Evaluation in ExperienceFocused HCI: Exploring the Virtual Intimate Object

About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation in ExperienceFocused HCI: Exploring the Virtual Intimate Object

Description:

... at-hand technologies used in ways unreplicable in the lab. ... I just clicked to say I love you. alt.chi, Ext. Abs. CHI 2006, ACM Press. Intimacy in HCI ... –

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: csfaciliti
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation in ExperienceFocused HCI: Exploring the Virtual Intimate Object


1
Evaluation in Experience-Focused HCI Exploring
the Virtual Intimate Object
  • Future Applications Lab
  • Viktoria Institute
  • Gothenburg, Sweden
  • 13 January 2006
  • Joseph Jofish Kaye
  • Culturally Embedded Computing
  • Cornell Information Science
  • jofish_at_cornell.edu

2
Evaluation in Experience-Focused HCI
  • Evaluation in experience-focused HCI is the poor
    cousin of design. As a field (if we are one!) we
    have excellent theoretical foundations (Dourish,
    Wright McCarthy), a wide repertoire of design
    techniques (Equator Project, IDEO) and extensive
    tools for building (CS, EE, PD, ID). But
    traditional HCI evaluation techniques (GOMS, etc)
    are inadequate for ready-at-hand technologies
    used in ways unreplicable in the lab.

3
Virtual Intimate Object (VIO)
  • A small red circle in Windows taskbar, or in a
    Mac window.
  • When circle is clicked, partners circle glows
    bright red, then fades over time.
  • http//io.infosci.cornell.edu
  • Kaye, Levitt, Nevins, Golden Schmidt.
    Communicating Intimacy One Bit at a Time. Ext.
    Abs. CHI 2005, ACM Press.
  • Kaye. I just clicked to say I love you.
    alt.chi, Ext. Abs. CHI 2006, ACM Press.

4
Intimacy in HCI
  • History of elegantly designed but ad-hoc
    interfaces for communicating intimacy in HCI
    hard to evaluate
  • Fields Thresholds (Dunne Raby DoP2 '94)
  • Feather, Scent Shaker (Strong Gaver CSCW'96)
  • The Bed (Dodge CHI'97)
  • UbiComp'03 Workshop on Intimacy
    www.intimateornot.org
  • Digital Family Portrait (Mynatt et. al. CHI'01)
  • inTouch (Brave, Ishii, Dahley CSCW'98)
  • inStink, Honey Im Home (Kaye '02, interactions
    '04)

5
How much does Ariel love Eric? Count the hearts!
Disney (1997) The Special Edition Little
Mermaid Coloring Book. Golden Books Publishing.
Answer 19
6
Two VIO Studies
  • Study I
  • 10 couples in existing long-distance
    relationships (n20)
  • 5 couples assigned to VIO (n10)
  • 5 couples assigned to MinIO (n10)
  • Paper logbooks pre, post-tests, daily questions
  • Study II
  • 80 subjects recruited through long distance
    relationship communities on LiveJournal
  • All subjects took pre-survey all were asked to
    take post-survey
  • Four groups VIO, VIO daily survey, daily
    survey alone, nothing
  • All surveys online - Currently being analyzed

7
Experience surveys starting points
  • Gaver et. al Cultural Probes
  • Geertz Thick description
  • Dourish, Wright McCarthy, etc experience-based
    HCI
  • Iterative design Design, Build, Evaluate..

8
Thick Description
  • Winking isnt just something your eye does
  • Its culturally embedded
  • Its only the thick description of the context
    and culture that lets us understand the role of
    the wink in sharing a conspiracy, or even
    parodying another sharing conspiracy.
  • Geertz, C. (1973) Interpretation of Cultures Ch.
    1

9
Cultural Probes
  • Gives context around a situation
  • Originally for inspiring the design part of the
    design ? build ? evaluate ? iterative design
    cycle
  • Repurposed here for inspiring the evaluation part
    of the cycle
  • ltprovocative statementgtWere changing a key,
    generally unspoken assumption by proposing that
    evaluation is creative, arbitrary, and
    complex.lt/provocativegt
  • Gaver et. al. Cultural Probes, interactions 6(1)
    1999

10
Three topics
  • Questions/tasks about the technology being
    evaluated.
  • Questions/tasks about the situation.
  • Questions/tasks about instrument being used to
    gather information

11
And three kinds of questions(for organization,
not canonical)
  • Context Where? When? Take a photo of How
    long? How often?
  • Metaphor What TV show? What song? What colour?
    What metaphor?
  • Valence Whats the best? Whats the worse?
    Whats your favorite? What should we change?
    What shouldnt we change? Draw the best, the
    worst.

12
Question Design chart
13
Getting beyond usability
  • Evaluating in context requires working in context
  • VIO becomes ready-at-hand, not present-at-hand,
    and so evaluation must be in context.
  • Users must have significant, continuous use, and
    you must have solved the usability problems
    otherwise most of what you get is usability
    issues i.e. Mobile Probes paper
  • Hulkko et. al. Mobile Probes Proc. NordCHI 04

14
Discussion
  • Unpacking meanings of evaluate
  • tell me if people like it
  • tell me if a variable that I can track has
    changed
  • make a comparison between my stated (unstated?)
    goals/values/principles and the built technology
  • to tell me what to do next
  • When? (Formative, iterative, final, discrete,
    continuous)

15
  • Thanks to Maria Håkansson, Lars Erik Holmquist,
    Phoebe Sengers, the Culturally Embedded Computing
    Group, my subjects and my coauthors.
  • Joseph Jofish Kaye
  • Culturally Embedded Computing
  • Cornell Information Science
  • jofish_at_cornell.edu
  • This talk at jofish.com/talks. VIO at
    io.infosci.cornell.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com