Lessons Learned The Hard Way: FPGA ? PCB Integration Challenges - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Lessons Learned The Hard Way: FPGA ? PCB Integration Challenges

Description:

Dave Brady & Bruce Riggins Agenda Design Overview Design Challenge Summary Lessons Learned Suggested Strategies System Design Challenges Complex system implemented ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:15
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: DaveB93
Learn more at: http://klabs.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Lessons Learned The Hard Way: FPGA ? PCB Integration Challenges


1
Lessons Learned The Hard Way FPGA ? PCB
Integration Challenges
  • Dave Brady Bruce Riggins

2
Agenda
  • Design Overview
  • Design Challenge Summary
  • Lessons Learned
  • Suggested Strategies

3
System Design Challenges
  • Complex system implemented using multiple
    high-pin count FPGAs
  • PCB bus speeds gt 150 Mhz
  • PCB physical size restricted
  • Implementation team (s)
  • System design, 2 engineers
  • System architecture, Embedded CPU h/w design
  • PCB design, 1 engineer
  • Functional design, PCB timing, PCB signal
    integrity
  • PCB physical design, 1 engineer
  • PCB place and route, design for manufacturing
  • FPGA design, 5 engineers
  • RTL HDL development
  • DSP design, 1 engineer
  • C algorithm development
  • Embedded software development, 2 engineers

4
Conceptual Design Overview
PCB
DRAMMemoryModules
FPGA Boot Module
FPGA 1
CPU Embedded Platform
Glue Logic
Custom (ASIC) Logic
Voltage Regulators/Generators
FPGA 2
Clock Generators
Custom (ASIC) Logic
DSP
Glue Logic
Communication Module
Communication Module
5
Design Challenge Summary
  1. Overdriven signals
  2. Cross talk
  3. Simultaneous switching outputs
  4. Meeting system performance specifications
  5. Minimizing PCB manufacturing costs
  6. Learning the FPGA device-specific I/O design
    rules
  7. Maintaining (updating) FPGA symbols for the PCB
    schematic
  8. Leveraging the complete design team

6
Lessons Learned Increasing PCB CostsStarted
with FPGA Timing
  • FPGA 1 pin-to-pin timing exceeded spec by 100 ps
  • FPGA designer increased drive strength
  • Pin-to-pin timing meets spec

PCB
FPGA 1
FPGA 2
Tp gt Spec by 100 ps
7
Increasing PCB CostsInduced Signal Ringing on
PCB (contd.)
  • Increasing drive strength on FPGA 1 output pin
    induced PCB signal ringing
  • PCB engineer identified

PCB
FPGA 1
FPGA 2
Tp lt Spec
8
Increasing PCB CostsInduced Signal Ringing on
PCB (contd.)
  • PCB engineer began inserting termination networks
  • Results
  • ? PCB component count
  • ? PCB via count
  • ? PCB trace count
  • ? PCB routability
  • ? PCB costs

PCB
R
FPGA 1
FPGA 2
Tp lt Spec
9
Lessons Learned Increasing PCB Costs --Scoping
the Problem
  • Not an issue for a single trace
  • Design contained four 64-bit high-speed data
    busses
  • All 256 signals were impacted!

PCB
B1data(063)
FPGA 1
FPGA 2
B2data(063)
B3data(063)
Tp lt Spec
B4data(063)
10
Lessons Learned Big Busses ? Cross Talk
  • Busses laid out on PCB with matching trace (tp)
    lengths
  • Identified by the PCB engineer
  • Traditional solutions
  • Increase trace-to-trace separation
  • Leverage lower-dielectric PCB laminates

PCB
B1data(0)
FPGA 1
FPGA 2
B1data(1)
B1data(2)
Tp lt Spec
B1data(63)
11
Lessons Learned Big Busses ? Simultaneous
Switching Outputs
  • Grouping busses into the same pin bank improves
    PCB routability
  • FPGA pin banks are limited in the current they
    may source
  • Leads to SSO issues

PCB
B1data(063)
FPGA 1
FPGA 2
B2data(063)
B3data(063)
Tp lt Spec
B4data(063)
12
Balance is the Key
FPGA I/O Drive Strength Setting
Signal Too Slow
Signal Ringing
FPGA I/O Rail Voltage Setting
Simultaneous Switching Output Issues
Signal Cross Talk
13
Lessons Learned Leveraging I/O Flexibility
  • Both FPGA devices designed to specs
  • Unable to meet system timing specs

14
Leveraging I/O Flexibility (contd.)
  • Changed the physical location of signals on the
    FPGA
  • Unable to meet timing in one FPGA

15
Leveraging I/O Flexibility (contd.)
  • Changed the physical location of signals (again)
  • Finally met system timing specs
  • Simple for a single signal ? Complex for wide
    busses

16
Lessons Learned The Domino Effect of Pin Swapping
3
1
2
17
All Pins Are Not The Same
18
Virtex II Pro Input AC Characteristics
Source Xilinx website
19
Virtex II Pro Input AC Characteristics
Source Xilinx website
20
Virtex II Pro Input AC Characteristics
Source Xilinx website
21
Resolving Symbol Size
22
Synchronizing the FPGA PCB Flows
Physical Placement Connectivity
23
Multiple Perspectives That Dont Match
  • FPGA and PCB design teams typically do not
    communicate

24
Suggested Strategies Eliminate Team
Communication Barriers
We do the FPGA I/O Design
System Designer
PCB (Schematic) Designer
We do the FPGA I/O Design
We do the FPGA I/O Design
FPGA Designer
Embedded System (CPU) Designer
PCB Layout
We do the FPGA I/O Design
We do the FPGA I/O Design
We do the FPGA I/O Design
PCB Timing Analysis
DSP Designer
We do the FPGA I/O Design
PCB Signal Integrity
We do the FPGA I/O Design
25
General Tips Tricks
  • Leverage Signal Integrity What if Analysis
    Early
  • Anticipate signal ringing, cross talk, ground
    bounce, etc.
  • Develop system constraints to minimize PCB
    components
  • Make trade-offs at the system level
  • Run Signal Integrity Analysis on the PCB Design
  • Interactive part of the normal design process
  • NOT a design verification check box
  • Leverage Embedded Resistors
  • Some signal termination is un-avoidable
  • Minimize PCB size
  • Reduced PCB costs
  • Leveraging Gigabit Transceivers Reduces PCB
    Traces BUT
  • GHz signals ? High-Speed ( cost) PCB laminates
  • Introduces additional PCB components (clock
    generators, voltage regulators, etc)
  • Introduces additional termination topology
    requirements
  • Re-partition the FPGA Design to Optimize PCB
    Performance
  • Alternative to leveraging Gigabit transceivers
  • Will not work for every design
  • Worked for this design

26

Routing Comparison
27
PCB Layer Reduction
28
Reduce Overall System Design Time
  • Concurrent design of FPGA and PCB
  • Optimize system performance reduce
    manufacturing costs
  • Solution Bi-directional FPGA I/O design

FPGA design
  • I/O Designer
  • Reduced Design Time
  • Enhanced System Integration
  • Optimized Performance
  • Lowered Manufacturing Costs

PCB design
29
Provide PCB Designers an Intelligent FPGA I/O
Design Tool
30
Show FPGA Designers the PCB Design
31
Provide Everyone Detailed Control
32

Automate Pin Planning
33
I/O Design Planning Benefits
Output to Setup Pass
Clock to Output Pass
  • Meet performance constraints
  • Overall timing constraints
  • FPGA in-chip
  • On board
  • PCB signal integrity constraints
  • Comply with FPGA technology I/O rules
  • Eliminate PCB signal layers

Board Interconnect Budget FAIL
34
The Complete Flow Including PCB Physical Design
  • Flow Integration
  • Schematic to layout
  • Layout to I/O pin planning
  • FPGA Designer has visibility into the PCB design
  • PCB designer has access to I/O design rules
  • Fast pin swaps
  • Automatic bus untangling
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com