Title: Status, conformity, and obedience
1Status, conformity, and obedience
2Questions
- Why do most groups have status hierarchies?
- What is the link between self-esteem and social
status? - Why do groups have social norms in place and why
do most people conform to them? - What happens to people who do not comply to
norms?
3- Acknowledged expertise attracts, though perhaps
only temporarily, what we may term a following of
dependent persons. These persons will be welcomed
as a principal source of prestige as a capital
benefit of the hunters expertise. Nor is this
expertise necessarily reduced or dissipated
through having to share it with other persons
attached to him (Paine, 1973)
4Definitions
- Status ones standing in a group
- Dominance status achieved through an ability to
threat and punish - Prestige status achieved through an ability to
help (in valued domains) Henrich Gil-White
(2001) - Power controlling someones outcomes
5Evolution of status psychology
- Status is a primary and universal human motive
(Hogan Hogan, 1991) - In any group, individuals compete for status,
because - Status is associated with reproductive resources
- particularly for males high status males make
more attractive mates and coalition partners
women prefer high status men (Buss, 1999) - Everyone aspires to high status and wants to
avoid low status (see DeBottons book in which he
describes a phenomenon called status anxiety
(keeping up with the Jones) - In humans, status is granted largely to
individuals who benefit others/the group through
their actions prestige - Prestige is based on ability to help and it
differs from dominance (ability to hurt) see
Henrich Gil-White, 2001 Pinker, 1994 - See Heinrich Gil-Whites paper on how prestige
is awarded to individuals (infocopying as
mechanism) - Status is a costly signal some handicaps may
give you status and a good reputation (Van Vugt,
Roberts, Hardy, 2006 Zahavi Zahavi, 1977)
cf. competitive altruism
6Evolution of prestige
- Prestige processes emerge from social learning
- Social learning (cultural transmission) saves
costs of individual learning - Natural selection favours learning and
identifying from models that possess
better-than-average information - Selection favours strategies to provide benefits
to models (via deference) to induce preferred
models to gain greater access and cooperation
7Exercise
- Use this prestige model to explain why the
folllowing people are prestigious, and how we
defer to them - Scientists
- Musicians
- Supermodels
- Sports stars
- Aristocrats
8The Chicken dilemma A model of status?
The lower left and upper right cells are
equilibria
9The lower left and upper right cells are
equilibria
10Social Psychology of Status
- Hogan Hogan (1991) Although status
considerations are ubiquitous and consequential,
psychologists have tended to avoid this topic - Yet, in any group, there are differences in
status and influence between members noticeable
over time - Expectation states theory (Berger, 1972) assumes
that status depends upon ones specific (e.g.,
athletic ability), and diffuse task
characteristics (e.g., sex, age) i.e.,
abilities that could help group - Social exchange theory (Homans, 1961) assumes
that status results from a reciprocal
relationship between individual and group
individual gives something to group, and, in
return, gets status - Quite consistent with evolutionary prestige model
11Correlations with status (Anderson et al., 2001)
- zero-order
- Extraversion .47
- Agreeableness .12
- Neuroticism -.31
- Conscientiousness .23
- Openness -.05
- Physical attractiveness .39
12- What do you think are the professions with the
highest status in British society today? - Could you give an evolutionary account of this?
13A Theory of Dominance (Cummins, 1996)
- Natural selection favours strategies that cause
one to rise in dominance, and strategies to
subvert the access of dominant individuals to
resources (via deception, coalition formation) - Humans have evolved strategies for reasoning
about social norms involving dominance
hierarchies (obligations, prohibitions,
permissions) cf. obedience norms - How did humans move away from dominance to status
hierarchies this is a VERY important issue????
Look at young children and one can see the change
from dominance to status - There is not a clear theory as yet to explain
this transition (Buss, 1999)
14Ultimate Bargaining game
- You have 10 (allocator)
- Any amount of this 10 you can share with another
person (recipient) - The recipient can either accept or reject this
offer - If s/he rejects the offer, nobody gets anything!
- Lets play!
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17Social Psychology of Norms
- Consensual standards that regulate group members
behaviours - Why do we need social norms?
- Increases conformity
- Reduces uncertainty
- Why do groups need conformist and loyal people?
- What is in it for the conforming individuals?
They are good social learners (Simon, 1990)
altruism as byproduct of docility - Types of social norms?
- Descriptive norms (what most do) is this a norm?
- Prescriptive norms (what people ought to do)
- Cialdinis litter research
- Think of norms in traffic situations distinguish
between descriptive and prescriptive norms
18The effect of prescriptive and descriptive norms
on littering (Reno, Cialdini, Kallgren, 1993)
19Evolution of social norms
- Norms as individual and/or group-level
adaptations - Individuals in groups with norms have better
survival and reproductive chances than in groups
without norms is that so, please give example - Norms for fairness exist (who gets what?) but are
they functional? see research on the Ultimate
Bargaining Game (Fehr Fischbacher, 2003)
offers range between 40/60 and 50/50 - Why do people reject low offers???
- Norms of reciprocity (Ill scratch your back,
youll ride mine) - Norms of morality (what one ought do) see Krebs
Janicki, 2002 - Decency norms
- Obedience norms
- Solidarity norms
- Find an example of each of these norms and
explain why we have them
20Evolution of social norms
- Research presented by Dr. Rick OGorman