strength and purity. The
    burden of proof was on FDA on the drug labeling
    prior to marketing
  • Federal Food, drug and cosmetic Act (1938)
    revised the 1906 drug law after the tragedy of
    107 people died caused by the elixir of
    sulfanilamide, required a manufacturer to prove
    the safety of drug prior to marketing
  • Durham-Humphrey Amendment (1951) defined R/
    drugs as those unsafe for SM and should only
    under a doctors supervision

12
THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. DRUG LAW
  • Kefauver-Harris Drug Amendments (1962) tighten
    control over drug prior to marketing due to the
    Thalidomide reports, a manufacturer is
    responsible not only on safety, but also
    effectiveness for the intended use. After
    marketing, ADR must be reported to FDA, and
    complete information on risk and benefit must be
    available
  • Orphan Drug Act (1983) encourage development of
    products which are for treating diseases. The law
    allows manufacturer to take tax deduction for ¾
    of the cost of CT

13
THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. DRUG LAW
  • Drug Price Competition and Patient Term
    Restoration Act (1984) expands the of drugs
    for ANDA make it less costly and time consuming
    for generics to reach the market
  • Generic Drug Enforcement Act (1992) imposes
    debarment and other remedies for criminal
    convictions based on activities relating to the
    approval of ANDAs
  • Prescription Drug User Fee Act ( 1992)
    regulates user fees for certain NDA and
    supplements, an annual establishment fee, and
    annual product fees.

14
THE EVOLUTION OF U.S. DRUG LAW
  • FDA Modernization Act (1997) contains
  • some of the most significant changes to the
    Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act in 35 years, such as
  • reauthorization of PDUFA through FY 2002
  • changes of assessment and collection of user
    fee, i.e.waiver of fee for orphan products,
    pediatrics suppl.
  • codifies FDAs accelerated approval and fast
    track.
  • issuance of guidance for NDA reviewer

15
DRUG / NATIONAL REGULATORY AUTHORITY (DRA/NRA)
  • A network that administer the full spectrum of
    drug regulatory activities, including at least
    the following functions
  • MA for new products and variation of existing
    authorization
  • QC laboratory testing
  • Adverse Drug Reaction
  • Provision of any drug information and formation
    of RUD and other distribution channels
  • Enforcement operations
  • Monitoring of Drug Utilization

16
PROVISIONS AND PREREQUISITS FOR REGULATORY CONTROL
  • Political will and commitment
  • Legislation
  • Accountability
  • Resources for MA function (Staff, Premises,
    Archiving, Computers, Experts Advising Body)
  • Fees and Cost Recovery
  • Inventory of existing products on the market
  • Rational selection of products (public health
    need, number of interchangeable products, price)
  • Special Access Scheme
  • PMS

17
Guiding Principles for Small DRA/NRA (1)
  • Objectives
  • To establish a frame work for drug regulation
  • The primary responsibility of DRA/NRA (i) to
    operate a system of administration and
    enforcement so that drugs conform to acceptable
    Q, S, E, (ii) promotion and marketing of drug is
    similar to PI approved (iii) Manufacturing,
    distribution, Supplying, dispensing and use
    conform with the requirements

18
Guiding Principles for small DRA/NRA (2)
  • A Mandatory system of licensing/authorizing of
  • All medicinal product (local or import)
  • All manufacturer, importing and exporting agents,
    distributors
  • All premises and facilities to manufacturer,
    store, distribute
  • All stages of manufacturing and distribution of
    product are supervised by qualified personnel
  • An efficient system of inspection with access to
    QC laboratory facilities
  • The legislation is enforceable

19
Guiding Principles for Small DRA/NRA (3)
  • Example Pre Marketing Authorization
  • With the limitation on human, financial,
    scientific, and technological resource
    decision may be guided by the regulatory status
    of the product in the country of origin based on
    information provided through the WHO
    Certification scheme on the Quality of
    Pharmaceutical products moving in International
    Commerce
  • Need Knowledge of and acceptance of the standards
    and competence of the DRA/NRA of Exporting
    country by the DRA/NRA of the importing country

20
BEST REGULATORY PRACTICES
GOAL Enhancing mutual understanding
  • Should include procedures and outcomes
    transparent to applicant, health professional
    and the public
  • The assessment products of pre-marketing approval
    of drug should be of a reasonable duration
    without compromising quality, safety and efficacy

21
WHO has set up a new initiative the world
Alliance for Quality Pharmaceuticals in
International Commerce (WAQPIC)
  • Strengthening national regulatory system
  • Enhancing mutual understanding and collaboration
    at the international level
  • Providing operational supports to global and
    regional harmonization efforts and
  • Reducing circulation of substandard drugs

22
WAQPIC
  • Tools to assess regulatory capacity, training
    opportunities, information exchange mechanism and
    forum for discussion
  • Partners
  • National/regional regulatory bodies
  • Pharmacopoeia Team
  • Professional association
  • Other UN organization

23

REGULATORY HARMONIZATION IN ASEAN COUNTRIES
Brunei Darussalam
Vietnam
Cambodia
Thailand
Singapore
Indonesia
Lao-PDR
Philippines
Malaysia
Myanmar
HARMONIZATION SCHEMES OF PHARMACEUTICAL
REGULATION OF THE ASEAN COUNTRIES HAS BEEN
INITIATED IN 1999
24
  • THE SCOPE OF HARMONIZATION
  • Includes harmonization of pharmaceutical product
    registration requirement in
  • - Common Technical Requirement (CTR)
  • - Common Technical Dossier (CTD)
  • FOUR MAJOR AREAS ON CTR AND CTD AND THE LEAD
    COUNTRIES
  • - Pharmaceutics (Quality) -
    Indonesia
  • - Pharmacological and Toxicological
  • data (Safety) - Philippines
  • - Clinical data (Efficacy) -
    Thailand
  • - Administrative data and Product
  • Information - Malaysia

25
REGULATION AND LEGISLATION ON PHARMACEUTICAL
INDONESIA EXPERIENCE
26
LEGAL BASIS FOR NA DFC
ACT 8/99 CONSUMER PROTECTION
ACT 7/96 FOOD
ACT 23/92 HEALTH
CENTRAL GOVERMENT GR 25/2000
ACT 69/99 FOOD LABELING
GR FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY
GR 72/98 PHARM. SAFETY
GR 81/99 SMOKING
DECENTRALIZATION PP 22/2000
DRUG AND FOOR CONTROL
NA-DFC DECREE ORG. STR
PRES DECREE 165/2000 MOH
PRES DECREE 166/2000 NA-DFC
MD ORG. ST.
27
(No Transcript)
28
ASPEK LEGAL BIDANG OBAT
Act 8/99Consumer Protection
Ordonant 419/49 Drugs
GR 72/98 Pharm. Med. Devices Control
Act 23/92 Health
GR 17/2001PNBP/Fee
NA-DFC Decree HK.00.063.00685 (7-03-01)
Guidelines on Drug Registration (old 1971,
1980, 1990,1993)
MOH Decree 949/2000 Drug Registration
Quality, safety efficacy requirement
Ch II
Ch 39
MOH Decree 2380 Reg. of Generic Drugs
To protect comm, quality, safety, efficacy of
product
Ch III
MOH Decree 140/91 Reg. of Med. Dev. Household
Ch II
Production
Reg. Procedure Pre-submission, Reg.
MOH Decree 5417/89 Revaluation
Ch IV
Ch 40
Ch III
MOH Decree 925/93 Schedule
Comply with FI and standards
Distribution
Data requirement
Ch IV
Ch V
Ch 41
Marketing approval
29
lanjutan
Ch V
Reg. Dossier
Export - Import
GR 32/91
Attachments
MOH Decree 415/80
Ch VIII
Guidelines
DG Letter 2243/94
Labeling Advertisement
MOH Decree 2380/83
MOH Decree 2396/86
Ch VIII, IX, X, XIII, XIV
DG Letters 13650/739159/8235/835660/83
Quality Assurance
MOH Decree 43/88 GMP
DGD 5411/89 GMP Implementation
MOH Ins. 186/80 ADR AEFI
30
REGULATORY SYSTEM ON DRUG REGISTRATION IN
INDONESIA
  • Started in 1971. Criteria for the registration
    1980 up dated in 1990, 1993 and 2000
  • Based On Risk Assessment (Quality, Safety
    Efficacy) and actual need of the public health
  • Since July 2000
  • To improve efficiency on drug registration
    process in anticipating Global Harmonization
    trend
  • To accelerate drug evaluation process without
    compromising S, E Q
  • To provide transparent and efficient communication

31
NEW REGULATION
  • REGISTRATION FEES APPLICABLE FOR ALL DRUGS
  • Implementation of fee with the concept of cost
    sharing, in force with GR 17/2001
  • FASTER APPROVAL IN THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS
  • A NEW COMPUTERIZED SYSTEM HAS BEEN INSTALLED FOR
    DRUG REGISTRATION (FERO)
  • To support 2 main functions
  • - document tracking
  • - evaluation process of certain copy products
    (template)

32
National Committee on New Drug Evaluation
  • Consist of experts in the field of clinical
    pharmacology, pharmacy, biology and relevant
    clinicians
  • Recruited from Universities and other relevant
    institutions
  • Conducting meeting regularly to discuss the
    result of evaluation on the safety, efficacy and
    quality of drugs

33
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF GCP
  • GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICES
  • Adoption of ICH-GCP
  • GCP requirements which are not stated in the
    ICH-GCP
  • Preparation of CT procedure
  • REGULATION ON CT PROCEDURE
  • AMONG OTHERS
  • GCP requirements
  • Import license requirement

34
ADVERSE DRUG REACTION (ADR) MONITORING PROGRAMME
  • Was started in 1975 as a pilot project
  • As national programme since 1981
  • Voluntary reporting system ? yellow card
  • Publishing bulletin Berita MESO
  • To arise the interest (active participation) of
    health practitioner
  • Contains ADR evaluation reports and other
    information associated with ADR
  • Twice / year
  • Distributed to hospitals, physicians and other
    health professionals

35
POST-MARKETING QUALITY ASSURANCE
  • SStandardization of quality of raw materials,
    finished products (Indonesia Pharmacopeiae, USP,
    BP)
  • LLicensing of drug establishment
  • IImplementation of GMP and Inspection on GMP
    Compliance
  • SSampling and Analysis of drugs
  • IInspection Supervision of Drug Distribution
    channel

36
DRUG PROMOTION ADVERTISEMENT
  • Advertising of drugs is subject to the
    regulation no. 386 of 1994 which ensures
    advertisements are truthful, appropriate and do
    not mislead consumer
  • Advertisement of prescription drugs to the
    general public is prohibited
  • Prescription drugs may be advertised only in
    medical and pharmaceutical journal
  • O.T.C. Drugs, can be advertised based on the
    information approved at the time of registration
  • Day to day monitoring of advertisement is
    conducted by the drug inspectors at the
    provincial levels
  • A committee was established to evaluate an
    advertisement before it is approved
  • Product samples are prohibited to be given to
    physicians

37
THANK YOU
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)